Another Look at Topic: Marked vs. Unmarked

@article{ART001055422},
author={ 양창용 },
title={Another Look at Topic: Marked vs. Unmarked},
journal={언어연구},
issn={1225-4770},
year={2007},
volume={22},
number={3},
pages={127-147},
doi={10.18627/jslg.22.3.200702.127},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.18627/jslg.22.3.200702.127}

TY - JOUR
AU - 양창용
TI - Another Look at Topic: Marked vs. Unmarked
T2 - 언어연구
PY - 2007
VL - 22
IS - 3
PB - 한국현대언어학회
SP - 127-147
SN - 1225-4770
AB - In this study, we look at the relationship between form and function in general and those between the forms of Korean topic and their functions in particular. For this purpose, the present study is based on the polar system(marked vs. unmarked) studied by Myhill(1992) and especially Chu(1998). Korean, as a topic-prominent language like Chinese, uses the same sets of forms to serve similar functions as Chinese does, in spite of the structural differences between the two languages. Therefore, our discussion sometimes includes chinese examples compared with the corresponding Korean forms. In this way we can provide a unified explanation for Korean topics in terms of markedness.
KW - Topic, information, (un)marked, aboutness, clause-linking
DO - 10.18627/jslg.22.3.200702.127
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.18627/jslg.22.3.200702.127
ER -

양창용 (2007). Another Look at Topic: Marked vs. Unmarked. 언어연구, 22( 3), 127- 147.

양창용 . 2007, “Another Look at Topic: Marked vs. Unmarked”, 언어연구, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 127-147. Available from: doi:10.18627/jslg.22.3.200702.127

양창용 “Another Look at Topic: Marked vs. Unmarked” 언어연구 22.3 pp. 127-147 (2007): 127.

양창용 . Another Look at Topic: Marked vs. Unmarked 언어연구 [Internet]. 2007; 22( 3), : 127-147. Available from: doi:10.18627/jslg.22.3.200702.127

양창용 . “Another Look at Topic: Marked vs. Unmarked” 언어연구 22, no.3 (2007): 127-147. doi: 10.18627/jslg.22.3.200702.127

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

Another Look at Topic: Marked vs. Unmarked

언어연구

약어 : -

2007, vol.22, no.3, pp.127 - 147

DOI : 10.18627/jslg.22.3.200702.127

발행기관 : 한국현대언어학회

연구분야 : 언어학

양창용¹

¹제주대학교

인용한 논문 수 : - 서지 간략 보기

초록

In this study, we look at the relationship between form and function in general and those between the forms of Korean topic and their functions in particular. For this purpose, the present study is based on the polar system(marked vs. unmarked) studied by Myhill(1992) and especially Chu(1998). Korean, as a topic-prominent language like Chinese, uses the same sets of forms to serve similar functions as Chinese does, in spite of the structural differences between the two languages. Therefore, our discussion sometimes includes chinese examples compared with the corresponding Korean forms. In this way we can provide a unified explanation for Korean topics in terms of markedness.

키워드

Topic, information, (un)marked, aboutness, clause-linking

참고문헌(16)

[학술지] / universityofhawaii. / S-Y. 1981 Studies in Korean Syntax:Ellipsis
[학술지] / University of Chicago Press.
[학술지] / 1996 / Korean
[학술지] / 1995 / Focus and Topic Movement in Korean and Licensing : 269 ~ 334
[학술지] / S-Y. 1986. Solving the Problem of the Korean Topic/Subject Particle nun and ka : 351 ~ 369
[학술지] / 1997 / Topic and Focus in Korean: The Information Partition by Phrase Structure and Morphology 6 : 545 ~ 561
[학술지] / 1998 / A Discourse Grammar of Mandarin Chinese
[학술지] / 182-195. / R. 1991. Topic Management in Conversational Discourse
[학술지] / 1995 / Functionalism and Grammar
[학술지] / S. 1990. Information Structure as a Consequence of Word Order Type. BLS 16 : 163 ~ 174
[학술지] / 1999 / Topicalization in Feature-Checking Theory : 233 ~ 259
[학술지] / Focus and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge
[학술지] / Quantitative Approaches to the Study of Linguistic Function. Cambridge
[학술지] / J and H. Hibiya. 1988. The Discourse Function of Clause Chaining. In J. Haiman and S. Thompson Clause Combing in Grammar and Discourse
[학술지] / An Analysis of Sentence Topics. Bloomington
[학술지] / complementation andrelativization.ph.d.dissertation.universityofhawaii / I. S. 1972. Korean Syntax:Case Markers