복합서술어의 특성과 범위

@article{ART001230960},
author={ 이호승 },
title={복합서술어의 특성과 범위},
journal={어문연구},
issn={1225-0783},
year={2007},
volume={55},
pages={51-72},
doi={10.17297/rsll.2007.55..003},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.17297/rsll.2007.55..003}

TY - JOUR
AU - 이호승
TI - 복합서술어의 특성과 범위
T2 - 어문연구
PY - 2007
VL - 55
IS -
PB - 어문연구학회
SP - 51-72
SN - 1225-0783
AB - This paper studies two problems. One is to discriminate the CP(Complex Predicates) from Base-separation of word, the other is to investigate whether [V-어 AV(auxiliary verbs)], [V-어 V] is the CP. And the concept of CP which is adopted in this paper is based on Lee Ho-Seung(2003). 1. [X+Hada] is split into two classes. [X+hada] as the CP have all or more than one of the following syntactic phenomena：① X can be modify by the modifiers，② X can become head of the relative clause, ③ the general adverbials can be located between X and Hada, ④ the one more Xs can be connected. The other hand, [X+hada] as word has not one of this syntactic phenomena. 2. [V-어 AV] is essentially syntactic construction. Auxiliary verb often constructions function as if it is morphological unit. But This appearance is not because syntactic [V-어 AV] is restructured as the morphological form, but because AV is syntactic-semantically dependant on V. Auxiliary verb construction is not the CP in that [V-어 AV] can't have argument structure. 3. Some [V-어 V]s is regarded as serial verb constructions(SVC). This theory considers SVC as the independent constructions which is not coordinate sentences and not compound verbs. But syntactic phenomena of the so-called SVC prove that this constructions is not SVC but coordinate sentences. Also morphological characteristics of this constructions make us admit the compound verbs which is the same forms as the so-called SVC. Finally I argue that SVC doesn't exist and it is unnecessary that ask whether SVC is the CP.
KW - CP(Complex Predicates), [X+Hada], Base-separation of word, [V-어 AV(auxiliary verbs)], [V-어 V], compound verbs, SVC(Serial Verb Constructions), argument structure.
DO - 10.17297/rsll.2007.55..003
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.17297/rsll.2007.55..003
ER -

이호승 (2007). 복합서술어의 특성과 범위. 어문연구, 55, 51- 72.

이호승 . 2007, “복합서술어의 특성과 범위”, 어문연구, vol. 55, pp. 51-72. Available from: doi:10.17297/rsll.2007.55..003

이호승 “복합서술어의 특성과 범위” 어문연구 55 pp. 51-72 (2007): 51.

이호승 . 복합서술어의 특성과 범위 어문연구 [Internet]. 2007; 55 : 51-72. Available from: doi:10.17297/rsll.2007.55..003

이호승 . “복합서술어의 특성과 범위” 어문연구 55 (2007): 51-72. doi: 10.17297/rsll.2007.55..003

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

복합서술어의 특성과 범위

어문연구

약어 : -

2007, vol.55, pp.51 - 72

DOI : 10.17297/rsll.2007.55..003

발행기관 : 어문연구학회

연구분야 : 한국어와문학

이호승¹

¹충북대학교

인용한 논문 수 : 12 서지 간략 보기

초록

This paper studies two problems. One is to discriminate the CP(Complex Predicates) from Base-separation of word, the other is to investigate whether [V-어 AV(auxiliary verbs)], [V-어 V] is the CP. And the concept of CP which is adopted in this paper is based on Lee Ho-Seung(2003). 1. [X+Hada] is split into two classes. [X+hada] as the CP have all or more than one of the following syntactic phenomena：① X can be modify by the modifiers，② X can become head of the relative clause, ③ the general adverbials can be located between X and Hada, ④ the one more Xs can be connected. The other hand, [X+hada] as word has not one of this syntactic phenomena. 2. [V-어 AV] is essentially syntactic construction. Auxiliary verb often constructions function as if it is morphological unit. But This appearance is not because syntactic [V-어 AV] is restructured as the morphological form, but because AV is syntactic-semantically dependant on V. Auxiliary verb construction is not the CP in that [V-어 AV] can't have argument structure. 3. Some [V-어 V]s is regarded as serial verb constructions(SVC). This theory considers SVC as the independent constructions which is not coordinate sentences and not compound verbs. But syntactic phenomena of the so-called SVC prove that this constructions is not SVC but coordinate sentences. Also morphological characteristics of this constructions make us admit the compound verbs which is the same forms as the so-called SVC. Finally I argue that SVC doesn't exist and it is unnecessary that ask whether SVC is the CP.

키워드

CP(Complex Predicates), [X+Hada], Base-separation of word, [V-어 AV(auxiliary verbs)], [V-어 V], compound verbs, SVC(Serial Verb Constructions), argument structure.

참고문헌(28)

[학술지] 고광주 / 1995 / 국어의 비대격 구문 연구 비대격 술어의 논항구조와 통사적 양상
[학술지] 김기혁 / 1995 / 국어 문법 연구형태
[학술지] 김유정 / 1993 / 국어 복합서술어구문 연구:기능동사를 중심으로
[학술지] 김창섭 / 2001 / ‘X하다’와 ‘X를 하다’의 관계에 대하여 37 (1) : 63 ~ 85
[학술지] 남기심 / 2003 / 표준국어문법론
[학술지] 남미혜 / 1996 / 국어의 연속 동사 구성 연구
[학술지] 문금현 / 1996 / 국어의 관용 표현 연구
[학술지] 서승현 / 1999 / ‘명사-조사-용언’ 긴밀 형식 구문에 관한 연구
[학술지] 손세모돌 / 1996 / 국어 보조용언 연구
[학술지] 안명철 / 2001 / 이중주어구문과 구-동사 38 : 181 ~ 208
[학술지] 양정석 / 1997 / 재구조화 재고 118 : 33 ~ 70
[학술지] 이병규 / 2001 / 국어 술어명사구문 연구
[학술지] 이선웅 / 1995 / 현대국어의 보조용언 연구 133
[학술지] 이선희 / 1993 / 복합술어 구문 연구
[학술지] 이숙희 / 1992 / The Syntax and Semantics of Serial Verb Construction
[학술지] 이호승 / 2003 / 국어 복합서술어 연구 [명사+조사+동사] 구성의 경우
[학술지] 이홍식 / 2000 / 국어 문장의 주성분 연구
[학술지] 임홍빈 / 1979 / 용언의 어근 분리 현상에 대하여 : 4 55 ~ 2 76
[학술지] 임홍빈 / 2002 / 한국어 구문 분석 방법론
[학술지] 정태구 / 1992 / Argument Structure and Serial Verbs in Korean
[학술지] 채희락 / 1996 / ‘하-’의 특성과 경술어 구문 32 (3) : 409 ~ 476
[학술지] 최현숙 / 1988 / Restructuring Parameters and Complex Predicates：A Transformational Approach
[학술지] 허철구 / 1998 / 국어의 합성동사 형성과 어기분리
[학술지] 홍재성 / 1999 / 기능동사 구문 연구의 한 시각：어휘적 접근 41집 : 135 ~ 173
[학술지] Baker, M / 1998 / Incorporation：A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing
[학술지] Cattell / 1984 / Composite Predication in English, Syntax and Semantics 17
[학술지] Manzini, M. R / 1983 / Restructure and Reanalysis
[학술지] Peter Sells / 1991 / Complex Verbs and Argument Structure in Korean