한국 이민자 자녀와 관련된 용어 사용상의 문제점－‘다문화가정’, ‘다문화교육’－

@article{ART001565853},
author={ 장한업 },
title={한국 이민자 자녀와 관련된 용어 사용상의 문제점－‘다문화가정’, ‘다문화교육’－},
journal={이중언어학},
issn={1229-1757},
year={2011},
number={46},
pages={347-366},
doi={10.17296/korbil.2011..46.347},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.17296/korbil.2011..46.347}

TY - JOUR
AU - 장한업
TI - 한국 이민자 자녀와 관련된 용어 사용상의 문제점－‘다문화가정’, ‘다문화교육’－
T2 - 이중언어학
PY - 2011
VL -
IS - 46
PB - 이중언어학회
SP - 347-366
SN - 1229-1757
AB - Foreigners in South Korea have never been a large portion of the population. Yet by 2010, the percentage of foreigners in South Korea had risen to 2.5% of the total population. This rise is expected to continue due to the country’s low birthrate and poor industrial structure. The government has taken measures to deal with this radical social change, particularly after having characterized the situation as “irreversible general trend” in 2006. The Ministry of Education is no exception to these national efforts, but its measures to strengthen educational support programs for foreign residents’ children show some shortcomings. One of these is the erroneous use of terms related to the children of immigrants. This study examines the appropriateness of the terms “multicultural family” and “multicultural education” in the context of Korean education. Since 2006, the Ministry of Education has called immigrant families “multicultural families.” However, the term “multicultural family” is not acceptable because it is based upon a premise that Korean families are “monocultural families” while ignoring the fact that it is difficult to imagine a real monocultural family in today’s society. Instead, in this paper we suggest the use of expressions such as the European term “Immigrant family”. The term “multicultural education” is less problematic, yet this study shows that the Ministry of Education has officially adopted a policy of “multicultural education,” derived from those developed in United States, without assessing whether this type of education is suitable for Korean society or considering alternatives such as “intercultural education” which prevails throughout Europe.
KW - multicultural family(다문화가정), multicultural education(다문화교육), intercultural education(상호문화교육), children of immigrants(이민자자녀)
DO - 10.17296/korbil.2011..46.347
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.17296/korbil.2011..46.347
ER -

장한업 (2011). 한국 이민자 자녀와 관련된 용어 사용상의 문제점－‘다문화가정’, ‘다문화교육’－. 이중언어학, 46, 347- 366.

장한업 . 2011, “한국 이민자 자녀와 관련된 용어 사용상의 문제점－‘다문화가정’, ‘다문화교육’－”, 이중언어학, no. 46, pp. 347-366. Available from: doi:10.17296/korbil.2011..46.347

장한업 “한국 이민자 자녀와 관련된 용어 사용상의 문제점－‘다문화가정’, ‘다문화교육’－” 이중언어학 46 pp. 347-366 (2011): 347.

장한업 . 한국 이민자 자녀와 관련된 용어 사용상의 문제점－‘다문화가정’, ‘다문화교육’－ 이중언어학 [Internet]. 2011; 46: 347-366. Available from: doi:10.17296/korbil.2011..46.347

장한업 . “한국 이민자 자녀와 관련된 용어 사용상의 문제점－‘다문화가정’, ‘다문화교육’－” 이중언어학 no.46 (2011): 347-366. doi: 10.17296/korbil.2011..46.347

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

한국 이민자 자녀와 관련된 용어 사용상의 문제점－‘다문화가정’, ‘다문화교육’－

이중언어학

약어 : BR

2011, no.46, pp.347 - 366

DOI : 10.17296/korbil.2011..46.347

발행기관 : 이중언어학회

연구분야 : 언어학

장한업¹

¹이화여자대학교

인용한 논문 수 : 23 서지 간략 보기

초록

Foreigners in South Korea have never been a large portion of the population. Yet by 2010, the percentage of foreigners in South Korea had risen to 2.5% of the total population. This rise is expected to continue due to the country’s low birthrate and poor industrial structure. The government has taken measures to deal with this radical social change, particularly after having characterized the situation as “irreversible general trend” in 2006. The Ministry of Education is no exception to these national efforts, but its measures to strengthen educational support programs for foreign residents’ children show some shortcomings. One of these is the erroneous use of terms related to the children of immigrants. This study examines the appropriateness of the terms “multicultural family” and “multicultural education” in the context of Korean education. Since 2006, the Ministry of Education has called immigrant families “multicultural families.” However, the term “multicultural family” is not acceptable because it is based upon a premise that Korean families are “monocultural families” while ignoring the fact that it is difficult to imagine a real monocultural family in today’s society. Instead, in this paper we suggest the use of expressions such as the European term “Immigrant family”. The term “multicultural education” is less problematic, yet this study shows that the Ministry of Education has officially adopted a policy of “multicultural education,” derived from those developed in United States, without assessing whether this type of education is suitable for Korean society or considering alternatives such as “intercultural education” which prevails throughout Europe.

키워드

multicultural family(다문화가정), multicultural education(다문화교육), intercultural education(상호문화교육), children of immigrants(이민자자녀)

참고문헌(19)

[보고서] 김종석 / 1984 / 美國多文化敎育(Multicultural Education)의 理論的考察 : 35 ~ 60
[학술지] 김철 / 2008 / 상호문화교육에 대한 교육인간학적 고찰-“인격적(person) 존재로서 인간”의 관점에서 / 교육철학연구 (42) : 87 ~ 107
[단행본] 장한업 / 2010 / 유럽의 상호문화교육 / 한울아카데미
[단행본] 박경태 / 2008 / 소수자와 한국사회: 이주노동자, 화교, 혼혈인 / 후마니타스
[단행본] 박찬승 / 2010 / 민족·민족주의 / 소화
[학위논문] 양영자 / 2008 / 한국 다문화교육의 개념 정립과 교육과정 개발 방향 탐색
[단행본] 이광수 / 1933 / 朝鮮民族論, In 東光叢書一, 二卷 / 所載 : 326 ~ 332
[단행본] 이현정 / 2009 / 우리의 미래 다문화에 달려 있다 / 소울메이트
[보고서] 장미혜 / 2008 / 다민족·다문화사회로의 이행을 위한 정책 패러다임 구축(II) : 다문화 역량 증진을 위한 정책·사회적 실천 현황과 발전 방향
[학술지] 장한업 / 2009 / 프랑스의 상호문화교육과 미국의 다문화교육의 비교연구 / 프랑스어문교육 (32) : 105 ~ 121
[학술지] 장한업 / 2010 / 프랑스와 한국의 이민자 자녀 교육정책 비교연구 / 불어불문학연구 (83) : 891 ~ 925
[학술지] 정영근 / 2007 / 사이'의 세기와 상호문화 교육 / 교육의 이론과 실천 12 (1) : 257 ~ 272
[단행본] 크리스틴 베네트 / 2009 / 다문화교육 이론과 실제 / 학지사
[단행본] 허영식 / 2010 / 다문화사회와 간문화성 / 강현출판사
[보고서] 교육인적자원부 / 2006 / 다문화가정 자녀 교육지원 대책
[보고서] 교육인적자원부 / 2007 / 다문화가정 자녀 교육지원 계획
[보고서] 교육과학기술부 / 2008 / 다문화가정 학생 교육 지원방안
[단행본] De Carlo, M. / 1998 / L'interculturel / CLE
[기타] UNESCO / 2006 / Guidelines on Intercultural Education