朝鮮後期文人의 『史記』認識과 評價에 관한 一考 -「項羽本紀」에 대한 諸家批評을 中心으로 -

@article{ART001263669},
author={ 윤지훈 },
title={朝鮮後期文人의 『史記』認識과 評價에 관한 一考 -「項羽本紀」에 대한 諸家批評을 中心으로 -},
journal={동방한문학},
issn={1226-668X},
year={2008},
number={35},
pages={253-279},
doi={10.17293/dbkcls.2008..35.253},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.17293/dbkcls.2008..35.253}

TY - JOUR
AU - 윤지훈
TI - 朝鮮後期文人의 『史記』認識과 評價에 관한 一考 -「項羽本紀」에 대한 諸家批評을 中心으로 -
T2 - 동방한문학
PY - 2008
VL -
IS - 35
PB - 동방한문학회
SP - 253-279
SN - 1226-668X
AB - The purpose of this paper is to find out what the literary man tried to learn from 『Sagi(史記)』in the late Joseon, according to the examination on their perception and estimation about it. They had revaluated it incessantly because of its value as an outstanding literary work. At that time, they regarded it as a history and an exemplary text to learn writing and made an effort to study it in diverse ways, which led to change the wat of reading it. They also sought to appreciate it in two points of view. One is to show the literary value of it by comparing it with「Hanseo(漢書)」. The other is the evaluation about the way of writing inꡔSagi(史記)ꡕ: the suitable usage of a foreshadow, the construction of a narrative centering around a scene, and the well-matched description of a narrative and argument. As above, this evaluation of the literary men in the late Joseon is worth to be watched with interest due to offering a clue which makes us know an aspect of their ability to learn and way to study, by throwing out the tangibly real fact about what they struggled to learn from it.
KW - 조선후기, 『사기』, 문장학습, 전범적 텍스트, 우열론, 서술기법
DO - 10.17293/dbkcls.2008..35.253
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.17293/dbkcls.2008..35.253
ER -

윤지훈 (2008). 朝鮮後期文人의 『史記』認識과 評價에 관한 一考 -「項羽本紀」에 대한 諸家批評을 中心으로 -. 동방한문학, 35, 253- 279.

윤지훈 . 2008, “朝鮮後期文人의 『史記』認識과 評價에 관한 一考 -「項羽本紀」에 대한 諸家批評을 中心으로 -”, 동방한문학, no. 35, pp. 253-279. Available from: doi:10.17293/dbkcls.2008..35.253

윤지훈 “朝鮮後期文人의 『史記』認識과 評價에 관한 一考 -「項羽本紀」에 대한 諸家批評을 中心으로 -” 동방한문학 35 pp. 253-279 (2008): 253.

윤지훈 . 朝鮮後期文人의 『史記』認識과 評價에 관한 一考 -「項羽本紀」에 대한 諸家批評을 中心으로 - 동방한문학 [Internet]. 2008; 35: 253-279. Available from: doi:10.17293/dbkcls.2008..35.253

윤지훈 . “朝鮮後期文人의 『史記』認識과 評價에 관한 一考 -「項羽本紀」에 대한 諸家批評을 中心으로 -” 동방한문학 no.35 (2008): 253-279. doi: 10.17293/dbkcls.2008..35.253

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

朝鮮後期文人의 『史記』認識과 評價에 관한 一考 -「項羽本紀」에 대한 諸家批評을 中心으로 -

동방한문학

약어 : -

2008, no.35, pp.253 - 279

DOI : 10.17293/dbkcls.2008..35.253

발행기관 : 동방한문학회

연구분야 : 한국어와문학

윤지훈¹

¹한국교육과정평가원

인용한 논문 수 : 6 서지 간략 보기

초록

The purpose of this paper is to find out what the literary man tried to learn from 『Sagi(史記)』in the late Joseon, according to the examination on their perception and estimation about it. They had revaluated it incessantly because of its value as an outstanding literary work. At that time, they regarded it as a history and an exemplary text to learn writing and made an effort to study it in diverse ways, which led to change the wat of reading it. They also sought to appreciate it in two points of view. One is to show the literary value of it by comparing it with「Hanseo(漢書)」. The other is the evaluation about the way of writing inꡔSagi(史記)ꡕ: the suitable usage of a foreshadow, the construction of a narrative centering around a scene, and the well-matched description of a narrative and argument. As above, this evaluation of the literary men in the late Joseon is worth to be watched with interest due to offering a clue which makes us know an aspect of their ability to learn and way to study, by throwing out the tangibly real fact about what they struggled to learn from it.