한국어의 어휘적 증거성

@article{ART002429412},
author={ 송재목 },
title={한국어의 어휘적 증거성},
journal={언어학},
issn={1225-7494},
year={2018},
number={82},
pages={105-131},
doi={10.17290/jlsk.2018..82.105},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.17290/jlsk.2018..82.105}

TY - JOUR
AU - 송재목
TI - 한국어의 어휘적 증거성
T2 - 언어학
PY - 2018
VL -
IS - 82
PB - 사단법인 한국언어학회
SP - 105-131
SN - 1225-7494
AB - Evidentiality can be expressed by either grammatical forms or lexical units. This paper analyzes lexical evidentiality in Korean. Korean shows three different groups of lexical units expressing evidentiality. Firstly, evidential meanings can be expressed by verbs such as ‘po- (to see), tut- (to hear), chwuchukha- (to assume), nukki- (to feel)'. They explicitly indicate the way the subject has gained evidence about the described situation or event. Secondly, evidential meanings can be expressed by adverbials such as ‘nolahgey (yellow), ccayngkulanghako (with a sound of tinkling), ssanulhakey- (with a chill)'. They describe concrete and personal experience and allude which sense the experiencer/observer has used to gain relevant information. Direct evidentiality is part of their intrinsic meaning, hence they are not adequate with 2nd or 3rd person subject. Mimetic adverbs describing inner sensations of an experiencer also have an intrinsic endophoric evidential meaning, which forces them to appear only with 1st person subject not with 2nd or 3rd person subject. Thirdly, the most systematic way to lexically differentiate evidential meanings in Korean is the distinction of psychological adjectives and psychological verbs. Psychological adjectives such as ‘chwup- (to be cold), paykopu- (to be hungry) oylop- (to be lonely), sulpu- (to be sad), (-ko) siph- (to want)' describe mental, emotional or physiological state of an experiencer, which cannot be directly perceived by someone else. They intrinsically have the meaning of endophoric evidentiality, because of which they are not appropriate with 2nd or 3rd person subject. When Korean adds ‘-e ha-' after psychological adjectives, it creates psychological verbs which express that people have drawn conclusion on someone else's inner state on the basis of indirect signs such as observable external physical states. Because of the indirect evidentiality encompassed in the psychological verbs, they do not usually occur with 1st person subject.
KW - grammatical evidentiality, lexical evidentiality, participatory evidentiality, endophoric evidentiality, psychological adjective, psychological verb, subject restriction
DO - 10.17290/jlsk.2018..82.105
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.17290/jlsk.2018..82.105
ER -

송재목 (2018). 한국어의 어휘적 증거성. 언어학, 82, 105- 131.

송재목 . 2018, “한국어의 어휘적 증거성”, 언어학, no. 82, pp. 105-131. Available from: doi:10.17290/jlsk.2018..82.105

송재목 “한국어의 어휘적 증거성” 언어학 82 pp. 105-131 (2018): 105.

송재목 . 한국어의 어휘적 증거성 언어학 [Internet]. 2018; 82: 105-131. Available from: doi:10.17290/jlsk.2018..82.105

송재목 . “한국어의 어휘적 증거성” 언어학 no.82 (2018): 105-131. doi: 10.17290/jlsk.2018..82.105

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

한국어의 어휘적 증거성

언어학

약어 : -

2018, no.82, pp.105 - 131

DOI : 10.17290/jlsk.2018..82.105

발행기관 : 사단법인 한국언어학회

연구분야 : 언어학

송재목¹

¹한국외국어대학교

인용한 논문 수 : 5 서지 간략 보기

초록

Evidentiality can be expressed by either grammatical forms or lexical units. This paper analyzes lexical evidentiality in Korean. Korean shows three different groups of lexical units expressing evidentiality. Firstly, evidential meanings can be expressed by verbs such as ‘po- (to see), tut- (to hear), chwuchukha- (to assume), nukki- (to feel)'. They explicitly indicate the way the subject has gained evidence about the described situation or event. Secondly, evidential meanings can be expressed by adverbials such as ‘nolahgey (yellow), ccayngkulanghako (with a sound of tinkling), ssanulhakey- (with a chill)'. They describe concrete and personal experience and allude which sense the experiencer/observer has used to gain relevant information. Direct evidentiality is part of their intrinsic meaning, hence they are not adequate with 2nd or 3rd person subject. Mimetic adverbs describing inner sensations of an experiencer also have an intrinsic endophoric evidential meaning, which forces them to appear only with 1st person subject not with 2nd or 3rd person subject. Thirdly, the most systematic way to lexically differentiate evidential meanings in Korean is the distinction of psychological adjectives and psychological verbs. Psychological adjectives such as ‘chwup- (to be cold), paykopu- (to be hungry) oylop- (to be lonely), sulpu- (to be sad), (-ko) siph- (to want)' describe mental, emotional or physiological state of an experiencer, which cannot be directly perceived by someone else. They intrinsically have the meaning of endophoric evidentiality, because of which they are not appropriate with 2nd or 3rd person subject. When Korean adds ‘-e ha-' after psychological adjectives, it creates psychological verbs which express that people have drawn conclusion on someone else's inner state on the basis of indirect signs such as observable external physical states. Because of the indirect evidentiality encompassed in the psychological verbs, they do not usually occur with 1st person subject.

키워드

grammatical evidentiality, lexical evidentiality, participatory evidentiality, endophoric evidentiality, psychological adjective, psychological verb, subject restriction

참고문헌(33)

[학술지] 김건희 / 2003 / 심리 형용사 연구― 논항 교체 유형들의 어휘 의미 구조를 중심으로 ― / 언어학 (37) : 47 ~ 70
[학위논문] 김세중 / 1994 / 국어 심리술어의 어휘의미구조
[단행본] 김흥수 / 1989 / 현대국어 심리동사 구문 연구 / 탑출판사
[단행본] 목정수 / 2014 / 한국어, 그 인칭의 비밀 / 태학사
[단행본] 서정수 / 1996 / "(수정 증보판)국어문법" / 한양대학교 출판원
[학술지] 송재목 / 1998 / 안맺음씨끝 ‘-더-’의 의미기능에 대하여: 유형론적 관점에서 / 국어학 32 : 135 ~ 169
[학술지] 송재목 / 2007 / 증거성(evidentiality)과 주어제약의 유형론-한국어, 몽골어, 티벳어를 예로 들어- / 형태론 9 (1) : 1 ~ 23
[학술지] 송재목 / 2011 / 한국어 증거성표지의 중복실현 / 비교문화연구 22 : 355 ~ 375
[학술지] 송재목 / 2015 / 증거성과 인칭의 상호작용 / 언어학 (73) : 111 ~ 132
[학술지] 송재목 / 2015 / 한국어 종결어미 ‘-네’의 의미기능 / 國語學 (76) : 123 ~ 159
[단행본] 유현경 / 1998 / 국어 형용사 연구 / 한국문화사
[단행본] 이익환 / 2005 / 심리동사의 의미론- 영어, 한국어와 독일어의 대조연구 / 역락
[학술지] 이정민 / 2016 / 심리술어와 1인칭: 증거성의 문제 / 언어 41 (4) : 679 ~ 713
[단행본] Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y / 2004 / Evidentiality / Oxford University Press
[단행본] Aoki, Haruo / 1986 / Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology / : 223 ~ 238
[단행본] Bybee, Joan / 1985 / Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form / John Benjamins
[단행본] Chafe, Wallace / 1986 / Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology / Ablex
[단행본] Comrie, Bernard / 1976 / Aspect / Cambridge University Press
[단행본] Dahl, Osten / 1985 / Tense and aspect systems / Basil Blackwell
[단행본] DeLancey / 1986 / Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology / : 203 ~ 213
[학위논문] Garrett, Edward John / 2001 / Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan
[학위논문] Kim, Young-Joo / 1990 / The Syntax and Semantics of Korean Case: The Interaction between Lexical and Sytactic Levels of Representation
[인터넷자료] Loughnane, Robyn / A Grammar of Oksapmin, University of Melbourne doctoral dissertation
[학술지] Mourelatos, Alexander P.D / 1978 / Events, processes, and states / Linguistics and Philosophy 2 : 415 ~ 434
[단행본] Oswalt, Robert L. / 1986 / Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology / : 29 ~ 45
[학술지] Plungian, Vladimir A / 2001 / The Place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space / Journal of Pragmatics 33 : 349 ~ 357
[단행본] Plungian, Vladimir A / 2010 / Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages / Walter de Gruyter : 15 ~ 58
[학술지] Roque, Lila San / 2012 / The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area / Linguistic Typology 16 : 111 ~ 167
[단행본] Smith, Carlota S / 1997 / The Parameter of Aspect / Kluwer Academic Publishers
[단행본] Sun, Jackson / 1993 / The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology LXIII Part IV / Academia Sinica : 945 ~ 1001
[단행본] Tournadre, Nicolas / 1996 / L'énonciation médiatisée / Peeters : 195 ~ 213
[단행본] Vendler, Zeno / 1967 / Linguistics in Philosophy / Cornell University Press : 97 ~ 121
[학술지] Willet, Thomas / 1988 / A Cross-Linguistic Survey of the Grammaticization of Evidentiality / Studies in Language 12 : 51 ~ 97