Plant Protect. Sci., 2020, 56(2):67-73 | DOI: 10.17221/57/2018-PPS

Differences in responses to Wheat dwarf virus infection in contrasting wheat cultivars Ludwig and SvitavaOriginal Paper

Jan Ripl, Tomáš Dráb, Sebastien Gadiou, Jiban Kumar Kundu*
Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic

The two contrasting cultivars, the very susceptible Ludwig and moderately susceptible Svitava, previously evaluated in field trials to determine their resistance levels to Wheat dwarf virus (WDV), were analysed by four different test methods to allow for the comparison of the methods and to consider whether the resistance level of cv. Svitava can be an effective component of wheat protection from the virus. The differences in the proportion of the diseased plants were observed after the inoculation by the viruliferous leafhoppers. The differences in the cultivar resistance levels were evaluated by comparing the biomass production after the infection. The amount of viral DNA was determined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Concurrently, the cultivar response to the virus infection after the controlled inoculation by the leafhoppers [Psammotettix alienus (Dahlbom, 1850)] under field conditions was further evaluated. The infected plants of cv. Svitava produced five times more dry matter in the vegetative growth stage than cv. Ludwig. The quantitative PCR analysis confirmed the resistance in cv. Svitava. The plant inoculation under a standardised infection pressure showed that the probability of the WDV infection after the inoculation feeding is smaller in the cv. Svitava plants. The comparison of the results from the different test methods shows that the field resistance tests are necessary to obtain a proper assessment of the possibilities for the cultivars' utilisation in the crop protection.

Keywords: Wheat dwarf virus; resistance; winter wheat; cv. Ludwig; cv. Svitava

Published: June 30, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ripl J, Dráb T, Gadiou S, Kundu JK. Differences in responses to Wheat dwarf virus infection in contrasting wheat cultivars Ludwig and Svitava. Plant Protect. Sci.. 2020;56(2):67-73. doi: 10.17221/57/2018-PPS.
Download citation

References

  1. Benkovics A.H., Vida G., Nelson D., Veisz O., Bedford I., Silhavy D., Boulton M.I. (2010): Partial resistance to Wheat dwarf virus in winter wheat cultivars. Plant Pathology, 59: 1144-1151. Go to original source...
  2. Cejnar P., Ohnoutkova L.,Ripl J., Kundu J.K. (2019): Wheat dwarf virus infectious clones allow to infect wheat and Triticum monococcum plants. Plant Protection Science, 55: 81-89. Go to original source...
  3. Cooper J. I., Jones A. T. (1983): Responses of plants to viruses: proposals for use of terms. Phytophatology, 73 : 127-128. Go to original source...
  4. Gadiou S., Ripl J., Jaňourová B., Jarošová J., Kundu J.K. (2012): Real-time PCR assay for the discrimination and quantification of wheat and barley strains of Wheat dwarf virus. Virus Genes, 44: 349-355. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Habekuß A., Riedel C., Schliephake E., Ordon F. (2009): Breeding for resistance to insect-transmitted viruses in barley - an emerging challenge due to global warming. Journal für Kulturpflanzen, 61: 53-61.
  6. Lindblad M., Sigvald R. (2004): Temporal spread of Wheat dwarf virus and mature plant resistance in winter wheat. Crop Protection, 23: 229-234. Go to original source...
  7. Lindsten K., Vacke J. (1991): A possible barley adapted strain of Wheat dwarf virus (WDV). Acta Phytopatologica et Entomologica Hungarica, 26: 175-180.
  8. Little T.J., Shuker D.M., Colegrave N., Day T., Day T., Graham A.L. (2010): The coevolution of virulence: Tolerance in Perspective. PLoS Pathogens, 6(9): e1001006. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001006 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Mehner S., Manurung B., Gruntzig M., Habekuß A., Witsack W., Fuchs E. (2003): Investigations into the ecology of the Wheat dwarf virus (WDV) in Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheit und Pflanzenschutz, 110: 313-323.
  10. Nygren J., Shad N., Kvarnheden A.,Westerbergh A. (2015): Variation in susceptibility to Wheat dwarf virus among wild and domesticated wheat. PLoS ONE, 10(4): e0121580. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121580 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Pagán I., García-Arenal F. (2018): Tolerance to plant pathogens: theory and experimental evidences. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19: 810-827. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Råberg L. (2014): How to live with enemy: Understanding tolerance to parasites. PLoS Biology 12(11): e1001989. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001989 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Robinson R.A. (1969): Disease resistance terminology. Review of Applied Mycology, 48: 393-606.
  14. Schafer J.F. (1971): Tolerance to plant disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 9: 235-252. Go to original source...
  15. Širlová L., Vacke J., Chaloupková M. (2005): Reaction of selected winter wheat cultivars to autumnal infection with Wheat dwarf virus. Plant Protection Science, 41: 1-7. Go to original source...
  16. Vacke J. (1961): Wheat dwarf virus disease. Biologia Plantarum, 3: 228-233. Go to original source...
  17. Vacke J. (1971): Zakrslost pšenice. Závěrečná zpráva. Praha, Výzkumný ústav rostlinné výroby.
  18. Vacke J., Cibulka R. (1999): Silky bent grass (Apera spica-venti [L.] Beauv.) - a new host and reservoir of Wheat dwarf virus. Plant Protection Science, 35: 47-50. Go to original source...
  19. Vacke J., Cibulka R. (2000): Response of selected winter wheat varieties to Wheat dwarf virus infection at an early growth stage. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 36: 1-4.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.