Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2011, 57(9):422-435 | DOI: 10.17221/137/2010-AGRICECON

Analysis of external and internal influences on CR agrarian foreign trade

Josef VOLOŠIN1, Luboš SMUTKA1, Richard SELBY2
1 Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Science, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Department of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Science, Prague, Czech Republic

The agrarian sector has a non-substitutable position in most world economics - including the CR. From the viewpoint of functioning of own agrarian trade it can be stated that the CR is roughly self-sufficient by 70-80% in products of a competitive nature. In case of products of a non-competitive nature, the CR shows almost zero self-sufficiency. It means that agrarian foreign trade occupies a non-substitutable position in the CR economy (at least from the export point of view). In the light of our own trade flows, the CR performs as an active exporter and importer (about 100 billion and 130 billion CZK respectively, in 2009). However, together with the still growing needs of the national economy and the inhabitants' requirements for a varied composition of agri‑food products, the CR does not succeed in the long term to decrease the negative balance of the agrarian foreign trade. It is, however, indisputable that if a serious discussion should be held about the competitiveness of Czech agriculture in confrontation with foreign producers or suppliers of agricultural and food products, the priority task to reach a balanced agrarian foreign trade balance can be accepted only for the competitive products segment. The complexity of a greater participation of the basic Czech agricultural and food products on the EU unified market deepens simultaneously with the acceleration of the liberalisation process on this market. The gradual process of the world agrarian market liberalisation then means that the cost and price relationships are determined by such world producers as are able to offer agrarian products for the most advantageous prices, or offer goods of exceptional quality, with a high added value, brand products, national specialties and so on. Potentially, the space for improvement of the active balance of agrarian foreign trade (AFT) is given to us in much the same way as to our competitors, but actually, our possibilities are limited. The stagnation or even growth of the negative AFT balance was, and is influenced by non-substitutable imports of non-competitive food raw materials and foodstuff products and many other raw materials required by the non-agricultural sectors of the national economy.

Keywords: agrarian market, export, import, balance, territorial and commodity structure

Published: September 30, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
VOLOŠIN J, SMUTKA L, SELBY R. Analysis of external and internal influences on CR agrarian foreign trade. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2011;57(9):422-435. doi: 10.17221/137/2010-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Balassa B. (1965): Trade liberalization and 'revealed' comparative advantages. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 32: 99-123. Go to original source...
  2. Barde J.P., Pearce D.W. (1990): Transport Policy and the Environment: Six Case Studies. OECD, Paris; ISBN 1 85383 075 5.
  3. Bazin G. (2006): Quelles perspectives pour l'agriculture europeenne et pour la PAC dans le contexte mondial? INA P-G, Paris.
  4. Binov V.V., Thomas K.J. (2008): The influence of hunger on food-stocking behaviour of climbing perch Anabas testudineus. Journal of fish biology, 73: 1053-1057. Go to original source...
  5. Braun J. (2007): The World Food Situation: New Driving Forces and Required Actions. IFPRI, Washington D.C.; ISBN 978-0-89629-530-8.
  6. Bryan T. (2010): Biofuels in the Future. Biomass magazine. Available at http://biomassmagazine.com/articles/1672/biofuels-in-the-future (accessed 2011-06-06).
  7. Coye M.J. (1985): The health effects of agricultural production. Journal of Public Health Policy, 6: 349-370. Go to original source...
  8. FAO (2009): The State of Food and Agriculture 2008. Rome; ISBN 978-92-5-105980-7.
  9. Fernández J. (2002): The common agricultural policy and EU enlargement: implication for agricultural production in the Central and Eastern European countries. In: Xth EAAE Congress 'Exploring Diversity in the European Agri-Food System. Zaragoza, Spain, 28-31 August 2002. Go to original source...
  10. Hayami Y., Godo Y. (2004): The three agricultural problems in the disequilibrium of world agriculture. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 1: 3-13 Go to original source...
  11. Hinloopen J., van Marrewijk C. (2006): Empirical relevance of the Hillman condition for revealed comparative advantage: 10 stylized facts. Applied Economics, 40: 2313-2328. Go to original source...
  12. Hinloopen J., van Marrewijk C. (2001): On the empirical distribution of the Balassa index. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics, 137: 1-35. Go to original source...
  13. Hisanaga M. (2007): Comparative Advantage Structure of U.S. International Trade. Kyoto Institute of Economic Research, June 2007. Available at www.kier.kyoto-u. ac.jp/index.html (accessed 2011-05-05).
  14. Jeníček V. (2009): The role of foreign trade and its effects. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 55: 211-220. Go to original source...
  15. Kraus J., Dyková E., Šlaisová J. (2006): WTO and Agriculture (in Czech). UZEI, Prague; ISBN 80-86671-37-2.
  16. Liesner H.H. (1958): The European common market and British industry. Economic Journal, 68: 302-316. Go to original source...
  17. Mendelsohn R., Dinar A. (2003): Climate, water, and agriculture. Land Economics Journal, 79: 328-341. Go to original source...
  18. Moldena D., Oweisb T., Stedutoc P., Bindraband P., Hanjrae M.A., Kijne J. (2010): Improving agricultural water productivity: Between optimism and caution. Agricultural Water Management, 97: 528-535. Go to original source...
  19. OECD-FAO (2007): Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016. OECD, FAO; ISBN 926402509X.
  20. Proudman J., Redding S. (2000): Evolving patterns of international trade. Review of International Economics, 8: 373-396. Go to original source...
  21. Qineti A., Rajcaniova M., Matejkova E. (2009): The competitiveness and comparative advantage of the Slovak and the EU agri-food trade with Russia and Ukraine. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 55: 375-383. Go to original source...
  22. Svatoš M. (2009): Foreign trade - theory and practise (in Czech). Grada, Prague; ISBN 978-80-247-2708-0.
  23. Štiková O. (2009): Development of food and beverages consumption in CR (in Czech). [Research Report.] ÚZEI, Prague.
  24. Tomek W.G., Willard W.C. (1962): Long-run demand: a concept, and elasticity estimates for meats. Journal of Farm Economics, Oxford University Press on behalf of the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association. Go to original source...
  25. Tripp R. (2009): Biotechnology and agricultural development. 1 st ed. Routledge, London; ISBN 0-20387646-6. Go to original source...
  26. Tvrdoō J. (2000): Ekonometrics (in Czech). CZU, Prague; ISBN 80-213-04282-0.
  27. VUZE (2007): Actual development on international agrarian market (in Czech). [Research study.] VÚZE, Prague.
  28. Wilson J.S., Otsuki T. (2003): Food safety and trade: Winners and losers in a non-harmonized world. Journal of Economic Integration, 18: 266-287. Go to original source...
  29. WTO (2007): World Trade Report 2007. Geneva; ISBN 978-92-870-3401-4.
  30. WTO (2009): International Trade Statistics 2008. Geneva; ISBN 978-92-870-3407-6.
  31. WTO (2011): World Trade Report 2011. Geneva; ISBN 978-92-870-3764-0.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.