European Oral Research

SUBMITINFORMATION
EnglishTürkçe

Original Research


DOI :10.17096/jiufd.96003   IUP :10.17096/jiufd.96003    Full Text (PDF)

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF THE STABILITY OF IMPLANTS PLACED AT DIFFERENT SUPRACRESTAL LEVELS

B. Alper Gültekin, Ali Şirali, Pınar Gültekin, Selim Ersanlı

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability during healing and before loading of implants placed at two different supracrestal levels according to their collar texture.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients who received posterior implants with the same macro design. Implants with a machined collar were placed 0.3 mm above the crestal bone (M group), while those with a laser-microtextured collar were placed 1 mm above the crestal bone (L group). All implants healed in a single stage with healing abutments. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were determined using resonance frequency analysis immediately after implant placement during surgery and after 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery. Other evaluated factors for stability included the implant diameter and length and the site of placement (maxilla or mandible).

Results: In total, 103 implants (47 L, 56 M) were evaluated. The median ISQ values at baseline and 1 week after placement were significantly higher for the M group than for the L group (p=0.006 and p=0.031, respectively). There were no differences at the subsequent observation points. The ISQ value was higher for wide-diameter than regular diameter (p=0.001) and mandibular implants than maxillary implants (p=0.001 at 0-8. weeks; p=0.012 at 12 weeks) at all observation points. When diameter data were neglected, the implant length did not influence the ISQ value at all observation points.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that submerging implant more inside bone may only influence primary stability. Moreover, the implant diameter and site of placement influence primary and secondary stability before loading, whereas the implant length does not when its diameter is not accounted for

Keywords: Dental implant, implant stability quotient, supracrestal level, bone–implant interface, osseointegration
DOI :10.17096/jiufd.96003   IUP :10.17096/jiufd.96003    Full Text (PDF)

Farklı Kret Üzeri Seviyelerde Yerleştirilen İmplantların Stabilitesinin Klinik Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

B. Alper Gültekin, Ali Şirali, Pınar Gültekin, Selim Ersanlı

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı boyun yüzeylerine göre iki farklı kret üzeri seviyede yerleştirilen implantların iyileşme sırasında ve yükleme öncesi stabilitelerinin değerlendirilmesidir.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu retrospektif çalışmaya posterior bölgede aynı makro tasarıma sahip implantlar yerleştirilen hastalar dahil edilmiştir. Lazer-mikroyüzey boyuna sahip implantlar kret seviyesinin 1 mm üzerinde yerleştirilirken (L grubu), cilalı boyuna sahip implantlar kret seviyesinin 0.3 mm üzerinde yerleştirilmiştir (M grubu). Tüm implantlar iyileşme başlığı ile tek aşamada iyileştirilmiştir. İmplant stabilite değerleri (ISQ) cerrahi işlem sırasında ve cerrahi işlem sonrasında 1., 4., 8., ve 12. haftalarda rezonans frekans analizi yardımıyla ölçülmüştür. Stabilite için değerlendirilen diğer olaso etkenler implant çapı, boyu ve yerleşim bölgesidir (maksilla veya mandibula).

Bulgular: Çalışmada toplam 103 implant (47 L, 56 M) değerlendirilmiştir. Başlangıç ve cerrahi sonrası 1. haftadaki medyan ISQ değerleri M grubu için L grubuna kıyasla anlamlı derecede yüksek bulunurken (p=0.006 ve p=0.031, sırasıyla) ilerleyen haftalarda anlamlı bir fark görülmemiştir. Tüm gözlem dönemlerinde, geniş çaplı implantların dar çaplı implantlara göre (p=0.001) ve alt çeneye yerleştirilen implantların üst çeneye yerleştirilen implantlara göre ISQ değerleri daha yüksek bulunmuştur (0-8. haftada p=0.001; 12. haftada p=0.012). Implant çapı gözardı edildiğinde, herhangi bir gözlem döneminde implant boyu ISQ değerlerini etkilememiştir (p>0.05).

Sonuç: İmplantın yerleştirme sırasında kemik içine daha fazla gömülmesi primer stabiliteyi etkileyebilmektedir. Bununla birlikte, implantın boyu, çap gözardı edildiğinde, stabilite üzerine etkili değilken çapı ve yerleştirildiği bölge yükleme öncesi primer ve sekonder stabiliteyi etkilemektedir.

Keywords: Dental implant, implant stabilite katsayısı, alveolar kemik seviyesi, osseointegrasyon, kemik implant arayüzeyi

PDF View

References

  • Sennerby L, Roos J. Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants: A review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11(5):408-420. google scholar
  • Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: Current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22(5):743-754. google scholar
  • Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11(5):491-501. google scholar
  • Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7(3):261-267. google scholar
  • Barewal RM, Oates TW, Meredith N, Cochran DL. Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18(5):641-651. google scholar
  • Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15(4):381-392. google scholar
  • Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: Clinical significance. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6(2):95-105. google scholar
  • Gultekin BA, Gultekin P, Leblebicioglu B, Basegmez C, Yalcin S. Clinical evaluation of marginal bone loss and stability in two types of submerged dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28(3):815-823. google scholar
  • Deli G, Petrone V, De Risi V, Tadic D, Zafiropoulos GG. Longitudinal implant stability measurements based on resonance frequency analysis after placement in healed or regenerated bone. J Oral Implantol 2014;40(4):438-447. google scholar
  • Huwiler MA, Pjetursson BE, Bosshardt DD, Salvi GE, Lang NP. Resonance frequency analysis in relation to jawbone characteristics and during early healing of implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18(3):275-280. google scholar
  • Sennerby L, Meredith N. Resonance frequency analysis: Measuring implant stability and osseointegration. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19(5):493-498, 500, 502; quiz 504. google scholar
  • Raghavendra S, Wood MC, Taylor TD. Early wound healing around endosseous implants: A review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20(3):425-431. google scholar
  • Barewal RM, Stanford C, Weesner TC. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the effects of three loading protocols on dental implant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27(4):945-956. google scholar
  • Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: Biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000 2008;47:51-66. google scholar
  • Torroella-Saura G, Mareque-Bueno J, Cabratosa-Termes J, Hernandez-Alfaro F, Ferres-Padro E, Calvo-Guirado JL. Effect of implant design in immediate loading. A randomized, controlled, split-mouth, prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26(3):240-244. google scholar
  • Ostman PO, Hellman M, Wendelhag I, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency analysis measurements of implants at placement surgery. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19(1):77-83; discussion 84. google scholar
  • Polizzi G, Rangert B, Lekholm U, Gualini F, Lindstrom H. Branemark system wide platform implants for single molar replacement: Clinical evaluation of prospective and retrospective materials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2(2):61-69. google scholar
  • Benic GI, Mir-Mari J, Hammerle CH. Loading protocols for single-implant crowns: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29 Suppl:222-238. google scholar
  • Fischer K, Backstrom M, Sennerby L. Immediate and early loading of oxidized tapered implants in the partially edentulous maxilla: A 1-year prospective clinical, radiographic, and resonance frequency analysis study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11(2):69-80. google scholar
  • Liaje A, Ozkan YK, Ozkan Y, Vanlioglu B. Stability and marginal bone loss with three types of early loaded implants during the first year after loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27(1):162-172. google scholar
  • Bischof M, Nedir R, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP, Samson J. Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15(5):529-539. google scholar
  • Bornstein MM, Hart CN, Halbritter SA, Morton D, Buser D. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (isq) values. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11(4):338-347. google scholar
  • Himmlova L, Dostalova T, Kacovsky A, Konvickova S. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: A finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91(1):20-25. google scholar
  • Misch CE. Density of bone: Effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing, and progressive boen loading. Int J Oral Implantol 1990;6(2):23-31. google scholar
  • Bayraktar M, Gultekin BA, Yalcin S, Mijiritsky E. Effect of crown to implant ratio and implant dimensions on periimplant stress of splinted implant-supported crowns: A finite element analysis. Implant Dent 2013;22(4):406-413. google scholar
  • Bogaerde LV, Pedretti G, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Immediate/early function of neoss implants placed in maxillas and posterior mandibles: An 18-month prospective case series study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12 Suppl 1:e83-94. google scholar
  • Karabuda ZC, Abdel-Haq J, Arisan V. Stability, marginal bone loss and survival of standard and modified sand-blasted, acid-etched implants in bilateral edentulous spaces: A prospective 15-month evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22(8):840-849. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Gültekin, B.A., Şirali, A., Gültekin, P., & Ersanlı, S. (2016). CLINICAL EVALUATION OF THE STABILITY OF IMPLANTS PLACED AT DIFFERENT SUPRACRESTAL LEVELS. European Oral Research, 50(3), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.96003


AMA

Gültekin B A, Şirali A, Gültekin P, Ersanlı S. CLINICAL EVALUATION OF THE STABILITY OF IMPLANTS PLACED AT DIFFERENT SUPRACRESTAL LEVELS. European Oral Research. 2016;50(3):21-31. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.96003


ABNT

Gültekin, B.A.; Şirali, A.; Gültekin, P.; Ersanlı, S. CLINICAL EVALUATION OF THE STABILITY OF IMPLANTS PLACED AT DIFFERENT SUPRACRESTAL LEVELS. European Oral Research, [Publisher Location], v. 50, n. 3, p. 21-31, 2016.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Gültekin, B. Alper, and Ali Şirali and Pınar Gültekin and Selim Ersanlı. 2016. “CLINICAL EVALUATION OF THE STABILITY OF IMPLANTS PLACED AT DIFFERENT SUPRACRESTAL LEVELS.” European Oral Research 50, no. 3: 21-31. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.96003


Chicago: Humanities Style

Gültekin, B. Alper, and Ali Şirali and Pınar Gültekin and Selim Ersanlı. “CLINICAL EVALUATION OF THE STABILITY OF IMPLANTS PLACED AT DIFFERENT SUPRACRESTAL LEVELS.” European Oral Research 50, no. 3 (May. 2024): 21-31. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.96003


Harvard: Australian Style

Gültekin, BA & Şirali, A & Gültekin, P & Ersanlı, S 2016, 'CLINICAL EVALUATION OF THE STABILITY OF IMPLANTS PLACED AT DIFFERENT SUPRACRESTAL LEVELS', European Oral Research, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 21-31, viewed 4 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.96003


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Gültekin, B.A. and Şirali, A. and Gültekin, P. and Ersanlı, S. (2016) ‘CLINICAL EVALUATION OF THE STABILITY OF IMPLANTS PLACED AT DIFFERENT SUPRACRESTAL LEVELS’, European Oral Research, 50(3), pp. 21-31. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.96003 (4 May. 2024).


MLA

Gültekin, B. Alper, and Ali Şirali and Pınar Gültekin and Selim Ersanlı. “CLINICAL EVALUATION OF THE STABILITY OF IMPLANTS PLACED AT DIFFERENT SUPRACRESTAL LEVELS.” European Oral Research, vol. 50, no. 3, 2016, pp. 21-31. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.96003


Vancouver

Gültekin BA, Şirali A, Gültekin P, Ersanlı S. CLINICAL EVALUATION OF THE STABILITY OF IMPLANTS PLACED AT DIFFERENT SUPRACRESTAL LEVELS. European Oral Research [Internet]. 4 May. 2024 [cited 4 May. 2024];50(3):21-31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.96003 doi: 10.17096/jiufd.96003


ISNAD

Gültekin, B.Alper - Şirali, Ali - Gültekin, Pınar - Ersanlı, Selim. “CLINICAL EVALUATION OF THE STABILITY OF IMPLANTS PLACED AT DIFFERENT SUPRACRESTAL LEVELS”. European Oral Research 50/3 (May. 2024): 21-31. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.96003



TIMELINE


Submitted12.02.2016
Accepted19.04.2016
Published Online10.03.2016

SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.