초록

Since the launch of Park Gun-Hye government, debates on the matter of permanent special prosecution and independent counsel have been intensified. One viable way to recover public trust in our prosecution service by securing political neutrality, is putting the politically sensitive cases away from the hands of prosecution service, and let the special prosecutors, or independent counsels handle such cases. However it should be noted, that for the special prosecution system to function properly, it is required to establish various pre- and post-control measures to prevent its abuse of power. As a pre-control measure, how the investigation be initiated should be clarified by law. The following could be suggested: special prosecution should investigate when 1) accused by 50 or more of National Assembly members, 2) accused by an independent counsel that effectively and constantly monitors corruption of the high-ranking officials such as presidential staffs, and the members of the presidential family, or 3) the Minister of Justice decides to refer the case to the special prosecutor, if the prosecution service recommends that the case be handled by the special prosecution system. As post-control measures, it is required 1) that prosecutorial discretion should be limited by compelling indictment when the charge is confirmed, 2) that the indictment should be made and maintained by the special prosecutor himself if the case is to be indicted, 3) that the special prosecutor mandatorily reports to the National Assembly on the procedures and the result of investigation. Finally, it is also advised that 4) the ‘Citizen’s Committee for the Prosecution’ be created, where lay citizens review non-prosecuted cases and compels prosecution for the case, like Japanese ‘Committee for the Inquest of Prosecution’.

키워드

상설특검(permanent special prosecution), 특별감찰관제(independent counsel), 대배심(grand jury), 검찰개혁(prosecutorial reform), 검찰시민위원회(prosecution citizen committee), 부패지수(Corruption Perception Index)

참고문헌(60)open

  1. [인터넷자료] / http://www.transparency.org/gcb2013/in_detail

  2. [인터넷자료] / http://www.transparency.org/gcb2013/country/?country=korea_(south)

  3. [인터넷자료] / http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2012/in_detail

  4. [인터넷자료] / http://www.transparency.org/cpi2011/in_detail

  5. [인터넷자료] / http://www.transparency.org/cpi2010/in_detail

  6. [인터넷자료] / http://archive.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2009/cpi_2009_table

  7. [인터넷자료] / http://archive.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2008/cpi_2008_table

  8. [인터넷자료] 국제투명성기구 / 2013년 세계부패바로미터(GCB)

  9. [인터넷자료] / http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?artid=201307092156465&code=940100

  10. [인터넷자료] / http://joongang.joins.com/article/877/12401877.html?ctg=

  11. [단행본] 김종구 / 2010 / 검찰제도론 / 법문사 : 450

  12. [인터넷자료] / http://www.leehs.kr/bbs/work_view.asp?sort=media1&idx=2802&page=20&keyfield=&keyword=

  13. [인터넷자료] / http://blog.naver.com/youngkyos?Redirect=Log&logNo=80171866057

  14. [인터넷자료] / http://news.hankooki.com/lpage/politics/200910/h2009101812260821000.htm

  15. [인터넷자료] / http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/society/2012/10/18/0702000000AKR20121018059200004.HTML

  16. [인터넷자료] / http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/society/2012/10/18/0702000000AKR20121018059200004.HTML

  17. [기타] John R. Heilbrunn / 2004 / Anti-Corruption Commissions: Panacea or Real Medicine to Fight Corruption? / The World Bank

  18. [기타] / Public Officials Integrity Act of 1977 - Report of the Committee on Governmental Affairs / United States Senate to Accompany S 555 - 95th Congress - 1st Session

  19. [인터넷자료] / http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/Abstract.aspx?id=63796

  20. [인터넷자료] / http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05a/usc_sup_05_5_10_sq3.html

  21. [인터넷자료] / http://ethics.house.gov/financial-dislosure/statutes-and-rules-governing-disclosure-financial-interests

  22. [인터넷자료] / http://www.oge.gov/About/Mission-and-Responsibilities/Mission---Responsibilities

  23. [인터넷자료] / http://www.sfo.gov.uk/

  24. [인터넷자료] / http://www.sfo.govt.nz/

  25. [인터넷자료] / http://www.icac.org.hk/en/home/index.html

  26. [인터넷자료] / http://www.icac.org.hk/en/law_enforcement/lc/

  27. [학술지] HKSAR v MAN-tak / 2005 / HKEC 1308, DC / Hong Kong Law Journal 35 : 271

  28. [학술지] HKSAR v Shum-Chiu / unreported ruling on permanent stay of proceedings, DCCC 687/2004, 5 July 2005, deputy Judge Livesey / Hong Kong Law Journal 35 : 272 ~ 273

  29. [인터넷자료] / http://www.scmp.com/article/146309/icac-chief-faces-charge

  30. [인터넷자료] / http://scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1228573/leung-committee-probe-icac-expenses

  31. [기타] / Singapore Statutes Online - 241 - Prevention of Corruption Act

  32. [인터넷자료] / http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/aol/search/display/view.w3p;page=0;query=DocId%3Aba9a8115-fb33-4254-8070-7b618d4fd8d1%20%20Status%3Ainforce%20Depth%3A0;rec=0

  33. [인터넷자료] CPIB / Top men were arrested, being probed for graft

  34. [인터넷자료] / Ex SCDF chief Peter Lim found guilty of corruption

  35. [인터넷자료] / CPIB director to be replaced over supervisory lapse

  36. [인터넷자료] / http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act//icaca1988442/

  37. [인터넷자료] / http://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/media-centre/media-releases/article/4394

  38. [인터넷자료] / http://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/media-centre/media-releases/article/4385

  39. [기타] / 중국공산당헌법 제43조

  40. [기타] / 싱가포르 헌법 제21조

  41. [인터넷자료] / http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act//icaca1988442/s5.html

  42. [인터넷자료] / http://www.legislation.gov.hk/blis_ind.nsf/WebView?OpenAgent&cap=CurAllEngDoc*201

  43. [인터넷자료] / http://app.cpib.gov.sg/cpib_new/user/default.aspx?pgID=204

  44. [인터넷자료] / http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act//icaca1988442/

  45. [학술지] 최석림 / 2010 / 고위공직자비리조사처 설치논의의 쟁점분석 / 이슈와 논점 (67) : 69

  46. [학위논문] 지영환 / 2007 / 공무원범죄 통제를 위한 형사입법론적 연구 : 고위공무원 부패범죄를 중심으로

  47. [학술지] 조재현 / 2010 / 공직자부패통제방안으로서 특별검사제와 고위공직자비리수사처의 설치에 관한 제언 / 한국부패학회보 15 (4) : 146 ~ 165

  48. [학술지] 조국 / 2002 / 특별검사제 재론-특별검사제의 한시적 상설화를 위한 제언 / 형사정책연구 14 (1)

  49. [학술대회] 서보학 / 2008 / 2008년 검찰･경찰의 현주소와 개혁과제 / 한국미래발전연구원 민주주의 리더십 연구회 제4차 월례 발표회 발표문 : 23

  50. [학술대회] 윤태범 / 2010 / 권력형 부패에 대한 효과적 대응을 위한 제도적 개선방안-고위공직자비리 조사처를 중심으로 / 여의도연구소 주최 토론회(공직비리 척결 어떻게 할 것인가? -「공직자비리수사처」설치를 중심으로- : 33

  51. [학술지] 하태훈 / 2010 / 독립성 보장된 사정기구 신설이 해답이다 / 국회보 (524) : 125

  52. [기타] / 동법 제3조

  53. [기타] / 「국가공무원법」 제26조

  54. [기타] / 「지방공무원법」 제25조

  55. [기타] / 「공공기관의 운영에 관한 법률」

  56. [학술지] 윤동호 / 2011 / 고위공직자비리수사처 신설의 정당성과 필요성 / 형사정책연구 22 (1) : 65 ~ 84

  57. [기타] / 국회법 제33조

  58. [기타] TIME지 / 1998 / Inside Starr and His Operation / Washington Post의 특집기사 “Untangling Whitewater”

  59. [인터넷자료] / http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,987779,00.html

  60. [인터넷자료] / http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/whitewater/whitewater.htm