본문 바로가기
KCI 등재

A True Anaphor

언어학 연구
약어 : 한국중원언어학회
2018 no.46, pp.169 - 196
DOI : 10.17002/sil..46.201801.169
발행기관 : 한국중원언어학회
연구분야 : 언어학
Copyright © 한국중원언어학회
강남길 1

1극동대학교

인용한 논문 수 :   -  
101 회 열람

The ultimate goal of this article is to capture the binding behavior of the universally attested local anaphors and long-distance anaphors. To achieve this goal, to begin with, we consider whether or not Richards’ (1997) theory may hold for three types of Korean anaphors. We demonstrate that the A-type anaphor ku-casin ‘he-self’, the B-type anaphor caki ‘self’, and the C-type anaphor caki-casin ‘self-self’ do not back up Richards’ (1997) theory. We also maintain that the B-type anaphor caki ‘self’ is interpreted as joining by common reference, but the A-type anaphor ku-casin and the C-type anaphor caki-casin ‘self’, unlike caki ‘self’, are interpreted as anaphoric reference. Also, we examine whether or not Safir’s (2014) theory works for Korean anaphors and pronouns, and argue that only one true anaphor (D-bound) which is universally available in Korean is not caki ‘self’ but caki-casin ‘self-self’. Additionally, we point out that caki-casin ‘self-self’ is a reflexivizer and a true anaphor, whereas caki ‘self’ is neither a reflexivizer nor a true anaphor. Finally, we contend that the Coargument-Based Condition A (Charnavel and Sportiche (2016)) is plausible even in Korean.

anaphor, pronoun, binding, N-feature, SELF anaphor, coargument-based Condition A

  • 1. [학술지] Charnavel, I / 2016 / Anaphor Binding: What French Inanimate Anaphors Show / Linguistic Inquiry / 47 (1) : 35 ~ 1
  • 2. [단행본] Chomsky, N. / 1986 / Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 13 / MIT Press
  • 3. [학위논문] Higginbotham, J. / 1992 / Anaphoric Reference and Common Reference
  • 4. [단행본] Huang, J / 1991 / Long-distance and Anaphora / Cambridge University Press : 191 ~
  • 5. [학술지] 강남길 / 2014 / Referential Number Agreement and Disagreement of Pronouns and Anaphors: Why are pronouns and anaphors different? / 언어학 연구 (33) : 1 ~ 33 kci
  • 6. [학술지] Pollard, C / 1992 / Anaphors and the Scope of Binding Theory / Linguistic Inquiry / 23 : 261 ~
  • 7. [학술지] Reinhart, T / 1993 / Reflexivity / Linguistic Inquiry / 24 : 657 ~
  • 8. [단행본] Reuland, E. / 2011 / Anaphora and Language Design / MIT Press
  • 9. [학위논문] Richards, N. / 1995 / Toward a Theory of Head-binding
  • 10. [학술지] Richards, N / 1997 / Competition and Disjoint Reference / Linguistic Inquiry / 28 : 178 ~
  • 11. [단행본] Safir, K. / 2004 / The Syntax of Anaphora / Oxford University Press
  • 12. [학술지] Safir, K / 2014 / On True Anaphor / Linguistic Inquiry / 45 (1) : 91 ~ 1