Korean J Endocr Surg. 2015 Jun;15(2):47-51. Korean.
Published online Jun 24, 2015.
Copyright © 2015 Korean Association of Thyroid and Endocrine Surgeons; KATES. All Rights Reserved.
Original Article

Preliminary Study on Safety of Robotic or Endoscopic Thyroidectomy via Bilateral Axillo-breast Approach (BABA) without Drainage Procedure: Multicenter Trial

So Hyang Moon, Young San Jeon,1 Wan Wook Kim,2 Su Hwan Kang,3 Young Ju Jeong,4 Jung Eun Choi,3 and Jihyoung Cho
    • Department of Surgery, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
    • 1Goo Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
    • 2Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
    • 3Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
    • 4Catholic University of Daegu College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Received March 05, 2015; Revised April 15, 2015; Accepted May 14, 2015.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of robotic or endoscopic thyroidectomy via bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) without a drainage procedure.

Methods

A total of 64 patients who underwent robotic or endoscopic thyroidectomy via BABA without a close suction drain between February and March 2012 were enrolled. We checked postoperative symptoms or signs including change of vital signs, dyspnea, swelling or fluctuation of anterior chest and neck and compression symptoms at 1, 6, 24, and 48 hours and 1 month after surgery. Postoperative ultrasonography was performed in patients with at least one or more postoperative symptoms or signs in order to confirm hematoma or fluid collection.

Results

None of the enrolled patients had dyspnea or change of vital signs. Two of 64 patients had swelling, 1 of 64 patients had fluctuation on the anterior chest, and 1 of 64 patients had compression symptoms. Fluid collection was confirmed in 2 of 4 of the above mentioned patients and the collected fluid was aspirated. The amounts of aspirated fluid were 25 mL and 8 mL. Thereafter, the follow up ultrasonography showed no more fluid collection in all patients. In addition, we rechecked the above mentioned symptoms or signs at 1 month after surgery; none of the enrolled patients had symptoms or signs.

Conclusion

Robotic or endoscopic thyroidectomy via BABA without a closed suction drain shows no serious seroma or hematoma collection. Therefore, we expect that robotic or endoscopic thyroidectomy via BABA without a closed suction drain can reduce the pain, discomfort or longer hospital stay as a result of closed suction drain using this method.

Keywords
Drain; Endoscopic thyroidectomy; Robotic thyroidectomy; Bilateral axillo-breast approach

Figures

Fig. 1
Case 1. (A) In USG, there was minimal fluid collection on sterna notch. (B) After 8 mL fluid aspiration, there was no more fluid collection.

Fig. 2
Case 2. (A, B) In USG, there was minimal fluid collection above SCM. (C) After 25 mL fluid aspiration, there was no more fluid collection.

Tables

Table 1
Clinical characteristics of the patients

Table 2
Incidence and management of abnormal sign and symptom

References

    1. Kim MH, Kim TW, Kim KH, An CH, Bae JS, Park WC, et al. Clinical comparative evaluation of open method and gasless or gas insufflation anterior chest approach in endoscopic thyroidectomy in a single institution. J Korean Surg Soc 2010;79:447–454.
    1. Alvarado R, McMullen T, Sidhu SB, Delbridge LW, Sywak MS. Minimally invasive thyroid surgery for single nodules: an evidence-based review of the lateral mini-incision technique. World J Surg 2008;32:1341–1348.
    1. Miccoli P, Minuto MN, Ugolini C, Pisano R, Fosso A, Berti P. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for benign thyroid disease: an evidence-based review. World J Surg 2008;32:1333–1340.
    1. Choi JY, Youn YK. Vision of thyroid surgery: past, present and future. J Korean Thyroid Assoc 2012;5:1–5.
    1. Yoon JH, Park CH, Chung WY. Gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy via an axillary approach: experience of 30 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2006;16:226–231.
    1. Choe JH, Kim SW, Chung KW, Park KS, Han W, Noh DY, et al. Endoscopic thyroidectomy using a new bilateral axillo-breast approach. World J Surg 2007;31:601–606.
    1. Gagner M. Endoscopic subtotal parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Br J Surg 1996;83:875.
    1. Hüscher CS, Chiodini S, Napolitano C, Recher A. Endoscopic right thyroid lobectomy. Surg Endosc 1997;11:877.
    1. Lobe TE, Wright SK, Irish MS. Novel uses of surgical robotics in head and neck surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2005;15:647–652.
    1. Bodner J, Fish J, Lottersberger AC, Wetscher G, Schmid T. Robotic resection of an ectopic goiter in the mediastinum. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2005;15:249–251.
    1. Shaha AR, Jaffe BM. Selective use of drains in thyroid surgery. J Surg Oncol 1993;52:241–243.
    1. Jeng LB, Chen MF. The use of a small feeding tube for suction drainage after thyroidectomy. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi 1994;17:235–238.
    1. Karayacin K, Besim H, Ercan F, Hamamci O, Korkmaz A. Thyroidectomy with and without drains. East Afr Med J 1997;74:431–432.
    1. Ardito G, Revelli L, Guidi ML, Murazio M, Lucci C, Modugno P, et al. Drainage in thyroid surgery. Ann Ital Chir 1999;70:511–516.
    1. Williams J, Toews D, Prince M. Survey of the use of suction drains in head and neck surgery and analysis of their biomechanical properties. J Otolaryngol 2003;32:16–22.
    1. Ruark DS, Abdel-Misih RZ. Thyroid and parathyroid surgery without drains. Head Neck 1992;14:285–287.
    1. Ariyanayagam DC, Naraynsingh V, Busby D, Sieunarine K, Raju G, Jankey N. Thyroid surgery without drainage: 15 years of clinical experience. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1993;38:69–70.
    1. Wax MK, Valiulis AP, Hurst MK. Drains in thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Are they necessary? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:981–983.
    1. Defechereux T, Hamoir E, Nguyen Dang D, Meurisse M. Drainage in thyroid surgery. Is it always a must? Ann Chir 1997;51:647–652.
    1. Tabaqchali MA, Hanson JM, Proud G. Drains for thyroidectomy/ parathyroidectomy: fact or fiction? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1999;81:302–305.
    1. Sanabria A, Carvalho AL, Silver CE, Rinaldo A, Shaha AR, Kowalski LP, et al. Routine drainage after thyroid surgery--a meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol 2007;96:273–280.
    1. Samraj K, Gurusamy KS. Wound drains following thyroid surgery. Cochrane Database Rev 2007;(4):CD006099.
    1. Hurtado-López LM, López-Romero S, Rizzo-Fuentes C, Zaldívar-Ramírez FR, Cervantes-Sánchez C. Selective use of drains in thyroid surgery. Head Neck 2001;23:189–193.
    1. Schoretsanitis G, Melissas J, Sanidas E, Christodoulakis M, Vlachonikolis JG, Tsiftsis DD. Does draining the neck affect morbidity following thyroid surgery? Am Surg 1998;64:778–780.
    1. Peix JL, Teboul F, Feldman H, Massard JL. Drainage after thyroidectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Int Surg 1992;77:122–124.
    1. Suslu N, Vural S, Oncel M, Demirca B, Gezen FC, Tuzun B, et al. Is the insertion of drains after uncomplicated thyroid surgery always necessary? Surg Today 2006;36:215–218.
    1. Randolph GW. In: Surgery of the thyroid and parathyroid glands. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003. pp. 434-439.
    1. Chung YS, Choe JH, Kang KH, Kim SW, Chung KW, Park KS, et al. Endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid malignancies: comparison with conventional open thyroidectomy. World J Surg 2007;31:2302–2306.
    1. Won TW, Lee KM, Choi UJ. Robotic endoscopic thyroidectomy; experience with 256 consecutive cases in a single institution. Korean J Endocr Surg 2014;14:211–218.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 2

Tables

1 / 2

PERMALINK