2005年以来韩国的汉语修辞学研究简介

@article{ART001492090},
author={ 나민구 },
title={2005年以来韩国的汉语修辞学研究简介},
journal={한중언어문화연구},
issn={1738-0502},
year={2010},
number={24},
pages={23-34},
doi={10.16874/jslckc.2010..24.002},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.16874/jslckc.2010..24.002}

TY - JOUR
AU - 나민구
TI - 2005年以来韩国的汉语修辞学研究简介
T2 - 한중언어문화연구
PY - 2010
VL -
IS - 24
PB - 한국중국언어문화연구회
SP - 23-34
SN - 1738-0502
AB - At present, the public interest and studies related to rhetoric are increasing day by day. Though rhetoric has been developed both in the East and the West in parallel, the aspects of its development are different from each other. In the West,centered on Europe, a variety of studies have been actively conducted on the basis of long tradition of rhetoric from the days of Aristotle in ancient Greece and to the present day. On the other hand, China, who represents the East, also has maintained her long tradition of ancient rhetoric. Modern rhetoric was emerged as an academic subject in China in 1938 ‐‐ quite late compared with the West ‐‐ when Chen Wangdao published An Introduction to Rhetoric; from that time on, the basic framework of modern Chinese rhetoric had been set up, establishing serious academic systems. Nowadays, Chinese rhetoric is making up for its idiosyncrasy by dint of conducting studies on the theories of rhetoric and exchanging ideas with other academic fields,also providing other investigators in closely‐related academic subjects with a breakthrough that allows them to overcome their academic constraints. The number of the books and papers that have been published in Korea in relation to Chinese rhetoric over the last 5 years in the 2000s is not so big. However, they can be regarded as remarkable achievements compared with the research achievements accrued over the past a few decades. Given the huge scale of communication going on between nations, people, and academics, the studies on Chinese rhetoric in Korea are expected to prevail in the future. Consequently, it is high time that the more active exchange with local Chinese scholars be highly necessary.
KW - Chinese, Rhetoric, Chinese Rhetoric, Rhetoric Society of Korea, Communication
DO - 10.16874/jslckc.2010..24.002
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.16874/jslckc.2010..24.002
ER -

나민구 (2010). 2005年以来韩国的汉语修辞学研究简介. 한중언어문화연구, 24, 23- 34.

나민구 . 2010, “2005年以来韩国的汉语修辞学研究简介”, 한중언어문화연구, no. 24, pp. 23-34. Available from: doi:10.16874/jslckc.2010..24.002

나민구 “2005年以来韩国的汉语修辞学研究简介” 한중언어문화연구 24 pp. 23-34 (2010): 23.

나민구 . 2005年以来韩国的汉语修辞学研究简介 한중언어문화연구 [Internet]. 2010; 24: 23-34. Available from: doi:10.16874/jslckc.2010..24.002

나민구 . “2005年以来韩国的汉语修辞学研究简介” 한중언어문화연구 no.24 (2010): 23-34. doi: 10.16874/jslckc.2010..24.002

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

2005年以来韩国的汉语修辞学研究简介

한중언어문화연구

약어 : JSLCKC

2010, no.24, pp.23 - 34

DOI : 10.16874/jslckc.2010..24.002

발행기관 : 한국중국언어문화연구회

연구분야 : 중국어와문학

나민구¹

¹수원대학교

인용한 논문 수 : - 서지 간략 보기

초록

At present, the public interest and studies related to rhetoric are increasing day by day. Though rhetoric has been developed both in the East and the West in parallel, the aspects of its development are different from each other. In the West,centered on Europe, a variety of studies have been actively conducted on the basis of long tradition of rhetoric from the days of Aristotle in ancient Greece and to the present day. On the other hand, China, who represents the East, also has maintained her long tradition of ancient rhetoric. Modern rhetoric was emerged as an academic subject in China in 1938 ‐‐ quite late compared with the West ‐‐ when Chen Wangdao published An Introduction to Rhetoric; from that time on, the basic framework of modern Chinese rhetoric had been set up, establishing serious academic systems. Nowadays, Chinese rhetoric is making up for its idiosyncrasy by dint of conducting studies on the theories of rhetoric and exchanging ideas with other academic fields,also providing other investigators in closely‐related academic subjects with a breakthrough that allows them to overcome their academic constraints. The number of the books and papers that have been published in Korea in relation to Chinese rhetoric over the last 5 years in the 2000s is not so big. However, they can be regarded as remarkable achievements compared with the research achievements accrued over the past a few decades. Given the huge scale of communication going on between nations, people, and academics, the studies on Chinese rhetoric in Korea are expected to prevail in the future. Consequently, it is high time that the more active exchange with local Chinese scholars be highly necessary.