Skip to main content
Log in

Simulating the water budgets of natural Carolina bay wetlands

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wetland restoration projects attempt to recreate the hydrology found in natural wetlands, but little is known of the water budgets associated with wetlands in their natural state. The objective of this study was to compute the water budgets of three natural Carolina bay wetlands in Bladen County, North Carolina, USA. DRAINMOD models of various locations in the bays were calibrated with measured water table depths over a 2-yr period using inputs of rainfall, air temperature, and soil physical properties. The models were successful in simulating water table depths at all well locations during the calibration period with average absolute deviations between simulated and measured water table depths of approximately 4 cm. Measured and simulated data revealed very shallow (< 0.1 m) water table depths at all of the bays. Groundwater inflow was a significant component of the water balance at locations near the perimeters of the bays, ranging from 3%–26% of the total water input for these sites during the study period. A semi-confined aquifer below one of the bays was likely the source of groundwater inflow for that bay. Meanwhile, locations near the centers of the bays did not have groundwater inflow as an input to their water budgets. Groundwater outflow for the centers of the bays ranged from 2%–21% of rainfall. Areas near the perimeters of the bays were recharge, discharge, or flow-through wetlands depending on hydrologic conditions at the sites. Areas near the centers of the bays exhibited characteristics of recharge wetlands only. These results were consistent across the three Carolina bays studied, and can be used to better understand the hydrology of natural Carolina bays, improving the success of restoration projects of similar sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Amatya, D. M. 1993. Hydrologic modeling of drained forested lands. Ph.D. Dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amatya, D. M., R. W. Skaggs, and J. D. Gregory. 1995. Comparison of methods for estimating REF-ET. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 121: 427–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ash, A. N., C. B. McDonald, E. S. Kane, and C. A. Pories. 1983. Natural and modified pocosins: literature synthesis and management options. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Biology, Washington, DC, USA. FWS/OBS-83/04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruland, G. L., M. F. Hanchey, and C. J. Richardson. 2003. Effects of agriculture and wetland restoration on hydrology, soils, and water quality of a Carolina Bay complex. Wetlands Ecology and Management 11: 141–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, P. V., A. A. Adams, C. P. Niewoehner, M. J. Vepraskas, and J. D. Gregory. 2005. Sampling device to extract intact cores in saturated organic soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69: 2071–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, P. V., M. J. Vepraskas, and J. D. Gregory. 2007. Physical properties of natural organic soils in Carolina bays of the southeastern United States. Soil Science Society of America Journal 71: 1051–57.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chescheir, G. M., D. M. Amatya, and R. W. Skaggs. 1994. Modeling the hydrology of a natural wetland. International Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI, USA. Paper number 942597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, R. B., S. W. Buol, H. J. Kleiss, and C. A. Ditzler. 1999. Soil systems in North Carolina. North Carolina State University, Soil Science Department, Raleigh, NC, USA. Bulletin 314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, J. M. 2003. Characterization of soils in a drained Carolina bay wetland prior to restoration. Ph.D. Dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, X., M. J. Vepraskas, R. W. Skaggs, and D. L. Lindbo. 2002. Adapting a drainage model to simulate water table levels in coastal plain soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66: 1722–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghoudt, S. B. 1940. Bijdragon tot de Kennis van Eenige Natuurkundige Groothen van den Grond, 7. Algemeene Beschouwing van het Probleem van de Detail Ontwatering en de Infiltratie door middle van Parallel Loopende Drains, Greppels, Slooten en Kanalen, Verslag. Landbouwk. Onderzoek 46: 515–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. L. and L. J. Otte. 1981. Peat in North Carolina wetlands. p. 125–34. In C. J. Richardson (ed.) Pocosin Wetlands. Hutchinson Ross Publishing Company, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klute, A. 1986. Water retention: laboratory methods. p. 635–62. In A. Klute (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, second edition. Agronomy Monograph 9, American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leab, R. J. 1990. Soil Survey of Bladen County North Carolina. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, B. P. 2004. Characterization and community analysis of three Carolina Bays in Bladen County, North Carolina. M.S. Thesis. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lide, R. F., V. G. Meentemeyer, J. E. Pinder, and L. M. Beatty. 1995. Hydrology of a Carolina bay located on the upper coastal plain of western South Carolina. Wetlands 15: 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthin, J. N. and D. Kirkham. 1949. A piezometer method for measuring permeability of soil in situ below a water table. Soil Science 68: 349–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, E. J., J. W. Flewelling, and R. W. Skaggs. 1992. Hydrologic model for drained forest watershed. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 118: 242–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M. G. and A. W. Harbaugh. 1988. A modular threedimensional finite difference ground water flow model. Techniques of Water Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey, book 6, chapter A1. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, R. and W. L. Nutter. 1984. Some modifications to CREAMS for forested applications. Forest Resources Research Report. School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteith, J. L. 1965. Evaporation and the environment. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 19: 205–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nokes, S. E. 1995. Evapotranspiration. p. 91–132. In A. D. Ward and W. J. Elliot (eds.) Environmental Hydrology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prouty, W. F. 1952. Carolina bays and their origin. Geological Society of America Bulletin 63: 167–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schalles, J. F. and D. J. Shure. 1989. Hydrology, community structure, and productivity patterns of a dystrophic Carolina Bay wetland. Ecological Monograph 59: 365–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharitz, R. R. and J. W. Gibbons. 1982. The ecology of southeastern shrub bogs (pocosins) and Carolina bays: a community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Biological Services, Washington, DC, USA. FWS/OBS-82/04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs, R. W. 1978. A water management model for shallow water table soils. Water Resources Institute, Raleigh, NC, USA. Technical Report 134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S. W. and A. G. Warne. 2000. Accessing and using meteorological data to evaluate wetland hydrology. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA. Technical Report TR-WRAP-00-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornthwaite, C. W. 1948. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geographical Review 38: 55–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA. 2002. WETS table documentation. Elizabethtown lock 2, NC2732. ftp://ftp.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/support/climate/wetlands/nc/37017.txt. Accessed March. 2006.

  • Western Regional Climate Center. 2005. Station data retrieval. Turnbull Creek North Carolina. http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/wea_list.pl?txNTUR. Accessed March 2006.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caldwell, P.V., Vepraskas, M.J., Skaggs, R.W. et al. Simulating the water budgets of natural Carolina bay wetlands. Wetlands 27, 1112–1123 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[1112:STWBON]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[1112:STWBON]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Navigation