Abstract
Vascular networks inside organs provide the means for metabolic exchange and adequate nutrition. Similarly, vascular or nutrient networks are needed when building tissue constructs >500 µm in vitro due to the hydrogel compact pore size of bioinks. As the hydrogel used in bioinks is rather soft, it is a great challenge to reconstruct effective vascular networks. Recently, coaxial 3D bioprinting was developed to print tissue constructs directly using hollow hydrogel fibers, which can be treated as built-in microchannels for nutrient delivery. Furthermore, vascular networks could be printed directly through coaxial 3D bioprinting. This review summarizes recent advances in coaxial bioprinting for the fabrication of complex vascularized tissue constructs including methods, the effectiveness of varying strategies, and the use of sacrificial bioink. The limitations and challenges of coaxial 3D bioprinting are also summarized.
概要
的技术难题. 近年来, 同轴生物 3D 打印技术为该问题提供了一种极具潜力的解决方案. 同轴生物 3D 打印技术的基本原理是: 使用同轴喷头将外层的水凝胶材料和内层的牺牲材料共同挤出, 打印为所需的复杂结构, 内层的牺牲材料去除后形成的中空通路即成为后续培养中的营养网络. 该技术结合了传统生物打印方法和牺牲组分 3D 打印方法的优点, 能够一步构造内置营养网络的大尺寸仿生结构, 在组织工程和器官重建等领域具有突出的优势.
本文结合课题组近年围绕同轴生物 3D 打印技术所做的一些工作, 梳理和总结了该技术的最新研究进展. 主要关注以下几点: (1) 在同轴 3D 打印血管时必须考虑的因素; (2) 首选生物材料清单; (3) 内皮化通道的制造原理及其潜在机制; (4) 同轴生物 3D 打印技术的最近进展; (5) 未来的挑战.
首先, 本文概述了当前生物 3D 打印中常用的水凝胶材料, 包括海藻酸钠 (Alginate), 明胶/甲基丙烯酸酐化明胶 (Gelatin/GelMA) 和胶原 (Collagen) 等, 介绍了这些材料的生物相容性, 可打印性和打印原理等生物 3D 打印技术中重点关注的因素. 随后, 论文详述了同轴生物 3D 打印技术的基本原理, 技术特点以及使用该技术构造内含营养网络 (特别是血管化) 的大尺寸结构的最新尝试. 最后, 论文展望了同轴生物 3D 技术未来可能的发展方向. 最新的研究进展表明, 该技术为快速制造血管化的组织/器官原型提供了可能.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference
Abraham LC, Zuena E, Perez-Ramirez, et al., 2008. Guide to collagen characterization for biomaterial studies. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research-Part B Applied Biomaterials, 87B(1):264–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31078
Aguado BA, Mulyasasmita W, Su J, et al., 2012. Improving viability of stem cells during syringe needle flow through the design of hydrogel cell carriers. Tissue Engineering Part A, 18(7–8):806–815. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0391
Ashammakhi N, Ahadian S, Xu C, et al., 2019. Bioinks and bioprinting technologies to make heterogeneous and biomimetic tissue constructs. Materials Today Bio, 1:100008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100008
Attalla R, Ling C, Selvaganapathy P, 2016. Fabrication and characterization of gels with integrated channels using 3D printing with microfluidic nozzle for tissue engineering applications. Biomedical Microdevices, 18(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-016-0042-6
Axpe E, Oyen ML, 2016. Applications of alginate-based bioinks in 3D bioprinting. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(12):1976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121976
Bertassoni LE, Cecconi M, Manoharan V, et al., 2014. Hydrogel bioprinted microchannel networks for vascularization of tissue engineering constructs. Lab on a Chip, 14(13):2202–2211. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4lc00030g
Blaeser A, Duarte Campos DF, Fischer H, 2017. 3D bioprinting of cell-laden hydrogels for advanced tissue engineering. Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering, 2:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2017.04.003
Chung JHY, Naficy S, Yue ZL, et al., 2013. Bio-ink properties and printability for extrusion printing living cells. Biomaterials Science, 1(7):763–773. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3bm00012e
Colosi C, Shin SR, Manoharan V, et al., 2016. Microfluidic bioprinting of heterogeneous 3D tissue constructs using low-viscosity bioink. Advanced Materials, 28(4):677–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503310
Cornelissen DJ, Faulkner-Jones A, Shu WM, 2017. Current developments in 3D bioprinting for tissue engineering. Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering, 2:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2017.05.004
Costantini M, Colosi C, Święszkowski W, et al., 2018. Co-axial wet-spinning in 3D bioprinting: state of the art and future perspective of microfluidic integration. Biofabrication, 11(1):012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aae605
Das S, Basu B, 2019. An overview of hydrogel-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting of soft tissues. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 99(3):405–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-019-00129-5
Datta P, Ayan B, Ozbolat IT, 2017. Bioprinting for vascular and vascularized tissue biofabrication. Acta Biomaterialia, 51:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.035
Dolati F, Yu Y, Zhang YH, et al., 2014. In vitro evaluation of carbon-nanotube-reinforced bioprintable vascular conduits. Nanotechnology, 25(14):145101. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/25/14/145101
Duarte Campos DF, Blaeser A, Buellesbach K, et al., 2016. Bioprinting organotypic hydrogels with improved mesenchymal stem cell remodeling and mineralization properties for bone tissue engineering. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 5(11):1336–1345. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201501033
Gao Q, He Y, Fu JZ, et al., 2015. Coaxial nozzle-assisted 3D bioprinting with built-in microchannels for nutrients delivery. Biomaterials, 61:203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.031
Gao Q, Liu ZJ, Lin ZW, et al., 2017. 3D bioprinting of vessel-like structures with multilevel fluidic channels. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 3(3):399–408. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00643
George M, Abraham TE, 2006. Polyionic hydrocolloids for the intestinal delivery of protein drugs: alginate and chitosan—a review. Journal of Controlled Release, 114(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.017
Glowacki J, Mizuno S, 2008. Collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biopolymers, 89(5):338–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.20871
Gómez-Guillén MC, Giménez B, López-Caballero ME, et al., 2011. Functional and bioactive properties of collagen and gelatin from alternative sources: a review. Food Hydrocolloids, 25(8):1813–1827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.02.007
Griffith CK, Miller C, Sainson RCA, et al., 2005. Diffusion limits of an in vitro thick prevascularized tissue. Tissue Engineering, 11(1–2):257–266. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2005.11.257
Guvendiren M, Molde J, Soares RMD, et al., 2016. Designing biomaterials for 3D printing. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 2(10):1679–1693. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00121
Hann SY, Cui HT, Esworthy T, et al., 2019. Recent advances in 3D printing: vascular network for tissue and organ regeneration. Translational Research, 211:46–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2019.04.002
Haycock JW, 2011. 3D cell culture: a review of current approaches and techniques. In: Haycock JW (Ed.), 3D Cell Culture. Humana Press, New York, USA, p.1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-984-0_1
He Y, Yang FF, Zhao HM, et al., 2016. Research on the printability of hydrogels in 3D bioprinting. Scientific Reports, 6:29977. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29977
He Y, Xie M, Gao Q, et al., 2019. Why choose 3D bioprinting? Part I: a brief introduction of 3D bioprinting for the beginners. Bio-Design and Manufacturing, 2:221–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-019-00053-8
He Y, Gu Z, Xie M, et al., 2020. Why choose 3D bioprinting? Part II: methods and bioprinters. Bio-Design and Manufacturing, 3:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00064-w
Helary C, Bataille I, Abed A, et al., 2010. Concentrated collagen hydrogels as dermal substitutes. Biomaterials, 31(3):481–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.073
Hennink WE, van Nostrum CF, 2012. Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 64(S1):223–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.009
Hong S, Kim JS, Jung B, et al., 2019. Coaxial bioprinting of cell-laden vascular constructs using a gelatin-tyramine bioink. Biomaterials Science, 7(11):4578–4587. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8bm00618k
Ji S, Almeida E, Guvendiren M, 2019. 3D bioprinting of complex channels within cell-laden hydrogels. Acta Biomaterialia, 95:214–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.038
Jia WT, Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Zhang YS, et al., 2016. Direct 3D bioprinting of perfusable vascular constructs using a blend bioink. Biomaterials, 106:58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.038
Kolesky DB, Truby RL, Gladman AS, et al., 2014. 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Advanced Materials, 26(19):3124–3130. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305506
Kuijpers AJ, van Wachem PB, van Luyn MJA, et al., 2000. In vivo compatibility and degradation of crosslinked gelatin gels incorporated in knitted Dacron. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 51(1):136–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200007)51:1<136::AID-JBM18>3.0.CO;2-W
Kyle S, Jessop ZM, Al-Sabah A, et al., 2017. ‘Printability’ of candidate biomaterials for extrusion based 3D printing: state-of-the-art. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 6(16):1700264. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700264
Lee A, Hudson AR, Shiwarski DJ, et al., 2019. 3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart. Science, 365(6452):482–487. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav9051
Lee JM, Yeong WY, 2016. Design and printing strategies in 3D bioprinting of cell-hydrogels: a review. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 5(22):2856–2865. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600435
Lee JY, Koo YW, Kim GH, 2018. Innovative cryopreservation process using a modified core/shell cell-printing with a microfluidic system for cell-laden scaffolds. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 10(11):9257–9268. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b18360
Lee VK, Kim DY, Ngo H, et al., 2014. Creating perfused functional vascular channels using 3D bio-printing technology. Biomaterials, 35(28):8092–8102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.083
Liu F, Chen QH, Liu C, et al., 2018. Natural polymers for organ 3D bioprinting. Polymers, 10(11):1278. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10111278
Liu WJ, Heinrich MA, Zhou YX, et al., 2017. Extrusion bioprinting of shear-thinning gelatin methacryloyl bioinks. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 6(12):1601451. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201601451
Liu WJ, Zhong Z, Hu N, et al., 2018. Coaxial extrusion bioprinting of 3D microfibrous constructs with cell-favorable gelatin methacryloyl microenvironments. Biofabrication, 10(2):024102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa9d44
Madl CM, Katz LM, Heilshorn SC, 2016. Bio-orthogonally crosslinked, engineered protein hydrogels with tunable mechanics and biochemistry for cell encapsulation. Advanced Functional Materials, 26(21):3612–3620. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201505329
Maiullari F, Costantini M, Milan M, et al., 2018. A multi-cellular 3D bioprinting approach for vascularized heart tissue engineering based on HUVECs and iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Scientific Reports, 8(1):13532. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31848-x
Mandrycky C, Wang ZJ, Kim K, et al., 2016. 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnology Advances, 34(4):422–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.011
McBeth C, Lauer J, Ottersbach M, et al., 2017. 3D bioprinting of GelMA scaffolds triggers mineral deposition by primary human osteoblasts. Biofabrication, 9(1):015009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa53bd
Miller JS, Stevens KR, Yang MT, et al., 2012. Rapid casting of patterned vascular networks for perfusable engineered three-dimensional tissues. Nature Materials, 11(9):768–774. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3357
Mironov V, Trusk T, Kasyanov V, et al., 2009. Biofabrication: a 21st Century manufacturing paradigm. Biofabrication, 1(2):022001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/1/2/022001
Mistry P, Aied A, Alexander M, et al., 2017. Bioprinting using mechanically robust core-shell cell-laden hydrogel strands. Macromolecular Bioscience, 17(6):1600472. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201600472
Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nature Biotechnology, 32(8):773–785. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958
Nagel T, Kelly DJ, 2013. The composition of engineered cartilage at the time of implantation determines the likelihood of regenerating tissue with a normal collagen architecture. Tissue Engineering Part A, 19(7–8):824–833. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0363
Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen YF, 2019. Print me an organ! why we are not there yet. Progress in Polymer Science, 97:101145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145
Onoe H, Okitsu T, Itou A, et al., 2013. Metre-long cell-laden microfibres exhibit tissue morphologies and functions. Nature Materials, 12(6):584–590. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3606
Ouyang LL, Yao R, Zhao Y, et al., 2016. Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells. Biofabrication, 8(3):035020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020
Ouyang LL, Highley CB, Sun W, et al., 2017. A generalizable strategy for the 3D bioprinting of hydrogels from non-viscous photo-crosslinkable inks. Advanced Materials, 29(8):1604983. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201604983
Ozbolat IT, Chen H, Yu Y, 2014. Development of ‘Multi-arm bioprinter’ for hybrid biofabrication of tissue engineering constructs. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 30(3):295–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2013.10.005
Parenteau-Bareil R, Gauvin R, Berthod F, 2010. Collagenbased biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Materials, 3(3):1863–1887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3031863
Park J, Lee SJ, Chung S, et al., 2017. Cell-laden 3D bioprinting hydrogel matrix depending on different compositions for soft tissue engineering: characterization and evaluation. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 71:678–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.10.069
Paulsen SJ, Miller JS, 2015. Tissue vascularization through 3D printing: will technology bring us flow? Developmental Dynamics, 244(5):629–640. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.24254
Pawar SN, Edgar KJ, 2012. Alginate derivatization: a review of chemistry, properties and applications. Biomaterials, 33(11):3279–3305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.007
Pereira RF, Bártolo PJ, 2015. 3D bioprinting of photocrosslinkable hydrogel constructs. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 132(48):42458. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.42458
Persikov AV, Ramshaw JAM, Kirkpatrick A, et al., 2005. Electrostatic interactions involving lysine make major contributions to collagen triple-helix stability. Biochemistry, 44(5):1414–1422. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi048216r
Pi QM, Maharjan S, Yan X, et al., 2018. Digitally tunable microfluidic bioprinting of multilayered cannular tissues. Advanced Materials, 30(43):1706913. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201706913
Pinnock CB, Meier EM, Joshi NN, et al., 2016. Customizable engineered blood vessels using 3D printed inserts. Methods, 99:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.12.015
Radisic M, Yang LM, Boublik J, et al., 2004. Medium perfusion enables engineering of compact and contractile cardiac tissue. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 286(2):H507–H516. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00171.2003
Rouwkema J, Rivron NC, van Blitterswijk CA, 2008. Vascularization in tissue engineering. Trends in Biotechnology, 26(8):434–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.04.009
Rücker M, Laschke MW, Junker D, et al., 2006. Angiogenic and inflammatory response to biodegradable scaffolds in dorsal skinfold chambers of mice. Biomaterials, 27(29):5027–5038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.033
Sasmal P, Datta P, Wu Y, et al., 2018. 3D bioprinting for modelling vasculature. Microphysiological Systems, 2:9. https://doi.org/10.21037/mps.2018.10.02
Sekine H, Shimizu T, Sakaguchi K, et al., 2013. In vitro fabrication of functional three-dimensional tissues with perfusable blood vessels. Nature Communications, 4:1399. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2406
Shao L, Gao Q, Zhao HM, et al., 2018. Fiber-based mini tissue with morphology-controllable gelma microfibers. Small, 14(44):1802187. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201802187
Shao L, Gao Q, Xie CQ, et al., 2019. Bioprinting of cell-laden microfiber: can it become a standard product? Advanced Healthcare Materials, 8(9):1900014. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201900014
Shao L, Gao Q, Xie CQ, et al., 2020a. Directly coaxial 3D bioprinting of large-scale vascularized tissue constructs. Biofabrication, 12(3):035014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab7e76
Shao L, Gao Q, Xie CQ, et al., 2020b. Synchronous 3D bioprinting of large-scale cell-laden constructs with nutrient networks. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 9(15):1901142. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201901142
Shaw CJ, Ter Haar GR, Rivens IH, et al., 2014. Pathophysiological mechanisms of high-intensity focused ultrasoundmediated vascular occlusion and relevance to noninvasive fetal surgery. Journal of the Royal Society Inteface, 11(95):20140029. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0029
Spang MT, Christman KL, 2018. Extracellular matrix hydrogel therapies: in vivo applications and development. Acta Biomaterialia, 68:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.12.019
Suntornnond R, An J, Yeong WY, et al., 2015. Biodegradable polymeric films and membranes processing and forming for tissue engineering. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 300(9):858–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201500028
Suntornnond R, An J, Chua CK, 2017. Bioprinting of thermoresponsive hydrogels for next generation tissue engineering: a review. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 302(1):1600266. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201600266
Townsend JM, Beck EC, Gehrke SH, et al., 2019. Flow behavior prior to crosslinking: the need for precursor rheology for placement of hydrogels in medical applications and for 3D bioprinting. Progress in Polymer Science, 91:126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.01.003
Unagolla JM, Jayasuriya AC, 2020. Hydrogel-based 3D bioprinting: a comprehensive review on cell-laden hydrogels, bioink formulations, and future perspectives. Applied Materials Today, 18:100479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100479
van den Bulcke AI, Bogdanov B, de Rooze N, et al., 2000. Structural and rheological properties of methacrylamide modified gelatin hydrogels. Biomacromolecules, 1(1):31–38. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm990017d
Wang XH, He K, Zhang WM, 2013. Optimizing the fabrication processes for manufacturing a hybrid hierarchical polyurethane-cell/hydrogel construct. Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, 28(4):303–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883911513491359
Wang XH, Ao Q, Tian XH, et al., 2017. Gelatin-based hydrogels for organ 3D bioprinting. Polymers, 9(9):401. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9090401
Wu ZJ, Su X, Xu YY, et al., 2016. Bioprinting three-dimensional cell-laden tissue constructs with controllable degradation. Scientific Reports, 6:24474. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24474
Xie M, Gao Q, Fu J, et al., 2020a. Bioprinting of novel 3D tumor array chip for drug screening. Bio-Design and Manufacturing, 3:175–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00078-4
Xie M, Zheng Y, Gao Q, et al., 2020b. Facile 3D cell culture protocol based on photocurable hydrogels. Bio-Design and Manufacturing, in press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00096-2
Xing Q, Yates K, Vogt C, et al., 2014. Increasing mechanical strength of gelatin hydrogels by divalent metal ion removal. Scientific Reports, 4:4706. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04706
Yao R, Zhang RJ, Yan YN, et al., 2009. In vitro angiogenesis of 3D tissue engineered adipose tissue. Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, 24(1):5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883911508099367
Yeo MG, Lee JS, Chun W, et al., 2016. An innovative collagen-based cell-printing method for obtaining human adipose stem cell-laden structures consisting of core-sheath structures for tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules, 17(4):1365–1375. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01764
Yu Y, Zhang YH, Martin JA, et al., 2013. Evaluation of cell viability and functionality in vessel-like bioprintable cell-laden tubular channels. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 135(9):091011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024575
Zhang LW, Li GY, Shi M, et al., 2017. Establishment and characterization of an acute model of ocular hypertension by laser-induced occlusion of episcleral veins. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 58(10):3879–3886. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-20807
Zhang Y, Zhou DZ, Chen JW, et al., 2019. Biomaterials based on marine resources for 3D bioprinting applications. Marine Drugs, 17(10):555. https://doi.org/10.3390/md17100555
Zhang YH, Yu Y, Chen H, et al., 2013. Characterization of printable cellular micro-fluidic channels for tissue engineering. Biofabrication, 5(2):025004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/5/2/025004
Zhang YH, Yu Y, Akkouch A, et al., 2015. In vitro study of directly bioprinted perfusable vasculature conduits. Biomaterials Science, 3(1):134–143. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4bm00234b
Zhang YS, Arneri A, Bersini S, et al., 2016. Bioprinting 3D microfibrous scaffolds for engineering endothelialized myocardium and heart-on-a-chip. Biomaterials, 110:45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.003
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Hamed RAMEZANI and Yong HE designed the outline of this review. Hamed RAMEZANI wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Lu-yu ZHOU and Lei SHAO helped to organize the manuscript. Yong HE revised and edited the final version.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Conflict of interest
Hamed RAMEZANI, Lu-yu ZHOU, Lei SHAO, and Yong HE declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2018YFA0703000) and the Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51521064)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramezani, H., Zhou, Ly., Shao, L. et al. Coaxial 3D bioprinting of organ prototyps from nutrients delivery to vascularization. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 21, 859–875 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2000261
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2000261