Abstract
The analysis of a stepped main shaft by 1D refined beam theories in cylindrical coordinate system is presented. High-order displacement fields are achieved by employing the Carrera unified formulation (CUF), which takes direct implementation of any-order theory without the requirement of considering special formulations. The classical beam theories can be derived from the formulation as particular cases. The principle of minimum potential energy is used to obtain the governing differential equations and the related boundary conditions in a cylindrical coordinate system. These explicit terms of the stiffness matrices are exhibited and a global stiffness matrix is then obtained by matrix transformation. For the special working condition in a mining hoist and stepped shaft, the resulting global stiffness matrix and the loading vector are modified and applied with the boundary conditions in the static analysis of shaft parts. The accuracy of static analysis based on the refined beam theory is confirmed by comparing ANSYS solid theory and classical beam theories. An experiment for verifying the availability of the modified 1D refined beam model on the surface strain of segment 9 of the main shaft is conducted in a field experiment at Zhaojiazhai Coal Mine, China. Experimental results demonstrate the practicability of the present theory in predicting the strain field on the surface of the stepped main shaft of a mining hoist.
摘要
目 的
研究基于 Carrera 通用表达式的一维高阶理论, 将其应用于矿井提升机主轴的力学特性分析, 针对矿井提升的特殊工况对主轴模型进行改进, 并探究该改进模型在工况监测中的可用性。
创新点
基于 Carrera 一维高阶理论, 建立提升机主轴的一维高阶模型; 根据矿井提升的特殊工况对主轴模型进行改进, 得到改进的主轴一维高阶模型。
方 法
-
1.
引入基于 Carrera 通用表达式的一维高阶理论, 克服传统梁理论的局限性和三维有限元法计算经济性差等问题;
-
2.
通过理论计算、 软件仿真和现场试验(图14 和15), 验证改进的主轴一维高阶模型的有效性和可用性。
结 论
-
1.
基于 Carrera 通用表达式的一维高阶理论模型能够以较少的计算量得出与 ANSYS 三维实体模型相近的结果;
-
2.
改进的提升机主轴一维高阶模型能够准确地监测矿井提升系统的工况。
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bathe KJ, 1996. Finite Element Procedure. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA.
Carrera E, Giunta G, 2010. Refined beam theories based on a unified formulation. International Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2(1):117–143. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1758825110000500
Carrera E, Petrolo M, 2011. On the effectiveness of higherorder terms in refined beam theories. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 78(2):021013. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002207
Carrera E, Petrolo M, 2012. Refined beam elements with only displacement variables and plate/shell capabilities. Meccanica, 47(3):537–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-011-9466-5
Carrera E, Giunta G, Petrolo M, 2011. Beam Structures: Classical and Advanced Theories. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, p.188.
Carrera E, Cinefra M, Petrolo M, et al., 2014. Finite Element Analysis of Structures through Unified Formulation. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, p.385.
Carrera E, Pagani A, Petrolo M, et al., 2015a. Recent developments on refined theories for beams with applications. Mechanical Engineering Reviews, 2(2):1400298. https://doi.org/10.1299/mer.14-0029.
Carrera E, Pagani A, Petrolo M, 2015b. Refined 1D finite elements for the analysis of secondary, primary, and complete civil engineering structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 141(4):04014123. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001076
Chan KT, Lai KF, Stephen NG, et al., 2011. A new method to determine the shear coefficient of Timoshenko beam theory. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 330(14):3488–3497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2011.02.012
Cowper GR, 1966. The shear coefficient in Timoshenko’s beam theory. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 33(2):335–340. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3625046
Dhillon BS, 2010. Mine Safety: a Modern Approach. Springer–Verlag London Limited, London, UK, p.192.
Euler L, 1744. De Curvis Elasticis. Bousquet, Geneva, Switzerland.
Filippi M, Pagani A, Petrolo M, et al., 2015. Static and free vibration analysis of laminated beams by refined theory based on Chebyshev polynomials. Composite Structures, 132:1248–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.014
Friedman Z, Kosmatka JB, 1993. An improved two–node Timoshenko beam finite element. Computers & Structures, 47(3):473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(93)90243-7
Gao XL, 2015. A new Timoshenko beam model incorporating microstructure and surface energy effects. Acta Mechanica, 226(2):457–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-014-1189-y
Gruttmann F, Wagner W, 2001. Shear correction factors in Timoshenko’s beam theory for arbitrary shaped crosssections. Computational Mechanics, 27(3):199–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004660100239
Hutchinson JR, 2001. Shear coefficients for Timoshenko beam theory. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 68(1):87–92. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1349417
Jensen JJ, 1983. On the shear coefficient in Timoshenko’s beam theory. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 87(4):621–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(83)90511-4
Pagani A, Boscolo M, Banerjee JR, et al., 2013. Exact dynamic stiffness elements based on one–dimensional higher–order theories for free vibration analysis of solid and thinwalled structures. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 332(23):6104–6127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.06.023
Pagani A, Petrolo M, Colonna G, et al., 2015. Dynamic response of aerospace structures by means of refined beam theories. Aerospace Science and Technology, 46:360–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.08.005
Pagani A, de Miguel AG, Petrolo M, et al., 2016. Analysis of laminated beams via Unified Formulation and Legendre polynomial expansions. Composite Structures, 156:78–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.095
Stephen NG, Levinson M, 1979. A second order beam theory. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 67(3):293–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(79)90537-6
Tetsuo I, 1990. Timoshenko beam theory with extension effect and its stiffness equation for finite rotation. Computers & Structures, 34(2):239–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(90)90367-B
Timoshenko SP, 1921. LXVI. On the correction for shear of the differential equation for transverse vibrations of prismatic bars. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 41(245):744–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786442108636264
Timoshenko SP, 1922. X. On the transverse vibrations of bars of uniform cross–section. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 43(253):125–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786442208633855
Vo TP, Thai HT, 2012. Static behavior of composite beams using various refined shear deformation theories. Composite Structures, 94(8):2513–2522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.010
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Project supported by the National Basic Research Program (973) of China (No. 2014CB049404), the National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2016YFC0600905), the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (No. IRT_16R68), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), China
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teng, Wx., Zhu, Zc. Static analysis of a stepped main shaft in a mine hoist by means of the modified 1D higher-order theory. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 19, 719–734 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1700509
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1700509
Key words
- Carrera unified formulation (CUF)
- 1D higher-order theory
- Finite element method
- Strain field
- Stepped main shaft
- Main hoist