Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of the cross section shape on the behaviour of SRG-confined prismatic concrete specimens

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effectiveness of the steel-reinforced grout (SRG) jacketing technique in increasing both strength and deformation capacity has been substantiated by experimental evidence (Thermou and Pantazopoulou in Fib Struct Concr J 8: 35–46, 2007; Thermou et al. in ECCOMAS Thematic Conference, 2013; Thermou et al. in Mater Struct J, 2013). What it has not been addressed yet is the influence of the cross section shape on the behaviour of SRG-confined prismatic unreinforced concrete specimens. An experimental study was carried out where 18 concrete small scale specimens were tested to failure under concentric uniaxial compression load. A single layer of the steel-reinforced fabric was applied to circular, square and square specimens with rounded edges. Test results demonstrated that both strength and deformation capacity increased as the shape of the cross section changed from square to circular. In case of the square specimens, the gain in compressive strength was satisfying, whereas the ductility increase was more significant compared to that of the square specimens with rounded edges. An analytical expression for the lateral confining pressure exerted by the composite system was derived based on the assumption that the steel cords were treated as well-anchored steel stirrups placed at a distance equal to the spacing between the steel cords. The ability of the various steel and fiber-reinforced polymer confinement models from literature to predict the normalized compressive strength of non-circular specimens confined with SRG jackets was also explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thermou GE, Pantazopoulou SJ (2007) Metallic fabric jackets: an innovative method for seismic retrofitting of substandard RC prismatic members. Fib Struct Concr J 8(1):35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thermou GE, Katakalos K, Manos G. Influence of the loading rate on the axial compressive behavior of concrete specimens confined with SRG jackets. ECCOMAS thematic conference, computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering (COMPDYN 2013), Kos, Greece, 2013; paper no. 1482

  3. Thermou GE, Katakalos K, Manos G (2013) Concrete confinement with steel-reinforced grout jackets. Mater Struct J. (Article in press)

  4. Kurtz S, Balaguru P (2001) Comparison of inorganic and organic matrices for strengthening of RC beams with carbon sheets. J Struct Eng ASCE 127(1):35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Garon R, Balaguru PN, Toutanji H. Performance of inorganic polymer-fiber composites for strengthening and rehabilitation of concrete beams. FRPRCS-5 Fiber Reinforced Plastics for Reinforced Concrete Structures, C. J. Burgoyne, ed., Thomas Telford, London, 2001;1: 53–62

  6. Toutanji H, Deng Y, Jia M (2003) Fatigue performance of RC beams strengthened with CF sheets bonded by inorganic matrix. In K. H. Tan, ed., FRPRCS-6 Fiber reinforced polymer reinforcement for concrete structures, World Scientific Publishing Co., vol 2, pp. 875–884

  7. Wu HC, Teng J (2003) Concrete confined with fiber reinforced cement based thin sheet composites. In K. H. Tan, ed., FRPRCS-6 fiber reinforced polymer reinforcement for concrete structures, World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore; vol 1, pp. 591–600

  8. Triantafillou TC, Papanicolaou CG, Zissimopoulos P, Laourdekis T (2006) Concrete confinement with textile-reinforced mortar jackets. ACI Struct J 103(1):28–37

    Google Scholar 

  9. Triantafillou TC, Papanicolaou CG (2006) Shear strengthening of reinforced concrete members with textile reinforced mortar (TRM) jackets. Mater Struct 39(285):93–103

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bournas DA, Lontou PV, Papanicolaou CG, Triantafillou TC (2007) Textile-reinforced mortar versus fiber-reinforced polymer confinement in reinforced concrete specimens. ACI Struct J 104(6):740–748

    Google Scholar 

  11. Menna C, Asprone D, Ferone C, Colangelo F, Balsamo A, Prota A, Cioffi R, Manfredi G (2013) Use of geopolymers for composite external reinforcement of RC members. J Compos B Eng 45(1):1667–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vasconcelos E, Fernandes S, De Barroso Aguiar JL, Pacheco-Torgal F (2011) Concrete retrofitting using metakaolin geopolymer mortars and CFRP. Constr Build Mater 25(8):3213–3221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vasconcelos E, Fernandes S, De Aguiar B, Pacheco-Torgal F (2013) Concrete retrofitting using CFRP and geopolymer mortars. Mater Sci Forum 730–732:427–432

    Google Scholar 

  14. D’Ambrisi A, Feo L, Focacci F (2013) Experimental analysis on bond between PBO-FRCM strengthening materials and concrete. J Compos B Eng 44(1):524–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D’Ambrisi A, Feo L, Focacci F (2012) Bond-slip relations for PBO-FRCM materials externally bonded to concrete. J Compos B Eng 43(8):2938–2949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Salloum YA (2007) Influence of edge sharpness on the strength of square concrete specimens confined with FRP composite laminates. J Compos B Eng 38:640–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang L-M, Wu Y-F (2008) Effect of corner radius on the performance of CFRP-confined square concrete specimens: test. Eng Struct 30:493–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Abbasnia R, Hosseinpour F, Rostamian M, Ziaadiny H (2012) Effect of corner radius on stress-strain of FRP confined prisms under axial cyclic compression. Eng Struct 40:529–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Micelli F, Modarelli R (2013) Experimental and analytical study on properties affecting the behaviour of FRP-confined concrete. J Compos B Eng 45(1):1420–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. El-Hacha R, Abdelrahman K (2013) Slenderness effect of circular concrete specimens confined with SFRP sheets. J Compos B Eng 44(1):152–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. De Lorenzis L, Tamužs V, Tepfers R, Valdmanis V, Vilks U (2004) Stability of CFRP confined specimens. IMTCR 2004. Innovative materials and technologies for construction and restoration conference, Lecce, 6–9 June 2004, pp. 327–342

  22. Valdmanis V, De Lorenzis L, Rousakis T, Tepfers R (2007) Behavior and capacity of CFRP-confined concrete cylinders subjected to monotonic and cyclic axial compressive load. Fib Struct Concr J 8(4):187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tamužs V., Tepfers R., Zīle E., Valdmanis V. (2008). Mechanical behaviour of FRP-confined concrete columns under axial compressive loading. American Society of Civil Engineers, International Committee, Los Angeles Section, 5th International Engineering and Construction Conference (IECC´5) (2008). pp. 223–241

  24. Lam L, Teng JG (2009) Stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete under cyclic axial compression. Eng Struct 31(2):308–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Eurocode 2 (2004) Design of concrete structures––Part 1–1: general rules and rules for buildings. EN 1992-1-1:2004, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels

  26. Lopez A, Galati N, Alkhrdaji T, Nanni A (2007) Strengthening of a reinforced concrete bridge with externally bonded steel reinforced polymer (SRP). J Compos B Eng 38(4):429–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Prota A, Tan K-Y, Nanni A, Pecce M, Manfredi G (2006) Performance of shallow reinforced concrete beams with externally bonded steel-reinforced polymer. ACI Struct J 163(2):163–170

    Google Scholar 

  28. El-Hacha R, Mashrik MA (2012) Effect of SFRP confinement on circular and square concrete specimens. Eng Struct 36(3):379–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Colajanni P, De Domenico F, Recupero A, Spinella N (2014) Concrete columns confined with fibre reinforced cementitious mortars: experimentation and modelling. Constr Build Mater 52:375–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Richart FE, Brandtzaeg A, Brown RL (1928) A study of the failure of concrete under combined compressive stresses. Bulletin No. 185, Engineering Experimental Station, University of Illinois, Urbana

  31. Newman K, Newman JB (1971) Failure theories and design criteria for plain concrete. In: Proceedings of the international civil engineering material conference on structure, solid mechanics and engineering design, Wiley Interscience, New York, pp 936–995

  32. Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. ASCE J Struct Eng 114(8):1804–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mirmiran A, Shahawy M, Samaan M, Echary HE, Mastrapa JC, Pico O (1998) Effect of specimen parameters on FRP-confined concrete. ASCE J Compos Constr 24:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shehata LAEM, Carneiro LAV, Shehata LCD (2002) Strength of short concrete specimens confined with CFRP sheets. Mater Struct J 35:50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lam L, Teng JG (2003) Design-oriented stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete in rectangular specimens. J Reinf Plast Compos 22(13):1149–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Campione G, Miraglia N (2003) Strength and strain capacities of concrete compression members reinforced with FRP. Cem Concr Compos 25:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ilki A, Kumbasar N, Koc V (2004) Low strength concrete members externally confined with FRP sheets. Int J Struct Eng Mech 18:167–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Youssef MN, Feng Q, Mosallam AS (2007) Stress-strain model for concrete confined by FRP composites. J Compos B Eng 38:614–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kumutha R, Vaidyanathan R, Palanichamy MS (2007) Behaviour of reinforced concrete rectangular specimens strengthened using GFRP. Cem Concr Compos 29(8):609–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu Y-F, Zhou Y-W (2010) Unified strength model based on hoek-brown failure criterion for circular and square concrete specimens confined by FRP. ASCE J Compos Constr 14(2):175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. ACI Committee 440 (2008) Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures, ACI 440.2R-08. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, p 76

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr. V. Kouftidis and Mr. T. Koukouftopoulos for their assistance in the experimental program. The program was conducted in the Laboratory of Strength of Materials and Structures and funded by the Research Committee of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki within the framework of the program “Funding for new researchers”. The materials were donated by SIKA Hellas and Interbeton.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgia E. Thermou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thermou, G.E., Katakalos, K. & Manos, G. Influence of the cross section shape on the behaviour of SRG-confined prismatic concrete specimens. Mater Struct 49, 869–887 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0545-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0545-2

Keywords

Navigation