Skip to main content
Log in

Improving strength, drying shrinkage, and pore structure of concrete using metakaolin

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the results of an investigation on the use of metakaolin (MK) as a supplementary cementing material to improve the performance of concrete. Two MK replacement levels were employed in the study: 10% and 20% by weight of the Portland cement used. Plain and PC-MK concretes were designed at two water–cementitious materials (w/cm) ratios of 0.35 and 0.55. The performance characteristics of the concretes were evaluated by measuring compressive and splitting tensile strengths, water absorption, drying shrinkage, and weight loss due to the corresponding drying. The porosity and pore size distribution of the concretes were also examined by using mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). Tests were conducted at different ages up to 120 days. The results revealed that the inclusion of MK remarkably reduced the drying shrinkage strain, but increased the strengths of the concretes in varying magnitudes, depending mainly on the replacement level of MK, w/cm ratio, and age of testing. It was also found that the ultrafine MK enhanced substantially the pore structure of the concretes and reduced the content of the harmful large pores, hence made concrete more impervious, especially at a replacement level of 20%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

References

  1. Chindaprasirt P, Homwuttiwong S, Sirivivatnanon V (2004) Influence of fly ash fineness on strength, drying shrinkage and sulfate resistance of blended cement mortar. Cem Concr Res 34:1087–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mehta PK, Monteiro P (1997) Concrete. Indian Edition, University of California, Berkeley

  3. Ambroise J, Murat M, Pera J (1985) Hydration reaction and hardening of calcined clays and related minerals. Cem Concr Res 15:261–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ding J, Li Z (2002) Effects of metakaolin and silica fume on properties of concrete. ACI Mater J 99(4):393–398

    Google Scholar 

  5. Khatib JM, Wild S (1996) Pore size distribution of metakaolin paste. Cem Concr Res 26(10):1545–1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brooks JJ, Megat Johari MA (2001) Effect of metakaolin on creep and shrinkage of concrete. Cem Concr Comp 23:495–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khatib JM, Clay RM (2004) Absorption characteristics of metakaolin concrete. Cem Concr Res 34(1):19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bai J, Sabir BB, Wild S, Kinuthia J (2000) Strength development in concrete incorporating PFA and metakaolin. Mag Concr Res 52(3):153–162

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sabir BB, Wild S, Bai J (2001) Metakaolin and calcined clays as pozzolans for concrete: a review. Cem Concr Compos 23:441–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bai J, Wild S, Sabir BB (2002) Sorptivity and strength of air-cured and water-cured PC-PFA-MK concrete and the influence of binder composition on carbonation depth. Cem Concr Res 32:1813–1821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li Z, Ding Z (2003) Property improvement of Portland cement by incorporating with metakaolin and slag. Cem Concr Res 33:579–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Poon CS, Kou SC, Lam L (2006) Compressive strength, chloride diffusivity and pore structure of high performance metakaolin and silica fume concrete. Constr Build Mater 20:858–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gleize PJP, Cyr M, Escadeillas G (2007) Effects of metakaolin on autogenous shrinkage of cement pastes. Cem Concr Comp 29:80–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Güneyisi E, Mermerdaş K (2007) Comparative study on strength, sorptivity, and chloride ingress characteristics of air-cured and water-cured concretes modified with metakaolin. Mater Struct (in press) DOI 10.1617/s11527-007-9258-5

  15. Caldarone MA, Gruber KA, Burg RG (1994) High-reactivity metakaolin: a new generation mineral admixture. Concrete Int 16(11):37–40

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wild S, Khatib JM, Jones A (1996) Relative strength, pozzolanic activity and cement hydration in superplasticized metakaolin concrete. Cem Concr Res 26:1537–1544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang MH, Malhotra VM (1995) Characteristics of a thermally activated alumino-silicate pozzolanic material ant its use in concrete. Cem Concr Res 25:1713–1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khatri RP, Sirivivatnanon V, Yu LK (1997) Effect of curing on water permeability of concretes prepared with normal Portland cement and with slag and silica fume. Mag Concr Res 49(180):162–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khatib JM, Wild S (1998) Sulphate resistance of metakaolin mortar. Cem Concr Res 28(1):83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ASTM C157 (1997) Standard test method for length change of hardened hydraulic-cement mortar and concrete. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 04.02 Concrete and Concrete Aggregates

  21. ASTM C39 (1999) Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 04.02 Concrete and Concrete Aggregates

  22. ASTM C496 (1996) Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 04.02 Concrete and Concrete Aggregates

  23. ASTM C642 (1993) Standard test method for specific gravity, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 04.02 Concrete and Concrete Aggregates

  24. Day RL, Marsh BK (1988) Measurement of porosity in blended cement pastes. Cem Concr Res 18:63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor HFW (1990) Cement chemistry. Academic Press Inc., London

    Google Scholar 

  26. Khatib JM, Hibbert JJ (2005) Selected engineering properties of concrete incorporating slag and metakaolin. Constr Build Mater 19:460–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bai J, Wild S, Gailius A (2004) Accelerating early strength development of concrete using metakaolin as an admixture. Mater Sci 10(4):338–344

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wild S, Khatib JM, Jones A (1996) Relative strength, pozzolanic activity and cement hydration in superplasticized metakaolin concrete. Cem Concr Res 26:1537–1544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Neville AM (2006) Properties of concrete, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Essex, England

    Google Scholar 

  30. ACI 363R-92 (1997) State of art report on high strength concrete (ACI Committee 363) (Reapproved 1997). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI

  31. CEB-FIB (1993) Committee Euro-International du Beton (CEB-FIB). CEB-FIB Model Code 1990. Thomas Telford, London

    Google Scholar 

  32. TS 500 (2000) Requirements for design and construction of reinforced concrete structures. Turkish Standard, TSE, Ankara, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang MH, Gjorv OE (1991) Mechanical properties of high-strength lightweight concrete. ACI Mater J 83(3):240–247

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wiegrink K, Marikunte S, Shah SP (1996) Shrinkage cracking of high-strength concrete. ACI Mater J 93(5):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  35. Al-Khaja WA (1994) Strength and time-depended deformations of silica fume concrete for use in Bahrain. Constr Build Mater 8(3):169–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jianyong L, Yan Y (2001) A study on creep and drying shrinkage of high performance concrete. Cem Concr Res 31:1203–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Regourd M (1985) Microstructure of high strength cement based systems. In: Materials research society proceedings series, vol 2. Materials Research Society, Warrendale, PA, pp 3–17

  38. Bissonnette B, Pierre P, Pigeon M (1999) Influence of key parameters on drying shrinkage of cementitious materials. Cem Concr Res 29:1655–1662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Feldman RF (1983) Significance of porosity measurements on blended cement performance. In: Malhotra VM (ed) Proceedings, SP-79, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, pp 415–433

  40. Feldman RF, Beaudoin JJ (1976) Microstructure and strength of hydrated paste. Cem Concr Res 6:398–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mehta PK (1993) Concrete: structure, properties, and materials. Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  42. Poon CS, Wong YL, Lam L (1997) The influence of different curing conditions on the pore structure and related properties of fly ash cement pastes and mortars. Const Build Mater 11(7–8):383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang B (1998) Relationship between pore structure and mechanical properties of ordinary concrete under bending fatigue. Cem Concr Res 28:699–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bouguerra A, Ledhem A, De-Barquin F, Dheilly RM, Queneudec M (1998) Effect of microstructure on the mechanical and thermal properties of lightweight concrete prepared from clay, cement, and wood aggregates. Cem Concr Res 28(8):1179–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chan YN, Luo X, Sun W (2000) Compressive strength and pore structure of high performance concrete after exposed to high temperature up to 800°C. Cem Concr Res 30:247–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank to Mr. Vakıf Kiriş for his invaluable assistance during the laboratory phase of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Gesoğlu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Güneyisi, E., Gesoğlu, M. & Mermerdaş, K. Improving strength, drying shrinkage, and pore structure of concrete using metakaolin. Mater Struct 41, 937–949 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9296-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9296-z

Keywords

Navigation