Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative performance of bio-derived/chemical additives in warm mix asphalt at low temperature

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A corn based bio-derived warm mix asphalt (WMA) additive is in the development stages and has shown to successfully reduce the mixing and compaction temperatures by 30 °C. The WMA additive, isosorbide distillation bottoms (IDB), is a co-product from the conversion of sorbitol to isosorbide where sorbitol is derived by hydrogenating glucose from corn biomass. A detailed investigation of binder properties at variable IDB dosages showed improvement in low temperature binder grades when tested in the BBR at a 0.5 % dosage rate by weight of binder. This research investigates low temperature improvement in two types of binders by comparing IDB-modified binder with binder modified using two commercially available/bio-derived WMA additives from the forest products industry. Multiple stress creep recovery and BBR binder tests indicated that the degree of improvement in binder properties may be binder dependent but improvement was observed for all WMA additives. Low temperature mix performance was evaluated in the semi-circular bending (SCB) test. SCB tests showed additive types were a statistically significant factor in the fracture toughness properties but not for stiffness and fracture energy. IDB was successfully used at reduced mixing and compaction temperatures and does not negatively impact low temperature fracture properties of warm mix asphalt. Improvement of binder properties was observed for all WMA additives studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AASHTO (2009) R 49—Determination of low-temperature performance grade (PG) of asphalt binders american association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC

  2. AASHTO (2010) MP 19—Performance-graded asphalt binder using multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC

  3. AASHTO (2011) T 166—Bulk Specific gravity of compacted hot mix asphalt (HMA) using saturated surface-dry specimens. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC

  4. AASHTO (2012) T 312—Preparing and determining the density of hot mix asphalt (HMA) specimens by means of the Superpave Gyratory Compactor. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC

  5. AASHTO (2013a) TP 70—Multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC

  6. AASHTO (2013b) TP 105—Determining the fracture energy of asphalt mixtures using the semicircular bend geometry (SCB). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC

  7. ASTM (2010) D7405—Test method for multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR) of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

  8. Buss A, Kuang Y, Williams RC, Bausano J, Cascione A, Schram SA (2014) Influence of warm mix asphalt additive and dosage rate on construction and performance of bituminous pavements. In: Transportation research board 93rd annual meeting, Washington, DC

  9. Button JW, Estakhri C, Wimsatt A (2007) A synthesis of warm mix asphalt. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chong KP, Kuruppu MD (1984) New specimen for fracture toughness determination for rock and other materials. Int J Fract 26:R59–R62. doi:10.1007/bf01157555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D’Angelo J (2008) Warm-mix asphalt: European practice. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  12. D’Angelo J, Dongré R (2009) Practical use of multiple stress creep and recovery test transportation research record. J Transp Res Board 2126:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D’Angelo J, Dongre R, Reinke G (2006) Evaluation of repeated creep and recovery test method as an alternative to SHRP + requirements for polymer modified asphalt binders. In: Fifty-first annual conference of the Canadian technical asphalt association (CTAA), Charlottetown

  14. D’Angelo J, Kluttz R, Dongre RN, Stephens K, Zanzotto L (2007) Revision of the superpave high temperature binder specification: the multiple stress creep recovery test (With Discussion). J Assoc Asph Paving Technol 76:55

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gandhi T (2008) Effects of warm asphalt additives on asphalt binder and mixture properties. Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson University, Clemson

  16. Hassan M (2009) Life-cycle assessment of warm-mix asphalt: an environmental and economic perspective. In: Transportation research board 88th annual meeting, 2009. Washington, DC

  17. Hurley GC, Prowell BD (2006) Evaluation of evotherm for use in warm mix asphalt, vol 6. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jenkins K, De Groot J, van de Ven M, Molenaar A (1999) Half-warm foamed bitumen treatment, a new process. In: 7th conference on asphalt pavements for Southern Africa (CAPSA 99), Victoria

  19. Kim H, Lee S, Amirkhanian S (2012) Influence of warm mix additives on PMA mixture properties. J Transp Eng 138:991–997. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Krans R, Tolman F, Van de Ven M (1996) Semi-circular bending test: a practical crack growth test using asphalt concrete cores. In: RILEM proceedings. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 123–132

  21. Kristjánsdóttir Ó (2006) Warm-mix asphalt for cold weather paving. University of Washington, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kristjánsdóttir Ó, Muench ST, Michael L, Burke G (2007) Assessing potential for warm-mix asphalt technology adoption. Transp Res Rec 2040:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Larsen O, Moen Ø, Robertus C, Koenders B (2004) WAM Foam asphalt production at lower operating temperatures as an environmental friendly alternative to HMA. In: 3rd Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress, 2004. Foundation Eurasphalt, Breukelen

  24. Leng Z, Gamez A, Al-Qadi I (2013) Mechanical property characterization of warm-mix asphalt prepared with chemical additives. J Mater Civ Eng. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000810

  25. Li X, Marasteanu M (2004) Evaluation of the low temperature fracture resistance of asphalt mixtures using the semi circular bend test (with discussion). J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 73:401–426

  26. Li XJ, Marasteanu MO (2010) Using semi circular bending test to evaluate low temperature fracture resistance for asphalt concrete. Exp Mech 50:867–876. doi:10.1007/s11340-009-9303-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li X, Braham AF, Marasteanu MO, Buttlar WG, Williams RC (2008) Effect of factors affecting fracture energy of asphalt concrete at low temperature. Road Mater Pavement Des 9:397–416. doi:10.1080/14680629.2008.9690176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lim I, Johnston I, Choi S (1993) Stress intensity factors for semi-circular specimens under three-point bending. Eng Fract Mech 44:363–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Marasteanu MO, Li X, Labuz JF, Petit C, Al-Qadi I, Millien (2004) A low temperature fracture test for asphalt mixtures. In: Fifth international RILEM conference on reflective cracking in pavements. RILEM Publications SARL, pp 249–256

  30. Marasteanu M, Buttlar W, Bahia B, Williams R (2012) National pooled fund study—Phase II: final report—Investigations of low temperature cracking in asphalt pavements. MN/RC 2012-23

  31. Morea F, Marcozzi R, Castaño G (2012) Rheological properties of asphalt binders with chemical tensoactive additives used in warm mix asphalts (WMAs). Constr Build Mater 29:135–141. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Perkins SW (2009) Synthesis of warm mix asphalt paving strategies for use in Montana highway construction. West Transp Inst, Helena

    Google Scholar 

  33. Prowell BD, Hurley GC, Crews E (2007) Field performance of warm-mix asphalt at the NCAT test track. In: Transportation research board 86th annual meeting, 2007. Washington, DC

  34. Tang S (2014) Evaluate the fracture and fatigue resistances of hot mix asphalt containing high percentage reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) materials at low and intermediate temperatures. Iowa State University, Ph.D.

  35. Teshale EZ (2012) Low-temperature fracture behavior of asphalt concrete in semi-circular bend test. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  36. Werpy TA, Holladay JE, White JF (2004) Top value added chemicals from biomass: I. Results of screening for potential candidates from sugars and synthesis gas

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Bill Haman from the Iowa Energy Center (IEC) for funding this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph H. Podolsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Podolsky, J.H., Buss, A., Williams, R.C. et al. Comparative performance of bio-derived/chemical additives in warm mix asphalt at low temperature. Mater Struct 49, 563–575 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0520-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0520-3

Keywords

Navigation