Abstract

HUMAN AND MEDICAL GENETICS

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Predicting the progress of colon cancer by DNA methylation markers of the p16 gene in feces - Evidence from an animal model

Wen-Chih Wu^I,II; Chih-Hsiung Hsu^II; Jen-Chun Kuan^III; Jih-Fu Hsieh^II; Chien-An Sun^II,IV; Tsan Yang^V; Chang-Chieh Wu^VI; Yu-Ching Chou^II

^IDepartment of Surgery, Zuoying Branch of Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

^IISchool of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan

^IIIGraduate Institute of Life Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan

^IVDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan

^VDepartment of Health Business Administration, Meiho University, Pingtung, Taiwan

^VIDepartment of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

^{Send correspondence to} Send correspondence to Yu-Ching Chou School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, No.161, Sec. 6, Minquan E. Rd., Neihu Dist., Taipei City, Taiwan. E-mail: trishow@mail.ndmctsgh.edu.tw

ABSTRACT

A new noninvasive screening tool for colorectal neoplasia detects epigenetic alterations exhibited by gastrointestinal tumor cells shed into stool. There is insufficient existing data to determine temporal associations between colorectal cancer (CRC) progression and aberrant DNA methylation. To evaluate the feasibility of using fecal DNA methylation status to determine CRC progression, we collected stool samples from 14 male SD rats aged six weeks, and administered subcutaneous injections of either 1,2-dimethylhydrazine or saline weekly. p16 DNA methylation statuses in tumorous and normal colon tissue, and from stool samples were determined using methylation-specific PCR. Additionally, p16 methylation was detected in stool DNA from 85.7% of the CRC rats. The earliest change in p16 methylation status in the DMH-treated group stool samples occurred during week nine; repeatabilities were 57.1% in week 19 (p = 0.070) and 85.7% in week 34 (p = 0.005). A temporal correlation was evidenced between progression of CRC and p16 methylation status, as evidenced by DMH-induced rat feces. Using fecal DNA methylation status to determine colorectal tissue methylation status can reveal CRC progression. Our data suggests that p16 promoter methylation is a feasible epigenetic marker for the detection and may be useful for CRC screening.

Keywords: colorectal cancer, DNA methylation, stool test for colorectal cancer.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) accounts for more than 600,000 deaths each year worldwide (Jemal et al., 2011). In Taiwan in recent years, CRC has become the most common form of cancer occurrence (Promotion, 2010). Effective treatment is possible during the early stages of CRC, but the disease is generally asymptomatic. Unfortunately, the therapy is rarely successful in stage IV after the tumor cells have spread to lymph nodes and other organs (Wong et al., 2004). Thus, an effective screening test and early detection would provide substantial clinical benefits. The present technology CRC screening tools for an average-risk population fall into two categories: (1) physical examination, including colonoscopy, virtual colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, double contrast barium enema (DCBE), and digital rectal exam (DRE) (Bretthauer, 2011), and (2) stool tests, including detection of occult blood and exfoliated mutant or epigenetic changes of DNA (Harrison and Benziger, 2011). Colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy are highly specific and sensitive screening tools; however, these are less acceptable to the public because of invasive medical procedures. Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), the most efficient noninvasive screening test for colorectal cancer, has a limited impact on survival rate because of its low sensitivity to early stage CRC (Baek et al., 2009).

To provide early detection, it is important to develop a noninvasive and screening tool that is sensitive to CRC characteristics (Krishnan and Wolf, 2011; Labianca and Merelli, 2010). At the molecular level, CRC progression is accompanied by specific genetic and epigenetic changes (Schmid, 2010). Aberrant DNA hypermethylation of CpG islands within promoters is associated with the development and progression of colorectal cancer, which in turn leads to silencing of tumor suppressor genes such as p16INK4a, MGMT and MLH1, SFRP2, and vimentin genes (Chen et al., 2005; Wang and Tang, 2008; Psofaki et al., 2010; Shima et al., 2010).

A novel and non-invasive screening tool for detection of colorectal neoplasia is to assay the methylation alterations present in gastrointestinal tumor cells shed into stool. (Lenhard et al., 2005; Azuara et al., 2010). However, existing data was insufficient to determine temporal correlation between the progression of CRC and aberrant DNA methylation. To address this knowledge gap, we assayed p16 gene methylation changes in the feces of a rat model with chemically induced colorectal cancer. The assay could provide evidence that feces contain a detectable biomarker to diagnose early stage colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using fecal DNA methylation status to predict CRC progression.

Materials and Methods

Animals

All 14 male Sprague-Dawley rats used in the experiment were obtained from BioLASCO Taiwan Co. Ltd. (Taipei, Republic of China), six weeks of age and weighing 250-300 g. They were individually housed in ventilated stainless-steel cages with soft shavings air-conditioned room (temperature 22 ± 1 ºC, humidity 50-60% with 12hour light-dark cycles, lights on at 0700), and were provided free access to food and water throughout the experiment. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of National Defense Medical Center (certificate number IACUC-09-047), and were performed in accordance with National Institute of Health guidelines for the treatment of animals.

Generation of DMH induced tumors

Beginning at seven weeks of age, the rats received subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of either 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH) (Sigma Chemical Co) at a dosage of 20 mg/kg body weight (n = 7), or the same volume of saline (n = 7) weekly for 30 weeks. Rats were sacrificed at age 34 weeks through inhaled overdose of CO₂.

Collection of samples

Fecal pellets were collected weekly and placed in 2 mL microcentrifuge tubes for DNA extraction. Tissue samples were harvested after the rats were sacrificed. Samples were resected with scissors and inspected for tumors. Tumor, normal tissue close to a tumor, and normal tissue samples were dissected with a razor blade and placed in 2 mL microcentrifuge tubers for DNA extraction. Each tis-sue sample was sectioned for standard histological preparation and hematoxylin-eosin staining. Tissue and fecal samples were stored at -80 ºC.

DNA extraction and sodium bisulfite treatment

Genomic DNA was extracted either from frozen tis-sue samples using a DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (QIAGENE, Germany), or from fecal samples using a QIAamp DNA stool Mini kit (QIAGENE, Germany). The resulting DNA was modified with sodium bisulfite using an EZ DNA Methylation kit (Zymo Research, Orange, County, CA), and a methylated DNA positive control for MSP assays was generated using SssI methylase (Zymo Research, Orange County, CA).

Tissue and fecal DNA methylation studies

The methylation status of tissue samples was determined by methylation-specific PCR (MSP) of bisulfite treated DNA. MSP was carried out in a volume of 15 µL with 7.5 µL of HotStart Taq Premlx (RBC Bioscience), 0.6 µL of each primer, and 0.6 µL of bisulphite treated DNA. PCR conditions included denaturation at 95 ºC for 10 min followed by 35 cycles at 95 ºC for 30 s, annealing temperature at 55 ºC for 35 s, 72 ºC for 30 s, and a extension at 72 ºC for 4 min.

As only limited quantities of DNA are obtained from fecal samples (Zou et al., 2009) we adopted a nested strategy (Glockner et al., 2009). During the first stage, we carried out amplification by bisulfite-sequencing PCR (BSP) for 35 cycles using primers located in the flanking region of the CDKN2A promoter. In the following stage, MSP amplification was carried out for 30 cycles using 1:100 dilutions of the first-stage products. Table 1 lists the MSP and BSP primer sets, and annealing temperatures.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 21.0 software package for Windows (SPSS Taiwan Corp.). We computed the sensitivity and specificity of the fecal DNA methylation assay by using the McNemar test to compare methylation statuses between fecal and tissue samples for rats treated with DMH (n = 7) and those injected with saline (n = 7); the Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate the differences of p16 hypermethylation between the two groups in stool samples. A p value : 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There were no significant differences in body weight between experimental and control rats at euthanasia, and both groups exhibited a healthy appearance. All of the DMH-treated, but none of the control group rates developed colorectal adenomatous cells (Figure 1).

We analyzed the methylation status of the p16 gene in DNA from tissue samples. A methylated p16 gene was detected in all intestinal adenoma tissue samples from the DMH-treated group. By contrast, there was no hypermethylation of the p16 gene in the control group tissue samples (Figure 2). We then assessed the p16 gene methylation status of tissue and stool samples from corresponding donor rats to ascertain the consistency of p16 hypermethylation between the two sample types. After euthanasia in week 34, p16 hypermethylation was found in the stool of 85.7% (6/7) of the DMH-treated rats but in none (0/7) of the control group. The McNemar test p-value was 1.000 (Table 2).

When retrospectively assaying stool samples to assess the temporal association between CRC progression and aberrant DNA methylation we detected the earliest instance of p16 hypermethylation in week nine. Samples from the DMH-treated group showed a p16 hypermethylation ratio of 71.4% (5/7) against 0% (0/7) from the control group (McNemar test p = 0.500, Table 2); the repeatability of using fecal DNA methylation status for identifying CRC in our rat samples was 57.1% (4/7) during week 19 and 85.7% (6/7) in week 34 (McNemar test p = 0.250 and 1.000, respectively) (Table 2).

From the two groups of this study (DMH-treat and saline control), the methylation status in stool samples of periods of time was significantly different in week nine and 34 (Fisher's exact test p-value were 0.021 and 0.005, respectively) and it was borderline significant in week 19 (p = 0.070) (Table 3). The repeatability of using fecal DNA methylation status was used as an indicator for CRC progression (Figure 3). Samples were taken at the indicated rat age.

Discussion

The development and progression of colorectal cancer follows the "adenoma-carcinoma" sequence, in which colorectal tumor cells develop via a worsening dysplasia of normal colonic mucosa (Fearon and Vogelstein, 1990). An uncomplicated surgical procedure can provide an effective treatment if diagnosis is made during the early stages before metastasis occurs (Kim et al., 2010). Thus, it is desirable to find biomarkers that have high sensitivity and specificity towards CRC.

There is abundant evidence supporting the efficacy of FOBT in decreasing colorectal cancer mortality. However, the impact of FOBT on CRC incidence is lessened by the method's low sensitivity (Heitman et al., 2010; Levi et al., 2007). Mandel et al. (2000) reported that FOBT decreases CRC incidence by 17-20%. Conversely, Heresbach et al. (2006) provided evidence that FOBT has an insignificant effect on CRC incidence. The incidence of CRC and its mortality rates are expected to increase due to our aging population, particularly if there are no new screening tools developed to replace FOBT.(Mariotto et al., 2006)

In a normal intestinal tract, the epithelium is constantly and rapidly renewed by the turnover of 5 x 10¹⁰ epithelial cells per day (Mehl, 1991). The shedding rate of carcinoma colonocytes is faster than that of normal cells, and we can use this characteristic to identify tumor cells and assay the status of genetic or epigenetic abnormalities. Promoter hypermethylation analysis of stool DNA is a promising noninvasive test for early diagnosis of CRC, and this area has received much research interest. An increasing number of genes is found to undergo promoter region hypermethylation in the tissue and stool of CRC patients, and Glockner et al. (2009) found a higher sensitivity to TFPI2 methylation in patients with CRC (73-89%), in patients with adenomas (21-43%), and a high specificity toward TFPI2 methylation by patients with either CRC or adenomas (93-100%). Other reports observed high sensitivity (> 68%) and specificity (> 84%) towards SFRP2 and GATA4 methylation (Oberwalder et al., 2008; Wang and Tang, 2008; Hellebrekers et al., 2009)

There is substantial evidence supporting the value of using methylation analysis of stool DNA as a screening tool, although we cannot exclude the possibility of bias due to the nature of these cross-sectional studies (Thomas et al., 2005); the literature contains no reports of a sequential association between CRC and changes in gene methylation status in stool. Our findings answer questions about the consistency and temporal association between the progression of CRC and aberrant DNA methylation.

There are currently two animal models commonly employed to investigate the rules of DNA methylation in progression of CRC: (1) using genetic manipulation of animals to overexpress or down-regulate specific genes that are direct regulators of DNA methylation and methylation-related gene expression; and (2) carcinogen-treated animal models with assessment of somatic epigenetic alterations that arise in the resulting tumors (Conerly and Grady, 2010). Our study design adopted the latter category; we used DMH to change the genome methylation status and induce CRC. DMH-induced colon apoptosis in the rat model exhibits a characteristic aberrant crypt foci-adenomacarcinoma sequence and associated increase in cellular proliferation of colonic epithelial cells similar to that observed in humans (Robertis et al., 2011).

Borinstein et al. (2010) used an AOM-induced mice model to investigate the relationship between methylation of candidate genes, CRC, and normal tissues, and these authors reported 25% p16 methylation in CRC tissue, whereas we found 100% methylation to occur. We attribute the difference between Borinstein's and our own findings to the use of different carcinogens and rat species. In human studies, the extent of p16 hypermethylation could be as high as 70% (Psofaki et al., 2010), which is in accordance with our results, indicating that p16 methylation is a high frequency CRC marker.

Although this study reveals a temporal correlation between progression of colorectal cancer and p16 methylation status in rat feces, the observed high frequency of p16 methylation in tumor samples may be due to the DMH carcinogenic mechanism (Robertis et al., 2011). Thus, our findings may not represent the true temporal causal relation between the natural history of colorectal cancer and p16 methylation status in human feces.

Our study demonstrates that p16 hypermethylation in stool occurs before CRC develops and that changes in the methylation status of the p16 gene in stool are statistically significant or borderline significant. The consistency of hypermethylated p16 between stool sample and tumor tissue demonstrates that detecting the hypermethylated p16 gene in stool to identify colorectal neoplasia provides a sensitive early detection, consistent and noninvasive screening tool.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by a grant from Zuoying Branch of Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, Taiwan, Republic of China. Grant number ZAFGH9901.

Received: April 5, 2012; Accepted: May 17, 2013.

Editor: Carlos F.M. Menck

License information: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Publication Dates

History