Do Agricultural Supports Affect Production? A Panel ARDL Analysis of Turkey

Erdem Bulut; Yüksel Bayraktar

doi:10.15832/ankutbd.988246

Research Article

Year 2023, Volume: 29 Issue: 1, 249 - 261, 31.01.2023

Erdem Bulut Yüksel Bayraktar

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.988246

Cited By: 1

Abstract

References

Adams G, Westhoff P, Willott B & Young II R E (2001). Do ‘Decoupled’ Payments Affect U.S. Crop Area? Preliminary Evidence from 1997-2000. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(5): 1190-1195
Aktaş E, Altıok M & Songur M (2015). Farklı Ülkelerdeki Tarımsal Destekleme Politikalarının Tarımsal Üretim Üzerine Etkisinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(4): 55-74
Anton J & Mouel L C (2004). Do Counter-Cyclical Payments in the 2002 US Farm Act Create Incentives to Produce? Agricultural Economics, 31(2): 277–284
Arumugam S, Ozkan B, Jayaraman A & Mockaisamy P (2021). Impacts of Covid-19 Pandemic on Global Agriculture, Livelihoods and Food Systems. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 27(3): 239-246
Baltagi H B & Kao C (2010). Nonstationary Panels, Cointegration in Panels and Dynamic Panels: A Survey, Syracuse University Center for Policy Research Working Paper
Baltagi H B, Qu F & Kao C (2012). A Lagrange Multiplier Test for Cross-Sectional Dependence in a Fixed Effects Panel Data Model. Journal of Econometrics, 170(1): 164-177
Bayraktar Y & Bulut E (2016). Tarımsal Desteklerin Değişen Yapısı ve Yüksek Tarımsal Desteklerin Nedenleri: Türkiye için Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz. İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 66(1): 45-66
Becker D A & Judge P R (2014). Evidence of Distortionary Effects of Decoupled Payments in US Indica Rice Production. Atlantic Economic Journal, 42(3): 265-275
Beckman J F & Wailes E J (2005). The Supply Response of U.S. Rice: How Decoupled Are Income Payments? American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting
Borawska B A, Borawski P, Guth M, Parzonko A, Rokicki T, Klepacki B, Wysokinski M, Maciag A & Dunn W J (2021). Price Changes of Dairy Products in the European Union. Agricultural Economics-Czech, 67(9): 373-381
Cahill S A (1997). Calculating the Rate of Decoupling for Crops under CAP/Oilseeds Reforms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 48(1-3): 349-378
Çakmak H E, Kasnakoğlu H & Akder A H (1999). Tarım Politikalarında Yeni Denge Arayışları ve Türkiye, TÜSİAD
Çakmak H E, Kasnakoğlu H & Yıldırım T (1998). Fark Ödeme Sisteminin Ekonomik Analizi, TEAE
Canbay Ş (2021). Does Agricultural Support Policy Affect Crop Production in Turkey? Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 12(23): 130-140
Castellano-Álvarez F J, Parejo-Moruno F M, Rangel-Preciado J F & Cruz-Hidalgo E (2021). Regulation of Agricultural Trade and Its Implications in the Reform of the CAP The Continental Products Case Study. Agriculture, 11(7): 633
Demirdöğen A & Olhan E (2017). Türkiye Tarımının Kısa Tarihi: Destekleme Politikası Özeli. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 23(1): 1-12
Demirdöğen A, Olhan E & Chavas J P (2016). Food vs. Fiber: An Analysis of Agricultural Support Policy in Turkey. Food Policy, (61): 1-8
Doğan H G, Kan M & Kan A (2018). Türkiye’de Fark Ödemesi Desteklemelerinin Bazı Hububat Ürünlerinin Üretici Kararlarına Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(6): 945-951
Eğri T (2014). 2000 Sonrası Türk Tarım Politikalarında Dönüşüm ve Çiftçi Algısı: Kırklareli Örneği. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(1): 89-104
Erdal G, Erdal H & Çiçek A (2020). An Analysis of the Effects of Livestock Support Policies on Breeders: An Example of TR83 Region in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 8(11): 2378-2387
Erdal H, Erdal G & Ayyıldız B (2021). Are Support Policies for Sustainable Livestock Important? Causality between Animal Existence and Support Policies: VECM Analysis for Turkey. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 31(1): 254-264
Frandsen E S, Gersfelt B & Jensen, G H (2003). The Impacts of Redesigning European Agricultural Support. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 15(2): 106-131
Goodwin K B & Mishra K A (2005). Another Look at Decoupling: Additional Evidence on the Production Effects of Direct Payments. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(5): 1200-1210
Goodwin K B & Mishra K A (2006). Are Decoupled Farm Program Payments Really Decoupled? An Empirical Evaluation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(1): 73-89
Haß M (2021). Coupled Support for Sugar Beet in the European Union: Does It Lead to Market Distortions? Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(1): 86-111
Hennessy D A (1998). The Production Effects of Agricultural Income Support Policies under Uncertainty. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1): 46–57
Katranidis D S & Kotakou A C (2008). Are CAP Decoupling Policies Really Production Neutral? European Association of Agricultural Economists
Key N & Roberts J M (2008). Do Decoupled Payments Stimulate Production? Estimating the Effect on Program Crop Acreage Using Matching. American Agricultural Economics Association
Komarek M A, Drogue S, Chenoune R, Hawkins J, Msangi B H & Flichman G (2017). Agricultural Household Effects of Fertilizer Price Changes for Smallholder Farmers in Central Malawi. Agricultural Systems, 154: 168-178 Maddala S G & Wu S (1999). A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and A New Simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(1): 631-652
Nash E F (1961). Agriculture. In: Arthur Selton (Ed.), Agenda for a Free Society: Essays on Hayek’s: The Constitution of Liberty, The Institute of Economic Affairs, London, pp. 170-191
Nicholls H W & Gale D J (1946). The Farm Price Policy Awards, 1945: A Topical Digest of the Winning Essays. Journal of Farm Economics, 27(1): 267-283
O'Donoghue J E & Whitaker B J (2010). Do Direct Payments Distort Producers' Decisions? An Examination of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 32(1): 170-193
OECD (1998). Agricultural Policies in OECD Countries: Measurement of Support and Background Information, Paris
OECD (2000). Decoupling: A Conceptual Overview, Paris
OECD (2001). The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture. An Evaluation of Its Implementation in OECD Countries, Paris
OECD (2005). Decoupling-Policy Implications, Paris
Pedroni P (1999). Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(1): 653-670
Pesaran M H & Shin Y (1999). An Autoregressive Distributed-Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis, In: S Storm (Ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999
Pesaran M H & Smith P R (1995) Estimating Long-Run Relationship from Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1): 79-113
Pesaran M H (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels, Discussion Paper Series IZA DP No. 1240
Pesaran M H (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross-Section Dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2): 265-312
Pesaran M H, Shin Y & Smith P R (1999). Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446): 623-625
Pesaran M H, Shin Y & Smith J R (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3): 289-326
Richter A E (2015). Doha Development Round: Why Did It Fail? Anchor Academic Publishing, Hamburg
Samargandi N, Fidrmuc J & Ghosh S (2013). Is the Relationship between Financial Development and Economic Growth Monotonic for Middle Income Countries? Economics and Finance Brunel University Working Paper Series
Srivastava K S, Chand R & Singh J (2017). Changing Crop Production Cost in India: Input Prices, Substitution and Technological Effects. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 30: 171-182
Suh H D & Moss B C (2021). Examining the Input and Output Linkages in Agricultural Production Systems. Agriculture, 11(1): 54
Swerling G B (1959). Income Protection for Farmers: A Possible Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 64(2): 173-186
Taylor D R & Koo W W (2008). Changes in Agricultural Input Costs and Their Impact on Net Farm Income. Agribusiness & Applied Economics 637, North Dakota State University
Van Donkersgoed E (1988). Decoupling: A Family Farm and Stewardship Approach. In: Finkle P & Cameron D (Eds), Decoupling: The Concept and Its Future in Canada, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, pp. 28-62
Weber G J & Key N (2012). How Much Do Decoupled Payments Affect Production? An Instrumental Variable Approach with Panel Data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 94(1): 52-66
Westcott P C & Young C E (2004). Farm Program Effects on Agricultural Production: Coupled and Decoupled Programs. In: Burfisher M E & Hopkins J (Eds), Decoupled Payments in a Changing Policy Setting. Agricultural Economic Report No. 838, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, pp. 7-17
Winters L A (1988). The So-Called "Non-Economic" Objectives of Agricultural Support, OECD
Wooldridge M J (2012). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, South-Western
WTO (1994). Agreement on Agriculture, Geneva
WTO (2016). Agriculture. The WTO Agreements Series, 3. Edition, Geneva
Xie H & Wang B (2017). An Empricial Analysis of the Impact of Agricultural Product Fluctuations on China’s Grain Yield. Sustainability, 9(6): 906
Yıldız F (2017). Türkiye’de Merkezi Yönetim Bütçesinden Yapılan Tarımsal Destekleme Ödemelerinin Tarımsal Üretim Üzerindeki Etkisi: 2006-2016 Dönemi. Sayıştay Dergisi, 104: 45-63
Yüceer S E, Tan S & Semerci A (2020) Türkiye’de 2000-2020 Döneminde Tarımsal Destekleme Politikalarının Gelişiminin İncelenmesi. Lapseki Meslek Yüksekokulu Uygulamalı Araştırmalar Dergisi 1(2): 36-46
Yükseler Z (1999). Tarımsal Destekleme Politikaları ve Doğrudan Gelir Desteği Sisteminin Değerlendirilmesi, DPT

Do Agricultural Supports Affect Production? A Panel ARDL Analysis of Turkey

Year 2023, Volume: 29 Issue: 1, 249 - 261, 31.01.2023

Erdem Bulut Yüksel Bayraktar

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.988246

Cited By: 1

Abstract

One of the controversial issues in the trade negotiations carried out with the World Trade Organization deals with agricultural supports related to production, which is claimed to disrupt the market system by creating an imbalance in supply and demand in the domestic market and to cause world trade contraction. In this context, the aim of this study is to examine the production effect of the deficiency payments and land-based direct supports widely used in Turkey. The study conducts a panel autoregressive distributed lag analysis for 11 selected agricultural products (wheat, corn, sunflower, seed cotton, paddy, soybean, canola, safflower, tea, dried beans, and olives) for the 2002-2019 period. The findings from the study are as follows: i) Increases in deficiency payments and land-based direct supports increase short and long run production. However, land-based direct supports have less of an effect on production. ii) While increases in input prices have a negative short run effect on production, the long run effect is the opposite. iii) Agricultural product price is not an important indicator for producers. This finding can be explained by the fact that farmers accept agricultural supports as a complement to the price variable in their production decisions. iv) Increases in the minimum wage added to the model based on Turkey’s structural characteristics have a negative long run impact on production. v) No statistically significant relationship exists between the number of tractors used to represent agricultural mechanization and the amount of production.

Keywords

Production effects of the agricultural supports, Decoupled payments, Deficiency payments, Land-based direct supports, Minimum wage

References

Adams G, Westhoff P, Willott B & Young II R E (2001). Do ‘Decoupled’ Payments Affect U.S. Crop Area? Preliminary Evidence from 1997-2000. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(5): 1190-1195
Aktaş E, Altıok M & Songur M (2015). Farklı Ülkelerdeki Tarımsal Destekleme Politikalarının Tarımsal Üretim Üzerine Etkisinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(4): 55-74
Anton J & Mouel L C (2004). Do Counter-Cyclical Payments in the 2002 US Farm Act Create Incentives to Produce? Agricultural Economics, 31(2): 277–284
Arumugam S, Ozkan B, Jayaraman A & Mockaisamy P (2021). Impacts of Covid-19 Pandemic on Global Agriculture, Livelihoods and Food Systems. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 27(3): 239-246
Baltagi H B & Kao C (2010). Nonstationary Panels, Cointegration in Panels and Dynamic Panels: A Survey, Syracuse University Center for Policy Research Working Paper
Baltagi H B, Qu F & Kao C (2012). A Lagrange Multiplier Test for Cross-Sectional Dependence in a Fixed Effects Panel Data Model. Journal of Econometrics, 170(1): 164-177
Bayraktar Y & Bulut E (2016). Tarımsal Desteklerin Değişen Yapısı ve Yüksek Tarımsal Desteklerin Nedenleri: Türkiye için Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz. İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 66(1): 45-66
Becker D A & Judge P R (2014). Evidence of Distortionary Effects of Decoupled Payments in US Indica Rice Production. Atlantic Economic Journal, 42(3): 265-275
Beckman J F & Wailes E J (2005). The Supply Response of U.S. Rice: How Decoupled Are Income Payments? American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting
Borawska B A, Borawski P, Guth M, Parzonko A, Rokicki T, Klepacki B, Wysokinski M, Maciag A & Dunn W J (2021). Price Changes of Dairy Products in the European Union. Agricultural Economics-Czech, 67(9): 373-381
Cahill S A (1997). Calculating the Rate of Decoupling for Crops under CAP/Oilseeds Reforms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 48(1-3): 349-378
Çakmak H E, Kasnakoğlu H & Akder A H (1999). Tarım Politikalarında Yeni Denge Arayışları ve Türkiye, TÜSİAD
Çakmak H E, Kasnakoğlu H & Yıldırım T (1998). Fark Ödeme Sisteminin Ekonomik Analizi, TEAE
Canbay Ş (2021). Does Agricultural Support Policy Affect Crop Production in Turkey? Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 12(23): 130-140
Castellano-Álvarez F J, Parejo-Moruno F M, Rangel-Preciado J F & Cruz-Hidalgo E (2021). Regulation of Agricultural Trade and Its Implications in the Reform of the CAP The Continental Products Case Study. Agriculture, 11(7): 633
Demirdöğen A & Olhan E (2017). Türkiye Tarımının Kısa Tarihi: Destekleme Politikası Özeli. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 23(1): 1-12
Demirdöğen A, Olhan E & Chavas J P (2016). Food vs. Fiber: An Analysis of Agricultural Support Policy in Turkey. Food Policy, (61): 1-8
Doğan H G, Kan M & Kan A (2018). Türkiye’de Fark Ödemesi Desteklemelerinin Bazı Hububat Ürünlerinin Üretici Kararlarına Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(6): 945-951
Eğri T (2014). 2000 Sonrası Türk Tarım Politikalarında Dönüşüm ve Çiftçi Algısı: Kırklareli Örneği. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(1): 89-104
Erdal G, Erdal H & Çiçek A (2020). An Analysis of the Effects of Livestock Support Policies on Breeders: An Example of TR83 Region in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 8(11): 2378-2387
Erdal H, Erdal G & Ayyıldız B (2021). Are Support Policies for Sustainable Livestock Important? Causality between Animal Existence and Support Policies: VECM Analysis for Turkey. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 31(1): 254-264
Frandsen E S, Gersfelt B & Jensen, G H (2003). The Impacts of Redesigning European Agricultural Support. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 15(2): 106-131
Goodwin K B & Mishra K A (2005). Another Look at Decoupling: Additional Evidence on the Production Effects of Direct Payments. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(5): 1200-1210
Goodwin K B & Mishra K A (2006). Are Decoupled Farm Program Payments Really Decoupled? An Empirical Evaluation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(1): 73-89
Haß M (2021). Coupled Support for Sugar Beet in the European Union: Does It Lead to Market Distortions? Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(1): 86-111
Hennessy D A (1998). The Production Effects of Agricultural Income Support Policies under Uncertainty. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1): 46–57
Katranidis D S & Kotakou A C (2008). Are CAP Decoupling Policies Really Production Neutral? European Association of Agricultural Economists
Key N & Roberts J M (2008). Do Decoupled Payments Stimulate Production? Estimating the Effect on Program Crop Acreage Using Matching. American Agricultural Economics Association
Komarek M A, Drogue S, Chenoune R, Hawkins J, Msangi B H & Flichman G (2017). Agricultural Household Effects of Fertilizer Price Changes for Smallholder Farmers in Central Malawi. Agricultural Systems, 154: 168-178 Maddala S G & Wu S (1999). A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and A New Simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(1): 631-652
Nash E F (1961). Agriculture. In: Arthur Selton (Ed.), Agenda for a Free Society: Essays on Hayek’s: The Constitution of Liberty, The Institute of Economic Affairs, London, pp. 170-191
Nicholls H W & Gale D J (1946). The Farm Price Policy Awards, 1945: A Topical Digest of the Winning Essays. Journal of Farm Economics, 27(1): 267-283
O'Donoghue J E & Whitaker B J (2010). Do Direct Payments Distort Producers' Decisions? An Examination of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 32(1): 170-193
OECD (1998). Agricultural Policies in OECD Countries: Measurement of Support and Background Information, Paris
OECD (2000). Decoupling: A Conceptual Overview, Paris
OECD (2001). The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture. An Evaluation of Its Implementation in OECD Countries, Paris
OECD (2005). Decoupling-Policy Implications, Paris
Pedroni P (1999). Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(1): 653-670
Pesaran M H & Shin Y (1999). An Autoregressive Distributed-Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis, In: S Storm (Ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999
Pesaran M H & Smith P R (1995) Estimating Long-Run Relationship from Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1): 79-113
Pesaran M H (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels, Discussion Paper Series IZA DP No. 1240
Pesaran M H (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross-Section Dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2): 265-312
Pesaran M H, Shin Y & Smith P R (1999). Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446): 623-625
Pesaran M H, Shin Y & Smith J R (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3): 289-326
Richter A E (2015). Doha Development Round: Why Did It Fail? Anchor Academic Publishing, Hamburg
Samargandi N, Fidrmuc J & Ghosh S (2013). Is the Relationship between Financial Development and Economic Growth Monotonic for Middle Income Countries? Economics and Finance Brunel University Working Paper Series
Srivastava K S, Chand R & Singh J (2017). Changing Crop Production Cost in India: Input Prices, Substitution and Technological Effects. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 30: 171-182
Suh H D & Moss B C (2021). Examining the Input and Output Linkages in Agricultural Production Systems. Agriculture, 11(1): 54
Swerling G B (1959). Income Protection for Farmers: A Possible Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 64(2): 173-186
Taylor D R & Koo W W (2008). Changes in Agricultural Input Costs and Their Impact on Net Farm Income. Agribusiness & Applied Economics 637, North Dakota State University
Van Donkersgoed E (1988). Decoupling: A Family Farm and Stewardship Approach. In: Finkle P & Cameron D (Eds), Decoupling: The Concept and Its Future in Canada, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, pp. 28-62
Weber G J & Key N (2012). How Much Do Decoupled Payments Affect Production? An Instrumental Variable Approach with Panel Data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 94(1): 52-66
Westcott P C & Young C E (2004). Farm Program Effects on Agricultural Production: Coupled and Decoupled Programs. In: Burfisher M E & Hopkins J (Eds), Decoupled Payments in a Changing Policy Setting. Agricultural Economic Report No. 838, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, pp. 7-17
Winters L A (1988). The So-Called "Non-Economic" Objectives of Agricultural Support, OECD
Wooldridge M J (2012). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, South-Western
WTO (1994). Agreement on Agriculture, Geneva
WTO (2016). Agriculture. The WTO Agreements Series, 3. Edition, Geneva
Xie H & Wang B (2017). An Empricial Analysis of the Impact of Agricultural Product Fluctuations on China’s Grain Yield. Sustainability, 9(6): 906
Yıldız F (2017). Türkiye’de Merkezi Yönetim Bütçesinden Yapılan Tarımsal Destekleme Ödemelerinin Tarımsal Üretim Üzerindeki Etkisi: 2006-2016 Dönemi. Sayıştay Dergisi, 104: 45-63
Yüceer S E, Tan S & Semerci A (2020) Türkiye’de 2000-2020 Döneminde Tarımsal Destekleme Politikalarının Gelişiminin İncelenmesi. Lapseki Meslek Yüksekokulu Uygulamalı Araştırmalar Dergisi 1(2): 36-46
Yükseler Z (1999). Tarımsal Destekleme Politikaları ve Doğrudan Gelir Desteği Sisteminin Değerlendirilmesi, DPT

There are 60 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language	English
Journal Section	Makaleler
Authors	Erdem Bulut 0000-0001-6383-2849 Yüksel Bayraktar 0000-0002-3499-4571
Early Pub Date	January 18, 2023
Publication Date	January 31, 2023
Submission Date	August 28, 2021
Acceptance Date	April 9, 2022
Published in Issue	Year 2023 Volume: 29 Issue: 1

Cite

APA	Bulut, E., & Bayraktar, Y. (2023). Do Agricultural Supports Affect Production? A Panel ARDL Analysis of Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 29(1), 249-261. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.988246

Cited By

Eksik Veri ile Politika Analizi: Çiftçi Kayıt Sistemi Örneği

Tarım Ekonomisi Araştırmaları Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.61513/tead.1325235

Download Cover Image

Article Files

Full Text

Journal of Agricultural Sciences is published open access journal. All articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).