Abstract
An approach is developed to study the dynamics of protein conformational transitions in depth. A computational (Monte Carlo) approach based on a united residue model is used. Unbiased transitions between the Apo and Holo conformations/states of calmodulin are observed at the rate of 1 per day per processor. A series of models of increasing complexity is studied, accounting for hydrophobic interactions and calcium binding. Details of the transitional region and structural information about intermediate states are obtained. Statistically converged ensembles of transitions are obtained in a reasonable real time period.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W. G. Krebs and M. Gerstein, Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 1665 (2000).
M. Gerstein and W. Krebs, Nucleic Acids Res., 26, 4280 (1998).
N. Echols, D. Milburn and M. Gerstein, Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 478 (2003).
S. C. Harvey and H. A. Gabb, Biopolymers, 33, 1167 (1993).
J. Schütter, M. Engels, P. Kruger et al, Molec. Sim., 10, 291, (1993).
D.M. Zuckerman, J. Phys. Chem. B, in press.
Y. Ueda, H. Taketomi, and N. Go, Int. J. Peptide Protein Res., 7, 445 (1975).
Y. Ueda, H. Taketomi, and N. Go, Biopolymers, 17, 1531 (1978).
D. Tobi, G. Shafran, N. Linial and R. Elber, Proteins, 40, 71 (2000).
K. F. Lau and K. A. Dill, Macromolecules, 22, 3986, (1989).
D. Chin and A. R. Means, Trends in Cell Biol., 10, 322 (2000).
B. Z. Peterson, C. D. DeMaria and D. T. Yue, Neuron, 22, 549 (1999).
L. Van Eldk and D. M. Watterson, Calmodulin and signal transduction, Academic, San Diego, 1998.
P. Cohen and C. B. Klee, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988.
L. J. van Eldik and D. M. Watterson, eds., Calmodulin and signal transduction, Academic Press, New York, 1998.
Y.S. Babu, C.E. Bugg and W.J. Cook, J. Molec. Bio., 204, 191 (1988).
N. C. J. Strynadka and M. N. G. James, Annu. Rev. Biochem 58, 951 (1989).
J. J. Falke, S. K. Drake et. al. Q. Rev. Biophys., 27, 219 (1994).
M. Ikura, Trends Biochem. Sci., 21, 14 (1996).
A. Crivici and M. Ikura, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 24, 85 (1995).
M. Kataoka, J. Head, B. Seaton and D. Engelman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 86, 6944 (1989).
N. Matsushima, Y. Izumi et al, J. Biochem. 105, 883 (1989).
W. E. Meador, A. R. Means and F. A. Quiocho, Science 257, 1251 (1992).
M. Ikura, Science, 256, 632 (1992).
A. K. Setty and D. M. Zuckerman, in preparation.
J. Clarke and L. S. Itzhaki, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8, 112 (1998).
A. Fersht, Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science, W. H. Freeman & Company, New York (1999).
R. Li and C. Woodward, Protein Sci., 8, 1571 (1999).
L. Hoang et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., 99, 12173 (2002).
A. K. Setty and D. M. Zuckerman, in preparation.
G. Hummer, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 516 (2004).
J. L. Fallon and F. A. Quiocho, Structure 11, 1303 (2003)
Acknowledgment
Funding provided by the UP-GSPH Department of Environmental Occupational Health AND NIH.
Thanks to Marty Ytreberg for useful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Setty, A.K., Zuckerman, D.M. Fast Simulation Protocol for Protein Structural Transitions: Modeling of the Relationship of Structure and Function. MRS Online Proceedings Library 826, 351–363 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-826-V3.5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-826-V3.5