Skip to main content
Log in

Soft Breakdown in Ultra-Thin Oxides

  • Published:
MRS Online Proceedings Library Aims and scope

Abstract

An understanding of dielectric breakdown mechanisms is critical for continued oxide scaling. Although working transistors have been demonstrated with sub-2nm SiO2 gate dielectrics, the manufacturability of such devices hinges on the reliability of the oxide. As oxides become thinner and operating voltages become lower, a fundamentally different mode of dielectric breakdown occurs. This has been called soft breakdown and is considered to be the formation of a small, localized tunneling path through a dielectric. For transistors with 2-nm gate oxides, threshold voltage and maximum transconductance are not affected by soft breakdown, implying that circuits may continue to operate after soft breakdown. The increase in gate current or voltage noise associated with soft breakdown is not a limiting factor for many applications. However, some cases will be shown in which soft breakdown does degrade device function.

In order to make comparisons of ultra-thin oxide quality, it is important to be able to reliably detect soft breakdown. J-ramp, a commonly used ramped-current measurement to determine oxide quality, is unable to detect soft breakdown in ultra-thin oxides. We will demonstrate the incorporation of noise measurements in a commercial J-ramp algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. R. Volters and J. F. Verwey, “Breakdown and Wearout Phenomena in SiO2 Films,” Chap. 6 p. 329, in Instabilities in Silicon Devices. G. M. Barbottin and A. Vapaille Eds., 1986 Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. R. Farmer, R. Saletti, and R. A. Buhrman, Applied Physics Letters Vol. 52, 1988, pp. 1749–1751.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Depas, T. Nigam, and M. M. Heyns, IEEE TED, Vol. 43, No.9, p. 1499, 1996 and References therein.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. B. E. Weir, P. J. Silverman, D. Monroe, K. S. Krisch, M. Alam, G. Alers, T. W. Sorsch, G. L. Timp, F. Baumann, C. T. Liu, Y. Ma, D. Hwang, IEDM Tech. Digest p. 73, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. Crupi, R. Degraeve, G. Groeseneken, T. Nigam, and H. Maes, IEEE TED, Vol. 45, No.11, p. 2329, 1998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Wu, E. Nowak, J. Aitken, W. Abadeer, L. K. Han, and S. Lo, IEDM Tech. Digest p. 187 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. The initial voltage ranged from 5.27-5.32V in all cases except for the 0.04cm2 capacitor which ranged from 5.37-5.42V.

  8. T. Pompl, H. Wurzer, M. Kerber, R. C. W. Wilkins, I. Eisele, IEEE IRPS Proceedings p. 82 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  9. The stress was removed within approximately 30 seconds after the breakdown. In the constant-voltage case, breakdown increases the current and therefore the stress on the oxide, while in constant-current, breakdown decreases the voltage and therefore the stress on the oxide. An interesting experiment would be to remove the stress in a shorter time after breakdown and compare the two cases.

  10. G. B. Alers, B. E. Weir, M. R. Frei, and D. Monroe, IEEE IRPS Proceedings p. 410 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. E. Weir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weir, B.E., Silverman, P.J., Alers, G.B. et al. Soft Breakdown in Ultra-Thin Oxides. MRS Online Proceedings Library 567, 301–306 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-567-301

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-567-301

Navigation