Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Water Diffusion in 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate (HEMA) Gels

  • Published:
MRS Online Proceedings Library Aims and scope

Abstract

A fundamental study focusing on correlating the local water self-diffusion coefficient to the local free water content in 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) gels was conducted. HEMA gels were synthesized with different nominal water content (50to 90%). MRI measurements of local diffusion coefficient distribution and local water content profiles are conducted on a 600 MHz scanner. The local water content is measured via two spin-echo images with sufficiently long repetition time (TR) to eliminate T1-weighting and two values for the echo time (TE) in order to account for T2-weighting. The local diffusion coefficient is determined using a standard pulsed-field gradient spin-echo sequence. The measured local water content and diffusion coefficient data are compared with several single-parameter diffusion models for interstitial diffusion in the hydrogel (Makie-Meares, Stokes-Einstein, Brownian motion around overlapping spheres).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. B. Lee, M. S. Jhon and J. D. Andrade, J. Colloid . Interface Sci. 51, 225–231 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Q. Liu, E. L. Hedberg, Z. Liu, R. Bahulekar, R. K. Meszlenyi, A. G. Mikos, Biomaterials 21, 2163–2169 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. K. A. George, E. Wentrup-Byrne, D. J. T. Hill and A. K. Whittaker, Biomacromolecules 5, 1194–1199 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. E. M. Shapiro, A. Borthakurt, J. H. Kaufman, J. S. Leigh and R. Reddy, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 9, 533–538 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Bammer, European Journal of Radiology 45, 169–184 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Meiboom and D. Gill, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 29, 668–691 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Barbieri, M. Quaglia, M. Delfini and E. Brosio, Polymer 39, 1059–1066 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Le Bihan, Magnetic Resonance Quarterly 7, 1–30 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. S. Mackie and P. Meares, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 232, 498–509 (1955).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Penke, S. Kinsey, S. J. Gibbs, T. S. Moerland, and B. R. Locke, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 132, 240–254 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. I. C. Kim and S. Torquato, Journal of Applied Physics 71, 2727–2735 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. F. Müller-Plathe, Berichte Der Bunsen-Gesellschaft-Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 102, 1679–1982 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. F. Refojo, Journal of Applied Polymer Science 9, 3417–3426 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. G. Hoch, A. Chauhan, and C. J. Radke, Journal of Membrane Science 214, 199–209 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raguin, G., Cibele, V.F., Prakash, S. et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Water Diffusion in 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate (HEMA) Gels. MRS Online Proceedings Library 930, 405 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-0930-JJ04-05

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-0930-JJ04-05

Navigation