Abstract
This paper presents a framework for guiding the design of new materials to enhance the sustainability of systems that utilize these materials throughout their production, use and retirement. Traditionally, materials engineering has focused on the interplay between material microstructure, physical properties, processing, and performance. Environmental impacts related to the system’s life cycle are not well integrated into the materials engineering process. To address this shortcoming, a new methodology has been developed that incorporates social, economic, and environmental indicators – the three dimensions of sustainability. The proposed framework accomplishes this task and provides a critical tool for use across a broad class of materials and applications. Material properties strongly shape and control sustainability performance throughout each life cycle stage including materials production, manufacturing, use and end-of-life management. Key material parameters that influence life cycle energy, emissions, and costs are highlighted. The proposed framework is demonstrated in the design of engineered cementitious composites, which are materials being developed for civil infrastructure applications including bridges, roads, pipe and buildings. This research is part of an NSF MUSES (Materials Use: Science, Engineering and Society) Biocomplexity project on sustainable concrete infrastructure materials and systems (http://sci.umich.edu).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
CSS. 2005 Materials Use Factsheet, Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan, http://css.snre.umich.edu/4_2_Factsheets.htm
ASCE. 2001. Renewing America’s Infrastructure: A Citizen’s Guide. American Society of Civil Engineers. Washington, D.C. pp. 43. http://www.asce.org/pdf/citizens_guide.pdf
TRIP. 2002. Key Facts About America’s Road and Bridge Conditions and Federal Funding. Accessed March 2002 from The Road Information Program (TRIP): http://www.tripnet.org/nationalfactsheet.html
van Oss, H. G. and A. C. Padovani. 2002b. Cement Manufacture and the Environment. Part I: Chemistry and Technology. Journal of Industrial Ecology
UNFPA. 2001. The State of World Population 2001, Chapter 3. Accessed March 2002 from the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA): http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2001/english/ch03.html#3
Hendricks, C.A., E. Worrell, L. Price, N. Martin, L. Ozawa Meida, D. de Jager and P. Reimer. 1998. Emission reduction of greenhouse gases from the cement industry. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies
Worrell, E., L. Price, N. Martin, C. Hendriks and L. Ozawa Meida. 2001. Carbon dioxide emissions from the global cement industry. Annual Reviews of Energy and the Environment
WBCSD. 2002. Toward a Sustainable Cement Industry. Draft report for World Business Council on Sustainable Development. Battelle Memorial Institute. http://www.wbcsd.org/newscenter/reports/2002/cement.pdf
US EPA. 1999. 40 CFR Part 63 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories; Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry; Final Rule. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/pcem/fr14jn99.html
US EPA. 2000. Sources of dioxin-like compounds in the United States. Draft exposure and human health reassessment of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and related compounds. EPA/600/P-00/001 Bb
TRIP. 2001. Stuck in Traffic: How Increasing Traffic Congestion is Putting the Brakes on Economic Growth from. Accessed March 2002 from The Road Information Program (TRIP): http://www.tripnet.org/StuckinTrafficReportMay01.PDF
Kanda, T. and Li. V.C. 1998. Multiple cracking sequence and saturation in fiber reinforced cementitious composites. Japan Concrete Institute Concrete Research and Technology
Li, V.C. 1998. Engineered cementitious composites - tailored composites through micromechanical modeling. Fiber Reinforced Concrete: Present and the Future
Li, V.C. 2003. “On Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) – A Review of the Material and its Applications,” J. Advanced Concrete Technology
Ashby, M. 1992 “Material Selection in Mechanical Design” Butterworth-Heinemann. Oxford, England. pp. 1–303
ISO. 1997. “Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework.” ISO 14040
Office of Management and Budget (2005) Discount Rates for Cost-Effectiveness, Lease, Purchase and Related Analyses. Appendix C to Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs
Weitzman, M. L. (2001) Gamma discounting. American Economic Review,
Gramlich, E. M. (1990) A Guide to Benefit-Cost Analysis,
Li, V.C., Fischer, G., Kim, Y., Lepech, M., Qian, S., Weimann, M., and Wang, S. 2003. “Durable link slabs for jointless bridge decks based on strain-hardening cementitious composites.” Project Report to MDOT.
Li, V.C. 2003. “On Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) – A Review of the Material and its Applications,” J. Advanced Concrete Technology
Liu, Y. and Weyers, R. 1998 “Modeling the Time-to-Corrosion Cracking in Chloride Contaminated Reinforced Concrete Structures” ACI Materials Journal
Nisbet, M. A., et al. 2002. “Environmental Life Cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Concrete: Appendix; Life Cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Manufacture.” Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL.
Ecobilan. 2001. “TEAM/DEAM.” Ecobilan, (PriceWaterhouseCoopers), Rockville, MD.
IISI. 2000. “Worldwide LCI Database for Steel Industry Products.” International Iron and Steel Institute.
KTC. 2002. “The Cost of Construction Delays and Traffic Control for Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Pavements.” KTC-02-07/SPR197-99 & SPR218-00-1F
Kendall, Alissa. 2004. “A Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Comparing Bridge Deck Designs.” Master’s Thesis. University of Michigan.
Keoleian, G.A., Kendall, A., Dettling, J.E., Smith, V.M., Chandler, R.F., Lepech, M.D. and Li, V.C. 2005. Life Cycle Modeling of Concrete Bridge Design: A Comparison of Engineered Cementitious Composite Link Slabs and Conventional Steel Expansion Joints. Journal of Infrastructure Systems.
Ravirala, V. and Grivas, D. 1995. “State Increment Method of Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Highway Management.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Ehlen, M. A. (1997) Life-Cycle Costs of New Construction Materials. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 3,
Ehlen, M. A. (1999) Life-cycle Costs of Fiber-Reinforced-Polymer Bridge Decks. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,
Banzhaf, H. S., W. H. Desvousges, et al. (1996). “Assessing the Externalities of Electricity Generation in the Midwest.” Resource and Energy Economics 18
Matthews, H. S. and L. B. Lave (2000). “Applications of Environmental Valuation for Determining Externality Costs.” Environmental Science and Technology, 24
Tol, R. S. J. (1999). “The Marginal Costs of Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” The Energy Journal 20
U.S. Department of Transportation. “Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design – In Search of Better Investment Decisions.” Report No. FHWA-SA-98-079. Pavement Division Interim Technical Bulletin. September 1998.
Chandler, Richard. 2004. “Life-Cycle Cost Model for Evaluating the Sustainability of Bridge Decks: A Comparison of Conventional Concrete Joints and Engineered Cementitious Composite Link Slabs.” Master’s Thesis. University of Michigan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keoleian, G.A., Kendall, A.M., Lepech, M.D. et al. Guiding the design and application of new materials for enhancing sustainability performance: Framework and infrastructure application. MRS Online Proceedings Library 895, 601 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-0895-G06-01
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-0895-G06-01