Skip to main content
Log in

Development of magnetically active scaffolds as intrinsically-deformable bioreactors

  • Biomaterials for 3D Cell Biology Research Letter
  • Published:
MRS Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cell behavior can be regulated through mechanical signaling, either by dynamic loading or through biomaterial properties. We developed intrinsically responsive tissue engineering scaffolds that can dynamically load cells. Porous collagen- and alginate-based scaffolds were functionalized with iron oxide to produce magnetically active scaffolds. Reversible deformations in response to magnetic stimulation of up to 50% were recorded by tuning the material properties. Cells could attach to these scaffolds and magnetically induced compressive deformation did not adversely affect viability or cause cell release. This platform should have broad application in the mechanical stimulation of cells for tissue engineering applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organisation: Global Health and Ageing (2011). http://www.who.int

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arthritis Research UK: Osteoarthritis in General Practice (2013). http://www.arthritisresearchuk.org

    Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Jiang, B.N. Jahagirdar, R.L. Reinhardt, R.E. Schwartz, C.D. Keene, X.R. Ortiz-Gonzalez, M. Reyes, T. Lenvik, T. Lund, M. Blackstad, J. Du, S. Aldrich, A. Lisberg, W.C. Low, D.A. Largaespada, and C.M. Verfaillie: Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature 418, 41 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. F.J. O’Brien: Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater. Today 14, 88 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M.P. Lutolf and J.A. Hubbell: Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 47 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. N. Plunkett and F.J. O’Brien: Bioreactors in tissue engineering. Technol. Health Care. 19, 55 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J.S. Temenoff and A.G. Mikos: Review: tissue engineering for regeneration of articular cartilage. Biomaterials 21, 431 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Martin and P. Vermette: Bioreactors for tissue mass culture: design, characterization, and recent advances. Biomaterials 26, 7481 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. S.V. Murphy and A. Atala: Organ engineering—combining stem cells, biomaterials, and bioreactors to produce bioengineered organs for transplantation. BioEssays 35, 163 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Hao, Y. Zhang, D. Jing, Y. Shen, G. Tang, S. Huang, and Z. Zhao: Mechanobiology of mesenchymal stem cells: perspective into mechanical induction of MSC fate. Acta Biomater. 20, 1 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. I.L. Ivanovska, J.-W. Shin, J. Swift, and D.E. Discher: Stem cell mechanobiology: diverse lessons from bone marrow. Trends Cell Biol. 25, 523 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M.A. Brady, R. Vaze, H.D. Amin, D.R. Overby, and C.R. Ethier: The design and development of a high-throughput magneto-mechanostimulation device for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng C, Methods 20, 149 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O. Démarteau, D. Wendt, A. Braccini, M. Jakob, D. Schäfer, M. Heberer, and I. Martin: Dynamic compression of cartilage constructs engineered from expanded human articular chondrocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 310, 580 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C.A. Cezar, S.M. Kennedy, M. Mehta, J.C. Weaver, L. Gu, H. Vandenburgh, and D.J. Mooney: Biphasic ferrogels for triggered drug and cell delivery. Adv. Healthcare Mat. 3, 1869 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. C.J. Kearney and D.J. Mooney: Macroscale delivery systems for molecular and cellular payloads. Nat. Mater. 12, 1004 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. X. Zhao, J. Kim, C.A. Cezar, N. Huebsch, K. Lee, K. Bouhadir, and D.J. Mooney: Active scaffolds for on-demand drug and cell delivery. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 67 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. C.A. Cezar, E.T. Roche, H.H. Vandenburgh, G.N. Duda, C.J. Walsh, and D.J. Mooney: Biologic-free mechanically induced muscle regeneration. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 1534 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. F.J. O’Brien, B.A. Harley, I.V. Yannas, and L.J. Gibson: The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials 26, 433 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M.G. Haugh, M.J. Jaasma, and F.J. O’Brien: The effect of dehydrothermal treatment on the mechanical and structural properties of collagen-GAG scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 89A, 363 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. A.D. Augst, H.J. Kong, and D.J. Mooney: Alginate hydrogels as biomaterials. Macromol. Biosc. 6, 623 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. K.Y. Lee and D.J. Mooney: Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Progr. Polym. Sci. 37, 106 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. L.J. Gibson and M.F. Ashby: Cellular Solids (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  23. B.A. Harley, J.H. Leung, E.C.C.M. Silva, and L.J. Gibson: Mechanical characterization of collagen–glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 3, 463 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. R.M. Delaine-Smith and G.C. Reilly: Mesenchymal stem cell responses to mechanical stimuli. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2, 169 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  25. R.M. Schulz and A. Bader: Cartilage tissue engineering and bioreactor systems for the cultivation and stimulation of chondrocytes. Euro. Biophys. J. 36, 539 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support from the TCD MSc program in Bioengineering and Science Foundation Ireland (AMBER, SFI/12/RC/2278). C.J.K. and F.J.O’.B. acknowledge RCSI’s Office of Research and Innovation Seed Fund Award (Grant Number GR 14-0963) and the European Union for a Marie Curie European Reintegration Grant under H2020 (Project Reference 659715). V.N. and C.H. would like to thank the ERC (StG 2DNanocaps) and SFI (PIYRA and AMBER) for their support and the Advanced Microscopy Laboratory, TCD for the provision of their facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cathal J. Kearney.

Supporting Information

Supplementary material

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2017.41.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gilroy, D.A., Hobbs, C., Nicolosi, V. et al. Development of magnetically active scaffolds as intrinsically-deformable bioreactors. MRS Communications 7, 367–374 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2017.41

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2017.41

Navigation