Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:07:44.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

False dilemmas? Or what COVID-19 can teach us about material theory, responsibility and ‘hard power’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2020

Lori Khatchadourian
Lori Khatchadourian*
Affiliation:
Department of Near Eastern Studies, Cornell University, USA (✉ lk323@cornell.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 94 , Issue 378 , December 2020 , pp. 1649 - 1652
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham (NC) & London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, A.M. & Kosiba, S.. 2016. How things act: an archaeology of materials in political life. Archaeological Dialogues 16: 115–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605316641244Google Scholar
Behar, K. (ed.). 2016. Object-oriented feminism. Minneapolis & London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Durham (NC): Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623Google Scholar
Boysen, B. 2018. The embarrassment of being human: a critique of new materialism and object-oriented ontology. Orbis Litterarum 73: 225–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/oli.12174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, C. 2018. Antebellum posthuman: race and materiality in the mid-nineteenth century. New York: Fordham University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1xzh0z9Google Scholar
Fernández-Götz, M., Maschek, D. & Roymans, N. 2020. The dark side of the Empire: Roman expansionism between object agency and predatory regime. Antiquity 94: 1630–1639. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2020.125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, S. 2011. The implications of the new materialisms for feminist epistemology, in Grasswick, H. (ed.) Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science: 69–83. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Ruibal, A. 2019. An archaeology of the contemporary era. London & New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429441752Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 2014. The asymmetries of symmetrical archaeology. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 1: 228–30. https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.v1i2.26674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Z.I. 2015. Outer worlds: the persistence of race in movement ‘beyond the human’. Queer Inhumanisms 21: 215–46.Google Scholar
Khatchadourian, L. 2016. Imperial matter: ancient Persia and the archaeology of empires. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/luminos.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, S. 2011. Bodies in action: corporeal agency and democratic politics. Political Theory 39: 299–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591711400025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laidlaw, J. 2010. Agency and responsibility: perhaps you can have too much of a good thing, in Lambek, M. (ed.) Ordinary ethics: anthropology, language, and action: 143–64. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Rekret, P. 2016. A critique of new materialism: ethics and ontology. Subjectivity 9: 225–45. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-016-0001-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A.T. 2015. The political machine: assembling sovereignty in the Bronze Age Caucasus. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1dr3558Google Scholar
Sunberg, J. 2013. Decolonizing posthumanist geographies. Cultural Geographies 21: 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474013486067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, Z. 2016. An indigenous feminist's take on the ontological turn: ‘ontology’ is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology 29: 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyke, R.M. In press. Ethics not objects. Cambridge Archaeological JournalGoogle Scholar
Versluys, M.J. 2017. Discussion. Object-scapes. Towards a material constitution of Romanness?, in Van Oyen, A. & Pitts, M. (ed.) Materialising Roman histories: 191–99. Havertown (PA): Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weheliye, A. 2014. Habeas viscus: racializing assemblages, biopolitics, and Black feminist theories of the human. Durham (NC): Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822376491Google Scholar
Wynter, S. 2005. On how we mistook the map for the territory, and reimprisoned ourselves in our unbearable wrongness of being, of Desêtre: Black studies toward the human project, in Gordon, L. & Gordon, J. (ed.) Not only the master's tools: African-American studies in theory and practice: 107–69. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996645. ch9Google Scholar