Synthetic draw solutes for forward osmosis: status and future

References

Achilli A, Cath TL, Childress AE. Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: an experimental and theoretical investigation. J Membr Sci 2009; 343: 42–52.10.1016/j.memsci.2009.07.006Search in Google Scholar

Achilli A, Cath TY, Childress AE. Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications. J Membr Sci 2010; 364: 233–241.10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.010Search in Google Scholar

Achilli A, Prante JL, Hancock NT, Maxwell EB, Childress AE. Experimental results from RO-PRO: a next generation system for low-energy desalination. Environ Sci Technol 2016; 48: 6437–6443.10.1021/es405556sSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Adham S, Oppenheimer J, Liu L, Kumar M. Dewatering reverse osmosis concentrate from water reuse applications using forward osmosis. Alexandria, VA: WateReuse Foundation 2007: 1–52.Search in Google Scholar

Adhikari B, Jones MG, Orme CJ, Wendt DS, Wilson AD. Compatibility study of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes with 1-cyclohexylpiperidenium bicarbonate solutions. J Membr Sci 2017; 527: 228–235.10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.017Search in Google Scholar

Akther N, Sodiq A, Giwa A, Daer S, Arafat HA, Hasan SW. Recent advancements in forward osmosis desalination: a review. Chem Eng J 2015; 281: 502–52210.1016/j.cej.2015.05.080Search in Google Scholar

Alejo T, Arruebo M, Carcelenm V, Monsalvo VM, Sebastian V. Advances in draw solutes for forward osmosis: hybrid organic-inorganic nanoparticles and conventional solutes. Chem Eng J 2017; 309: 738–752.10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.079Search in Google Scholar

Alnaizy R, Aidan A, Qasim M. Copper sulfate as draw solute in forward osmosis desalination. Chem Eng J 2013; 1: 424–430.10.1016/j.jece.2013.06.005Search in Google Scholar

Alsvik IL, Hägg MB. Pressure retarded osmosis and forward osmosis membranes: materials and methods. Polymers 2013; 5: 303–327.10.3390/polym5010303Search in Google Scholar

Bai H, Liu Z, Sun DD. Highly water soluble and recovered dextran coated Fe₃O₄ magnetic nanoparticles for brackish water desalination. Sep Purif Technol 2011; 81: 392–399.10.1016/j.seppur.2011.08.007Search in Google Scholar

Bamaga OA, Yokochi A, Zabara B, Babaqi AS. Hybrid FO/RO desalination system: preliminary assessment of osmotic energy recovery and designs of new FO membrane module configurations. Desalination 2011; 268: 163–169.10.1016/j.desal.2010.10.013Search in Google Scholar

Batchelder GW. Process for the demineralization of water. US Patent No. 3171799, 1965.Search in Google Scholar

Bouwer EJ, Crowe PB. Biological processes in drinking water treatment. J Am Water Works Ass 1988; 80: 82–93.10.1002/j.1551-8833.1988.tb03103.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bowden KS, Achilli A, Childress AE. Organic ionic salt draw solutions for osmotic membrane bioreactors. Bioresource Technol 2012; 122: 207–216.10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Cai Y, Hu XM. A critical review on draw solutes development for forward osmosis. Desalination 2016; 391: 16–29.10.1016/j.desal.2016.03.021Search in Google Scholar

Cai Y, Shen W, Loo SL, Krantz WB. Wang R, Fane AG, Hu X. Towards temperature driven forward osmosis desalination using semi-IPN hydrogels as reversible draw agents. Water Res 2013a; 47: 3773–3781.10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Cai Y, Shen W, Wang R, Krantz WB, Fane AG, Hu X. CO₂ switchable dual responsive polymers as draw solutes for forward osmosis desalination. Chem Commun 2013b; 49: 8377–8379.10.1039/c3cc43289kSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Cai Y, Shen W, Wei J, Chong TH, Wang R, Krantz WB, Fane AG, Hu X. Energy-efficient desalination by forward osmosis using responsive ionic liquid draw solutes. Environ Sci: Water Res Technol 2015; 1: 341–347.10.1039/C4EW00073KSearch in Google Scholar

Cath TY, Childress AE, Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J Membr Sci 2006; 281: 70–87.10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.048Search in Google Scholar

Chekli L, Phuntsho S, Shon HK, Vigneswaran S, Kandasamy J, Chanan A. A review of draw solutes in forward osmosis process and their use in modern applications. Desalin Water Treat 2012; 43: 167–184.10.1080/19443994.2012.672168Search in Google Scholar

Chekli L, Kim Y, Phuntsho S, Li S, Ghaffour N, Leiknes T, Shon HK. Evaluation of fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis for sustainable agriculture and water reuse in arid regions. J Environ Manage 2017; 187: 134–145.10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Chou S, Shi L, Wang R, Tang CY, Qiu C, Fane AG. Characteristics and potential applications of a novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membrane. Desalination 2010; 261: 365–372.10.1016/j.desal.2010.06.027Search in Google Scholar

Chung TS, Li X, Ong RC, Ge Q, Wang H, Han G. Emerging forward osmosis (FO) technologies and challenges ahead for clean water and clean energy applications. Curr Opin Chem Eng 2012a; 1: 246–257.10.1016/j.coche.2012.07.004Search in Google Scholar

Chung TS, Zhang S, Wang KY, Su J, Ling MM. Forward osmosis processes: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Desalination 2012b; 287: 78–81.10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.019Search in Google Scholar

Cosgrove WJ, Loucks DP. Water management: current and future challenges and research directions. Water Resour Res 2015; 51: 4823–4839.10.1002/2014WR016869Search in Google Scholar

Cui J, Zhang X, Liu H, Liu S, Yeung KL. Preparation and application of zeolite/ceramic microfiltration membranes for treatment of oil contaminated water. J Membr Sci 2008; 325: 420–426.10.1016/j.memsci.2008.08.015Search in Google Scholar

Cui Y, Ge Q, Liu XY, Chung TS. Novel forward osmosis process to effectively remove heavy metal ions. J Membr Sci 2014a; 467: 188–194.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.034Search in Google Scholar

Cui Y, Liu XY, Chung TS. Enhanced osmotic energy generation from salinity gradients by modifying thin film composite membranes. Chem Eng J 2014b; 242: 195–203.10.1016/j.cej.2013.12.078Search in Google Scholar

Dey P, Izake EL. Magnetic nanoparticles boosting the osmotic efficiency of a polymeric FO draw agent: effect of polymer conformation. Desalination 2015; 373: 79–85.10.1016/j.desal.2015.07.010Search in Google Scholar

Gabelich CJ, Williams MD, Rahardianto A, Franklin JC, Cohen Y. High-recovery reverse osmosis desalination using intermediate chemical demineralization. J Membr Sci 2007; 301: 131–141.10.1016/j.memsci.2007.06.007Search in Google Scholar

Gao W, Liang H, Ma J, Han M, Chen ZL, Han ZS, Li GB. Membrane fouling control in ultrafiltration technology for drinking water production: a review. Desalination 2011; 272: 1–8.10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.051Search in Google Scholar

Gary GT, McCutcheon JR, Elimelech M. Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation. Desalination 2006; 197: 1–8.10.1016/j.desal.2006.02.003Search in Google Scholar

Ge Q, Chung TS. Hydroacid complexes: a new class of draw solutes to promote forward osmosis (FO) processes. Chem Commun 2013; 49: 8471–8473.10.1039/c3cc43951hSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Ge Q, Chung TS. Oxalic acid complexes: promising draw solutes for forward osmosis (FO) in protein enrichment. Chem Commun 2015; 51: 4854–4857.10.1039/C5CC00168DSearch in Google Scholar

Ge Q, Su J, Chung TS, Amy G. Hydrophilic superparamagnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and performance in forward osmosis processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 2011; 50: 382–388.10.1021/ie101013wSearch in Google Scholar

Ge Q, Wang P, Wan C, Chung TS. Polyelectrolyte-promoted forward osmosis-membrane distillation (FO-MD) hybrid process for dye wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 2012a; 46: 6236–6243.10.1021/es300784hSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Ge Q, Su J, Amy GL, Chung TS. Exploration of polyelectrolytes as draw solutes in forward osmosis processes. Water Res 2012b; 46: 1318–1326.10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.043Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ge Q, Ling MM, Chung TS. Draw solutions for forward osmosis processes: developments, challenges, and prospects for the future. J Membr Sci 2013; 442: 225–237.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.046Search in Google Scholar

Ge Q, Fu F, Chung TS. Ferric and cobaltous hydroacid complexes for forward osmosis (FO) processes. Water Res 2014; 58: 230–238.10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.024Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ge Q, Yang L, Cai J, Xu W, Chen Q, Liu M. Hydroacid magnetic nanoparticles in forward osmosis for seawater desalination and efficient regeneration via integrated magnetic and membrane separations. J Membr Sci 2016a; 520: 550–559.10.1016/j.memsci.2016.07.033Search in Google Scholar

Ge Q, Han G, Chung TS. Effective As(III) removal by a multi-charged hydroacid complex draw solute facilitated forward osmosis-membrane distillation (FO-MD) processes. Environ Sci Technol 2016b; 50: 2363–2370.10.1021/acs.est.5b05402Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ge Q, Amy GL, Chung TS. Forward osmosis for oily wastewater reclamation: multi-charged oxalic acid complexes as draw solutes. Water Res 2017; 122: 580–590.10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.025Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Glew DN. Process for liquid recovery and solution concentration. US Patent No. 3216930, 1965.Search in Google Scholar

Guo CX, Huang S, Lu X. A solventless thermolysis route to large-scale production of ultra-small hydrophilic and biocompatible magnetic ferrite nanocrystals and their application for efficient protein enrichment. Green Chem 2014a; 16: 2571–2579.10.1039/c3gc42645aSearch in Google Scholar

Guo CX, Zhao D, Zhao Q, Wang P, Lu X. Na⁺-functionalized carbon quantum dots: a new draw solute in forward osmosis for seawater desalination. Chem Commun 2014b; 50: 7318–7321.10.1039/c4cc01603cSearch in Google Scholar

Han G, Ge Q, Chung TS. Conceptual demonstration of novel closed-loop pressure retarded osmosis process for sustainable osmotic energy generation. Appl Energy 2014; 132: 383–393.10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.029Search in Google Scholar

Hao R, Xing R, Xu Z, Hou Y, Gao S, Sun S. Synthesis, functionalization, and biomedical applications of multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles. Adv Mater 2010; 22: 2729–2742.10.1002/adma.201000260Search in Google Scholar

Hartanto Y, Yun S, Jin B, Dai S. Functionalized thermo-responsive microgels for high performance forward osmosis desalination. Water Res 2015; 70: 385–393.10.1016/j.watres.2014.12.023Search in Google Scholar

Hau NT, Chen SS, Nguyen NC, Huang KZ, Ngo HH, Guo W. Exploration of EDTA sodium salt as novel draw solution in forward osmosis process for dewatering of high nutrient sludge. J Membr Sci 2014; 455: 305–311.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.068Search in Google Scholar

Hough WT. Process for extracting solvent from a solution. US Patent No. 3532621, 1970.Search in Google Scholar

Huang M, Chen Y, Huang CH, Sun P, Crittenden J. Rejection and adsorption of trace pharmaceuticals by coating a forward osmosis membrane with TiO₂. Chem Eng J 2015; 279: 904–911.10.1016/j.cej.2015.05.078Search in Google Scholar

Ivnitsky H, Minz D, Kautsky L, Preis A, Ostfeld A. Biofouling formation and modeling in nanofiltration membranes applied to wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci 2010; 360: 165–173.10.1016/j.memsci.2010.05.007Search in Google Scholar

Jessop PG, Mercer SM, Heldebrant DJ. CO₂-triggered switchable solvents, surfactants, and other materials. Energy Environ Sci 2012; 5: 7240–7253.10.1039/c2ee02912jSearch in Google Scholar

Kessler JO, Moody CD. Drinking water from sea water by forward osmosis. Desalination 1976; 18: 297–306.10.1016/S0011-9164(00)84119-3Search in Google Scholar

Kim YC, Elimelech M. Potential of osmotic power generation by pressure retarded osmosis using seawater as feed solution: analysis and experiments. J Membr Sci 2013; 429: 330–337.10.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.039Search in Google Scholar

Kim SD, Cho J, Kim IS, Vanderford BJ, Snyder SA. Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors in South Korean surface, drinking, and waste waters. Water Res 2007; 41: 1013–1021.10.1016/j.watres.2006.06.034Search in Google Scholar

Kim JJ, Chung JS, Kang H, Yu YA, Choi WJ, Kim HJ, Lee JC. Thermo-responsive copolymers with ionic group as novel draw solutes for forward osmosis processes. Macromol Res 2014; 22: 963–970.10.1007/s13233-014-2142-6Search in Google Scholar

Kim DI, Kim J, Shon HK, Hong S. Pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) for integrating seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation: energy consumption and fouling. J Membr Sci 2015; 483: 34–41.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.02.025Search in Google Scholar

Kim JJ, Kang H, Choi YS, Yu YA, Lee JC. Thermo-responsive oligomeric poly(tetrabutylphosphonium styrenesulfonate)s as draw solutes for forward osmosis (FO) applications. Desalination 2016; 381: 84–94.10.1016/j.desal.2015.11.013Search in Google Scholar

Kravath RE, Davis JA. Desalination of sea water by direct osmosis. Desalination 1975; 16: 151–155.10.1016/S0011-9164(00)82089-5Search in Google Scholar

Kuylenstierna JL, Björklund G, Najlis P. Sustainable water future with global implications: everyone’s responsibility. Nat Resour Forum 1997; 21: 181–190.10.1111/j.1477-8947.1997.tb00691.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Laohaprapanon S, Fu YJ, Hu CC, You SJ, Tsai HA, Hung WS, Lee KR, Lai JY. Evaluation of a natural polymer-based cationic polyelectrolyte as a draw solute in forward osmosis. Desalination 2017; 421: 72–78.10.1016/j.desal.2017.04.027Search in Google Scholar

Lee S, Boo C, Elimelech M, Hong S. Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO). J Membr Sci 2010; 365: 34–39.10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.036Search in Google Scholar

Lee KP, Arnot TC, Mattia D. A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalination – development to date and future potential. J Membr Sci 2011; 370: 1–22.10.1016/j.memsci.2010.12.036Search in Google Scholar

Lewis GN. The osmotic pressure of concentrated solutions, and the laws of the perfect solution. J Am Chem Soc 1908; 30: 668–683.10.1021/ja01947a002Search in Google Scholar

Li D, Wang H. Smart draw agents for emerging forward osmosis application. J Mater Chem 2013; 1: 14049–14060.10.1039/c3ta12559aSearch in Google Scholar

Li D, Zhang X, Yao J, Simon GP, Wang H. Stimuli-responsive polymer hydrogels as a new class of draw agent for forward osmosis desalination. Chem Commun 2011a; 47: 1710–1712.10.1039/c0cc04701eSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Li D, Zhang X, Yao J, Zeng Y, Simon GP, Wang H. Composite polymer hydrogels as draw agents in forward osmosis and solar dewatering. Soft Matter 2011b; 7: 10048–10056.10.1039/c1sm06043kSearch in Google Scholar

Li ZY, Yangali-Quintanilla V, Valladares-Linares R, Li Q, Zhan T, Amy G. Flux patterns and membrane fouling propensity during desalination of seawater by forwards osmosis. Water Res 2012; 46: 195–204.10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.051Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Li D, Zhang X, Simon GP, Wang H. Forward osmosis desalination using polymer hydrogels as a draw agent: influence of draw agent, feed solution and membrane on process performance. Water Res 2013; 47: 209–215.10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.049Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Li D, Yan Y, Wang H. Recent advances in polymer and polymer composite membranes for reverse and forward osmosis processes. Prog Polym Sci 2016; 61: 104–155.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.03.003Search in Google Scholar

Liang CZ, Sun SP, Zhao BW, Chung TS. Integration of nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes with coagulation/flocculation to treat colored wastewater from a dyestuff manufacturer: a pilot scale study. Ind Eng Chem Res 2015; 54: 11159–11166.10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03193Search in Google Scholar

Ling MM, Chung TS. Novel dual-stage FO system for sustainable protein enrichment using nanoparticles as intermediate draw solutes. J Membr Sci 2011a; 372: 201–209.10.1016/j.memsci.2011.02.003Search in Google Scholar

Ling MM, Chung TS. Desalination process using super hydrophilic nanoparticles via forward osmosis integrated with ultrafiltration regeneration. Desalination 2011b; 278: 194–202.10.1016/j.desal.2011.05.019Search in Google Scholar

Ling MM, Chung TS. Surface-dissociated nanoparticle draw solutions in forward osmosis and the regeneration in an integrated electric field and nanofiltration system. Ind Eng Chem Res 2012; 51: 15463–15471.10.1021/ie302331hSearch in Google Scholar

Ling MM, Wang KY, Chung TS. Highly water-soluble magnetic nanoparticles as novel draw solutes in forward osmosis for water reuse. Ind Eng Chem Res 2010; 49: 5869–5876.10.1021/ie100438xSearch in Google Scholar

Ling MM, Chung TS, Lu X. Facile synthesis of thermosensitive magnetic nanoparticles as “smart” draw solutes in forward osmosis. Chem Commun 2011; 47: 10788–10790.10.1039/c1cc13944dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Long Q, Wang Y. Sodium tetraethylenepentamine heptaacetate as novel draw solute for forward osmosis-synthesis. Energies 2015; 8: 12917–12928.10.3390/en81112344Search in Google Scholar

Long Q, Qi G, Wang Y. Synthesis and application of ethylenediamine tetrapropionic salt as a novel draw solute for forward osmosis application. AIChE J 2015; 61: 1309–1321.10.1002/aic.14720Search in Google Scholar

Long Q, Qi G, Wang Y. Evaluation of renewable gluconate salts as draw solutes in forward osmosis process. Sust Chem Eng 2016; 4: 85–93.10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00784Search in Google Scholar

Lu AH, Salabas EL, Schüth F. Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, protection, functionalization, and application. Angew Chem Int Ed 2007; 46: 1222–1244.10.1002/anie.200602866Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Matilainen A, Vepsäläinen M, Sillanpää M. Natural organic matter removal by coagulation during drinking water treatment: a review. Adv Colloid Interfac 2010; 159: 189–197.10.1016/j.cis.2010.06.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

McCutcheon JR, Elimelech M. Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2006; 284: 237–247.10.1016/j.memsci.2006.07.049Search in Google Scholar

McCutcheon JR, McGinnis RL, Elimelech M. Osmotic desalination process. US Patent No. 6391205, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

McCutcheon JR, McGinnis RL, Elimelech M. A novel ammonia – carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process. Desalination 2005; 174: 1–11.10.1016/j.desal.2004.11.002Search in Google Scholar

McCutcheon JR, McGinnis RL, Elimelech M. Desalination by ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis: influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance. J Membr Sci 2006; 278: 114–123.10.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.048Search in Google Scholar

McGinnis RL, Elimelech M. Global challenges in energy and water supply: the promise of engineered osmosis. Environ Sci Technol 2008; 42: 8625–8629.10.1021/es800812mSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

McGinnis R, McGurgan G. Forward osmosis membranes. US Patent No. 818794, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

McGinnis RL, McCutcheon JR, Elimelech M. A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide osmotic heat engine for power generation. J Membr Sci 2007; 305: 13–19.10.1016/j.memsci.2007.08.027Search in Google Scholar

Na Y, Yang S, Lee S. Evaluation of citrate-coated magnetic nanoparticles as draw solute for forward osmosis. Desalination 2014; 347: 34–42.10.1016/j.desal.2014.04.032Search in Google Scholar

Neff RA. Solvent extractor. US Patent No. 3130156, 1964.Search in Google Scholar

Noh M, Mok Y, Lee S, Kim H, Lee SH, Jin GW, Seo JH, Koo H, Park TH, Lee Y. Novel lower critical solution temperature phase transition materials effectively control osmosis by mild temperature changes. Chem Commun 2012; 48: 3845–3847.10.1039/c2cc30890hSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Orme CJ, Wilson AD. 1-Cyclohexylpiperidine as a thermolytic draw solute for osmotically driven membrane processes. Desalination 2015; 371: 126–133.10.1016/j.desal.2015.05.024Search in Google Scholar

Ou R, Wang Y, Wang H, Xu T. Thermo-sensitive polyelectrolytes as draw solutions in forward osmosis process. Desalination 2013; 318: 48–55.10.1016/j.desal.2013.03.022Search in Google Scholar

Panwar NL, Kaushik SC, Kothari S. Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: a review. Renew Sust Energy Rev 2011; 15: 1513–1524.10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.037Search in Google Scholar

Park SY, Ahn HW, Chung JW, Kwak SY. Magnetic core-hydrophilic shell nanosphere as stability-enhanced draw solute for forward osmosis (FO) application. Desalination 2016; 397: 22–29.10.1016/j.desal.2016.06.017Search in Google Scholar

Phillip WA, Yong JS, Elimelech M. Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. Environ Sci Technol 2010; 44: 5170–5176.10.1021/es100901nSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Phuntsho S, Shon HK, Hong S, Lee S, Vigneswaran S. A novel low energy fertilizer driven forward osmosis desalination for direct fertigation: evaluating the performance of fertilizer draw solutions. J Membr Sci 2011; 375: 172–181.10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.038Search in Google Scholar

Phuntsho S, Shon HK, Majeed T, Saliby IE, Vigneswaran S, Kandasamy J, Hong S, Lee S. Blended fertilizers as draw solutions for fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis desalination. Environ Sci Technol 2012; 46: 4567–4575.10.1021/es300002wSearch in Google Scholar

Qdais HA, Moussa H. Removal of heavy metals from wastewater by membrane processes: a comparative study. Desalination 2004; 64: 105–110.10.1016/S0011-9164(04)00169-9Search in Google Scholar

Rahardianto A, Gao J, Gabelich CJ, Williams MD, Cohen Y. High recovery membrane desalting of low-salinity brackish water: integration of accelerated precipitation softening with membrane RO. J Membr Sci 2007; 289: 123–137.10.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.043Search in Google Scholar

Razmjou A, Liu Q, Simon GP, Wang H. Bifunctional polymer hydrogel layers as forward osmosis draw agents for continuous production of fresh water using solar energy. Environ Sci Technol 2013a; 47: 13160–13166.10.1021/es403266ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Razmjou A, Barati MR, Simon GP, Suzuki K, Wang H. Fast deswelling of nanocomposite polymer hydrogels via magnetic field-induced heating for emerging FO desalination. Environ Sci Technol 2013b; 47: 6297–6305.10.1021/es4005152Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Reimund KK, Coscia BJ, Arena JT, Wilson AD, McCutcheon JR. Characterization and membrane stability study for the switchable polarity solvent N,N-dimethylcyclohexylamine as a draw solute in forward osmosis. J Membr Sci 2016; 501: 93–99.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.039Search in Google Scholar

She Q, Wang R, Fane AG, Tang CY. Membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes: a review. J Membr Sci 2016; 499: 201–233.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.040Search in Google Scholar

Sirivedhin T, McCue J, Dallbauman L. Reclaiming produced water for beneficial use: salt removal by electrodialysis. J Membr Sci 2004; 243: 335–343.10.1016/j.memsci.2004.06.038Search in Google Scholar

Stone ML, Rae C, Stewart FF, Wilson AD. Switchable polarity solvents as draw solutes for forward osmosis. Desalination 2013a; 312: 124–129.10.1016/j.desal.2012.07.034Search in Google Scholar

Stone ML, Wilson AD, Harrup MK, Stewart FF. An initial study of hexavalent phosphazene salts as draw solutes in forward osmosis. Desalination 2013b; 312: 130–136.10.1016/j.desal.2012.09.030Search in Google Scholar

Su J, Chung TS, Helmer BJ, Wit JS. Enhanced double-skinned FO membranes with inner dense layer for wastewater treatment and macromolecule recycle using sucrose as draw solute. J Membr Sci 2012; 396: 92–100.10.1016/j.memsci.2012.01.001Search in Google Scholar

Sukitpaneenit P, Chung TS. High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes with macrovoid-free and highly porous structure for sustainable water production. Environ Sci Technol 2012; 46: 7358–7365.10.1021/es301559zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Van der Bruggen B, Luis P. Forward osmosis: understanding the hype. Rev Chem Eng 2015; 31: 1–12.10.1515/revce-2014-0033Search in Google Scholar

Wan CF, Chung TS. Osmotic power generation by pressure retarded osmosis using seawater brine as the draw solution and wastewater retentate as the feed. J Membr Sci 2015; 479: 148–158.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.12.036Search in Google Scholar

Wang P, Cui Y, Ge Q, Tew TF, Chung TS. Evaluation of hydroacid complex in the forward osmosis-membrane distillation (FO-MD) system for desalination. J Membr Sci 2015; 494: 1–7.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.07.022Search in Google Scholar

Wang Y, Yu H, Xie R, Zhao K, Ju X, Wang W, Liu Z, Chu L. An easily recoverable thermo-sensitive polyelectrolyte as draw agent for forward osmosis process. Chinese J Chem Eng 2016; 24: 86–93.10.1016/j.cjche.2015.11.015Search in Google Scholar

Wang ZX, Yang XB, Cheng ZJ, Liu YY, Shao L, Jiang L. Simply realizing “water diode” Janus membranes for multifunctional smart applications. Mater Horiz 2017a; 4: 701–708.10.1039/C7MH00216ESearch in Google Scholar

Wang J, Pathak N, Chekli L, Phuntsho S, Kim Y, Li D, Shon HK. Performance of a novel fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis aerobic membrane bioreactor (FDFO-MBR): mitigating salinity build-up by integrating microfiltration. Water 2017b; 9: 1–13.10.3390/w9010021Search in Google Scholar

Warne B, Buscall R, Mayers E, Oriard T, Norris I. GB Patent No. 2464956, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Westerhoff P, Moon H, Minakata D, Crittenden J. Oxidation of organics in retentates from reverse osmosis wastewater reuse facilities. Water Res 2009; 43: 3992–3998.10.1016/j.watres.2009.04.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Wilson AD. Design of the next-generation FO draw solution. In: Wang P, editor. Rational design of next-generation nanomaterials and nanodevices for water applications. London, UK: International Water Association (IWA) Publishing, 2016: 103–130.Search in Google Scholar

Xia QC, Wang J, Wan X, Chen BZ, Guo JL, Jia TZ, Sun SP. A hydrophilicity gradient control mechanism for fabricating delamination-free dual-layer membranes. J Membr Sci 2017; 539: 392–402.10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.021Search in Google Scholar

Xu YC, Tang YP, Liu LF, Guo ZH, Shao L. Naonocomposite organic solvent nanofiltration membranes by a highly-efficient mussel-inspired co-deposition strategy. J Membr Sci 2017a; 526: 32–42.10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.026Search in Google Scholar

Xu W, Chen Q, Ge Q. Recent advances in forward osmosis (FO) membrane: chemical modifications on membranes for FO processes. Desalination 2017b; 419: 101–116.10.1016/j.desal.2017.06.007Search in Google Scholar

Yang Q, Wang KY, Chung TS. Dual-layer hollow fibers with enhanced flux as forward osmosis membranes for water reuses and protein enrichment. US Patent No. 20110266223, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Yang HM, Lee KW, Moon JK. Synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles as a draw solute in forward osmosis membrane process for the treatment of radioactive liquid waste. Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting Gwangju 2013; 30–31.Search in Google Scholar

Yasukawa M, Tanaka Y, Takahashi T, Shibuya M, Mishima S, Matsuyama H. Effect of molecular weight of draw solute on water permeation in forward osmosis process. Ind Eng Chem Res 2015; 54: 8239–8246.10.1021/acs.iecr.5b01960Search in Google Scholar

Yen SK, Haja NFM, Su M, Wang KY, Chung TS. Study of draw solutes using 2-methylimidazole-based compounds in forward osmosis. J Membr Sci 2010; 364: 242–252.10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.021Search in Google Scholar

Yong JS, Phillip WA, Elimelech M. Coupled reverse draw solute permeation and water flux in forward osmosis with neutral draw solutes. J Membr Sci 2012; 392–393: 9–17.10.1016/j.memsci.2011.11.020Search in Google Scholar

Zeng Y, Qiu L, Wang K, Yao J, Li D, Simon GP, Wang R, Wang H. Significantly enhanced water flux in forward osmosis desalination with polymer-graphene composite hydrogels as a draw agent. RSC Adv 2013; 3: 887–894.10.1039/C2RA22173JSearch in Google Scholar

Zhang C, Li P, Cao B, Electrospun microfibrous membranes based on PIM-1/POSS with high oil wettability for separation of oil-water mixtures and cleanup of oil soluble contaminants. Ind Eng Chem Res 2015a; 54: 8772–8781.10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02321Search in Google Scholar

Zhang H, Li J, Cui H, Li H, Yang F. Forward osmosis using electric-responsive polymer hydrogels as draw agents: influence of freezing-thawing cycles, voltage, feed solutions on process performance. Chem Eng J 2015b; 259: 814–819.10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.065Search in Google Scholar

Zhang J, Northcott K, Duke M, Scales P, Gray SR. Influence of pre-treatment combinations on RO membrane fouling. Desalination 2016; 393: 120–126.10.1016/j.desal.2016.02.020Search in Google Scholar

Zhang YQ, Yang XB, Wang ZX, Long J, Shao L. Designing multifunctional 3D magnetic foam for effective insoluble oil separation and rapid selective dye removal for use in wastewater remediation. J Mater Chem A 2017; 5: 7316–7325.10.1039/C6TA11252HSearch in Google Scholar

Zhao Q, Chen N, Zhao D, Lu X. Thermoresponsive magnetic nanoparticles for seawater desalination. Appl Mater Interfaces 2013; 5: 11453–11461.10.1021/am403719sSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Zhao D, Wang P, Zhao Q, Chen N, Lu X. Thermoresponsive copolymer-based draw solution for seawater desalination in a combined process of forward osmosis and membrane distillation. Desalination 2014a; 348: 26–32.10.1016/j.desal.2014.06.009Search in Google Scholar

Zhao D, Chen S, Wang P, Zhao Q, Lu X. A dendrimer-based forward osmosis draw solute for seawater desalination. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014b; 53: 16170–16175.10.1021/ie5031997Search in Google Scholar

Zhao D, Chen S, Guo CX, Zhao Q, Lu X. Multi-functional forward osmosis draw solutes for seawater desalination. Chinese J Chem Eng 2016a; 24: 23–30.10.1016/j.cjche.2015.06.018Search in Google Scholar

Zhao Y, Ren Y, Wang X, Xiao P, Tian E, Wang X, Li J. An initial study of EDTA complex based draw solutes in forward osmosis process. Desalination 2016b; 378: 28–36.10.1016/j.desal.2015.09.006Search in Google Scholar

Zhong Y, Feng X, Chen W, Wang X, Huang KW, Gnanou Y, Lai Z. Using UCST ionic liquid as a draw solute in forward osmosis to treat high-salinity water. Environ Sci Technol 2016; 50: 1039–1045.10.1021/acs.est.5b03747Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Zhou A, Luo H, Wang Q, Chen L, Zhang TC, Tao T. Magnetic thermoresponsive ionic nanogels as novel draw agents in forward osmosis. RCS Adv 2015; 5: 15359–15365.10.1039/C4RA12102CSearch in Google Scholar

Zou S, He Z. Enhancing wastewater reuse by forward osmosis with self-diluted commercial fertilizers as draw solutes. Water Res 2016; 99: 235–243.10.1016/j.watres.2016.04.067Search in Google Scholar PubMed