Abstract
Languages have diverse strategies for marking agentivity and number. These strategies are negotiated to create combinatorial systems. We consider the emergence of these strategies by studying features of movement in a young sign language in Nicaragua (NSL). We compare two age cohorts of Nicaraguan signers (NSL1 and NSL2), adult homesigners in Nicaragua (deaf individuals creating a gestural system without linguistic input), signers of American and Italian Sign Languages (ASL and LIS), and hearing individuals asked to gesture silently. We find that all groups use movement axis and repetition to encode agentivity and number, suggesting that these properties are grounded in action experiences common to all participants. We find another feature – unpunctuated repetition – in the sign systems (ASL, LIS, NSL, Homesign) but not in silent gesture. Homesigners and NSL1 signers use the unpunctuated form, but limit its use to No-Agent contexts; NSL2 signers use the form across No-Agent and Agent contexts. A single individual can thus construct a marker for number without benefit of a linguistic community (homesign), but generalizing this form across agentive conditions requires an additional step. This step does not appear to be achieved when a linguistic community is first formed (NSL1), but requires transmission across generations of learners (NSL2).
References
Anderson, Stephen. 1992. A-morphous Morphology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511586262Search in Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar
Benedicto, Elena, Diane Brentari. 2004. Where did all the arguments go?: Argument-Changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22, pp. 743-810. Search in Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane. 1998. A Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5644.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane, Marie Coppola, Laura Mazzoni, Susan Goldin-Meadow et al. 2012. When does a system become phonological? Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and homesigners. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30, pp. 1-31. Search in Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane, Marie Coppola, Ashley Jung, Susan Goldin-Meadow et al. 2013. Acquiring word class distinctions in American Sign Language. Language Learning and Development 9, pp. 130-150. Search in Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane, Marie Coppola. 2013. What sign language creation teaches us about language. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 4, pp. 201–211. Search in Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane, Alessio Di Renzo, Jonathan Keane, Virginia Volterra et al. 2015. Cognitive, Cultural and Linguistic Sources of a Handshape Distinction Expressing Agentivity. TopiCS 7, pp. 95-123. Search in Google Scholar
Carrigan, Emily, Marie Coppola. 2013. Mothers do not drive structure in adult homesign systems: Evidence from comprehension.In N. Miyake, D. Peebles, R. Cooper, et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Sapporo, Japan: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1398-1403. Search in Google Scholar
Coppola, Marie, Elissa Newport. 2005. Grammatical Subjects in home sign: Abstract linguistic structure in adult primary gesture systems without linguistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102, pp. 19249-19253. Search in Google Scholar
Coppola, Marie, Elizabet Spaepen, Susan Goldin-Meadow et al. 2013. Communicating about number without a language model: Number devices in homesign grammar. Cognitive Psychology 67, pp. 1-25. Search in Google Scholar
Coppola, Marie, Diane Brentari 2014. From iconic handshapes to grammatical constrasts: longitudinal evidence from a child homesigner. Frontiers in Psychology 5, pp. 1-23. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00830Search in Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 2000. Number. Cambridge, UK ; New York: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Crasborn, Otto, Han Sloetjes. 2008. Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora, in Proceedings of LREC, Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Search in Google Scholar
De Vos, Connie. 2013. Sign-spatiality in Kata Kolok: How a village sign language in Bali inscribes its signing space. PhD Thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen. 10.1075/sll.16.2.08vosSearch in Google Scholar
ELAN. EUDICO Linguistic Annotator. Available online at: http://tla.mpi.nl/tools/tla-tools/elan/ Search in Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen, Melissa Herzig. 2003. Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign language. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 10.4324/9781410607447Search in Google Scholar
Gershkoff-Stowe, Lisa, Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2002. Is there a natural order for expressing semantic relations? Cognitive Psychology 45, pp. 375-412. Search in Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 2003. The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. In J. Werker, H. Wellman et al (eds.), Essays in Developmental Psychology series. New York: Psychology Press. Search in Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 2015. The impact of time on predicate forms in the manual modality: Signers, homesigners, and silent gesturers. TopICS 7 (2015), pp. 169-184. doi 10.1111/tops.12119. Search in Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Carolyn Mylander 1984. Gestural communication in deaf children: the effects and noneffects of parental input on early language development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 49, pp. 1-151. 10.2307/1165838Search in Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Butcher, Cynthia, Carolyn Mylander, Mark Dodge et al. 1994. Nouns and Verbs in a Self-Styled Gesture System: What’s in a Name? Cognitive Psychology 27, pp. 259-319. Search in Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Carolyn Mylander, Cynthia Butcher et al. 1995. The resilience of combinatorial structure at the word level: Morphology in self-styled gesture systems. Cognition 56, pp. 195-262. 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00662-ISearch in Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, David McNeill, Jenny Singleton et al. 1996. Silence is liberating: Removing the handcuffs, on grammatical expression in the manual modality. Psychological Review 103, pp. 34-55. Search in Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Carolyn Mylander. 1998. Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures. Nature 391, pp. 279-281. Search in Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Carolyn Mylander, Amy Franklin et al. 2007. How children make language out of gesture: Morphological structure in gesture systems developed by American and Chinese deaf children. Cognitive Psychology 55, pp. 87-135. Search in Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Asli Ozyurek, B. Sancar, Carolyn Mylander et al. 2009. Making language around the globe: A cross-linguistic study of homesign in the United States, China, and Turkey. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig & S. Ervin-Tripp et al. (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis, pp. 27-39. Search in Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Diane Brentari, Marie Coppola, Laura Horton, Ann Senghas et al. 2015. Watching language grow in the manual modality: Nominals, predicates and handshapes. Cognition 136, pp. 381-395. 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.029Search in Google Scholar
Janis, Wynne. 1992. Morphosyntax of the ASL verb phrase. PhD thesis. Buffalo, New York: State University of New York, USA. Search in Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy. 1990. Predicate argument structure and verb-class organization in the ASL lexicon. In C. Lucas, ed., Sign language research: Theoretical issues. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press, pp. 149–175. Search in Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy, Gail Iwata. 1989. Lenguaje de Signos Nicaraguense: A pidgin sheds light on the “creole”? ASL. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Pacific Linguistics Conference. University of Oregon, Eugene. Search in Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy, Ann Senghas, Marie Coppola, et al. 1999. Creation through contact: Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In M. DeGraff (ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization diachrony, and development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp, 179–237. Search in Google Scholar
Malaia, E., Wilbur, R. B., & Milković, M. (2013). Kinematic Parameters of Signed Verbs. Journal Of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 56(5), pp. 1677-1688. 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0257)Search in Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter. 1991. Morphology (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics), 2nd Ed. New York: Cambridge University. Search in Google Scholar
Meir, Irit, Wendy Sandler, Carol Padden, Mark Aronoff et al. 2010. Emerging Sign Languages. In M. Marschark and P. Spencer (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language, and Education, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195390032.013.0018Search in Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1991. Active/ agentive case marking and its motivations. Language 67, pp. 510-546. Search in Google Scholar
Nyst, Victoria. 2010. Sign Language Varieties in West Africa. In D. Brentari, ed. Sign Languages: A Cambridge language survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 405-432. Search in Google Scholar
Ozyurek, Asli, Reyhan Furman, Susan Goldin-Meadow et al. 2015. On the way to language: Event segmentation in homesign and gesture. Journal of Child Language 42, pp. 64-94. Search in Google Scholar
Padden, Carol, Irit Meir, Mark Aronoff, Wendy Sandler et al. 2010. The grammar of space in two new sign languages. In D. Brentari (ed.), Sign Languages: A Cambridge Language Survey. New York: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1991. The syntax of event structure. Cognition 41, pp. 47-81. Search in Google Scholar
Polich, Laura. 2005. The emergence of the deaf community in Nicaragua: “With sign langauge you can learn so much”. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland, Marcus Steinbach. 2006. Pluralization in sign and in speech: A cross-modal typological study. Linguistic Typology 10, pp. 49–135. Search in Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Carol Padden, Mark Aronoff et al. 2005. The emergence of grammar in a new sign language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, pp. 2661-2665. Search in Google Scholar
Senghas, Ann. 2003. Intergenerational influence and ontogenetic development in the emergence of spatial grammar in Nicaraguan Sign Language. Cognitive Development 18, pp. 511–531. Search in Google Scholar
Senghas, Ann, Marie Coppola. 2001. Children creating language: How Nicaraguan Sign Language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science 12, pp. 323-328. Search in Google Scholar
Singleton, Jenny, Elissa Newport. 2004. When learners surpass their models: The acquisition of American Sign Language from inconsistent input. Cognitive Psychology 49, pp. 370-407. Search in Google Scholar
Singleton, Jenny, Jill Morford, Susan Goldin-Meadow et al. 1993. Once is not enough: Standards of well-formedness in manual communication created over three different timespans. Language 69, pp. 683-715. 10.2307/416883Search in Google Scholar
Stokoe, William. 1960. Sign Language Structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. In, Studies in linguistics. Occasional papers; 8. Buffalo: Dept. of Anthropology and Linguistics, University of Buffalo. Search in Google Scholar
Strickland, B., Geraci, C., Chemla, E., Schlenker, P., Kelepir, M., & Pfau, R. (2015). Event representations constrain the structure of language: Sign language as a window into universally accessible linguistic biases. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America, 112(19). p. 5968. 10.1073/pnas.1423080112Search in Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted. 1982. Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language. PhD Thesis. San Diego, CA: University of California, USA. Search in Google Scholar
Wilbur, R. B. (2008). Complex predicates involving events, time, and aspect: Is this why sign languages look so similar? In J. Quer (Ed.), Signs of the time: Selected papers from TISLR 8. Hamburg, Germany: Signum. pp. 217–250. Search in Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike, Connie de Vos (eds.). 2012. Sign Languages in Village Communities: Anthropological and Linguistic Insights. Njimegen: Ishara. 10.1515/9781614511496Search in Google Scholar
© 2015 L. Horton et al.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
