Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 1, 2020

Reference ranges for the fetal mitral, tricuspid, and interventricular septum annular plane systolic excursions (mitral annular plane systolic excursion, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and septum annular plane systolic excursion) between 20 and 36 + 6 weeks of gestation

  • Alberto Borges Peixoto , Nathalie Jeanne Bravo-valenzuela , Wellington P. Martins , Gabriele Tonni , Rosiane Mattar , Antonio Fernandes Moron , David Baptista Pares and Edward Araujo Júnior EMAIL logo

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to establish reference ranges for fetal mitral, tricuspid, and interventricular septum annular plane systolic excursions (MAPSE, TAPSE, and SAPSE) in normal pregnant women between 20 and 36 + 6 weeks of gestation.

Methods

This prospective and cross-sectional study included 360 low-risk singleton pregnancies between 20 and 36 + 6 weeks of gestation. MAPSE, TAPSE, and SAPSE were measured by M-mode in real time in an apical or basal four-chamber view through placing the cursor at the atrioventricular junction, marked by the valve rings at the tricuspid, mitral, and basal septum, respectively. A regression analysis was done to determine the appropriate polynomial equation model for both measurements and standard deviation (SD) values in relation to gestational age (GA). The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was evaluated using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and limits of agreement (LoA).

Results

There was a significant positive correlation between MAPSE (r=0.705, p<0.0001), TAPSE (r=0.804, p<0.0001), and SAPSE (r=0.690, p<0.0001) and GA. The mean of each parameter ranged as follows: 2.87–5.56 mm, MAPSE; 3.98–8.07 mm, TAPSE; and 2.34–4.21 mm, SAPSE. Poor/moderate intra- and inter-observer reliability (CCC between 0.70 and 0.90) and poor/moderate agreement of all the tested parameters were evaluated (LoA between 10 and 50%).

Conclusions

Reference values were established for the fetal MAPSE, TAPSE, and SAPSE between 20 and 36 + 6 weeks of gestation in low-risk pregnant women. These parameters showed poor/moderate reproducibility.


Corresponding author: Prof. Edward Araujo Júnior, PhD, Department of Obstetrics, Paulista School of Medicine - Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP), Rua Belchior de Azevedo, 156 apto. 111 Torre Vitoria, São Paulo-SP, São Paulo-SP, CEP 05089-030, Brazil, Phone/Fax: +55 11 37965944, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of UNIFESP and UNIUBE (CAAE, 48421315.4.0000.5505).

References

1. Crispi, F, Gratacós, E. Fetal cardiac function: technical considerations and potential research and clinical applications. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012;32:47–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000338003.Search in Google Scholar

2. Van Mieghem, T, Hodges, R, Jaeggi, E, Ryan, G. Functional echocardiography in the fetus with non-cardiac disease. Prenat Diagn 2014;34:23–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4254.Search in Google Scholar

3. Bravo-Valenzuela, NJ, Peixoto, AB, Nardozza, LM, Souza, AS, Araujo Júnior, E. Applicability and technical aspects of two-dimensional ultrasonography for assessment of fetal heart function. Med Ultrason 2017;19:94–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-934.Search in Google Scholar

4. Feigenbaum, H, Armstrong, W, Ryan, T. Feigenbaum’s echocardiography. 6th ed. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA; 2005.Search in Google Scholar

5. Hamill, N, Yeo, L, Romero, R, Hassan, SS, Myers, SA, Mittal, P, et al. Fetal cardiac ventricular volume, cardiac output, and ejection fraction determined with 4-dimensional ultrasound using spatiotemporal image correlation and virtual organ computer-aided analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:76.e1-e10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.028.Search in Google Scholar

6. Pinedo, M, Villacorta, E, Tapia, C, Arnold, R, Lopez, J, Revilla, A, et al. Inter- and intra- observer variability in the echocardiographic evaluation of right ventricular function. Rev Esp Cardiol 2010;63:802–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1885-5857(10)70165-1.Search in Google Scholar

7. Koestenberger, M, Ravekes, W, Everett, AD, Stueger, HP, Heinzl, B, Gamillscheg, A, et al. Right ventricular function in infants, children and adolescents: reference values of the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) in 640 healthy patients and calculation of z score values. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:715–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2009.03.026.Search in Google Scholar

8. Cruz-Lemini, M, Crispi, F, Valenzuela-Alcaraz, B, Figueras, F, Sitges, M, Gómez, O, et al. Value of annular M-mode displacement vs tissue Doppler velocities to assess cardiac function in intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42:175–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12374.Search in Google Scholar

9. Mao, YK, Zhao, BW, Wang, B. Z-score reference ranges for angular M-mode displacement at 22-40 weeks’ gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2017;41:115–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000446071.Search in Google Scholar

10. Lee-Tannock, A, Hay, K, Gooi, A, Kumar, S. Longitudinal reference ranges for tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and mitral annular plane systolic excursion in normally grown fetuses. J Ultrasound Med 2019 Nov 18. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15177. [Epub ahead of print].Search in Google Scholar

11. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of fetal echocardiography. J Ultrasound Med 2013;32:1067–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2011.30.1.127.Search in Google Scholar

12. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carvalho, JS, Allan, LD, Chaoui, R, Copel, JA, DeVore, GR, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:348–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12403.Search in Google Scholar

13. Hadlock, FP, Harrist, RB, Sharman, RS, Deter, RL PS. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements – a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:333–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(85)90298-4.Search in Google Scholar

14. Moore, TR Cayle, JE. The amniotic fluid index in normal human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:1168–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/875647939000600514.Search in Google Scholar

15. Royston, P WE. How to construct “normal ranges” for fetal variables. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;11:30–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11010030.x.Search in Google Scholar

16. Altman, DG, Chitty, LS. Charts of fetal size: 1. Methodology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;101:29–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1742271x9400200404.Search in Google Scholar

17. Martins, WP, Nastri, CO. Interpreting reproducibility results for ultrasound measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43:479–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13320.Search in Google Scholar

18. Bland, JM, Altman, DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8.Search in Google Scholar

19. Gardiner, HM, Pasquini, L, Wolfenden, J, Barlow, A, Li, W, Kulinskaya, E, et al. Myocardial tissue Doppler and long axis function in the fetal heart. Int J Cardiol 2006;113:39–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.10.029.Search in Google Scholar

20. Germanakis, I, Pepes, S, Sifakis, S, Gardiner, H. Fetal longitudinal myocardial function assessment by anatomic M-mode. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012;32:65–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000330790.Search in Google Scholar

21. Ortiz, JU, Crispi, F, Yamamoto, R, Masoller, N, Cruz-Lemini, M, Gómez, O, et al. Longitudinal annular displacement by M-mode (MAPSE and TAPSE) in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome before and after laser surgery. Prenat Diagn 2015;35:1197–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4671.Search in Google Scholar

22. Carvalho, JS, O’Sullivan, C, Shinebourne, EA, Henein, MY. Right and left ventricular long- axis function in the fetus using angular M- mode. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:619–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00587.x.Search in Google Scholar

23. Messing, B, Gilboa, Y, Lipschuetz, M, Valsky, DV, Cohen, SM, Yagel, S. Fetal tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (f-TAPSE): evaluation of fetal right heart systolic function with conventional M-mode ultrasound and spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) M-mode. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42:182–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12375.Search in Google Scholar

24. Breatnach, CR, Levy, PT, James, AT, Franklin, O, El-Khuffash, A. Novel echocardiography methods in the functional assessment of the newborn heart. Neonatology 2016;110:248–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000445779.Search in Google Scholar

25. Gonçalves, LF, Lee, W, Espinoza, J, Romero, R. Examination of the fetal heart by four-dimensional (4D) ultrasound with spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:336–48.10.1002/uog.2724Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Zanardini, C, D’Antonio, F, Hvingel, B, Vårtun, Å, Prefumo, F, Flacco, ME, et al. Agreement between anatomical M-mode and tissue Doppler imaging in the assessment of fetal atrioventricular annular plane displacement in uncomplicated pregnancies: a prospective longitudinal study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2019;45:2150–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14068.Search in Google Scholar

27. Tello, K, Wan, J, Dalmer, A, Vanderpool, R, Ghofrani, HA, Naeije, R, et al. Validation of the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/systolic pulmonary artery pressure ratio for the assessment of right ventricular-arterial coupling in severe pulmonary hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:e009047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.119.010059.Search in Google Scholar

28. Koestenberger, M, Raith, W, Ravekes, W. Importance of quantifiable right heart systolic function evaluation using tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) in fetuses and neonates. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42:367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12530.Search in Google Scholar

29. Bergenzaun, L, Ohlin, H, Gudmundsson, P, Willenheimer, R, Chew, MS. Mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) in shock: a valuable echocardiographic parameter in intensive care patients. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2013;11:16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-11-16.Search in Google Scholar

30. Li, T, Nie, F, Li, Z, Wang, Y, Li, Q. Evaluation of right ventricular function in fetuses with isolated single umbilical artery using spatiotemporal image correlation. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2019;17:14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-019-0164-0.Search in Google Scholar

31. Gornall, AS, Kurinzuk, JJ, Konje, JC. Antenatal detection of a single umbilical artery: does it matter?. Prenat Diagn 2003;23:117–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.540.Search in Google Scholar

32. Perlman, S, Messing, B, Salem, Y, Parat, S, Achiron, R, Gilboa, Y. The added value of f-TAPSE in the surveillance of pregnancies complicated by fetal and placental tumors. Prenat Diagn 2017;37:788–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5087.Search in Google Scholar

33. Gardiner, HM, Pasquini, L, Wolfenden, J, Kulinskaya, E, Li, W, Henein, M. Increased peri- conceptual maternal glycated haemoglobin in diabetic mothers reduces fetal long axis cardiac function. Heart 2006;92:1125–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2005.076885.Search in Google Scholar

34. Allen, CC, Keller, R, Barnard, KC, Gao, Z, King, EC, Michelfelder, EC. Test-retest variability for quantitative two-dimensional and Doppler measurements in the fetus. Echocardiography 2019;36:142–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.14202.Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2020-0002).


Received: 2020-01-02
Accepted: 2020-04-24
Published Online: 2020-07-01
Published in Print: 2020-07-28

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 16.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2020-0002/html
Scroll to top button