Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 27, 2017

A non-invasive method to rule out transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN): fetal pulmonary artery acceleration to ejection time ratio

  • Barış Büke and Hatice Akkaya ORCID logo EMAIL logo

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate whether fetal pulmonary artery acceleration to ejection time (PATET) ratio can predict or rule out subsequent diagnosis of transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN).

Methods:

This prospective cohort study included 105 pregnant women in labor, who met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen of these women were removed from the study cohort, because of an inability to acquire sufficient Doppler waveforms and a longer duration of deliveries. According to subsequent diagnosis of TTN in the neonate, the two groups were constituted, TTN+ and TTN−.

Results:

There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding maternal obstetric and demographic features. The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) submission rate was significantly higher in the TTN+ group (100%, 17%, P<0.0001, respectively). Regarding the fetal pulmonary artery Doppler findings, PATET ratio in the TTN+ group was significantly lower than the TTN− group (0.307 vs. 0.389, P<0.0001, respectively). The PATET ratio and diagnosis of TTN were inversely correlated (r=−0.41, P<0.001), even if adjusted for birth weight, gestational age and fetal gender (r=0.42, P=0.0021). The cut-off value of 0.319 provided 82.7% specificity, 83.3% sensitivity, 96% negative predictive value and 41.6% positive predictive value. Additionally intraobserver ICC for PATET was found to be 0.86.

Conclusion:

The fetal PATET ratio seems to serve as a promising tool to rule out subsequent diagnosis of TTN.


Corresponding author: Hatice Akkaya, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey, Tel.: 903523368884

  1. Author’s statement

  2. Conflict of interest: All of the contributing authors declare no conflict of interest.

  3. Material and methods

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The research related to human subject use has complied with all the relevant national regulations, and institutional policies, and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the authors’ institutional review board or equivalent committee.

References

[1] Guglani L, Lakshminrusimha S, Ryan RM. Transient tachypnea of the newborn. Pediatr Rev. 2008;29:e59–65.10.1542/pir.29.11.e59Search in Google Scholar

[2] Demirel G, Uras N, Celik IH, Canpolat FE, Dilmen U. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for transient tachypnea of newborn: a randomized, prospective study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:1099–102.10.3109/14767058.2013.766707Search in Google Scholar

[3] Avery ME, Gatewood OB, Brumley G. Transient tachypnea of newborn: possible delayed resorption of fluid at birth. Am J Dis Child. 1966;111:380–5.10.1001/archpedi.1966.02090070078010Search in Google Scholar

[4] Tudehope D, Smyth MH. Is “transient tachypnoea of the newborn” always a benign disease? Report of 6 babies requiring mechanical ventilation. J Paediatr Child Health. 1979;15:160–5.10.1111/j.1440-1754.1979.tb01215.xSearch in Google Scholar

[5] Kugelman A, Riskin A, Weinger‐Abend M, Bader D. Familial neonatal pneumothorax associated with transient tachypnea of the newborn. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003;36:69–72.10.1002/ppul.10283Search in Google Scholar

[6] Rasanen J, Huhta JC, Weiner S, Wood DC, Ludomirski A. Fetal branch pulmonary arterial vascular impedance during the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1441–9.10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70586-0Search in Google Scholar

[7] Chaoui R, Taddei F, Rizzo G, Bast C, Lenz F, Bollmann R. Doppler echocardiography of the main stems of the pulmonary arteries in the normal human fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;11:173–9.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11030173.xSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Kitabatake A, Inoue M, Asao M, Masuyama T, Tanouchi J, Morita T, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of pulmonary hypertension by a pulsed Doppler technique. Circulation. 1983;68:302–9.10.1161/01.CIR.68.2.302Search in Google Scholar

[9] Mitchell J, Roberts A, Lee A. Doppler waveforms from the pulmonary arterial system in normal fetuses and those with pulmonary hypoplasia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;11:167–72.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11030167.xSearch in Google Scholar

[10] Chaoui R, Kalache K, Tennstedt C, Lenz F, Vogel M. Pulmonary arterial Doppler velocimetry in fetuses with lung hypoplasia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999;84:179–85.10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00327-3Search in Google Scholar

[11] Kim SM, Park JS, Norwitz ER, Hwang EJ, Kang HS, Park C-W, et al. Acceleration time-to-ejection time ratio in fetal pulmonary artery predicts the development of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective cohort study. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30:805–12.10.1055/s-0032-1333132Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Guan Y, Li S, Luo G, Wang C, Norwitz ER, Fu Q, et al. The role of Doppler waveforms in the fetal main pulmonary artery in the prediction of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. J Clin Ultrasound. 2015;43:375–83.10.1002/jcu.22219Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Rizzo G, Capponi A, Angelini E, Mazzoleni A, Romanini C. Blood flow velocity waveforms from fetal peripheral pulmonary arteries in pregnancies with preterm premature rupture of the membranes: relationship with pulmonary hypoplasia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;15:98–103.10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00006.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Rawlings JS, Smith FR. Transient tachypnea of the newborn: an analysis of neonatal and obstetric risk factors. Am J Dis Child. 1984;138:869–71.10.1001/archpedi.1984.02140470067022Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Clark SL, Meyers JA, Perlin JB. Oversight of elective early term deliveries: avoiding unintended consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:387–9.10.1016/j.ajog.2011.08.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman M, Curtin SC, Matthews T. Births: final data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64:1–65.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Statland BE, Sher G, Freer DE, Kraybill EN, Smith HY, Hisley JC. Evaluation of a modified foam stability (FS-50) test: an assay performed on amniotic fluid to predict fetal pulmonary maturity. Am J Clin Pathol. 1978;69:514–9.10.1093/ajcp/69.5.514Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Hagen E, Link JC, Arias F. A comparison of the accuracy of the TDx-FLM assay, lecithin-sphingomyelin ratio, and phosphatidylglycerol in the prediction of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:1004–8.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Tsuda H, Takahashi Y, Iwagaki S, Uchida Y, Kawabata I, Hayakawa M, et al. Amniotic lamellar body counts can predict the occurrence of respiratory distress syndrome as well as transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN). J Perinat Med. 2011;39:245–50.10.1515/jpm.2011.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Machado M, Chita S, Allan L. Acceleration time in the aorta and pulmonary artery measured by Doppler echocardiography in the midtrimester normal human fetus. Br Heart J. 1987;58:15–8.10.1136/hrt.58.1.15Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] Laudy J, Gaillard J, Anker J, Tibboel D, Wladimiroff J. Doppler ultrasound imaging: a new technique to detect lung hypoplasia before birth? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;7:189–92.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07030189.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Azpurua H, Norwitz ER, Campbell KH, Funai EF, Pettker CM, Kleine M, et al. Acceleration/ejection time ratio in the fetal pulmonary artery predicts fetal lung maturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:40.e1–8.10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.075Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Schenone MH, Samson JE, Jenkins L, Suhag A, Mari G. Predicting fetal lung maturity using the fetal pulmonary artery Doppler wave acceleration/ejection time ratio. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36:208–14.10.1159/000358299Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-11-26
Accepted: 2017-2-20
Published Online: 2017-3-27
Published in Print: 2018-2-23

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2016-0380/html
Scroll to top button