Abstract
Objective: To correlate placental pathologic lesions, as defined by the Society for Pediatric Pathology, to the severity of the ratio of the pulsatility Doppler index (PI) of the fetal middle cerebral artery to that of the umbilical artery (cerebroplacental ratio, CPR).
Study design: A cohort-study of 176 singleton pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction (FGR).
Results: The mean values of gestational age, birth weight and CPR of the entire cohort were 33.9±3.6 weeks, 1552±561 g, and 1.33±0.68, respectively. In ordered logistic regression analysis, after adjustment for potential confounders, muscularised arteries (Odds Ratio [OR]=3.14; 95% confidence intervals [CI]=1.58–6.28, P=0.001), mural hypertrophy (OR=2.35; 95% CI=1.26–4.4, P=0.008), immature intermediate trophoblast (OR=2.0; 95% CI=1.07–3.71, P=0.03) and maternal vascular underperfusion (OR=2.32; 95% CI=1.25–4.23, P=0.007) were the only parameters associated with severity of CPR.
Conclusions: The correlation between placental histological findings indicating maternal underperfusion and placental occlusion suggest that forced centralization of fetal circulation in FGR could be at least partially attributable to the hemodynamic consequences of increased placental vascular resistance.
References
[1] ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. Obstet Gynecol. 99:159–67.10.1097/00006250-200201000-00028Search in Google Scholar
[2] Al Ghazali W, Chita SK, Chapman MG, Allan LD. Evidence of redistribution of cardiac output in asymmetrical growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987;96:697–704.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03285.xSearch in Google Scholar
[3] Bahado-Singh RO, Kovanci E, Jeffres A, Oz U, Deren O, Copel J, et al. The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:750–56.10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70283-8Search in Google Scholar
[4] Baschat AA. Fetal growth restriction – from observation to intervention. J Perinat Med. 2010;38:239–46.10.1515/jpm.2010.041Search in Google Scholar
[5] Baschat AA, Gembruch U. The cerebroplacental ratio revisited. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:124–7.10.1002/uog.20Search in Google Scholar
[6] Baschat AA, Cosmi E, Bilardo CM, Wolf H, Berg C, Rigano S, et al. Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:253–61.10.1097/01.AOG.0000253215.79121.75Search in Google Scholar
[7] Baschat AA, Gembruch U, Viscardi RM, Gortner L, Harman CR. Antenatal prediction of intraventricular hemorrhage in fetal growth restriction: what is the role of Doppler? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:334–9.10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00661.xSearch in Google Scholar
[8] Dubiel M, Gudmundsson S, Gunnarsson G, Marsal K. Middle cerebral artery velocimetry as a predictor of hypoxemia in fetuses with increased resistance to blood flow in the umbilical artery. Early Hum Dev. 1997;47:177–84.10.1016/S0378-3782(96)01777-XSearch in Google Scholar
[9] Ebbing C, Rasmussen S, Kiserud T. Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and pulsatility index of the cerebroplacental pulsatility ratio: longitudinal reference ranges and terms for serial measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:287–96.10.1002/uog.4088Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] Ferrazzi E, Bozzo M, Rigano S, Bellotti M, Morabito A, Pardi G, et al. Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:140–46.10.1046/j.0960-7692.2002.00627.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] Fok RY, Pavlova Z, Benirschke K, Paul RH, Platt LD. The correlation of arterial lesions with umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in the placentas of small-for-dates pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:578–83.Search in Google Scholar
[12] Gramellini D, Folli MC, Raboni S, Vadora E, Merialdi A. Cerebral-umbilical Doppler ratio as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79:416–20.10.1097/00006250-199203000-00018Search in Google Scholar
[13] Harrington K, Thompson MO, Carpenter RG, Nguyen M, Campbell S. Doppler fetal circulation in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia or delivery of a small for gestational age baby: 2. Longitudinal analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:453–66.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08299.xSearch in Google Scholar
[14] Kovo M, Schreiber L, Ben-Haroush A, Wand S, Golan A, Bar J. Placental vascular lesion differences in pregnancy-induced hypertension and normotensive fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:561.e1–510.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.012Search in Google Scholar
[15] Parazzini F, Cortinovis I, Bortolus R, Fedele L. Standards of birth weight in Italy. Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat. 1991;112:203–46.Search in Google Scholar
[16] Redline RW, Patterson P. Preeclampsia is associated with an excess of immature intermediate trophoblast. Hum Pathol. 1995;26:594–600.10.1016/0046-8177(95)90162-0Search in Google Scholar
[17] Redline RW, Ariel I, Baergen RN, Desa DJ, Kraus FT, Roberts DJ, et al. Fetal vascular obstructive lesions: nosology and reproducibility of placental reaction patterns. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2004;7:443–52.10.1007/s10024-004-2020-xSearch in Google Scholar
[18] Redline RW, Boyd T, Campbell V, Hyde S, Kaplan C, Khong TY, et al. Maternal vascular underperfusion: nosology and reproducibility of placental reaction patterns. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2004;7:237–49.10.1007/s10024-003-8083-2Search in Google Scholar
[19] Redline RW, Heller D, Keating S, Kingdom J. Placental diagnostic criteria and clinical correlation – a workshop report. Placenta. 2005;26 (Suppl A):S114–7.10.1016/j.placenta.2005.02.009Search in Google Scholar
[20] Salafia CM, Pezzullo JC, Minior VK, Divon MY. Placental pathology of absent and reversed end-diastolic flow in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:830–6.10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00473-0Search in Google Scholar
[21] Sebire NJ, Sepulveda W. Correlation of placental pathology with prenatal ultrasound findings. J Clin Pathol. 2008;61: 1276–84.10.1136/jcp.2008.055251Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[22] Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Publication Committee, Berkley E, Chauhan SP, Abuhamad A. Doppler assessment of the fetus with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:300–8.10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.022Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[23] Spinillo A, Gardella B, Bariselli S, Alfei A, Silini E, Dal Bello B. Placental histopathological correlates of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32:1263–72.10.1002/pd.3988Search in Google Scholar
[24] Sterne G, Shields LE, Dubinsky TJ. Abnormal fetal cerebral and umbilical Doppler measurements in fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction predicts the severity of perinatal morbidity. J Clin Ultrasound. 2001;29:146–51.10.1002/1097-0096(200103/04)29:3<146::AID-JCU1014>3.0.CO;2-ISearch in Google Scholar
[25] Todros T, Ferrazzi E, Groli C, Nicolini U, Parodi L, Pavoni M, et al. Fitting growth curves to head and abdomen measurements of the fetus: a multicentric study. J Clin Ultrasound. 1987;15:95–105.10.1002/jcu.1870150203Search in Google Scholar
[26] Vedmedovska N, Rezeberga D, Teibe U, Melderis I, Donders GG. Microscopic lesions of placenta and Doppler velocimetry related to fetal growth restriction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284:1087–93.10.1007/s00404-010-1781-xSearch in Google Scholar
[27] Wladimiroff JW, Tonge HM, Stewart PA. Doppler ultrasound assessment of cerebral blood flow in the human fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986;93:471–5.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07932.xSearch in Google Scholar
The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.
©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston
