Abstract
U.S. climate change-related policy response is failing, despite scientific consensus on core realities, in part because of comprehensive, simultaneous, yet incommensurable doctrines and political biases. Climate disruption is a critically important agenda for homeland security and emergency management, yet as framed today, the policy communication regime frequently requires many skeptics or deniers to abandon their opinions, cultural commitments and epistemic frameworks. Public opinion consensus would be optimal, but the traditional education/information approach is flawed, and continued delays in significant mitigation and adaptation policy implementation will mean far larger future costs to protect civilian environmental security and national interests. Thus, effective response demands new messaging strategies, pursuing interim progress, leveraging overlapping consensus, enhancing risk analysis literacy, and constructing alternative, intermediary categories of multiple parallel discourse. These framings would center on security, economic interests, public health, religious stewardship, and other themes. Customized audience discourses may enable better public and opinion leader buy-in, partly transcending polarization, since such leaders have a unique ability to help translate and promote these various discourses. In addition, eventual construction of a multi-dimensional map could optimize effective messaging and supportive coalitions. Otherwise, stalemate on climate-related policy and environmental security will continue, with increasingly likely catastrophic implications.
References
Anderegg, William R. L., James W. Prall, Jacob Harold and Stephen H. Schneider (2010) “Expert Credibility in Climate Change,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(27):12107–12109.10.1073/pnas.1003187107Search in Google Scholar
Barker, David C. and David H. Bearce (2013) “End-Times Theology, the Shadow of the Future, and Public Resistance to Addressing Global Climate Change,” Political Research Quarterly, 66(2):267–279.10.1177/1065912912442243Search in Google Scholar
Broder, John M. (2010) “Graham Pulls Support for Major Senate Climate Bill.” New York Times, April 24. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/25/us/politics/25graham.html?_r=0.Search in Google Scholar
Carmen, Herbert E., Christine Parthemore and Will Rogers (2010) Broadening Horizons: Climate Change and the U.S. Armed Forces. Washington, D.C.: Center for a New American Security. Available at: http://www.cnas.org/files/documents/publications/CNAS%20Publication_Climate%20Change%20and%20the%20US%20Armed%20Forces_April%2020.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Cook, John, Dana Nuccitelli, Sarah A. Green, Mark Richardson, Barbel Winkler, Rob Painting, Robert Way, Peter Jacobs and Andrew Skuce (2013) “Quantifying the Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming in the Scientific Literature,” Environmental Research Letters, 8(2). Available at: http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/024024/article.10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024Search in Google Scholar
Corner, Adam and Alex Randall (2011) “Selling Climate Change? The Limitations of Social Marketing as a Strategy for Climate Change Public Engagement,” Global Environmental Change, 21(3):1005–1014.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.05.002Search in Google Scholar
Corner, Adam, Lorraine Whitmarsh and Dimitrios Xenias (2012) “Uncertainty, Scepticism and Attitudes towards Climate Change: Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarisation,” Climatic Change, 114(3–4):463–478.10.1007/s10584-012-0424-6Search in Google Scholar
David Gardiner and Associates, LLC (2013) Power Forward: Why the World’s Largest Companies Are Investing in Renewable Energy. Arlington, Va. Available at: http://www.ceres.org/resources/reports/power-forward-why-the-world2019s-largest-companies-are-investing-in-renewable-energy.Search in Google Scholar
Department of Defense (DoD) (2012) Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense. Available at: http://www.defense.gov/news/defense_strategic_guidance.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Department of Defense (DoD) (2014) Quadrennial Defense Review. Available at: http://www.defense.gov/pubs/2014_Quadrennial_Defense_Review.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Donner, Simon D. and Jeremy McDaniels (2013) “The Influence of National Temperature Fluctuations on Opinions about Climate Change in the U.S. since 1990,” Climatic Change, 118(3–4):537–550.Search in Google Scholar
Egan, Patrick J. and Megan Mullin (2012) “Turning Personal Experience into Political Attitudes: The Effect of Local Weather on Americans’ Perceptions about Global Warming,” The Journal of Politics, 74(3):796–809.10.1017/S0022381612000448Search in Google Scholar
Feinberg, Matthew and Robb Willer (2013) “The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes,” Psychological Science, 24(1):56–62.10.1177/0956797612449177Search in Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon, Henry W. Riecken, and Stanley Schachter (1956) When Prophecy Fails. 2012 reprint: Whitefish, MT: Literary Licensing LLC.10.1037/10030-000Search in Google Scholar
Fischer, Anke, Vera Peters, Mirjam Neebe, Jan Vávra, Antoinette Kriel, Miloslav Lapka and Boldizsár Megyesi (2012) “Climate Change? No, Wise Resource Use Is the Issue: Social Representations of Energy, Climate Change and the Future,” Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(3):161–176.10.1002/eet.1585Search in Google Scholar
Gifford, Robert and Louise A. Comeau (2011) “Message Framing Influences Perceived Climate Change Competence, Engagement, and Behavioral Intentions,” Global Environmental Change, 21(4):1301–1307.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.004Search in Google Scholar
Gromet, Dena M., Howard Kunreuther and Richard P. Larrick. 2013. “Political Ideology Affects Energy-Efficiency Attitudes and Choices,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(23):9314–9319.Search in Google Scholar
Guéguen, Nicolas (2012) “Dead Indoor Plants Strengthen Belief in Global Warming,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(2):173–177.10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.12.002Search in Google Scholar
Hamilton, Lawrence C. (2010) “Education, Politics and Opinions about Climate Change Evidence for Interaction Effects,” Climatic Change, 104(2):231–242.10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8Search in Google Scholar
Hmielowski, Jay D., Lauren Feldman, Teresa A. Myers, Anthony Leiserowitz and Edward Maibach (2013) “An Attack on Science? Media Use, Trust in Scientists, and Perceptions of Global Warming,” Public Understanding of Science, (April):1–18. Available at: http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/about_us/meet_us/max_boykoff/readings/hmielowski_2013.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Hobson, Kersty and Simon Niemeyer (2013) ‘“What Sceptics Believe’: The Effects of Information and Deliberation on Climate Change Scepticism,” Public Understanding of Science, 22(4):396–412.Search in Google Scholar
Hoffman, Andrew J. (2011) “Talking Past Each Other? Cultural Framing of Skeptical and Convinced Logics in the Climate Change Debate,” Organization and Environment, 24(1):3–33.10.1177/1086026611404336Search in Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Working Group 1. September (2013) Fifth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Available at: http://www.ipcc.ch/.10.1017/CBO9781107415324Search in Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan, Donald Braman, Paul Slovic, John Gastil and Geoffrey L. Cohen (2007) The Second National Risk and Culture Study: Making Sense of – and Progress in – the American Culture War of Fact. GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 370; Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 154; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 370; Harvard Law School Program on Risk Regulation Research Paper No. 08-26. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1017189 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1017189.10.2139/ssrn.1017189Search in Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., Hank Jenkins-Smith and Donald Braman (2011a) “Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus,” Journal of Risk Research, 14(2):147–174.10.1080/13669877.2010.511246Search in Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., Maggie Wittlin, Ellen Peters, Paul Slovic, Lisa Larrimore Ouellette, Donald Braman and Gregory N. Mandel (2011b) The Tragedy of the Risk-Perception Commons: Culture Conflict, Rationality Conflict, and Climate Change. Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-26; Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper No. 89; Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 435; Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 230. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1871503 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1871503.10.2139/ssrn.1871503Search in Google Scholar
Kearney, Anne R. (1994) “Understanding Global Change: A Cognitive Perspective on Communicating through Stories,” Climatic Change, 27(4):419–441.10.1007/BF01096270Search in Google Scholar
Kellstedt, P.M., S. Zahran and A. Vedlitz (2008) “Personal Efficacy, the Information Environment, and Attitudes towards Global Warming and Climate Change in the United States,” Risk Analysis, 28(1):113–126.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01010.xSearch in Google Scholar
King, Marcus and Sherri Goodman (2011) “Defense Community Perspectives on Uncertainty and Confidence Judgments,” Climatic Change, 108(4):803–809.10.1007/s10584-011-0191-9Search in Google Scholar
Kleefeld, Eric (2010) “Bob Inglis’s Defeat Sends Warning Signal to GOP: Don’t Badmouth Glenn Beck,” TPM, June 23. Available at: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/bob-inglis-s-defeat-sends-warning-signal-to-gop-don-t-badmouth-glenn-beck.Search in Google Scholar
Koronowski, Ryan (2014) “House Votes to Deny Climate Science and Ties Pentagon’s Hands on Climate Change,” Climate Progress, May 22, 2014. Available at: http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/05/22/3440827/mckinley-climate-pentagon-climate-change/.Search in Google Scholar
Lacey, Stephen (2012) “Climate on Steroids: More Mainstream Media Coverage of Extreme Weather and Climate Change,” Climate Progress, April 11. Available at: http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/04/11/462277/climate-on-steroids-media-coverage-of-extreme-weather-and-climate-change/.Search in Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, Anthony, Edward Maibach, Connie Roser-Renouf, Geoff Feinberg and Peter Howe (2012) Extreme Weather and Climate Change in the American Mind. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, Yale University and George Mason University. Available at: http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/article/extreme-weather-public-opinion-September-2012.Search in Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, Anthony, Edward Maibach, Connie Roser-Renouf, Geoff Feinberg and Peter Howe (2013) Global Warming’s Six Americas,September 2012. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, Yale University and George Mason University. Available at: http://environment.yale.edu/climate/publications/Six-Americas-September-2012.Search in Google Scholar
Leviston, Z., I. Walker and S. Morwinski (2013) “Your Opinion on Climate Change Might Not Be as Common as You Think,” Nature Climate Change, 3(4):334–337.10.1038/nclimate1743Search in Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, Stephan, Klaus Oberauer and Gilles E. Gignac (2012) “NASA Faked the Moon Landing – Therefore (Climate) Science Is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science,” Psychological Science, 24(5):622–633.10.1177/0956797612457686Search in Google Scholar
Lorenzoni, Irene, Sophie Nicholson-Cole and Lorraine Whitmarsh (2007) “Barriers Perceived to Engaging with Climate Change among the UK Public and Their Policy Implications,” Global Environmental Change, 17(3):445–459.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004Search in Google Scholar
Loschel, Andreas, Bodo Sturm and Reinhard Uehleke’ (2013) “Revealed Preferences for Climate Protection When the Purely Individual Perspective Is Relaxed – Evidence from a Framed Field Experiment,” Discussion paper 13-006,., Zentrum für EuropäischeWirtschaftsforschung 13(6). http://www.zew.de/en/publications/6888.Search in Google Scholar
Lowe, Thomas, Katrina Brown, Suraje Dessai, Miguel de França Doria, Kat Haynes and Katharine Vincent (2006) “Does Tomorrow Ever Come? Disaster Narrative and Public Perceptions of Climate Change,” Public Understanding of Science, 15(4):435–457.10.1177/0963662506063796Search in Google Scholar
Maibach, Edward W., Connie Roser-Renouf and Anthony Leiserowitz (2008) “Communication and Marketing as Climate Change–Intervention Assets: A Public Health Perspective,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(5): 488–500.10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.016Search in Google Scholar
Maibach, Edward W., Matthew Nisbet, Paula Baldwin, Karen Akerlof and Guoqing Diao (2010) “Reframing Climate Change as a Public Health Issue: An Exploratory Study of Public Reactions,” BMC Public Health, 10(1):299.10.1186/1471-2458-10-299Search in Google Scholar
Maibach, Edward W., Connie Roser-Renouf, Emily Vraga, Brittany Bloodhart, Ashley Anderson, Neil Stenhouse and Anthony Leiserowitz (2013) A National Survey of Republicans and Republican-Leaning Independents on Energy and Climate Change. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, Yale University and George Mason University. Available at: http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/files/Republican_Views_on_Climate_Change.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Malka, A., J. A. Krosnick and G. Langer (2009) “The Association of Knowledge with Concern about Global Warming: Trusted Information Sources Shape Public Thinking,” Risk Analysis, 29(5):633–647.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01220.xSearch in Google Scholar
McCright, Aaron M. and Riley E. Dunlap (2011a) “Cool Dudes: The Denial of Climate Change among Conservative White Males in the United States,” Global Environmental Change, 21(4):1163–1172.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003Search in Google Scholar
McCright, Aaron M. and Riley E. Dunlap (2011b) “The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public’s Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010,” The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2):155–194.10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.xSearch in Google Scholar
Moser, Susanne C. (2006) “Talk of the City: Engaging Urbanites on Climate Change,” Environmental Research Letters, 1:014006. Available at: http://www.susannemoser.com/documents/Moser_erl6_1_014006_final.pdf.10.1088/1748-9326/1/1/014006Search in Google Scholar
Moser, Susanne C. and Lisa Dilling (2004) “Making Climate Hot,” Environment, 46(10):32–46. doi:10.1080/00139150409605820.10.1080/00139150409605820Search in Google Scholar
Myers, Teresa A., Edward W. Maibach, Connie Roser-Renouf, Karen Akerlof and Anthony A. Leiserowitz (2013) “The Relationship between Personal Experience and Belief in the Reality of Global Warming,” Nature Climate Change, 3(4):343–347.10.1038/nclimate1754Search in Google Scholar
Nisbet, Erik C, P. S. Hart, Teresa Myers and Morgan Ellithorpe (2013) “Attitude Change in Competitive Framing Environments? Open-/Closed-Mindedness, Framing Effects, and Climate Change,” Journal of Communication, 63(4):766–785.10.1111/jcom.12040Search in Google Scholar
Nicholls, Neville (1999) “Cognitive Illusions, Heuristics, and Climate Prediction,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 80:1385–1397.10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<1385:CIHACP>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar
Ockwell, David, Lorraine Whitmarsh and Saffron O’Neill (2009) “Reorienting Climate Change Communication for Effective Mitigation: Forcing People to Be Green or Fostering Grass-Roots Engagement?,” Science Communication, 30(3):305–327.10.1177/1075547008328969Search in Google Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi and Erik M. Conway (2010) Merchants of Doubt. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rabinovich, Anna and Thomas A. Morton (2012) “Unquestioned Answers or Unanswered Questions: Beliefs about Science Guide Responses to Uncertainty in Climate Change Risk Communication,” Risk Analysis, 32(6):992–1002.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01771.xSearch in Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Reynolds, Travis W., Ann Bostrom, Daniel Read and M. Granger Morgan (2010) “Now What Do People Know about Global Climate Change? Survey Studies of Educated Laypeople,” Risk Analysis, 30(10):1520–1538.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01448.xSearch in Google Scholar
Sarewitz, Daniel (2011) “Does Climate Change Knowledge Really Matter?,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(4):475–481.10.1002/wcc.126Search in Google Scholar
Schuldt, Jonathon P., Sara H. Konrath and Norbert Schwarz (2011) ‘“Global Warming’ or ‘Climate Change’?: Whether the Planet Is Warming Depends on Question Wording,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(1):115.10.1093/poq/nfq073Search in Google Scholar
Scruggs, Lyle and Salil Benegal (2012) “Declining Public Concern about Climate Change: Can We Blame the Great Recession?,” Global Environmental Change, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.002.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.002Search in Google Scholar
Slimak, Michael W. and Thomas Dietz (2006) “Personal Values, Beliefs, and Ecological Risk Perception,” Risk Analysis, 26(6):1689–1705.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00832.xSearch in Google Scholar
Small Business Majority (2013) “Entrepreneurs Believe Climate Change a Problem That Can Hurt Small Businesses, Disrupt Economy,” Opinion Poll, June 25.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, Adam and Katie Jenkins (2013) “Extreme Weather Events and Climate Discourse in the USA,” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 3(3):259–268.10.1007/s13412-013-0132-1Search in Google Scholar
Smith, Nicholas and A. Leiserowitz (2013) “American Evangelicals and Global Warming,” Global Environmental Change, 23(5):1009–1017.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.001Search in Google Scholar
Tobler, Christina, Vivianne H. M. Visschers and Michael Siegrist (2012) “Addressing Climate Change: Determinants of Consumers’ Willingness to Act and to Support Policy Measures,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3):197–207.10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.001Search in Google Scholar
Villar, Ana and Jon A. Krosnick (2011) “Global Warming vs. Climate Change, Taxes vs. Prices: Does Word Choice Matter?,” Climatic Change, 105(1–2):1–12.Search in Google Scholar
Vraga, Emily, Connie Roser-Renouf, Anthony Leiserowitz and Edward Maibach (2013) The Political Benefits to Taking a Pro-Climate Stand in 2013. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, Yale University and George Mason University. Available at: http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/files/Political-Benefits-Pro-Climate-Stand-2013.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, Lorraine (2009) “What’s in a Name? Commonalities and Differences in Public Understanding of ‘Climate Change’ and ‘Global Warming,’” Public Understanding of Science, 18(4):401–420.10.1177/0963662506073088Search in Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, Lorraine, Gill Seyffang and Saffron O’Neill (2011) “Public Engagement with Carbon and Climate Change: To what Extent is the Public ‘Carbon Capable’?,” Global Environmental Change, 21(1):56–65.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.011Search in Google Scholar
Wibeck, Victoria (2013) “Enhancing Learning, Communication and Public Engagement about Climate Change: Some Lessons from Recent Literature,” Environmental Education Research, (July):1–25.10.1080/13504622.2013.812720Search in Google Scholar
Wolf, Johanna and Susanne Moser (2011) “Individual Understandings, Perceptions, and Engagement with Climate Change: Insights from In-Depth Studies across the World,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(4):547–569.10.1002/wcc.120Search in Google Scholar
Wright, Martin (2010) “Using Doom and Gloom So People Take Climate Change Seriously Doesn’t Work,” The Guardian, December 6. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/blog/doom-gloom-climate-change-seriously.Search in Google Scholar
Yerman, Marcia G. (2013) “Bob Inglis – Conservatives Have a Climate Solution,” Climate Progress, July 5. Available at: http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/07/05/2252491/bob-inglis-conservatives-have-a-climate-solution/.Search in Google Scholar
Zia, Asim and Anne Marie Todd (2010) “Valuating the Effects of Ideology on Public Understanding of Climate Change Science: How to Improve Communication across Ideological Divides?,” Public Understanding of Science, 19(6):743–761.10.1177/0963662509357871Search in Google Scholar
©2014 by De Gruyter
