Abstract
The goal of this descriptive qualitative study was to examine the views of students about their experience and development as scholars during the first two years of an online cohort nursing doctoral program. A secondary goal was to seek the views of faculty members very involved in the program. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 of the 13 students of the first two online cohorts and five faculty members. Four themes emerged from the data: adjusting to the program; the group as emotional and academic support; reflections on teaching and learning; and becoming a scholar. The findings suggest that the students were developing as scholars, and that the cohort model was a source of support for them. Similar to other PhD students, transition into doctoral education necessitated finding a new balance between other commitments and doctoral studies. Providing opportunities to engage with faculty outside of courses is important.
Funding source: Teaching and Learning Enhancement Fund, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Award Identifier / Grant number: RES 0030211
Acknowledgments
If applicable.
-
Research funding: This work was supported by the Teaching and Learning Enhancement Fund, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.
-
Ethical approval: The University of Alberta Ethics Review Board granted ethics approval for this project. The project number approval was PRO 00064669.
References
Berry, S. (2018). Building community in an online graduate program: Exploring the role of an in-person orientation. Qualitative Report, 23(7), 1673–1687. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3299.Search in Google Scholar
Bista, K., & Cox, D. W. (2014). Cohort-based doctoral programs: What we have learned over the last 18 years. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 9, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.28945/1941.Search in Google Scholar
Bolliger, D. Y., & Halupa, C. (2012). Student perceptions of satisfaction and anxiety in an online doctoral program. Distance Education, 33(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.667961.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, C. J. (2011). Learning communities or support groups: The use of student cohorts in doctoral educational leadership programs [Doctoral Dissertation]. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA. Retrieved from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/2378/.Search in Google Scholar
Byrd, J. C. (2016). Understanding the online doctoral learning experience: Factors that contribute to students’ sense of community. The Journal of Educators Online–JEO, 13(2), 102–135.10.9743/JEO.2016.2.3Search in Google Scholar
Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing (2018). Registered nurses education in Canada statistics 2016-2017. Retrieved from https://www.casn.ca/2018/12/registered-nurses-education-in-canada-statistics-2016-2017/.Search in Google Scholar
Denman, P. M., Corrales, J. M., Smyth, S., & Craven, K. (2018). From ABD to PHD: A qualitative study examining the benefits of a support group during dissertation in an online doctoral program. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 66(2), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2016.1469067.Search in Google Scholar
Effken, J. A., Boyle, J., & Isenberg, M. A. (2008). Creating a virtual research community: The University of Arizona PhD Program. Journal of Professional Nursing, 24(4), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.06.024.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Frydman, J. S., Cheung, L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2019). The “journey” of doctoral study in applied psychology: Lived experiences of students in counseling, clinical and school psychology. Qualitative Report, 24(6), 1181–1210.10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3393Search in Google Scholar
Gardner, S. K. (2009). The development of doctoral students: Phases of challenge and support. ASHE Higher Education Report, 34(6), 1–127.10.1002/aehe.v34:6Search in Google Scholar
Gazza, E. A., & Hunker, D. F. (2014). Facilitating student retention in online graduate nursing education programs: A review of the literature. Nurse Education Today, 34, 1125–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.01.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Goodfellow, L. (2014). Professional socialization of students enrolled in an online Doctor of Philosophy program in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(10), 595–599. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140922-06.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Govender, K., & Dhunpath, R. (2011). Student experiences of the PhD cohort model: Working within or outside communities of practice? Perspectives in Education, 29, 88–99.Search in Google Scholar
Janta, H., Lugosi, P., & Brown, L. (2014). Coping with loneliness: An ethnographic study of doctoral students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(4), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2012.726972.Search in Google Scholar
Kozar, O., & Lum, J. F. (2015). Online doctoral writing groups: Do facilitators or communication modes make a difference? Quality in Higher Education, 21(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2015.1032003.Search in Google Scholar
Lambert, V. A., & Lambert, C. E. (2012). Editorial: Qualitative descriptive research: An acceptable design. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 255–256.Search in Google Scholar
McCambly, H. (2013). Becoming a scholar. Peer Review, 15(4), 31.Search in Google Scholar
Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202.Search in Google Scholar
Myers, D., Singletary, J., Rogers, R., Ellor, J., & Barham, S. (2019). A synchronous online social work PhD program educational design and student/faculty response. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 39(4–5), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2019.1659908.Search in Google Scholar
Myers, L., Jeffery, A. D., Nimmagadda, H., Werthman, J. A., & Jordan, K. (2015). Building a community of scholars: One cohort’s experience in an online and distance education Doctor of Philosophy program. Journal of Nursing Education, 54(11), 650–654. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20151016-07.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
National League for Nursing (NLN) (2020). NLN faculty census survey of schools of nursing 2018-2019, executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/newsroom/nursing-education-statistics/2018-19-executive-summary.pdf?sfvrsn=2.Search in Google Scholar
Naylor, R., Chakravarti, S., & Baik, C. (2017). Expectations and experiences of off-campus PhD students in Australia. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(4), 524–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2017.1301405.Search in Google Scholar
Pemberton, C. L., & Akkary, R. K. (2010). A cohort, is a cohort, is a cohort… or is it? Journal of Leadership Education, 5(5), 180–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/194277511000500501.Search in Google Scholar
Richter, S. R., & Idleman, L. (2017). Online teaching efficacy: A product of professional development and ongoing support. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 14(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2016-0033.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Waugh, M. L., & Su, J. (2016). Student perceptions of a successful online collaborative learning community. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 14(1), 1–16.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
