Abstract
The High-Speed Power Line Carrier Communication (HPLC) enables the connections among power metering devices in integrated energy systems, and thus their satisfying operations are indispensable for system reliabilities. In order to more precisely diagnose their conditions especially in real complex data scenes, a multi-model evaluation ensemble is proposed in this paper. Firstly, typical IoT application contexts of customer-side metering equipment are analyzed, thus the corresponding main impact factors along with their performance evaluation indices can be probed. Next, to handle the multi-source, heterogeneous, high-dimensional datasets during applications, the Kernel Independent Component Analysis (KICA) is established to diminish data dimensionalities, thus the individual weights of each index can be rated. On the other hand, the Component Importance Measure (CIM) model is built to differentiate the impact degree of each indicator on the overall IoT connection performance, where the influence of dissimilar index on the entire performance, rather than the proportion or frequency, will be directly assessed to determine their impact weights. Ergo, a comprehensive diagnosis can be achieved via these two-fold total weights accordingly. Finally, the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method can be verified by an empirical case study, which is conducive to further improving the accuracy and rationality of HPLC condition evaluations.
Funding source: National Natural Science Foundation of China
Award Identifier / Grant number: 52207074
Funding source: Natural Science Foundation of Changsha
Award Identifier / Grant number: kq2208231
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: This work is supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (52207074) and Natural Science Foundation of Changsha (kq2208231).
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Gan, S, Zhang, W. Building carbon neutrality goals break down strategies for sustainable energy development. Int J Emerg Elec Power Syst 2022;23:899–911. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijeeps-2022-0152.Search in Google Scholar
2. Zhao, D, Li, C, Wang, Q, Yuan, J. Comprehensive evaluation of national electric power development based on cloud model and entropy method and TOPSIS: a case study in 11 countries. J Clean Prod 2020;277:123190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123190.Search in Google Scholar
3. Qiu, W, Tang, Q, Yao, W, Qin, Y, Ma, J. Probability analysis for failure assessment of electric energy metering equipment under multiple extreme stresses. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 2021;17:3762–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2020.3025314.Search in Google Scholar
4. Atat, R, Ismail, M, Shaaban, MF, Serpedin, E, Overbye, T. Stochastic geometry-based model for dynamic allocation of metering equipment in spatio-temporal expanding power grids. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2019;11:2080–91.10.1109/TSG.2019.2947148Search in Google Scholar
5. Gaber, M, Shabib, G, Elbaset, AA, Yasunori, M. Renewable power systems dynamic security using a new coordination of frequency control strategy based on virtual synchronous generator and digital frequency protection. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2019;109:351–68.10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.02.007Search in Google Scholar
6. Kirn Kumar, N, Indra Gandhi, V, Ravi, L. Improving security for wind energy systems in smart grid applications using digital protection technique. Sustain Cities Soc 2020;60:102265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102265.Search in Google Scholar
7. Vosughi, A, Tamimi, A, King, AB, Majumder, S, Srivastava, AK. Cyber-physical vulnerability and resiliency analysis for DER integration: a review, challenges and research needs. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2022;168:112794.10.1016/j.rser.2022.112794Search in Google Scholar
8. Ray, M, Chakraborty, B. Impact of evolving technology on collaborative energy access scaling. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2019;110:13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.051.Search in Google Scholar
9. Niang, M, Riera, B, Philippot, A, Zaytoon, J, Gellot, F, Coupat, R. A methodology for automatic generation, formal verification and implementation of safe PLC programs for power supply equipment of the electric lines of railway control systems. Comput Ind 2020;123:103328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103328.Search in Google Scholar
10. Yaacoub, JPA, Fernandez, JH, Noura, HN, Chehab, A. Security of power line communication systems: issues, limitations and existing solutions. Comput Sci Rev 2021;39:100331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100331.Search in Google Scholar
11. Nixon, K, Jindal, S, Parker, F, Reich, NG, Ghobadi, K, Lee, EC, et al.. An evaluation of prospective COVID-19 modelling studies in the USA: from data to science translation. Lancet Digit Health 2022;4:e738-47.10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00148-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
12. Kamineni, A, Doria-Rose, VP, Chubak, J, Inadomi, JM, Corley, DA, Haas, JS, et al.. Evaluation of harms reporting in U.S. Cancer screening guidelines. Ann Intern Med 2022;175:1582–90.10.7326/M22-1139Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
13. Bukari, D, Kemausuor, F, Quansah, DA, Adaramola, MS. Towards accelerating the deployment of decentralised renewable energy mini-grids in Ghana: review and analysis of barriers. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2021;135:110408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110408.Search in Google Scholar
14. Jbaihi, O, Ouchani, F-Z, Merrouni, AA, Cherkaoui, M, Ghennioui, A, Maaroufi, M. An AHP-GIS based site suitability analysis for integrating large-scale hybrid CSP+PV plants in Morocco: an approach to address the intermittency of solar energy. J Clean Prod 2022;369:133250.10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133250Search in Google Scholar
15. Thirumala, K, Budhavarapu, J, Devara, HB. A composite power quality index for low-voltage active distribution networks. Int J Emerg Elec Power Syst 2021;22:339–51.10.1515/ijeeps-2020-0225Search in Google Scholar
16. Jiang, X. Automatic monitoring system of power equipment based on Internet of Things technology. Int J Emerg Elec Power Syst 2022;23:807–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijeeps-2022-0144.Search in Google Scholar
17. Wan, Q, Xu, X, Zhuang, J, Pan, B. A sentiment analysis-based expert weight determination method for large-scale group decision-making driven by social media data. Expert Syst Appl 2021;185:115629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115629.Search in Google Scholar
18. Yang, X, He, H, Zhong, X. Approximate dynamic programming for nonlinear-constrained optimizations. IEEE Trans Cybern 2019;51:2419–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2019.2926248.Search in Google Scholar
19. Yang, X, He, H. Adaptive dynamic programming for decentralized stabilization of uncertain nonlinear large-scale systems with mismatched interconnections. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 2018;50:2870–82.10.1109/TSMC.2018.2837899Search in Google Scholar
20. Liu, Y, Zheng, Z, Zhao, L, Wang, Z. Quality assessment of post-consumer plastic bottles with joint entropy method: a case study in Beijing, China. Resources. Conserv Recycl 2021;175:105839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105839.Search in Google Scholar
21. Kim, M-K, Chang, JW, Park, K, Yang, DR. Comprehensive assessment of the effects of operating conditions on membrane intrinsic parameters of forward osmosis (FO) based on principal component analysis (PCA). J Membr Sci 2022;641:119909.10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119909Search in Google Scholar
22. Hafezalkotob, A, Hafezalkotob, A, Liao, H, Herrera, F. Interval MULTIMOORA method integrating interval Borda rule and interval best-worst-method-based weighting model: case study on hybrid vehicle engine selection. IEEE Trans Cybern 2019;50:1157–69. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2018.2889730.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Wu, Y, Wang, J, Ji, S, Song, Z, Ke, Y. Optimal investment selection of industrial and commercial rooftop distributed PV project based on combination weights and cloud-TODIM model from SMEs’ perspectives. J Clean Prod 2019;234:534–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.249.Search in Google Scholar
24. Noorollahi, Y, Senani, AG, Fadaei, A, Simaee, M, Moltames, R. A framework for GIS-based site selection and technical potential evaluation of PV solar farm using Fuzzy-Boolean logic and AHP multi-criteria decision-making approach. Renew Energy 2022;186:89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.124.Search in Google Scholar
25. Gao, S, Qiao, R, Lim, MK, Qu, Y, Xia, L. Integrating corporate website information into qualitative assessment for benchmarking green supply chain management practices for the chemical industry. J Clean Prod 2021;311:127590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127590.Search in Google Scholar
26. Mobin, N, Rihan, M, Zuhaib, M. Selection of an efficient linear state estimator for unified real time dynamic state estimation in Indian smart grid. Int J Emerg Elec Power Syst 2019;20:20190042. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijeeps-2019-0042.Search in Google Scholar
27. Cerrillo-Cuenca, E, Sepúlveda, M, Guerrero-Bueno, Z. Independent component analysis (ICA): a statistical approach to the analysis of superimposed rock paintings. J Archaeol Sci 2021;125:105269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105269.Search in Google Scholar
28. Zhang, L, Zhu, YQ, Yan, XX, Wu, H, Li, K. Optimized mixture kernels independent component analysis and echo state network for flame image recognition. J Electr Eng Technol 2022;17:3553–64.10.1007/s42835-022-01123-1Search in Google Scholar
29. Vishnu, N, Padgett, JE, Dueñas, OL. Risk-based bridge component importance measures under seismic loads. Earthq Spectra 2022;38:1683–1704.10.1177/87552930211073815Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
