Robot-assisted post-stroke motion rehabilitation in upper extremities: a survey

References

1. Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW, Bateman A. Stroke. Physiotherapy 1995;81:689–94.10.1016/S0031-9406(05)66623-0Search in Google Scholar

2. Scrivener K, Sherrington C, Schurr K. A systematic review of the responsiveness of lower limb physical performance measures in inpatient care after stroke. BMC Neurol 2013;13:4.10.1186/1471-2377-13-4Search in Google Scholar

3. Statistics, A.B.o. Profiles of Disability, Australia. 2009; Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4429.0main+features100262009.Search in Google Scholar

4. Stewart KC, Cauraugh JH, Summers JJ. Bilateral movement training and stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 2006;244:89–95.10.1016/j.jns.2006.01.005Search in Google Scholar

5. Hallett M. Recent advances in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehab Neural Repair 2002;16:211–7.10.1177/08839002016002003Search in Google Scholar

6. Gayla L, Poling JMW, Kerwin T. The role of multisensory feedback in haptic surface perception. In 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (HAPTICS’03). 2003.Search in Google Scholar

7. Cesqui B, Tropea P, Micera S, Krebs HI. EMG-based pattern recognition approach in post stroke robot-aided rehabilitation: a feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2013;10:75.10.1186/1743-0003-10-75Search in Google Scholar

8. Cameirao MS, Badia SB, Oller ED, Verschure PF. Neurorehabilitation using the virtual reality based Rehabilitation Gaming System: methodology, design, psychometrics, usability and validation. J NeuroEng Rehabil 2010;7:48.10.1186/1743-0003-7-48Search in Google Scholar

9. Broetz D, Braun C, Weber C, Soekadar SR, Caria A, Birbaumer N. Combination of brain-computer interface training and goal-directed physical therapy in chronic stroke: a case report. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010;24:674–9.10.1177/1545968310368683Search in Google Scholar

10. Lam P, Hebert D, Boger J, Lacheray H, Gardner D, Apkarian J, et al. A haptic-robotic platform for upper-limb reaching stroke therapy: preliminary design and evaluation results. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2008;5:15.10.1186/1743-0003-5-15Search in Google Scholar

11. Faralli A, Bigoni M, Mauro A, Rossi F, Carulli D. Noninvasive strategies to promote functional recovery after stroke. Neural Plast 2013;2013:854597.10.1155/2013/854597Search in Google Scholar

12. Dobkin BH. Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol 2004;3:528–36.10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00851-8Search in Google Scholar

13. Takeuchi N, Izumi S-I. Maladaptive plasticity for motor recovery after stroke: mechanisms and approaches. Neural Plast 2012;2012:1–9.10.1155/2012/359728Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Belda-Lois J-M, Mena-del Horno S, Bermejo-Bosch I, Moreno JC, Pons JL, Farina D, et al. Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011;8:66.10.1186/1743-0003-8-66Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Thrasher TA, Zivanovic V, McIlroy W, Popovic MR. Rehabilitation of reaching and grasping function in severe hemiplegic patients using functional electrical stimulation therapy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:706–14.10.1177/1545968308317436Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Hubbard IJ, Parsons MW, Neilson C, Carey LM. Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Occup Ther Int 2009;16:175–89.10.1002/oti.275Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Zimmerli L, Krewer C, Gassert R, Müller F, Riener R, Lünenburger L. Validation of a mechanism to balance exercise difficulty in robot-assisted upper-extremity rehabilitation after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012;9:6.10.1186/1743-0003-9-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Thielman GT, Dean CM, Gentile AM. Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: task-related training versus progressive resistive exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1613–8.10.1016/j.apmr.2004.01.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Dromerick AW, Edwards DF. Measurement of upper-extremity function early after stroke: properties of the action research arm test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1605–10.10.1016/j.apmr.2006.09.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. van Delden AL, Peper CL, Kwakkel G, Beek PJ. A systematic review of bilateral upper limb training devices for poststroke rehabilitation. Stroke Res Treat 2012;2012:972069.10.1155/2012/972069Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Bosecker C, Dipietro L, Volpe B, Krebs HI. Kinematic robot-based evaluation scales and clinical counterparts to measure upper limb motor performance in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010;24:62–9.10.1177/1545968309343214Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Ferraro M, Demaio JH, Krol J, Trudell C, Rannekleiv K, Edelstein L, et al. Assessing the motor status score: a scale for the evaluation of upper limb motor outcomes in patients after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002;16:283–9.10.1177/154596830201600306Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Padovani C, Pires CV, Ferreira FP, Borin G, Filippo TR, Imamura M. Application of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) in the recovery of upper limb function in patients after chronic stroke: a literature review. Acta Fisiátrica 2013;20:42–9.10.5935/0104-7795.20130008Search in Google Scholar

24. Hsieh YW, Lin KC, Wu CY, Lien HY, Chen JL, Chen CC, et al. Predicting clinically significant changes in motor and functional outcomes after robot-assisted stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014;95:316–21.10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Poole JL. Measures of hand function: Arthritis hand function test (AHFT), Australian Canadian osteoarthritis hand index (AUSCAN), Cochin hand function scale, functional index for hand osteoarthritis (FIHOA), grip ability test (GAT), Jebsen Hand function test (JHFT), and Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire (MHQ). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63(Suppl 11):S189–99.10.1002/acr.20631Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Vergaro E, Squeri V, Brichetto G, Casadio M, Morasso P, Solaro C, et al. Adaptive robot training for the treatment of incoordination in Multiple Sclerosis. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010;7:37.10.1186/1743-0003-7-37Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Sivan M, O’Connor RJ, Makower S, Levesley M, Bhakta B. Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke. J Rehabil Med 2011;43:181–9.10.2340/16501977-0674Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Morris JH, van Wijck F, Joice S, Ogston SA, Cole I, MacWalter RS. A comparison of bilateral and unilateral upper-limb task training in early poststroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:1237–45.10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Turk R, Burridge JH, Davis R, Cosendai G, Sparrow O, Roberts HC, et al. Therapeutic effectiveness of electric stimulation of the upper-limb poststroke using implanted microstimulators. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:1913–22.10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Loureiro RC, Harwin WS, Nagai K, Johnson M. Advances in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a technology push. Med Biol Eng Comput 2011;49:1103–18.10.1007/s11517-011-0797-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. See J, Dodakian L, Chou C, Chan V, McKenzie A, Reinkensmeyer DJ, et al. A standardized approach to the fugl-meyer assessment and its implications for clinical trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013;27:732–41.10.1177/1545968313491000Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Barreca S, Wolf SL, Fasoli S, Bohannon R. Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: a critical review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003;17:220–6.10.1177/0888439003259415Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Massie C, Malcolm MP, Greene D, Thaut M. The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:571–9.10.1016/j.apmr.2008.09.574Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:952–9.10.1053/apmr.2001.33101Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Staubli P, Nef T, Klamroth-Marganska V, Riener R. Effects of intensive arm training with the rehabilitation robot ARMin II in chronic stroke patients: four single-cases. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009;6:46.10.1186/1743-0003-6-46Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Mehrholz J, Hädrich A, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;6:CD006876.10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Coote S, Stokes EK. Effect of robot-mediated therapy on upper extremity dysfunction post-stroke – a single case study. Physiotherapy 2005;91:250–6.10.1016/j.physio.2004.12.003Search in Google Scholar

38. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;22:111–21.10.1177/1545968307305457Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

39. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hogan N. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:477–82.10.1053/apmr.2003.50110Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Prange GB, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Hermens HJ, Ijzerman MJ. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006;43:171–84.10.1682/JRRD.2005.04.0076Search in Google Scholar

41. Zhang M, Davies TC, Xie S. Effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy on ankle rehabilitation – a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2013;10:30.10.1186/1743-0003-10-30Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

42. Oujamaa L, Relave I, Froger J, Mottet D, Pelissier JY. Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke. Literature review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2009;52:269–93.10.1016/j.rehab.2008.10.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Brewer BR, McDowell SK, Worthen-Chaudhari LC. Poststroke upper extremity rehabilitation: a review of robotic systems and clinical results. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007;14:22–44.10.1310/tsr1406-22Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Lo HS, Xie SQ. Exoskeleton robots for upper-limb rehabilitation: state of the art and future prospects. Med Eng Phys 2012;34:261–8.10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.10.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

45. Norouzi-Gheidari N, Archambault PS, Fung J. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Rehabil Res Dev 2012;49:479–96.10.1682/JRRD.2010.10.0210Search in Google Scholar

46. Kahn LE, Zygman ML, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2006;3:12.10.1186/1743-0003-3-12Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

47. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, Federman DG, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1772–83.10.1056/NEJMoa0911341Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

48. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:111–21.10.1177/1545968307305457Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

49. Mazzoleni S, Sale P, Franceschini M, Bigazzi S, Carrozza MC, Dario P, et al. Effects of proximal and distal robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on chronic stroke recovery. NeuroRehabilitation 2013;33:33–9.10.3233/NRE-130925Search in Google Scholar PubMed

50. Colombo R, Sterpi I, Mazzone A, Delconte C, Pisano F. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation in sub-acute and chronic stroke: does spontaneous recovery have a limited impact on outcome? NeuroRehabilitation 2013;33:621–9.10.3233/NRE-131002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

51. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Kahn LE, Averbuch M, McKenna-Cole A, Schmit BD, Rymer WZ. Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000;37:653–62.Search in Google Scholar

52. Krebs HI, Ferraro M, Buerger SP, Newbery MJ, Makiyama A, Sandmann M, et al. Rehabilitation robotics: pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2004;1:5.10.1186/1743-0003-1-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

53. van der Linde RQ, Lammertse P. HapticMaster – a generic force controlled robot for human interaction. Ind Robot 2003;30:515–24.10.1108/01439910310506783Search in Google Scholar

54. Coote S, Murphy B, Harwin W, Stokes E. The effect of the GENTLE/s robot-mediated therapy system on arm function after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2008;22:395–405.10.1177/0269215507085060Search in Google Scholar PubMed

55. Fazekas G, Horvath M, Toth A. A novel robot training system designed to supplement upper limb physiotherapy of patients with spastic hemiparesis. Int J Rehabil Res 2006;29:251–4.10.1097/01.mrr.0000230050.16604.d9Search in Google Scholar PubMed

56. Burgar CG, Lum PS, Scremin AM, Garber SL, Van der Loos HF, Kenney D, et al. Robot-assisted upper-limb therapy in acute rehabilitation setting following stroke: Department of Veterans Affairs multisite clinical trial. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011;48:445–58.10.1682/JRRD.2010.04.0062Search in Google Scholar

57. Rosati G, Gallina P, Masiero S. Design, implementation and clinical tests of a wire-based robot for neurorehabilitation. Neural systems and rehabilitation engineering. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007;15:560–9.10.1109/TNSRE.2007.908560Search in Google Scholar PubMed

58. Maciejasz P, Eschweiler J, Gerlach-Hahn K, Jansen-Troy A, Leonhardt S. A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2014;11:3.10.1186/1743-0003-11-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

59. Hesse S, Mehrholz J, Werner C. Robot-assisted upper and lower limb rehabilitation after stroke: walking and arm/hand function. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2008;105:330–6.Search in Google Scholar

60. Hwang CH, Seong JW, Son DS. Individual finger synchronized robot-assisted hand rehabilitation in subacute to chronic stroke: a prospective randomized clinical trial of efficacy. Clin Rehabil 2012;26:696–704.10.1177/0269215511431473Search in Google Scholar PubMed

61. Stein J, Bishop J, Gillen G, Helbok R. A pilot study of robotic-assisted exercise for hand weakness after stroke. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2011;2011:5975426.10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975426Search in Google Scholar PubMed

62. Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Mathai A, Qiu Q, Lewis J, Merians AS. Design of a complex virtual reality simulation to train finger motion for persons with hemiparesis: a proof of concept study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009;6:28.10.1186/1743-0003-6-28Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

63. Sanchez RJ, Wolbrecht E, Smith R, Liu J, Rao S, Cramer S, et al. A pneumatic robot for re-training arm movement after stroke: rationale and mechanical design. In Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005. 9th International Conference on. 2005. DOI: 10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501151.Search in Google Scholar

64. Wolbrecht ET, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Bobrow JE. Pneumatic control of robots for rehabilitation. Int J Robot Res 2009;29:23–38.10.1177/0278364909103787Search in Google Scholar

65. Sale P, Lombardi V, Franceschini M. Hand robotics rehabilitation: feasibility and preliminary results of a robotic treatment in patients with hemiparesis. Stroke Res Treat 2012;2012:1–5.10.1155/2012/820931Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

66. Masia L, Krebs HI, Cappa P, Hogan N. Design, characterization, and impedance limits of a hand robot. In Rehabilitation Robotics, 2007. ICORR 2007. IEEE 10th International Conference on. 2007.10.1109/ICORR.2007.4428558Search in Google Scholar

67. Bouzit M, Popescu G, Burdea G, Boian R. The Rutgers Master II-ND force feedback glove. In Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2002. HAPTICS 2002. Proceedings. 10th Symposium on. 2002. DOI: 10.1109/HAPTIC.2002.998952Search in Google Scholar

68. Schabowsky CN, Godfrey SB, Holley RJ, Lum PS. Development and pilot testing of HEXORR: hand EXOskeleton rehabilitation robot. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010;7:36.10.1186/1743-0003-7-36Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

69. Dovat L, Lambercy O, Gassert R, Maeder T, Milner T, Leong TC, et al. HandCARE: a cable-actuated rehabilitation system to train hand function after stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2008;16:582–91.10.1109/TNSRE.2008.2010347Search in Google Scholar PubMed

70. Lum PS, Godfrey SB, Brokaw EB, Holley RJ, Nichols D. Robotic approaches for rehabilitation of hand function after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2012;91(11 Suppl 3):S242–54.10.1097/PHM.0b013e31826bcedbSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

71. Einav O, Geva D, Yoeli D, Kerzhner M, Mauritz KH. Development and validation of the first robotic scale for the clinical assessment of upper extremity motor impairments in stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil 2011;18(Suppl 1):587–98.10.1310/tsr18s01-587Search in Google Scholar PubMed

72. Giralt X, Amigo L, Casals A, Amat J. Robotic platform to evaluate the assistance and assessment on the rehabilitation loop. In: Pons JL, Torricelli D, Pajaro M, editors. Converging clinical and engineering research on neurorehabilitation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013:1031–5.10.1007/978-3-642-34546-3_169Search in Google Scholar

73. Balasubramanian S, Wei R, Perez M, Shepard B, Koeneman E, Koeneman J, et al. RUPERT: an exoskeleton robot for assisting rehabilitation of arm functions. Virt Rehabil 2008:163–7.10.1109/ICVR.2008.4625154Search in Google Scholar

74. Bernabucci I, Conforto S, Capozza M, Accornero N, Schmid M, D’Alessio T. A biologically inspired neural network controller for ballistic arm movements. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007;4:33.10.1186/1743-0003-4-33Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

75. Duschau-Wicke A, Caprez A, Riener R. Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010;7:43.10.1186/1743-0003-7-43Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

76. Goldenberg GJ. Robust hybrid impedance control of robot manipulators. In IEEE Intemational Conference on Robotics and Automation. April, 1991. Sacramento, California.Search in Google Scholar

77. Glen Bilodeau EP. A model-based impedance control scheme for high-performance hydraulic joints. In International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 1998. Victoria, B.C., Canada.Search in Google Scholar

78. Ming-Shaung Ju C-C. A rehabilitation robot with force-position hybrid fuzzy controller: hybrid fuzzy control of rehabilitation robot. In IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2005.10.1109/TNSRE.2005.847354Search in Google Scholar PubMed

79. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Takahashi CD, Timoszyk WK, Reinkensmeyer AN, Kahn LE. Design of robot assistance for arm movement therapy following stroke. Adv Robotics 2001;14:625–37.10.1163/156855301742058Search in Google Scholar

80. Chang M-K. An adaptive self-organizing fuzzy sliding mode controller for a 2-DOF rehabilitation robot actuated by pneumatic muscle actuators. Control Eng Pract 2010;18:13–22.10.1016/j.conengprac.2009.08.005Search in Google Scholar

81. Vergaro E, Casadio M, Squeri V, Giannoni P, Morasso P, Sanguineti V. Self-adaptive robot training of stroke survivors for continuous tracking movements. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010;7:13.10.1186/1743-0003-7-13Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

82. Choi Y, Gordon J, Park H, Schweighofer N. Feasibility of the adaptive and automatic presentation of tasks (ADAPT) system for rehabilitation of upper extremity function post-stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011;8:42.10.1186/1743-0003-8-42Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

83. Goffredo M, Bernabucci I, Schmid M, Conforto S. A neural tracking and motor control approach to improve rehabilitation of upper limb movements. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2008;5:5.10.1186/1743-0003-5-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

84. Marchal-Crespo L, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009;6:20.10.1186/1743-0003-6-20Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

85. Koopman B, van Asseldonk EH, van der Kooij H. Selective control of gait subtasks in robotic gait training: foot clearance support in stroke survivors with a powered exoskeleton. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2013;10:3.10.1186/1743-0003-10-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

86. Keller U, Rauter G, Riener R. Assist-as-needed path control for the PASCAL rehabilitation robot. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. June 2013. Seattle, Washington, USA.10.1109/ICORR.2013.6650475Search in Google Scholar PubMed