Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 14, 2013

The Value of Diagnostic Testing in Personalized Medicine

  • Dana P. Goldman , Charu Gupta , Eshan Vasudeva , Kostas Trakas , Ralph Riley , Darius Lakdawalla , David Agus , Neeraj Sood , Anupam B. Jena and Tomas J. Philipson EMAIL logo

Abstract

Personalized medicine – the targeting of therapies to individuals on the basis of their biological, clinical, or genetic characteristics – is thought to have the potential to transform health care. While much emphasis has been placed on the value of personalized therapies, less attention has been paid to the value generated by the diagnostic tests that direct patients to those targeted treatments. This paper presents a framework derived from information economics for assessing the value of diagnostics. We demonstrate, via a case study, that the social value of such diagnostics can be very large, both by avoiding unnecessary treatment and by identifying patients who otherwise would not get treated. Despite the potential social benefits, diagnostic development has been discouraged by cost-based, rather than value-based, reimbursement.


Corresponding author: Tomas J. Philipson, Harris School of Public Policy, The University of Chicago, 1155 East 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA, e-mail:

  1. 1

    For example, HercepTest is an assay to determine HER2 protein overexpression in breast cancer tissue. Only breast cancer patients who overexpress HER2 respond to therapy with Herceptin (trastuzumab), a monoclonal antibody (Hudis 2007).

References

Aspinall, M. G. and R. G. Hamermesh (2007) “Realizing the Promise of Personalized Medicine,” Harvard Business Review, 85(10):108–117.Search in Google Scholar

Brune, K., H. A. Katus, J. Moecks, E. Spanuth, A. S. Jaffe and E. Giannitsis (2008) “N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Concentrations Predict the Risk of Cardiovascular Adverse Events from Antiinflammatory Drugs: A Pilot Trial,” Clinical Chemistry, 54(7):1149–1157.10.1373/clinchem.2007.097428Search in Google Scholar

Carlson, J. J., L. P. Garrison Jr and S. D. Sullivan (2009) “Paying for Outcomes: Innovative Coverage and Reimbursement Schemes for Pharmaceuticals,” Journal of Management Care Pharmacology, 15(8):683.10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.8.683Search in Google Scholar

Davis, J.C., L. Furstenthal, A. A. Desai, T. Norris, S. Sutaria, E. Fleming and P. Ma (2009) “The Microeconomics of Personalized Medicine: Today’s Challenge and Tomorrow’s Promise,” Natural Review Drug Discovery, 8(4):279–286.10.1038/nrd2825Search in Google Scholar

Elkin, E. B., M. C. Weinstein, E. P. Winer, K. M. Kuntz, S. J. Schnitt and J. C. Weeks (2004) “HER-2 Testing and Trastuzumab Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(5):854–863.10.1200/JCO.2004.04.158Search in Google Scholar

Epstein, R. S., T. P. Moyer, R. E. Aubert, D. J. Okane, F. Xia, R. R. Verbrugge, B. F. Gage and J. R. Teagarden (2010) “Warfarin Genotyping Reduces Hospitalization Rates Results from the MM-WES (Medco-Mayo Warfarin Effectiveness Study),” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 55(25):2804–2812.10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.009Search in Google Scholar

Faulkner, E. (2009) “Clinical Utility or Impossibility? Addressing the Molecular Diagnostics Assessment and Reimbursement Conundrum,” Journal of Managed Care Medicine, 12(4): 42–.Search in Google Scholar

Gardiner, S. J. and E. J. Begg (2005) “Pharmacogenetic Testing for Drug Metabolizing Enzymes: Is It Happening in Practice?” Pharmacogenetics and Genomics, 15(5):365.10.1097/01213011-200505000-00013Search in Google Scholar

Gaughan, E. M. and D. B. Costa (2011) “Genotype-Driven Therapies for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Focus on EGFR, KRAS and ALK Gene Abnormalities,” Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, 3(3):113–125.10.1177/1758834010397569Search in Google Scholar

Health Advances (2010) “The Reimbursement Landscape for Novel Diagnostics.”Search in Google Scholar

Hudis, C. A. (2007) “Trastuzumab – Mechanism of Action and Use in Clinical Practice,” New England Journal of Medicine, 357(1):39–51.10.1056/NEJMra043186Search in Google Scholar

Institute of Medicine (2010) Policy Issues in the Development of Personalized Medicine in Oncology: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kemp, L. K., C. M. Doran, T. Vos and W. Hall (2007) “Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Genetic Screening for the Taq1B Polymorphism in the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease,” Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 7(2):119–128.10.1586/14737167.7.2.119Search in Google Scholar

Lakdawalla, D. N., E. C. Sun, A. B. Jena, C. M. Reyes, D. P. Goldman and T. J. Philipson (2010) “An Economic Evaluation of the War on Cancer,” Journal of Health Economics, 29(3):333–346.10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.02.006Search in Google Scholar

McCabe, L. L. and E. R. McCabe (2008) “Expanded Newborn Screening: Implications for Genomic Medicine,” Annual Review of Medicine, 59:163–175.10.1146/annurev.med.59.110106.132016Search in Google Scholar

McGhee, S. A., E. R. Stiehm and E. R. McCabe (2005) “Potential Costs and Benefits of Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency,” The Journal of Pediatrics, 147(5): 603–608.10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, P. (1970) “Information and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Political Economy, 78(2):311–329.10.1086/259630Search in Google Scholar

Philipson, T. J. and A. B. Jena (2005) “Who Benefits from New Medical Technologies? Estimates of Consumer and Producer Surpluses for HIV/AIDS Drugs,” NBER Working Paper Series, No. 11810.Search in Google Scholar

Psaty, B. M. and C. D. Furberg (2005) “COX-2 Inhibitors – Lessons in Drug Safety,” New England Journal of Medicine, 352(11):1133–1135.10.1056/NEJMe058042Search in Google Scholar

Ruff, C. T., D. A. Morrow, P. Jarolim, F. Ren, C. F. Contant, A. Kaur, S. P. Curtis, L. Laine, C. P. Cannon and K. Brune (2011) “Evaluation of NT-proBNP and High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein for Predicting Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Arthritis Taking Longterm Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs,” Journal of Rheumatology, 38(6):1071–1078.10.3899/jrheum.100880Search in Google Scholar

Seabury, S. A., D. P. Goldman, J. R. Maclean, J. R. Penrod and D. N. Lakdawalla (2012) “Patients Value Metastatic Cancer Therapy more Highly than is Typically shown through Traditional Estimates,” Health Affairs, 31(4):691–699.10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0174Search in Google Scholar

Sood, N., T. Philipson and P. Huckfeldt (2013) “Quantifying the Value of Personalized Medicines: Evidence from COX-2 Inhibitors,” Forum for Health Economics and Policy, 16(1):1–22.10.1515/fhep-2013-0005Search in Google Scholar

The Lewin Group (2005) The Value of Diagnostics Innovation, Adoption and Diffusion into Health Care, Prepared for the Advanced Medical Technology Association.Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2004) Safety of Vioxx: FDA Public Health Advisory. Washington, DC.Search in Google Scholar

UnitedHealth Group (2012) “Personalized Medicine: Trends and Prospects for the New Science of Genetic Testing and Molecular Diagnostics,” Working Paper 7.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-09-14
Published in Print: 2013-09-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Downloaded on 9.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/fhep-2013-0023/html
Scroll to top button