Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter November 18, 2017

Towards Pressure-Robust Mixed Methods for the Incompressible Navier–Stokes Equations

  • Naveed Ahmed , Alexander Linke EMAIL logo and Christian Merdon

Abstract

In this contribution, we review classical mixed methods for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations that relax the divergence constraint and are discretely inf-sup stable. Though the relaxation of the divergence constraint was claimed to be harmless since the beginning of the 1970s, Poisson locking is just replaced by another more subtle kind of locking phenomenon, which is sometimes called poor mass conservation and led in computational practice to the exclusion of mixed methods with low-order pressure approximations like the Bernardi–Raugel or the Crouzeix–Raviart finite element methods. Indeed, divergence-free mixed methods and classical mixed methods behave qualitatively in a different way: divergence-free mixed methods are pressure-robust, which means that, e.g., their velocity error is independent of the continuous pressure. The lack of pressure robustness in classical mixed methods can be traced back to a consistency error of an appropriately defined discrete Helmholtz projector. Numerical analysis and numerical examples reveal that really locking-free mixed methods must be discretely inf-sup stable and pressure-robust, simultaneously. Further, a recent discovery shows that locking-free, pressure-robust mixed methods do not have to be divergence free. Indeed, relaxing the divergence constraint in the velocity trial functions is harmless, if the relaxation of the divergence constraint in some velocity test functions is repaired, accordingly. Thus, inf-sup stable, pressure-robust mixed methods will potentially allow in future to reduce the approximation order of the discretizations used in computational practice, without compromising the accuracy.

MSC 2010: 76D05; 65M60; 65N30

References

[1] N. Ahmed, A. Linke and C. Merdon, Towards pressure-robust mixed methods for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations, Finite Volumes for Complex Applications VIII—Methods and Theoretical Aspects, Springer Proc. Math. Stat. 199, Springer, Cham (2017), 351–359. 10.1007/978-3-319-57397-7_28Search in Google Scholar

[2] D. N. Arnold, F. Brezzi and M. Fortin, A stable finite element for the Stokes equations, Calcolo 21 (1984), no. 4, 337–344. 10.1007/BF02576171Search in Google Scholar

[3] I. Babuška and M. Suri, Locking effects in the finite element approximation of elasticity problems, Numer. Math. 62 (1992), no. 4, 439–463. 10.1007/BF01396238Search in Google Scholar

[4] I. Babuška and M. Suri, On locking and robustness in the finite element method, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 29 (1992), no. 5, 1261–1293. 10.1137/0729075Search in Google Scholar

[5] C. Bernardi and G. Raugel, Analysis of some finite elements for the Stokes problem, Math. Comp. 44 (1985), no. 169, 71–79. 10.1090/S0025-5718-1985-0771031-7Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. Bonelle and A. Ern, Analysis of compatible discrete operator schemes for the Stokes equations on polyhedral meshes, IMA J. Numer. Anal. 35 (2015), no. 4, 1672–1697. 10.1093/imanum/dru051Search in Google Scholar

[7] C. Brennecke, A. Linke, C. Merdon and J. Schöberl, Optimal and pressure-independent L2 velocity error estimates for a modified Crouzeix–Raviart Stokes element with BDM reconstructions, J. Comput. Math. 33 (2015), no. 2, 191–208. 10.4208/jcm.1411-m4499Search in Google Scholar

[8] F. Brezzi and M. Fortin, Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods, Springer Ser. Comput. Math. 15, Springer, New York, 1991. 10.1007/978-1-4612-3172-1Search in Google Scholar

[9] M. A. Case, V. J. Ervin, A. Linke and L. G. Rebholz, A connection between Scott–Vogelius and grad-div stabilized Taylor–Hood FE approximations of the Navier–Stokes equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 49 (2011), no. 4, 1461–1481. 10.1137/100794250Search in Google Scholar

[10] R. Codina, Numerical solution of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations with Coriolis forces based on the discretization of the total time derivative, J. Comput. Phys. 148 (1999), no. 2, 467–496. 10.1006/jcph.1998.6126Search in Google Scholar

[11] M. Crouzeix and P.-A. Raviart, Conforming and nonconforming finite element methods for solving the stationary Stokes equations. I, Rev. Française Automat. Informat. Recherche Opérationnelle Sér. Rouge 7 (1973), no. R-3, 33–75. 10.1051/m2an/197307R300331Search in Google Scholar

[12] D. A. Di Pietro, A. Ern, A. Linke and F. Schieweck, A discontinuous skeletal method for the viscosity-dependent Stokes problem, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 306 (2016), 175–195. 10.1016/j.cma.2016.03.033Search in Google Scholar

[13] O. Dorok, W. Grambow and L. Tobiska, Aspects of finite element discretizations for solving the Boussinesq approximation of the Navier–Stokes equations, Numerical Methods for the Navier–Stokes Equations, Notes on Numer. Fluid Mech. 47, Vieweg+Teubner, Wiesbaden (1994), 50–61. 10.1007/978-3-663-14007-8_6Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. Fortin and A. Fortin, Newer and newer elements for incompressible flows, Finite Elements Fluids 6 (1985), 171–187. Search in Google Scholar

[15] L. P. Franca and T. J. R. Hughes, Two classes of mixed finite element methods, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 69 (1988), no. 1, 89–129. 10.1016/0045-7825(88)90168-5Search in Google Scholar

[16] P. Frolkovic, Consistent velocity approximation for density driven flow and transport, Advanced Computational Methods in Engineering. Part 2, Shaker Publishing, Maastricht (1998), 603–611. Search in Google Scholar

[17] K. J. Galvin, A. Linke, L. G. Rebholz and N. E. Wilson, Stabilizing poor mass conservation in incompressible flow problems with large irrotational forcing and application to thermal convection, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 237/240 (2012), 166–176. 10.1016/j.cma.2012.05.008Search in Google Scholar

[18] S. Ganesan and V. John, Pressure separation—A technique for improving the velocity error in finite element discretisations of the Navier–Stokes equations, Appl. Math. Comput. 165 (2005), no. 2, 275–290. 10.1016/j.amc.2004.04.071Search in Google Scholar

[19] S. Ganesan, G. Matthies and L. Tobiska, On spurious velocities in incompressible flow problems with interfaces, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 196 (2007), no. 7, 1193–1202. 10.1016/j.cma.2006.08.018Search in Google Scholar

[20] J.-F. Gerbeau, C. Le Bris and M. Bercovier, Spurious velocities in the steady flow of an incompressible fluid subjected to external forces, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 25 (1997), no. 6, 679–695. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19970930)25:6<679::AID-FLD582>3.0.CO;2-QSearch in Google Scholar

[21] V. Girault and P.-A. Raviart, Finite Element Methods for Navier–Stokes Equations, Springer Ser. Comput. Math.5, Springer, Berlin, 1986. 10.1007/978-3-642-61623-5Search in Google Scholar

[22] P. M. Gresho, R. L. Lee, S. T. Chan and J. M. Leone, A new finite element for incompressible or Boussinesq fluids, International Conference on Finite Elements in Flow Problems. Volume 1 (Banff 1980), University of Calgary, Calgary (1981), 204–215. Search in Google Scholar

[23] J. Guzmán and M. Neilan, Conforming and divergence-free Stokes elements in three dimensions, IMA J. Numer. Anal. 34 (2014), no. 4, 1489–1508. 10.1093/imanum/drt053Search in Google Scholar

[24] J. Guzmán and M. Neilan, Conforming and divergence-free Stokes elements on general triangular meshes, Math. Comp. 83 (2014), no. 285, 15–36. 10.1090/S0025-5718-2013-02753-6Search in Google Scholar

[25] E. Jenkins, V. John, A. Linke and L. Rebholz, On the parameter choice in grad-div stabilization for the Stokes equations, Adv. Comput. Math. 40 (2014), no. 2, 491–516. 10.1007/s10444-013-9316-1Search in Google Scholar

[26] V. John, Finite Element Methods for Incompressible Flow Problems, Springer Ser. Comput. Math. 51, Springer, Cham, 2016. 10.1007/978-3-319-45750-5Search in Google Scholar

[27] V. John, A. Linke, C. Merdon, M. Neilan and L. G. Rebholz, On the divergence constraint in mixed finite element methods for incompressible flows, SIAM Rev. 59 (2017), no. 3, 492–544. 10.1137/15M1047696Search in Google Scholar

[28] P. L. Lederer, A. Linke, C. Merdon and J. Schöberl, Divergence-free reconstruction operators for pressure-robust Stokes discretizations with continuous pressure finite elements, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 55 (2017), no. 3, 1291–1314. 10.1137/16M1089964Search in Google Scholar

[29] C. Lehrenfeld and J. Schöberl, High order exactly divergence-free hybrid discontinuous Galerkin methods for unsteady incompressible flows, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 307 (2016), 339–361. 10.1016/j.cma.2016.04.025Search in Google Scholar

[30] A. Linke, Collision in a cross-shaped domain—A steady 2D Navier–Stokes example demonstrating the importance of mass conservation in CFD, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 198 (2009), no. 41–44, 3278–3286. 10.1016/j.cma.2009.06.016Search in Google Scholar

[31] A. Linke, A divergence-free velocity reconstruction for incompressible flows, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 350 (2012), no. 17–18, 837–840. 10.1016/j.crma.2012.10.010Search in Google Scholar

[32] A. Linke, On the role of the Helmholtz decomposition in mixed methods for incompressible flows and a new variational crime, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 268 (2014), 782–800. 10.1016/j.cma.2013.10.011Search in Google Scholar

[33] A. Linke, G. Matthies and L. Tobiska, Robust arbitrary order mixed finite element methods for the incompressible Stokes equations with pressure independent velocity errors, ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 50 (2016), no. 1, 289–309. 10.1051/m2an/2015044Search in Google Scholar

[34] A. Linke and C. Merdon, On velocity errors due to irrotational forces in the Navier–Stokes momentum balance, J. Comput. Phys. 313 (2016), 654–661. 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.02.070Search in Google Scholar

[35] A. Linke and C. Merdon, Pressure-robustness and discrete Helmholtz projectors in mixed finite element methods for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 311 (2016), 304–326. 10.1016/j.cma.2016.08.018Search in Google Scholar

[36] A. Linke, C. Merdon and W. Wollner, Optimal L2 velocity error estimate for a modified pressure-robust Crouzeix–Raviart Stokes element, IMA J. Numer. Anal. 37 (2017), no. 1, 354–374. 10.1093/imanum/drw019Search in Google Scholar

[37] M. Neilan, Discrete and conforming smooth de Rham complexes in three dimensions, Math. Comp. 84 (2015), no. 295, 2059–2081. 10.1090/S0025-5718-2015-02958-5Search in Google Scholar

[38] M. A. Olshanskii and A. Reusken, Grad-div stabilization for Stokes equations, Math. Comp. 73 (2004), no. 248, 1699–1718. 10.1090/S0025-5718-03-01629-6Search in Google Scholar

[39] D. Pelletier, A. Fortin and R. Camarero, Are FEM solutions of incompressible flows really incompressible? (or how simple flows can cause headaches!), Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 9 (1989), no. 1, 99–112. 10.1002/fld.1650090108Search in Google Scholar

[40] J. Qin, On the Convergence of Some Low Order Mixed Finite Elements for Incompressible Fluids, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, 1994; Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, 1994. Search in Google Scholar

[41] J. Qin and S. Zhang, Stability and approximability of the 𝒫1-𝒫0 element for Stokes equations, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 54 (2007), no. 5, 497–515. 10.1002/fld.1407Search in Google Scholar

[42] F. Schieweck, Parallele Lösung der Navier–Stokes-Gleichungen, Habilitation, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, 1997. Search in Google Scholar

[43] H. Sohr, The Navier–Stokes Equations, Mod. Birkhäuser Class., Birkhäuser, Basel, 2001. 10.1007/978-3-0348-8255-2Search in Google Scholar

[44] R. Stenberg, Error analysis of some finite element methods for the Stokes problem, Math. Comp. 54 (1990), no. 190, 495–508. 10.1090/S0025-5718-1990-1010601-XSearch in Google Scholar

[45] R. W. Thatcher and D. Silvester, A locally mass conserving quadratic velocity, linear pressure element, Numerical Analysis Report No. 147, Manchester University/UMIST, 1987. Search in Google Scholar

[46] D. M. Tidd, R. W. Thatcher and A. Kaye, The free surface flow of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids trapped by surface tension, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 8 (1988), no. 9, 1011–1027. 10.1002/fld.1650080904Search in Google Scholar

[47] S. Zhang, A new family of stable mixed finite elements for the 3D Stokes equations, Math. Comp. 74 (2005), no. 250, 543–554. 10.1090/S0025-5718-04-01711-9Search in Google Scholar

[48] S. Zhang, A family of Qk+1,k×Qk,k+1 divergence-free finite elements on rectangular grids, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47 (2009), no. 3, 2090–2107. 10.1137/080728949Search in Google Scholar

[49] S. Zhang, Divergence-free finite elements on tetrahedral grids for k6, Math. Comp. 80 (2011), no. 274, 669–695. 10.1090/S0025-5718-2010-02412-3Search in Google Scholar

[50] S. Zhang, Quadratic divergence-free finite elements on Powell–Sabin tetrahedral grids, Calcolo 48 (2011), no. 3, 211–244. 10.1007/s10092-010-0035-4Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-05-12
Revised: 2017-09-06
Accepted: 2017-10-03
Published Online: 2017-11-18
Published in Print: 2018-07-01

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cmam-2017-0047/html
Scroll to top button