Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
References
1. Jones G, Calleja J, Chesher D, Parvin C, Yundt-Pacheo J, Mackay M, et al. Collective opinion paper on a 2013 AACB workshop of experts seeking harmonisation of approaches to setting a laboratory quality control policy. Clin Biochem Rev 2015;36:87–95.Search in Google Scholar
2. Kinns H, Pitkin S, Housley D, Freedman D. Internal quality control: best practice. J Clin Pathol 2013;66:1027–32.10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201661Search in Google Scholar
3. Miller WG, Myers GL, Rej R. Why commutability matters. Clin Chem 2006;52:553–4.10.1373/clinchem.2005.063511Search in Google Scholar
4. Miller WG, Myers GL. Commutability still matters. Clin Chem 2013;59:1291–3.10.1373/clinchem.2013.208785Search in Google Scholar
5. Miller WG, Jones GR, Horowitz GL, Weykamp C. Proficiency testing/external quality assessment: current challenges and future directions. Clin Chem 2011;57:1670–80.10.1373/clinchem.2011.168641Search in Google Scholar
6. Miller WG. Specimen materials, target values and commutability for external quality assessment (proficiency testing) schemes. Clin Chim Acta 2003;327:25–37.10.1016/S0009-8981(02)00370-4Search in Google Scholar
7. Badrick T, Graham P. Can a combination of average of normals and “real time” external quality assurance replace internal quality control? Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:549–53.10.1515/cclm-2017-0115Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. RCPA Quality Assurance Programs Pty Ltd., Sydney, Australia. www.rcpaqap.com.au. Accessed: 23 Jul 2017.Search in Google Scholar
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
