Abstract
Background: Manual microscopy still represents the gold standard for urinary sediment (US) examination. We report the results obtained in the period 2012–2015 by the EQA Italian program on US, which today involves about 260 laboratories.
Methods: The program includes four surveys per year. In two surveys, participants are asked to supply identification and clinical association of US particles. In two other surveys, they are asked to supply the diagnosis of clinical cases, presented with images, some key laboratory findings and a short clinical history. Sixty-six images of US particles (21 cells, 2 lipids, 21 casts, 10 crystals, 3 microorganisms, 15 contaminants) and seven clinical cases were presented.
Results: The correct identification rate for each category of particles, in decreasing order, was: micro-organisms (mean±SD: 92.4%±4.5%), lipids (92.0%±1.8%), casts (82.8%±8.8%), crystals (79.4%±29.8%), cells (77.3%±13.5%), and contaminants (70.9%±22.2%). For 13 particles, a correct clinical association was indicated by 91.5%±11.7% of participants, while it was 52.7% for particles associated with urinary tract infection. For clinical cases, due to a high rate of particles misidentification, only 44.3%±10.1% of participants achieved access to clinical diagnosis, which was then correctly indicated by 92.5%±5.3% of them.
Conclusions: The results of the EQA program confirm that, while some US particles are well known in terms of identification, clinical association and clinical meaning, others particles still are not, and this represents an important reason to encourage EQA programs on US.
References
1. ISO 15189:2012. Medical laboratories – requirements for quality and competence. Geneva: ISO, 2012.Search in Google Scholar
2. Kouri T, Fogazzi G, Gant V, Hallander H, Hofmann W, Guder WG. European urinalysis guidelines. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2000;60(Suppl 231):20–3.10.1080/00365513.2000.12056993Search in Google Scholar
3. CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute, ex NCCLS). GP16-A3 – Urinalysis; Approved guideline – Third Edition, 2009; Vol. 29, No. 4.Search in Google Scholar
4. Guder WG, Boisson RC, Fogazzi G, Galimany R, Kouri T, Malakhov VN, et al. External quality assessment of urine analysis in Europe. Results of a round table discussion during the Symposium ‘From Uroscopy to Molecular Analysis’, Seeon, Germany, September 18-20, 1999. Clin Chim Acta 2000;297:275–84.10.1016/S0009-8981(00)00253-9Search in Google Scholar
5. Cwiklińska A, Kakol J, Kuchta A, Kortas-StempakB, Pacanis A, Rogulski J, et al. The standardization of urine particle counting in medical laboratories – a Polish experience with the EQA programme. Scand J clin Lab Invest 2012:72:52–8.10.3109/00365513.2011.628688Search in Google Scholar PubMed
6. Appendix B. Origin and application of proficiency testing: why we do it. In: Haber MH, Blomberg D, Galagan KA, Glassy EF, Ward PC, editors. Color atlas of the urinary sediment. An illustrated field guide based on proficiency testing. Northfield: CAP Press, 2010:403–9.Search in Google Scholar
7. Sciacovelli L, Zardo L, Secchiero S, Plebani M. Quality specifications in EQA schemes: from theory to practice. Clin Chim Acta 2004;346:87–97.10.1016/j.cccn.2004.02.037Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Sciacovelli L, Secchiero S, Zardo L, Zaninotto M, Plebani M. External Quality Assessment: an effective tool for Clinical Governance in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:740–9.10.1515/CCLM.2006.133Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Sciacovelli L, Secchiero S, Zardo L, Plebani M. The role of External Quality Assessment. Biochemia Medica 2010;2:160–4.10.11613/BM.2010.019Search in Google Scholar
10. Ceriotti F, Secchiero S, Sciacovelli L, Zaninotto M, Zardo L, Plebani M. Linee guida per la gestione dei Programmi di Valutazione Esterna di Qualità. Documento SIBioC. Biochimica Clinica 2011;35:107–26.Search in Google Scholar
11. Secchiero S, Sciacovelli L, Faggian A, Plebani M. Gli strumenti di assicurazione della Qualità in Medicina di Laboratorio: i Programmi di VEQ e gli Indicatori di Qualità del Centro di Ricerca Biomedica. Ligand Assay 2013;18,2:41–53.Search in Google Scholar
12. Fogazzi GB, Garigali G. The clinical art and science of urinary microscopy. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2003;12:625–32.10.1097/00041552-200311000-00009Search in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Fogazzi GB, Garigali G, Pirovano B, Muratore MT, Raimondi S, Berti S. How to improve the teaching of urine microscopy. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45:407–12.10.1515/CCLM.2007.079Search in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Fogazzi GB, Verdesca S, Garigali G. Urinalysis: core curriculum 2008. Am J Kidney Dis 2008;51:1052–67.10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.11.039Search in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Fogazzi GB. The urinary sediment. An integrated view, 3rd ed. Milano: Elsevier, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
16. Fogazzi GB, Secchiero S, Consonni D, Sciacovelli L, Zardo L, Garigali G, et al. An Italian external quality assessment (EQA) program on urinary sediment. Clin Chim Acta 2010;411:859–67.10.1016/j.cca.2010.02.073Search in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Fogazzi GB, Secchiero S, Garigali G, Plebani M. Evaluation of clinical cases in External Quality Assessment Scheme (EQAS) for the urinary sediment. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:845–52.10.1515/cclm-2013-0785Search in Google Scholar
18. Manoni F, Tinello A, Fornasiero L, Hoffer P, Temporin V, Valverde S, et al. Urine particle evaluation: a comparison between the UF-1000i and quantitative microscopy. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:1107–11.10.1515/CCLM.2010.233Search in Google Scholar
19. Manoni F, Gessoni G, Alessio MG, Caleffi A, Saccani G, Silvestri MG, et al. Mid-stream vs. first-voided urine collection by using automated analyzers for particle examination in healthy subjects: an Italian multicenter study. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;50:679–84.Search in Google Scholar
20. Manoni F, Gessoni G, Caleffi A, Alessio MG, Rosso R, Menozzi P, et al. Pediatric reference values for urine particle quantification by using automated flow cytometer: results of a multicenter study of Italian urinalysis group. Clin Biochem 2013;46: 1820–4.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.09.005Search in Google Scholar
21. Manoni F, Gessoni G, Alessio MG, Caleffi A, Saccani G, Epifani MG, et al. Gender’s equality in evaluation of urine particles: results of a multicenter study of the Italian urinalysis group. Clin Chim Acta 2014;1;427:1–5.10.1016/j.cca.2013.09.012Search in Google Scholar
22. Hotta O, Yusa N, Kitamura H, Taguma Y. Urinary macrophages as activity markers of renal injury. Clin Chim Acta 2000;297:123–33.10.1016/S0009-8981(00)00239-4Search in Google Scholar
23. Maruhashi Y, Nakajima M, Akazawa H, Shimoyama H, Nishiguchi M, Yamoto Y, et al. Analysis of macrophages in urine sediments in children with IgA nephropathy. Clin Nephrol 2004;62:336–43.10.5414/CNP62336Search in Google Scholar PubMed
24. Perazella MA, Coca SG, Kanbay M, Brewster UC, Parikh CR. Diagnostic value of urine microscopy for differential diagnosis of acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3:1615–9.10.2215/CJN.02860608Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
25. Chawla LS, Dommu A, Berger A, Shih S, Patel SS. Urinary sediment cast scoring index for acute kidney injury: a pilot study. Nephron Clin Practice 2008;110:145–50.10.1159/000166605Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
26. Fogazzi GB, Carboni N, Pruneri G, Ponticelli C. The cells of deep layers of the urothelium in the urine sediment: an overlooked marker of severe diseases of the excretory urinary system. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1995;10:1918–9.Search in Google Scholar
27. Fogazzi GB, Saglimbeni L, Banfi G, Cantú M, Moroni G, Garigali G, et al. Urinary sediment features in proliferative and non-proliferative glomerular diseases. J Nephrol 2005;18:703–10.Search in Google Scholar
28. Fogazzi GB, Ferrari B, Garigali G, Simonini P, Consonni D. Urinary sediment findings in acute interstitial nephritis. Am J Kidney Dis 2012;60:330–2.10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.05.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed
29. Fairley KF, Birch DF. Hematuria: a simple method for identifying glomerular bleeding. Kidney Int 1982;2:105–8.Search in Google Scholar
30. Rasoulpour M, Banco L, Laut JM, Burke GS. Inability of community based laboratories to identify pathological casts in urine samples. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1996;150:1201–4.10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170360091015Search in Google Scholar PubMed
31. Tsai JJ, Yeun JY, Kumar VA, Don BR. Comparison and interpretation of urinalysis performed by a nephrologist versus a hospital-based clinical laboratory. Am J Kidney Dis 2005;46:820–9.10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.07.039Search in Google Scholar PubMed
32. Selvarajah M, Nicholls K, Hewitson TD, Becker GJ. Targeted urine microscopy in Anderson-Fabry disease: a cheap, sensitive and specific diagnostic technique. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011;26:3195–202.10.1093/ndt/gfr084Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2015 by De Gruyter
