Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 6, 2013

Cancer antigen 125, human epididymis 4, kallikrein 6, osteopontin and soluble mesothelin-related peptide immunocomplexed with immunoglobulin M in epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis

  • Elisabetta Bandiera EMAIL logo , Laura Zanotti EMAIL logo , Aline S.C. Fabricio , Elisa Bucca , Elisa Squarcina , Chiara Romani , Renata Tassi , Eliana Bignotti , Paola Todeschini , Germana Tognon , Cesare Romagnolo , Massimo Gion , Enrico Sartori , Tiziano Maggino , Sergio Pecorelli and Antonella Ravaggi

Abstract

Background: Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), kallikrein 6 (KLK6), osteopontin (OPN) and soluble mesothelin-related peptide (SMRP) are new promising biomarkers that could integrate CA125 in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) diagnosis. The autoantibody response to tumor antigens is a potential tool for improving the diagnostic performances of biomarkers. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic potential of these biomarkers in the form of free markers and immunocomplexed with immunoglobulin M (IgM). Moreover, we analyzed the association between these markers and clinico-pathological characteristics of EOC patients.

Methods: Serum and plasma samples of 60 healthy controls, 60 ovarian benign cysts, 60 endometriosis and 60 EOCs, collected before any treatment, were tested for CICs and free antigens by immunoassays.

Results: Immunocomplexes were characterized by poor sensitivity and specificity, since they allowed the detection only of a small number of EOC patients and were increased in patients with benign gynecological pathologies. However, the markers in the form of free antigens showed good diagnostic performances. Of note, CA125 and HE4 showed high sensitivity in the detection of the malignancy and HE4 emerged as a useful biomarker in differential diagnosis between EOC and endometriosis. Finally, elevated KLK6 and OPN, were associated with advanced FIGO stage, high grade disease, suboptimally debulked tumor and ascites.

Conclusions: This study confirms the diagnostic role of CA125, HE4, KLK6, OPN and SMRP, and for the first time showed that CA125, HE4, KLK6, OPN and SMRP immunocomplexed with IgM are not a potential tool for EOC diagnosis.


Corresponding authors: Dr. Elisabetta Bandiera and Dr. Laura Zanotti, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, “Angelo Nocivelli”, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Brescia, Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy, Phone: +39 0303996286, Fax: +39 0303996059

The authors thank all the nurses working in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of University of Brescia and of the “Dell’Angelo Hospital”, Mestre-Venice, and especially Ms. Margherita Franzoni and Marta Perin, for their assistance in collecting blood samples. They also thank the staff of the Laboratory Analysis Unit, Department of Clinical Pathology, Azienda ULSS 12 Veneziana, Mestre-Venice, and especially Ms. Silvia Busnardi, Ms. Maria Cristina Perdon, Mr. Dino Tamai and Mr. Claudio Zanette, for their technical assistance in processing samples.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ conflict of interest disclosure: The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. Research support played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

Research funding: Supported by grants from the Nocivelli Foundation, Brescia, Italy and by grants from the Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, Italy: PRIN project, prot2008AZJM9E and Integrated Project ‘Progetto Oncologico di Medicina Molecolare: Tumori Femminili’.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

References

1. Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:212–36.10.3322/caac.20121Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Su Z, Graybill WS, Zhu Y. Detection and monitoring of ovarian cancer. Clin Chim Acta 2013;415:341–5.10.1016/j.cca.2012.10.058Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Jacobs I, Oram D, Fairbanks J, Turner J, Frost C, Grudzinskas JG. A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:922–9.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02448.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Menon U, Skates SJ, Lewis S, Rosenthal AN, Rufford B, Sibley K, et al. Prospective study using the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm to screen for ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:7919–26.10.1200/JCO.2005.01.6642Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Bast RC Jr, Badgwell D, Lu Z, Marquez R, Rosen D, Liu J, et al. New tumor markers: CA125 and beyond. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005;15:274–81.10.1111/j.1525-1438.2005.00441.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Bast RC Jr, Brewer M, Zou C, Hernandez MA, Daley M, Ozols R, et al. Prevention and early detection of ovarian cancer: mission impossible? Recent Results Cancer Res 2007;174:91–100.10.1007/978-3-540-37696-5_9Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Buys SS, Partridge E, Black A, Johnson CC, Lamerato L, Isaacs C, et al. Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Med Assoc 2011;305:2295–303.10.1001/jama.2011.766Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Moore LE, Pfeiffer RM, Zhang Z, Lu KH, Fung ET, Bast RC Jr. Proteomic biomarkers in combination with CA 125 for detection of epithelial ovarian cancer using prediagnostic serum samples from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Cancer 2012;118:91–100.10.1002/cncr.26241Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Bast RC Jr, Skates S, Lokshin A, Moore RG. Differential diagnosis of a pelvic mass: improved algorithms and novel biomarkers. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2012;22(Suppl 1):S5–8.10.1097/IGC.0b013e318251c97dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Yip P, Chen TH, Seshaiah P, Stephen LL, Michael-Ballard KL, Mapes JP, et al. Comprehensive serum profiling for the discovery of epithelial ovarian cancer biomarkers. PLoS One 2011;6:e29533.10.1371/journal.pone.0029533Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Clarke CH, Yip C, Badgwell D, Fung ET, Coombes KR, Zhang Z, et al. Proteomic biomarkers apolipoprotein A1, truncated transthyretin and connective tissue activating protein III enhance the sensitivity of CA125 for detecting early stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2011;122:548–53.10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.06.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Zhu CS, Pinsky PF, Cramer DW, Ransohoff DF, Hartge P, Pfeiffer RM, et al. A framework for evaluating biomarkers for early detection: validation of biomarker panels for ovarian cancer PLCO Project Team. Cancer Prev Res 2011;4:375–83.10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0193Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Cramer DW, Bast RC Jr, Berg CD, Diamandis EP, Godwin AK, Hartge P, et al. Ovarian cancer biomarker performance in prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial specimens. Cancer Prev Res 2011;4:365–74.10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0195Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Yurkovetsky Z, Skates S, Lomakin A, Nolen B, Pulsipher T, Modugno F, et al. Development of a multimarker assay for early detection of ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:2159–66.10.1200/JCO.2008.19.2484Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Edgell T, Martin-Roussety G, Barker G, Autelitano DJ, Allen D, Grant P, et al. Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2010;136:1079–88.10.1007/s00432-009-0755-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Amonkar SD, Bertenshaw GP, Chen TH, Bergstrom KJ, Zhao J, Seshaiah P, et al. Development and preliminary evaluation of a multivariate index assay for ovarian cancer. PLoS One 2009;4:e4599.10.1371/journal.pone.0004599Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Bertenshaw GP, Yip P, Seshaiah P, Zhao J, Chen TH, Wiggins WS, et al. Multianalyte profiling of serum antigens and autoimmune and infectious disease molecules to identify biomarkers dysregulated in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17:2872–81.10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0464Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Visintin I, Feng Z, Longton G, Ward DC, Alvero AB, Lai Y, et al. Diagnostic markers for early detection of ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:1065–72.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1569Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Havrilesky LJ, Whitehead CM, Rubatt JM, Cheek RL, Groelke J, He Q, et al. Evaluation of biomarker panels for early stage ovarian cancer detection and monitoring for disease recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 2008;110:374–82.10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.04.041Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Zhang Z, Yu Y, Xu F, Berchuck A, van Haaften-Day C, Havrilesky LJ, et al. Combining multiple serum tumor markers improves detection of stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007;107:526–31.10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.08.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Skates SJ, Horick N, Yu Y, Xu FJ, Berchuck A, Havrilesky LJ, et al. Preoperative sensitivity and specificity for early-stage ovarian cancer when combining cancer antigen CA-125II, CA 15–3, CA 72–4, and macrophage colony-stimulating factor using mixtures of multivariate normal distributions. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:4059–66.10.1200/JCO.2004.03.091Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Moore RG, Brown AK, Miller MC, Skates S, Allard WJ, Verch T, et al. The use of multiple novel tumor biomarkers for the detection of ovarian carcinoma in patients with a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol 2008;108:402–8.10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.10.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Bandiera E, Romani C, Specchia C, Zanotti L, Galli C, Ruggeri G, et al. Serum human epididymis protein 4 and risk for ovarian malignancy algorithm as new diagnostic and prognostic tools for epithelial ovarian cancer management. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20:2496–506.10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0635Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Taylor DD, Gercel-Taylor C, Parker LP. Patient-derived tumor-reactive antibodies as diagnostic markers for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009;115:112–20.10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.06.031Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Szubert S, Michalak S, Szpurek D, Moszynski R, Krygowska-Zielinska J, Sajdak S. Anti-ovarian antibodies in sera of patients with ovarian tumors. Immunol Lett 2012;148:133–7.10.1016/j.imlet.2012.09.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Anderson KS, Wong J, Vitonis A, Crum CP, Sluss PM, Labaer J, et al. p53 autoantibodies as potential detection and prognostic biomarkers in serous ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;193:859–68.10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0880Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Cramer DW, O’Rourke DJ, Vitonis AF, Matulonis UA, Dijohnson DA, Sluss PM, et al. CA125 immune complexes in ovarian cancer patients with low CA125 concentrations. Clin Chem 2010;56:1889–92.10.1373/clinchem.2010.153122Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Gagnon A, Kim JH, Schorge JO, Ye B, Liu B, Hasselblatt K, et al. Use of a combination of approaches to identify and validate relevant tumor-associated antigens and their corresponding autoantibodies in ovarian cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:764–71.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0856Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Nesterova M, Johnson N, Cheadle C, Cho-Chung YS. Autoantibody biomarker opens a new gateway for cancer diagnosis. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006;1762:398–403.10.1016/j.bbadis.2005.12.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Lokshin AE, Winans M, Landsittel D, Marrangoni AM, Velikokhatnaya L, Modugno F, et al. Circulating IL-8 and anti-IL-8 autoantibody in patients with ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2006;102:244–51.10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.12.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Barua A, Bradaric MJ, Kebede T, Espionosa S, Edassery SL, Bitterman P, et al. Anti-tumor and anti-ovarian autoantibodies in women with ovarian cancer. Am J Reprod Immunol 2007;57:243–9.10.1111/j.1600-0897.2007.00470.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

32. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837–45.10.2307/2531595Search in Google Scholar

33. Castaldi F, Marino M, Beneduce L, Belluco C, De Marchi F, Mammano E, et al. Detection of circulating CEA-IgM complexes in early stage colorectal cancer. Int J Biol Markers 2005;20:204–8.10.1177/172460080502000402Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Beneduce L, Castaldi F, Marino M, Quarta S, Ruvoletto M, Benvegnù L, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen-immunoglobulin M complexes as novel biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 2005;103:2558–65.10.1002/cncr.21106Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Pontisso P, Quarta S, Caberlotto C, Beneduce L, Marino M, Bernardinello E, et al. Progressive increase of SCCA-IgM immune complexes in cirrhotic patients is associated with development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer 2006;119:735–40.10.1002/ijc.21908Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Beneduce L, Prayer-Galetti T, Giustinian AM, Gallotta A, Betto G, Pagano F, et al. Detection of prostate-specific antigen coupled to immunoglobulin M in prostate cancer patients. Cancer Detect Prev 2007;31:402–7.10.1016/j.cdp.2007.10.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Beneduce L, Pesce G, Gallotta A, Zampieri F, Biasiolo A, Tono N, et al. Tumour-specific induction of immune complexes: DCP-IgM in hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Clin Invest 2008;38:571–7.10.1111/j.1365-2362.2008.01985.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Dunn GP, Old LJ, Schreiber RD. The immunobiology of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting. Immunity 2004;21:137–48.10.1016/j.immuni.2004.07.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Bandiera E, Zanotti L, Bignotti E, Romani C, Tassi R, Todeschini P, et al. Human kallikrein 5: an interesting novel biomarker in ovarian cancer patients that elicits humoral response. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009;19:1015–21.10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181ab597fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Luborsky JL, Barua A, Shatavi SV, Kebede T, Abramowicz J, Rotmensch J. Anti-tumor antibodies in ovarian cancer. Am J Reprod Immunol 2005;54:55–62.10.1111/j.1600-0897.2005.00287.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Huhtinen K, Suvitie P, Hiissa J, Junnila J, Huvila J, Kujari H, et al. Serum HE4 concentration differentiates malignant ovarian tumours from ovarian endometriotic cysts. Br J Cancer 2009;100:1315–9.10.1038/sj.bjc.6605011Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

42. Bordin L, Fiore C, Donà G, Andrisani A, Ambrosini G, Faggian D, et al. Evaluation of erythrocyte band 3 phosphotyrosine level, glutathione content, CA-125, and human epididymal secretory protein E4 as combined parameters in endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1616–21.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.038Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Montagnana M, Danese E, Ruzzenente O, Bresciani V, Nuzzo T, Gelati M, et al. The ROMA (Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm) for estimating the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women presenting with pelvic mass: is it really useful? Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:521–5.10.1515/CCLM.2011.075Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Holcomb K, Vucetic Z, Miller MC, Knapp RC. Human epididymis protein 4 offers superior specificity in the differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:358.e1–6.10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2013-2-26
Accepted: 2013-7-29
Published Online: 2013-09-06
Published in Print: 2013-09-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2013-0151/html
Scroll to top button