Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mayfly (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) assemblages of a regulated perennial Mediterranean river system in the Western Balkans

  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influences of river regulations on aquatic biota are insufficiently investigated. We assessed the level of ecological disturbance of the mayfly assemblages through the damming and flow alterations at two highly regulated Mediterranean rivers in Croatia: the Cetina River and its tributary, the Ruda. Contrary to our hypotheses, species richness, abundance and diversity of mayflies increased along the river’s course. At the sites directly influenced by the river regulations, mayfly assemblage changed: it was less diverse and less abundant. However, no obvious influence of the river regulation on the mayfly assemblages was detected for the sites that were indirectly influenced by these alterations. This was most likely due to specific karst hydrology, i.e., the presence of lateral springs along the course of the river. Multidimensional scaling analysis (MDS) revealed grouping of sites according to the similarity in physico-chemical water properties. The pH and water temperature were the most important environmental variables influencing mayfly assemblages. The data on ecology and distribution of mayflies presented in the current study represent a valuable background for further research and conservation practices in the Mediterranean region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan J.D. & Castillo M.M. 2007. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters. 2 edn. Springer, 436 pp. ISBN: 978-1-4020-5582-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauernfeind E. & Humpesch U.H. 2001. Die Eintagsfliegen Zentraleuropas: Bestimmung und Okologie.Verlag des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien, Wien, 239 pp. ISBN: 3900275866, 9783900275860

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauernfeind E. & Moog O. 2000. Mayflies (Insecta: Ephemero-ptera) and the assessment of ecological integrity: a methodog-ical approach. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 71–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017090504518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauernfeind E. & Soldan T. 2012. The Mayflies of Europe (Ephemeroptera). Apollo Books, Ollerup, Denmark, 781 pp. ISBN-13: 9788788757453

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter R.M. 1977. Environmental effects of dams and impoundments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 8: 255–283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/an-nurev.es.08.110177.001351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berner L. & Pescador M.L. 1988. The Mayflies of Florida. Revised edn, University Presses of Florida, Gainesville, 415 pp. ISBN-10: 081300845X, ISBN-13: 9780813008455

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacci O. & Roje-Bonacci T. 2003. The influence of hydroelec-trical development on the flow regime of the karstic Cetina River. Hydrol. Process 17 (1): 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.ll90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonada N. & Resh V.H. 2013. Mediterraneanclimate streams and rivers: geographically separated but ecologically comparable freshwater systems. Hydrobiologia 719 (1): 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0750-013-1634-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudot J.-P., Kalkman V.J., Azpilicueta Amorín M., Bogdanović T., Cordero Rivera A., Degabriele G., Dommanget J.-L., Fer-reira S., Garrigós B., Jović M., Kotarac M., Lopau W., Mari-nov M., Mihoković N., Riservato E., Samraoui B. & Schneider W. 2009. Atlas of the Odonata of the Mediterranean and North Africa. Libellula, Supplement 9: 3–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittain J.E. 1982. Biology of mayflies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 27: 119–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.27.010182.001003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brittain J.E. & Saltveit S.J. 1989. A review of the effect of river regulation on mayflies (Ephemeroptera). Regul. Rivers Res. Manage. 3 (1): 191–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rrr.3450030119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brittain J.E. & Sartori M. 2003. Ephemeroptera (Mayflies), Chapter 90, pp. 373–380. In: Resh V.H. & Carde R.T. (eds), Encylopedia of Insects, Academic Press, Amsterdam, 1266 pp. ISBN: 0080546056, 9780080546056

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffagni A., Armanini D.G., Cazzola M., Alba-Tercedor J., López-Rodríguez M.J., Murphy J., Sandin L. & Schmidt-Kloiber A. 2015. Dataset “Ephemeroptera”. www. freshwaterecology info - the taxa and autecology database for freshwater organisms, version 6.0 (accessed 31.08.2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffagni A., Cazzola M., López-Rodríguez M.J., Alba-Tercedor J. & Armanini D.G. 2009. Vol. 3 - Ephemeroptera, pp. 1–254. In: Schmidt-Kloiber A. & Hering D. (eds), Distribution and Ecological Preferences of European Freshwater Organisms, Pensoft Publishers, Sofia-Moscow, 254 pp. ISBN-13: 9789546425089

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffagni A., Erba S. & Armanini D.G. 2010. The lenticlotic character of Mediterranean rivers and its importance to aquatic invertebrate communities. Aquat. Sci. 72 (1): 45–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-009-0112-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canning-Clode J., Valdivia N., Molis M., Thomason J.C., Wahl M. 2008. Estimation of regional richness in marine benthic communities: quantifying the error. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 6 (11): 580–590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2008.6.580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cereghino R., Cugny P. & Lavandier P. 2002. Influence of intermittent hydropeaking on the longitudinal zonation patterns of benthic invertebrates in a mountain stream. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 87 (1): 47–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2632(200201)87:K47::AID-IROH47>3.0.CO;2-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Céréghino R. & Lavandier P. 1998. Influence of hypolimnetic hydropeaking on the distribution and population dynamics of Ephemeroptera in a mountain stream. Freshwater Biol. 40 (2): 385–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1998.00353.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao A., Colwell R.K., Lin C.-W. & Gotelli N.J. 2009. Sufficient sampling for asymptotic minimum species richness estimators. Ecology 90 (4): 1125–1133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/07-2147.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatzinikolaou Y., Dakos V. & Lazaridou M. 2006. Longitudinal impacts of anthropogenic pressures on benthic macroinver-tebrate assemblages in a large transboundary Mediterranean river during the low flow period. Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol. 34 (5): 453–463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aheh.200500644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke K.R. & Warwick R.M. 2001. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. 2 ed. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, 176 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Giovanni M.V., Goretti E., Ceccagnoli D., La Porta G. & Chiappafreddo U. 2003. Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera in the Chiascio River (Central Italy) since a dum’s building, pp 293- 298. In: Gaino E. (ed.), Research Update on Ephemeroptera & Plecoptera, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott J.M., Humpesch U.H. & Macan T.T. 1988. Larvae of the British Ephemeroptera: A Key with Ecological Notes. Scientific publication No. 49. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, 145 pp. ISBN: 0-900386-47-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyhof J. 2012. Threatened freshwater fishes and molluscs of the Balkan, potential impact of hydropower projects. Unpublished report. ECA Watch Austria & EuroNatur, 82 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli N.J. & Colwell R.K. 2011. Estimating species richness, Part II, Chapter 4, pp. 39–54. In: Magurran A.E. & McGill B.J. (eds), Biological Diversity: Frontiers in Measurement and Assessment, 1st ed., Oxford University Press, New York, 368 pp. ISBN-10: 0199580668, ISBN-13: 978–0199580675

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf W.L. 2005. Geomorphology and American dams: the scientific, social and economic context. Geomorphology 71 (1-2): 3–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habdija I., Radanović I., Primc-Habdija B. & Špoljar M. 2002. Vegetation cover and substrate type as factors influencing the spatial distribution of Trichopterans along a Karstic River. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 87 (4): 423–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2632(200207)87:4<423::AID-IROH423>3.0.CO;2-V

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haybach A. 1999. Beitrag zur Larvaltaxonomie der Ecdyonurus venosus Gruppe in Deutschland. Lauterbornia 37: 113–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivković M., Matoničkin Kepčija R., Mihaljević Z. & Horvat B. 2007. Assemblage composition and ecological features of aquatic dance flies (Diptera, Empididae) in the Cetina River system, Croatia. Fundam. Appl. Limnol. 170 (3): 223–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1127/1863-9135/2007/0170-0223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maiolini B., Carolli M. & Silveri L. 2011. Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera in springs in Trentino (southeastern Alps). J. Limnol. 70 (Suppl. 1): 122–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3274/JL11-70-S1-09

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malzacher P. 1984. Die europäischen Arten der Gattung Caenis Stephens (Insecta: Ephemeroptera). The European species of the genus Caenis Stephens (Insecta: Ephemeroptera). Stuttg. Beitr. Naturkd. A Biol. 373: 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menetrey N., Oertli B., Sartori M., Wagner A. & Lachavanne J.B. 2008. Eutrophication: are mayflies (Ephemeroptera) good bioindicators for ponds? Hydrobiologia 597 (1): 125–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0750-007-9223-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moog O. 2002. Fauna Aquatica Austriaca. A Comprehensive Species Inventory of Austrian Aquatic Organisms with Ecological Notes. Catalogue for autecological classification of Austrian aquatic organisms 2002 edn. Wassserwirtschaft-skataster, Bundesministerium fiir Land und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft, Vienna, 92 pp. ISBN: 3–85 174-044-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog O., Schmidt-Kloiber A. & Koller-Kreimel V. 2010. ECO-PROF Version 4.0 - software for assessing the ecological water.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Liebenau I. 1969. Revision der europaischen Arten der Gattung Baetis Leach, 1815. (Insecta, Ephemeroptera). Gewässer und Abwässer 48/49: 1–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., da Fonseca G.A.B. & Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinna M., Sangiorgio F., Fonnesu A. & Basset A. 2003. Spatial analysis of plant detritus processing in a Mediterranean River type: the case of the River Tirso Basin, Sardinia, Italy. J. Environ. Sci. 15 (2): 227–240. PMID: 12765266

    Google Scholar 

  • Poff N.L. & Zimmermann J.K.H. 2010. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwater Biol. 55: 194–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02272.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieradevall M., Bonada N. & Prat N. 1999. Community structure and water quality in the Mediterranean streams of a natural park (St. Llorencdel Munt, NE Spain). Limnetica 17: 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabater S., Guasch H., Marti E., Armengol J., Vila M. & Sabater F. 1992. The Ter, a Mediterranean river system in Spain. Limnetica 8: 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz U. 2012. Balkan Rivers-The Blue Heart of Europe, Hy-dromorphological Status and Dam Projects. Report, Vienna, Austria, 151 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer D.L. 2006. Challenges for freshwater invertebrate conservation. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 25 (2): 271–287. DOI: doi:https://doi.org/10.1899/0887-3593(2006)25[271:CFFIC]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šemnički P., Previšić A., Ivković M., Čmrlec K. & Mihaljević Z. 2012. Tufa barriers from a caddisfly’s point of view: Streams or lake outlets? Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 97 (6): 465–484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.201101500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stambuk-Giljanović N. 2001. The quality of water in Buško Blato Reservoir. Environ. Monit. Assess. 71 (3): 279–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011806218107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak C.J.F. & Smilauer P. 1998. Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.02). Centre for Biometry Wageningen, CPRODLO, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp J.H. 2014. Metamorphosis in river ecology: from reaches to macrosystems. Freshwater Biol. 59 (1): 200–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierno de Figueroa J.M., López-Rodríguez M.J., Fenoglio S., Sánchez-Castillo P. & Fochetti R. 2013. Freshwater biodiversity in the rivers of the Mediterranean Basin. Hydrobiologia 719 (1): 137–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0750-012-1281-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/MAP/PAP 2000. River Cetina Watershed and the Adje-cent Coastal Area: Environmental and Socio-economic Profile. Priority Actions Programme, Split, 177 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannote R.R., Minshall G.W., Cummins K.W., Sedell J.R. & Cushing C.E. 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37 (1): 130–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/f80-017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidinskienë M. 2005. Biodiversity, distribution and ecology of macrozoobenthos in small Lithuanian rivers. Ekologija 2005 (2): 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vučković I., Božak I., Ivković M., Jelenčić M., Kerovec M., Popijač A., Previšić A., Širac S., Zrinski I. & Kučinić M. 2009. Composition and structure of benthic macroinverte-brate communities in the Mediterranean karst river the Cetina and its tributary the Ruda, Croatia. Nat. Croat. 18 (1): 49–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward J.V & Stanford J.A. 1979. The Ecology of Regulated Streams. Springer, 398 pp. ISBN: 978–1-4684-8615-5, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8613-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarfl C., Lumsdon A.E., Berlekamp J., Tydecks L. & Tockner K. 2015. A global boom in hydropower dam construction. Aquat. Sci. 77: 161–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-014-0377-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žganec K., Duric P., Hudina S. & Gottstein S. 2013. Population and distribution changes of two coexisting river amphipods after the closure of a new large dam. Limnologica 43 (6): 460–468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2013.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Vilenica.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vilenica, M., Previšić, A., Ivković, M. et al. Mayfly (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) assemblages of a regulated perennial Mediterranean river system in the Western Balkans. Biologia 71, 1038–1048 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2016-0121

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2016-0121

Key words

Navigation