Abstract
This paper demonstrates the central role of the Socratic elenchus in the Sophist. In the first part, I defend the position that the Stranger describes the Socratic elenchus in the sixth division of the Sophist. In the second part, I show that the Socratic elenchus is actually used when the Stranger scrutinizes the accounts of being put forward by his predecessors. In the final part, I explain the function of the Socratic elenchus in the argument of the dialogue. By contrast with standard scholarly interpretations, this way of reading the text provides all the puzzles about being (241c4–251a4) with a definite function in the dialogue. It also reveals that Plato’s methodology includes a plurality of method and is more continuous than what is often believed.
Acknowledgements
A previous version of this paper was presented at Kyoto University. The present version owes a lot to discussions with Sylvain Delcomminette and to the constructive criticisms of several referees. I also warmly thank Alexander Bown and Laura Brown for correcting my English.
References
Benson, H. 1989. “A Note on Eristic and the Socratic Elenchus.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 27:591–599.10.1353/hph.1989.0083Search in Google Scholar
Benson, H. 2009. “Plato’s Method of Dialectic.” In A Companion to Plato, edited by H. Benson, 85–99. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996256.ch7Search in Google Scholar
Bluck, R.S. 1975. Plato’s Sophist. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Brickhouse, T.C., and N.D. Smith. 1989. Socrates on Trial. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, L. 1998. “Innovation and Continuity: The Battle of Gods and Giants, Sophist 245–249.” In Method in Ancient Philosophy, edited by J. Gentzler, 181–207. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, L. 2010. “Definition and Division in the Sophist.” In Definition in Greek Philosophy, edited by D. Charles, 151–171. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199564453.003.0005Search in Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. 2010. Ancient Self-Refutation. The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation. Argument from Democritus to Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, S.M. 1973. “Plato’s Method of Division.” In Patterns in Plato’s Thought, edited by. J.M.E. Moravcsik, 181–191. Dordrecht/Boston: D. Reidel Publishing company.10.1007/978-94-010-2545-4_10Search in Google Scholar
Cornford, F.M. 1935. Plato’s Theory of Knowledge: The Theaetetus and the Sophist of Plato Translated with a Running Commentary. Routledge & Kegan Paul. London and New York.Search in Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. 2004. “Socratic Refutation and Platonic Refutation.” In Socrates: 2400 Years since his Death, edited by V. Karasmanis, 247–248. Delphi: European Cultural Centre of Delphi.Search in Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. 2012. Plato’s Account of Falsehood. A Study of the Sophist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139015004Search in Google Scholar
Delcomminette, S. 2000. L’inventivité dialectique dans le Politique de Platon. Ousia, Bruxelles.Search in Google Scholar
Delcomminette, S. 2014. “Odysseus and the Home of the Stranger from Elea.” The Classical Quarterly 64:533–541.10.1017/S0009838814000111Search in Google Scholar
Dixsaut, M. 2000. Platon et la question de la pensée. Etudes platoniciennes I. Vrin, Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Dixsaut, M. 2001. Le naturel philosophe. Essai sur les dialogues de Platon. Vrin, Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. 2012. “Aristotle’s Definition of Elenchus in the light of Plato’s Sophist.” In The Development of Dialectic from Plato to Aristotle, edited by J.L. Fink, 251–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511997969.014Search in Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1967. Prädikation Und Existenzaussage: Platons Gebrauch Von ‘ … Ist … ’ Und ‘ … Ist Nicht … ’ Im Sophistes. Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, Göttingen.Search in Google Scholar
Harte, V. 2002. Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0198236751.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Kerferd, G.B. 1954. “Plato’s Noble Art of Sophistry.” The Classical Quarterly 4:84–90.10.1017/S000983880000793XSearch in Google Scholar
Mackie, J.L. 1964. “Self-Refutation – A Formal Analysis.” The Philosophical Quarterly 56:193–203.10.2307/2955461Search in Google Scholar
McCabe, M.M.2000. Plato and His Predecessors. The Dramatisation of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511552601Search in Google Scholar
Moravcsik, J.M.E. 1973. “Plato’s Method of Division.” In Patterns in Plato’s Thought, edited by. J.M.E. Moravcsik, 158–180. Dordrecht/Boston: D. Reidel Publishing company.10.1007/978-94-010-2545-4_9Search in Google Scholar
Notomi, N. 1999. The Unity of Plato’s Sophist, between the Sophist and the Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107297968Search in Google Scholar
Owen, G.E.L 1971. “Plato on Not-Being.” In Plato: A Collection of Critical Essays, I: Metaphysics and Epistemology, edited by G. Vlastos, 223–267. New-York: Doubleday.10.1007/978-1-349-86203-0_13Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, J. 1986. “The Problem about Being in the Sophist.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 3:229–243.Search in Google Scholar
Robinson, R. 1941. Plato’s Earlier Dialectic. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ross, W.D. 1951. Plato’s Theory of Ideas. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Szaif, J. 2017 [Final Draft Shortened], “Socrates and the Benefits of Puzzlment.” To be published in The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy, edited by G. Karamanolis & V. Politis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://www.academia.edu/34729936/Socrates_and_the_Benefits_of_Puzzlement_final_draft_shortened_2017_Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, C.C.W. 2006. “Socrates the Sophist.” In Remembering Socrates. Philosophical Essays, edited by L. Judson & V. Karasmanis, 157–168. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (ed.). 1991. Socrates. Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511518508Search in Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (ed.). 1994. Socratic Studies, Ed. By M. Burnyeat. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511518515Search in Google Scholar
White, N.P. (trans.). 1993. Plato: Sophist. Indianapolis and Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar
Young, C.M. 2009. “The Socratic Elenchus.” In A Companion to Plato, edited by H. Benson, 55–69. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin
