Abstract
I argue that a common interpretation of DA 3.4, which sees Aristotle as there rejecting Anaxagoras’s account of mind, is mistaken. Instead, I claim that, in providing his solution to the main puzzles of this chapter, Aristotle takes special care to preserve the essential features that he thinks Anaxagoras ascribes to mind, namely, its ability to know all things, its being unmixed, and its inability to be affected by mixed objects.
References
Aquinas. 1959. Aristotelis librum de Anima commentarium. Edited by M. Pirotta. Taurini: Marietti.=In De an.Search in Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1982. The Presocratic Philosophers. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Bowin, J. 2011. “Aristotle on Various Types of Alteration in De Anima II 5.” Phronesis 56: 138–161.10.1163/156852811X558456Search in Google Scholar
Brentano, F. 1977. The Psychology of Aristotle. Edited and translated by R. George. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 2002. “De Anima ii.5.” Phronesis 47: 28–90.10.1163/156852802760075693Search in Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 2004. “Aristotle on the Foundations of Sublunary Physics.” In Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book 1: Symposium Aristotelicum, edited by Haas, F., and J. Mansfeld, 7–24. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Carter, J. 2017. “Aristotle’s Critique of Timaean Psychology.” Rhizomata 5: 51–78.10.1515/rhiz-2017-0003Search in Google Scholar
Carter, J. 2018. “Does the Soul Weave? Reconsidering De Anima 1.4, 408a29-b18.” Phronesis 61: 25–63.10.1163/15685284-12341341Search in Google Scholar
Caston, V. 2000. “Aristotle’s Argument for Why the Understanding is not Compounded with the Body.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 16: 135–175.10.1163/2213441700X00114Search in Google Scholar
Charlton, W. 1991. Philoponus: On Aristotle on the Intellect (De Anima 3.4–8). London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. 1935. Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cohoe, C. 2013. “Why the Intellect Cannot Have a Bodily Organ: De Anima 3.4.” Phronesis 58: 344–377.10.1163/15685284-12341253Search in Google Scholar
Cohoe, C. 2016. “When and Why Understanding Needs Phantasmata: A Moderate Interpretation of Aristotle’s De Memoria and De Anima on the Role of Images in Intellectual Activities.” Phronesis 61: 337–372.10.1163/15685284-12341311Search in Google Scholar
Cooper, J. 2012. “Conclusion – and Retrospect: Metaphysics A.10.” In Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha: Symposium Aristotelicum, edited by C. Steel and O. Primavesi, 336–365. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Curd, P. 2010. Anaxagoras of Clazomenae: Fragments and Testimonia. A Text and Translation with Notes and Essays by Patricia Curd. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar
Diels, H. 1879. Doxographi Graeci. Berlin: Reimer.Search in Google Scholar
Diels, H., and W. Kranz. 1951. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 6th ed. Berlin: Weidmann. [=DK].Search in Google Scholar
Driscoll, J. 1992. “The Anaxagorean Assumption in Aristotle’s Account of Mind.” In Essay in Greek Philosophy V: Aristotle’s Ontology, edited by A. Preus and J. Anton, 273–292. New York: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar
Frede, M. 2008. “Aristotle on Thinking.” Rhizai: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 2: 287–301.Search in Google Scholar
Graham, D. 2004. “Was Anaxagoras a Reductionist?” Ancient Philosophy 24: 1–17.10.5840/ancientphil20042411Search in Google Scholar
Hamlyn, D. 1968. Aristotle’s De anima: Books II and III (with certain passages from book I). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Heidel, W. 1913. “On Certain Fragments of the Pre-Socratics: Critical Notes and Elucidations.” Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 48 (19): 681–734.10.2307/20022872Search in Google Scholar
Heinaman, R. 2007. “Actuality, Potentiality and De Anima II.5.” Phronesis 52: 139–187.10.1163/156852807X180063Search in Google Scholar
Hicks, R. 1907. Aristotle De Anima. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hussey, E. 1972. The Pre-Socratics. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar
Johansen, T. 1997. Aristotle on the Sense-Organs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511518461Search in Google Scholar
Kahn, C. 1992. “Aristotle on Thinking.” In Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, edited by Nussbaum, M., and A. Rorty, 359–379. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/019823600X.003.0020Search in Google Scholar
Kirk, G., J. Raven, and M. Schofield. 1983. The Presocratic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813375Search in Google Scholar
Laks, A. 1993. “Mind’s Crisis. On Anaxagoras’s ΝΟΥΣ.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 31: 19–37.10.1111/j.2041-6962.1993.tb00693.xSearch in Google Scholar
Lesher, J. 1995. “Mind’s Knowledge and Powers of Control in Anaxagoras DK B12.” Phronesis 40: 125–142.10.1163/156852895321051919Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, F. 1996. “Self-knowledge in Aristotle.” Topoi 15: 39–58.10.1007/BF00141305Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, F. 2003. “Is There Room for Anaxagoras in an Aristotelian Theory of Mind?” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25: 89–129.Search in Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1990. “Doxography and Dialectic: the Sitz in Leben of the Placita.” In Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, Teil II: Principat, Band 36.4, edited by W. Haase and H. Temporini, 3056–3229. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 2010. “Physikai doxai and problêmeta physica in Philosophy and Rhetoric: from Aristotle to Aëtius (and Beyond).” In Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer. Volume Three. Studies in the Doxographical Traditions of Ancient Philosophy, edited by Mansfeld, J., and D. Runia, 33–97. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004180413.i-650.8Search in Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. 2017. Everything in Everything: Anaxagoras’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190611972.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. 2010. Philosophy Before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary. Indianapolis: Hackett.Search in Google Scholar
Menn, S. 1995. Plato on God as Nous. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Menn, S. 2002. “Aristotle’s Definition of the Soul and the Programme of the De Anima.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 12: 83–139.Search in Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. 1984. “Aristotle’s Rationalist Account of Qualitative Interaction.” Phronesis 29: 1–16.10.1163/156852884X00166Search in Google Scholar
Polansky, R. 2007. Aristotle’s De Anima. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511551017Search in Google Scholar
Politis, V. 2001. “Aristotle’s Account of the Intellect as Pure Capacity.” Ancient Philosophy 21: 375–402.10.5840/ancientphil200121249Search in Google Scholar
Ross, W. 1961. Aristotle De Anima: Edited, with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/actrade/9780198141556.book.1Search in Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 1980. An Essay on Anaxagoras. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Shields, C. 1997. “Intentionality and Isomorphism in Aristotle.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 11: 307–330.10.1163/2213441795X00192Search in Google Scholar
Shields, C. 2016. Aristotle: De Anima, Translated with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sider, D. 2005. The Fragments of Anaxagoras: Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Sisko, J. 1999. “On Separating the Intellect from the Body: Aristotle’s De anima III.4, 429a10-b5.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 81: 249–267.10.1515/agph.1999.81.3.249Search in Google Scholar
Sisko, J. 2000. “Aristotle’s Nous and the Modern Mind.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 16: 177–198.10.1163/2213441700X00123Search in Google Scholar
von Fritz, K. 1943. “Νοῦς and Νοεῖν in the Homeric Poems.” Classical Philology 38: 79–93.10.1086/362695Search in Google Scholar
von Fritz, K. 1945. “Νοῦς, Νοεῖν and their Derivatives in Pre-Socratic Philosophy (Excluding Anaxagoras): Part I.” Classical Philology 40: 223–242.10.1086/362903Search in Google Scholar
von Fritz, K. 1946. “Νοῦς, Νοεῖν and their Derivatives in Pre-Socratic Philosophy (Excluding Anaxagoras): Part II.” Classical Philology 41: 12–34.10.1086/362917Search in Google Scholar
von Fritz, K. 1964. “Der ΝΟΥΣ des Anaxagoras’s.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 9: 87–102.Search in Google Scholar
Witt, C. 1992. “Dialectic, Motion, and Perception: De Anima, Book I.” In Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, edited by Nussbaum, M., and A. Rorty, 169–183. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/019823600X.003.0011Search in Google Scholar
Note
I am grateful to Ronald Polansky, Daniel Vasquez, and my anonymous reviewers, for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper, as well as to David Charles, for taking the time to offer criticisms of some of the ideas expressed within it.
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin
