Abstract
The new compounds LiK[C(CN)3]2 and Li[C(CN)3]·½ (H3C)2CO were synthesized and their crystal structures were determined. Li[C(CN)3]·½ (H3C)2CO crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Ima2 (no. 46) with the cell parameters a=794.97(14), b=1165.1(2) and c=1485.4(3) pm, while LiK[C(CN)3]2 adopts the monoclinic space group P21/c (no. 14) with the cell parameters a=1265.7(2), b=1068.0(2) and c=778.36(12) pm and the angle β=95.775(7)°. Single crystals of K[C(CN)3] were also acquired, and the crystal structure was refined more precisely than before corroborating earlier results.
1 Introduction
Li[tcm] (tcm: tricyanomethanide) is a compound, which is used as a promising lead salt in some lithium accumulators [1, 2]. Since its synthesis in form of needles was reported some 30 years ago [3, 4] and no structural data were readily available, we wanted to determine the crystal structure of Li[tcm]. Following the literature [4], we indeed obtained either very fine or multiple twinned needles. This material exhibited no diffraction patterns that could be evaluated. Different approaches to obtain Li[tcm] yielded single crystals of LiK[tcm]2 and Li[tcm]·½ (H3C)2CO. We report here their crystal structures and more precise structural data for K[tcm], all determined by single-crystal X-ray methods.
2 Experimental section
2.1 Synthesis
All manipulations were performed under normal atmospheric conditions. All chemicals were used as purchased. Single crystals of K[tcm] (Strem, > 98 %) were obtained by recrystallizing the compound from deionized water. Combining stoichiometric amounts of K[tcm] and LiCl (Aldrich, 99 %) dissolved in acetone precipitated KCl, which was filtered off. The solvent of the resulting clear solution was allowed to evaporate leaving transparent and colorless, small irregular, very hygroscopic chunks of Li[tcm]·½ (H3C)2CO. These crystals dissolved within a few minutes in the attracted water, leaving only solution droplets behind. Following the same procedures with acetonitrile as solvent, only very fine needles resulted, which are presumably Li[tcm]. These needles are sensitive even to slight pressure (e.g., touching them with a preparation needle) splitting up even more. This behavior is the reason why no X-ray or Raman data were obtained. Ethanol solutions of K[tcm] and LiCl yielded as main product the already known fine needles, but some transparent, colorless, thin plates were not hygroscopic and stable. These were found to be LiK[tcm]2.
2.2 Crystallographic studies
Samples of the respective crystalline products were immersed in polybutene oil (Aldrich, Mn ∼ 320, isobutylene > 90 %) for single-crystal selection under a polarization microscope. Crystals were mounted in a drop of polybutene sustained in a plastic loop and placed onto the goniometer. A cold stream of nitrogen (T=203(2) K) froze the polybutene oil, thus keeping the crystal stationary and protected from oxygen and moisture in the air. Intensity data were collected with a Bruker X8 Apex II diffractometer equipped with a 4 K CCD detector and using graphite-monochromatized MoKα radiation (λ=71.073 pm). The intensity data were manipulated with the program package [5] that came with the diffractometer. An empirical absorption correction was applied using Sadabs [6]. The program Shelxs-97 [7, 8] found the positions of potassium in K[tcm] and LiK[tcm]2 and the nitrogen positions with the help of Direct Methods techniques. The positions of the carbon and hydrogen atoms were apparent from the positions of highest electron density on the difference Fourier map resulting from the first refinement cycles by full-matrix least-squares calculations on F2 in Shelxl-97 [9, 10]. Additional crystallographic details are described in Table 1. Atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic displacement coefficients are shown in Table 2. Table 3 displays selected interatomic distances and angles of the title compound.
Compound | K[tcm] | LiK[tcm]2 | Li[tcm]·½ (H3C)2CO |
---|---|---|---|
Mr | 129.17 | 226.18 | 126.05 |
Crystal color | Transparent colorless | Transparent colorless | Transparent colorless |
Crystal shape | Thin plate | Thin plate | Irregular chunk |
Crystal size, mm3 | 0.16 × 0.12 × 0.06 | 0.06 × 0.04 × 0.02 | 0.12 × 0.12 × 0.04 |
Crystal system | Triclinic | Monoclinic | Orthorhombic |
Space group (no.), Z | P1̅ (2), 2 | P21/c (12), 4 | Ima2 (46), 8 |
Lattice parameters: a; b; c, pm | 385.01(3) 867.53(8) 884.62(7) | 1265.7(2) 1068.0(2) 778.36(12) | 794.97(14) 1165.1(2) 1485.4(3) |
Angles: α; β; γ, deg | 104.854(4) 92.601(4) 90.191(4) | 90 95.775(7) 90 | 90 90 90 |
V, Å3 | 285.27(4) | 1046.8(3) | 1375.9(4) |
Dcalcd, g cm–3 | 1.50 | 1.44 | 1.22 |
F(000), e– | 128 | 448 | 512 |
μ, mm–1 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
Diffractometer | Bruker X8 Apex II equipped with a 4 K CCD | ||
Radiation; λ, pm; monochromator | MoKα; 71.073; graphite | ||
Scan mode; T, K | ϕ and ω scans; 203(2) | ||
Ranges, 2θmax, deg; h, k, l | 61.57; ± 5, ± 12, ± 12 | 46.24; ± 14, –11 → 7, ± 8 | 52.77; –9 → 7, –14 → 13, ± 18 |
Data correction | LP, Sadabs [7] | LP | LP |
Transmission: min. / max. | 0.651 / 0.746 | – | – |
x Flack [11, 12] | – | – | 0.09(4) |
Reflections: measured / unique | 1757 / 1757 | 6060 / 1510 | 3085 / 1415 |
Unique reflections with Fo > 4 σ (Fo) | 1451 | 995 | 914 |
Rint / Rσ | 0.0277 / 0.0332 | 0.0707 / 0.0703 | 0.0377 / 0.0640 |
Refined parameters | 73 | 109 | 125 |
R1a / wR2b / GoFc (all refl.) | 0.0444 / 0.0836 / 1.050 | 0.0967 / 0.1609 / 1.057 | 0.0918 / 0.0890 / 0.984 |
Factors x / y (weighting scheme)b | 0.0425 / 0.0443 | 0.0693 / 1.1707 | 0.035 / 0 |
Max. shift/esd, last refinement cycle | <0.00005 | <0.00005 | <0.00005 |
Δρfin (max, min), e– Å–3 | 0.46 (83 pm to K), –0.33 (82 pm to K) | 0.78 (132 pm to K), –0.29 (82 pm to K) | 0.17 (35 pm to H4), –0.18 (108 pm to H2) |
CSD number | 428779 | 428780 | 428781 |
aR1=Σ ||Fo| – |Fc||/Σ |Fo|; bwR2=[Σw(Fo2 – Fc2)2/Σ(wFo2)2]1/2; w=1/[σ2(Fo2) + (xP)2 + yP], where P=[(Fo2) + 2Fc2]/3 and x and y are constants adjusted by the program; c GoF(S)=[Σw(Fo2 – Fc2)2/(n – p)]1/2, with n being the number of reflections and p being the number of refined parameters.
Atom | Wyckoff site | x | y | z | Ueq (pm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
K | 2i | 0.78481(7) | 0.17304(4) | 0.20098(4) | 269(1) |
C0 | 2i | 0.4207(4) | 0.6923(2) | 0.2704(2) | 247(3) |
C1 | 2i | 0.3340(4) | 0.8121(2) | 0.1956(2) | 244(3) |
N1 | 2i | 0.2651(4) | 0.9132(2) | 0.1375(2) | 329(3) |
C2 | 2i | 0.3367(4) | 0.5308(2) | 0.2001(2) | 269(3) |
N2 | 2i | 0.2718(4) | 0.3980(2) | 0.1473(2) | 379(3) |
C3 | 2i | 0.5770(4) | 0.7352(2) | 0.4230(2) | 300(3) |
N3 | 2i | 0.7035(4) | 0.7699(2) | 0.5473(2) | 418(4) |
K | 4e | 0.24199(9) | 0.7453(1) | 0.0379(1) | 323(5) |
Li | 4e | 0.2477(6) | 0.0498(9) | 0.2903(10) | 311(20) |
C01 | 4e | 0.0809(4) | 0.3921(5) | 0.2637(6) | 323(13) |
C11 | 4e | –0.0087(4) | 0.3153(5) | 0.2495(6) | 320(13) |
N11 | 4e | –0.0822(4) | 0.2506(5) | 0.2374(6) | 430(13) |
C12 | 4e | 0.1247(4) | 0.4337(5) | 0.4266(7) | 311(13) |
N12 | 4e | 0.1613(3) | 0.4689(5) | 0.5602(6) | 433(13) |
C13 | 4e | 0.1270(4) | 0.4296(5) | 0.1147(7) | 293(13) |
N13 | 4e | 0.1658(3) | 0.4604(5) | –0.0045(6) | 416(13) |
C02 | 4e | 0.4451(4) | 0.4018(5) | 0.2621(6) | 310(13) |
C21 | 4e | 0.5506(4) | 0.4038(5) | 0.2216(6) | 309(13) |
N21 | 4e | 0.6376(3) | 0.4081(4) | 0.1921(5) | 343(11) |
C22 | 4e | 0.6059(4) | 0.0158(6) | 0.2075(6) | 303(13) |
N22 | 4e | 0.6492(4) | 0.1071(5) | 0.1834(6) | 420(12) |
C23 | 4e | 0.3899(4) | 0.2907(6) | 0.2733(7) | 362(14) |
N23 | 4e | 0.3423(4) | 0.1995(5) | 0.2852(7) | 529(14) |
Li1 | 4b | ¾ | 0.3130(5) | 0.5834(4) | 370(15) |
Li2 | 4b | ¾ | 0.3334(6) | 0.9147(4) | 447(18) |
O | 4b | ¾ | 0.1399(2) | 0.5526(2) | 380(7) |
C1 | 4b | ¾ | 0.0580(4) | 0.6052(3) | 441(11) |
C2 | 4b | ¾ | 0.0776(6) | 0.7040(3) | 706(17) |
C3 | 4b | ¾ | 0.9382(4) | 0.5693(5) | 843(19) |
H1 | 8c | 0.845(4) | 0.892(4) | 0.589(3) | 1350(174) |
H2 | 4b | ¾ | 0.925(6) | 0.495(6) | 1678(286) |
H3 | 8c | 0.818(6) | 0.031(4) | 0.732(3) | 1607(221) |
H4 | 4b | ¾ | 0.155(7) | 0.727(6) | 1996(376) |
C01 | 4b | ¾ | 0.6499(3) | 0.4289(2) | 342(9) |
C11 | 8c | 0.5969(3) | 0.7066(2) | 0.4146(2) | 372(7) |
N11 | 8c | 0.4692(2) | 0.7518(2) | 0.4036(2) | 477(7) |
C12 | 4b | ¾ | 0.5396(4) | 0.4677(3) | 378(10) |
N12 | 4b | ¾ | 0.4498(3) | 0.4992(2) | 468(10) |
C02 | 4b | ¾ | 0.6181(3) | 0.7166(2) | 331(9) |
C21 | 8c | 0.9035(3) | 0.6516(2) | 0.6784(2) | 341(6) |
N21 | 8c | 0.9689(3) | 0.3220(2) | 0.6482(2) | 485(7) |
C22 | 4b | ¾ | 0.5411(4) | 0.7887(3) | 363(10) |
N22 | 4b | ¾ | 0.4777(3) | 0.8480(2) | 555(11) |
aUeq is defined as a third of the orthogonalized Uij tensors.
K– | N2 | 284.3(2) | N1– | C1 | 115.1(2) |
N3 | 284.9(1) | N2– | C2 | 114.9(2) | |
N1 | 287.9(1) | N3– | C3 | 114.7(2) | |
N2 | 289.0(2) | C0– | C1 | 140.1(2) | |
N1 | 289.1(1) | C2 | 140.9(2) | ||
N3 | 292.6(2) | C3 | 141.1(2) | ||
N1 | 293.6(1) | ||||
∡(C0–C1–N1) | 178.3(2) | ∡(C1–C0–C2) | 121.4(1) | ||
∡(C0–C2–N2) | 177.7(2) | ∡(C1–C0–C3) | 119.3(1) | ||
∡(C0–C3–N3) | 179.2(2) | ∡(C2–C0–C3) | 119.3(1) | ||
K– | N11 | 279.5(5) | N11– | C11 | 115.6(6) |
N22 | 279.7(5) | N12– | C12 | 115.8(6) | |
N11 | 280.4(5) | N13– | C13 | 114.1(6) | |
N22 | 285.9(5) | C01– | C11 | 139.5(8) | |
N21 | 296.0(4) | C12 | 140.4(8) | ||
N21 | 301.9(4) | C13 | 140.8(7) | ||
N13 | 319.9(5) | N21– | C21 | 114.9(6) | |
N12 | 322.9(5) | N22– | C22 | 114.4(7) | |
Li– | N13 | 199.3(9) | N23– | C23 | 115.4(7) |
N23 | 200.0(10) | C02– | C21 | 140.2(7) | |
N12 | 201.2(9) | C22 | 140.9(8) | ||
N21 | 209.2(9) | C23 | 138.5(8) | ||
∡(C01–C11–N11) | 179.4(6) | ∡(C11–C01–C12) | 120.1(4) | ||
∡(C01–C12–N12) | 179.3(6) | ∡(C12–C01–C13) | 120.2(5) | ||
∡(C01–C13–N13) | 179.0(5) | ∡(C12–C01–C13) | 119.7(5) | ||
∡(C02–C21–N21) | 178.0(6) | ∡(C21–C02–C22) | 119.6(4) | ||
∡(C02–C22–N22) | 178.7(6) | ∡(C21–C02–C23) | 119.2(5) | ||
∡(C02–C23–N23) | 178.3(6) | ∡(C22–C02–C23) | 121.6(5) | ||
Li1– | N21 2× | 199.2(4) | N11– | C11 | 115.5(3) |
N12 | 202.6(7) | N12– | C12 | 114.6(5) | |
O | 206.9(7) | C10– | C11 2× | 139.5(8) | |
C12 | 140.4(8) | ||||
Li2– | N22 | 195.2(7) | N21– | C21 | 115.1(3) |
N11 2× | 199.2(4) | N22– | C22 | 114.9(5) | |
O | 207.2(7) | C20– | C21 2× | 140.1(3) | |
C22 | 139.7(5) | ||||
∡(C10–C11–N11) | 178.8(3) | ∡(C11–C10–C11) | 120.7(3) | ||
∡(C10–C12–N12) | 180.4(4) | ∡(C11–C10–C12) | 119.5(2) | ||
∡(C20–C21–N21) | 178.8(3) | ∡(C21–C20–C21) | 121.1(3) | ||
∡(C20–C23–N23) | 179.9(5) | ∡(C21–C20–C22) | 119.3(2) |
Further details of the crystal structure investigation may be obtained from Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany (Fax: (+49) 7247-808-666; E-mail: crysdata@fiz-karlsruhe.de, http://www.fiz-karlsruhe.de/request_for_deposited_data.html), on quoting the depository number CSD-428779 for K[tcm], CSD-428780 for LiK[tcm]2 and CSD-428781 for Li[tcm]·½ (H3C)2CO.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Crystal structure of K[tcm]
The crystal structure of K[tcm] has been previously reported by two different groups, once as a preliminary report with the unit cell only [13], while the second includes atomic coordinates concentrating on the geometry of the [tcm] anion [14]. In K[tcm], the potassium cation is coordinated by seven nitrogen atoms forming a monocapped trigonal prism. The [tcm] anion shows only small deviations from D3h symmetry. The crystal structure of K[tcm] is – as can be deduced from the plate-like habit of the crystals – layered (Fig. 1) with K+ and [tcm]– stacked directly above each other along the cystallographic a axis with a small displacement of the successive layers (Fig. 2). All distances and angles are in the expected range (Table 3).
3.2 Crystal structure of LiK[tcm]2
In LiK[tcm]2, lithium is coordinated in a tetrahedral fashion by four nitrogen atoms, while potassium is surrounded by six nitrogen atoms in a trigonal prismatic way (Fig. 3a and 3b). The trigonal prisms around potassium form columns parallel to the crystallographic c axis by sharing triangular faces (Fig. 4). These columns are connected by the [tcm] anions, which are bound to the tetrahedrally coordinated lithium atoms located in the voids in between the columns. In this perspective the layered nature of this compound also becomes obvious; the cations are all located at a ≈ ¼ and ¾.
3.3 Crystal structure of Li[tcm]·½(H3C)2CO
Looking at Li[tcm]·½ (H3C)2CO, one is reminded of Ag[tcm] [15, 16]. Both compounds share the same rarely adopted space group Ima2 (no. 46), but the unit cell parameters are rather different. Conversely, if the coordination of the metal atoms is taken into consideration, more similarities become obvious. Ag[tcm] is one of the rare examples of a trigonal planar coordination of silver [15, 16], which is prevented in Li[tcm]·½ (H3C)2CO by the acetone molecule connecting two crystallographically different Li atoms. Therefore, both lithium atoms are coordinated in a distorted tetrahedral fashion forming a corner shared Li2N6O2/2 moiety (Fig. 5). These double-tetrahedra are stacked along the crystallographic a axis and connected by the [tcm] units, which also bind to the other double-tetraheda stacks. The coordination of lithium by acetone buckles these stacks opening channels parallel to the crystallographic a axis (and, therefore, to the aforementioned stacks). In these voids the nonpolar part of the acetone is located (Fig. 6).
4 Conclusion
More precise structural data for K[tcm] have been acquired, and the previously unknown compounds LiK[tcm]2 and Li[tcm]·½ (H3C)2CO were synthesized and structurally characterized. The structures show close relationships to known compounds through their coordination patterns and bond lengths. Despite earlier reports claiming differently [3, 4], we found that well-crystallized solvent-free Li[tcm] is not easily obtained. Most probably the small and hard Li+ cation and the fairly rigid and bulky [tcm]– anion do not meet each other’s coordination needs in a way that allows for the easy formation of single crystals. Since very little is known about Li[tcm] other than some electrochemical applications [1, 2] and a poorly resolved Raman spectrum [2], we were not the first to face this problem. Nevertheless, our results indicate that we are on a good path to learn more about lithium containing tricyanomethanide compounds.
References
[1] M. Marszalek, Z. Fei, D.-R. Zu, R. Scopelliti, P. J. Dyson, S. M. Zakeeruddin, M. Grätzel, Inorg. Chem.2011, 50, 11561.Search in Google Scholar
[2] B. Guo, X.-G. Sun, G. M. Veith, Z. Bi, S. M. Mahurin, C. Liao, C. Bridges, M. P. Paranthaman, S. Dai, Adv. Energy Mater.2013, 3, 708.Search in Google Scholar
[3] H. Köhler, Habilitation Thesis, University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, 1967.Search in Google Scholar
[4] A. M. Golub, H. Köhler (Eds.), Chemie der Pseudohalogenide, VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin 1979, p. 372.Search in Google Scholar
[5] Apex2 (version 1.22), Saint Plus,Xprep (version 6.14), Software for the CCD system, Bruker Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin (USA) 2004.Search in Google Scholar
[6] G. M. Sheldrick, Sadabs, Program for Empirical Absorption Correction of Area Detector Data, University of Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany) 2003.Search in Google Scholar
[7] G. M. Sheldrick, Shelxs-97, Program for the Solution of Crystal Structures, University of Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany) 1997.Search in Google Scholar
[8] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.1990, A46, 467.Search in Google Scholar
[9] G. M. Sheldrick, Shelxl-97, Program for the Refinement of Crystal Structures, University of Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany) 1997.Search in Google Scholar
[10] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2008, A64, 112.Search in Google Scholar
[11] H. D. Flack, Acta Crystallogr.1983, A39, 876.Search in Google Scholar
[12] H. D. Flack, G. Bernardinelli, Acta Crystallogr.1999, A55, 908.Search in Google Scholar
[13] P. Andersen, B. Klewe, Nature1963, 200, 464.10.1038/200464a0Search in Google Scholar
[14] J. R. Witt, D. Britton, Acta Crystallogr.1971, B27, 1835.Search in Google Scholar
[15] J. Konnert, D. Britton, Inorg. Chem.1966, 5, 1193.Search in Google Scholar
[16] S. R. Batten, B. F. Hoskins, R. Robson, New J. Chem.1998, 22, 173.Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter