Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 29, 2014

Simulation of the Denitrification Process of Waste Water with a Biochemical Systems Model: A Non-Conventional Approach

  • Nouceiba Adouani , Lionel Limousy , Thomas Lendormi , Eberhard O. Voit and Olivier Sire EMAIL logo

Abstract

Matching experimental and theoretical approaches have often been fruitful in the investigation of complex biological processes. Here we develop a novel non-conventional model for the denitrification of waste water. Earlier models of the denitrification process were compiled by the International Association on Water Quality group. The Activated Sludge Models 1–3, which are the most frequently used all over the world, are presently not adapted towards the integration of both nitrous and nitric oxide emissions during the denitrification process. In the present work, a Generalized Mass Action model, based on Biochemical Systems Theory, was designed to simulate the nitrate reduction observed in specific experimental conditions. The model was implemented and analysed with the software package PLAS. Data from a representative experiment were chosen (T=10°C, pH=7, C/N=3, with acetate as carbon source) to simulate greenhouse NO and N2O gas emissions, in order to test hypotheses about the corresponding bacterial metabolic pathways. The results show that the reduction of nitrate and nitrite is kinetically limiting and that nitrate reduction is limited by diffusion and support that distinct microbial subpopulations are involved in the denitrification pathway, which has consequences for NO emissions.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge La Région Bretagne for the financial support to the PhD work leading to this study.

Appendix

PLAS model to simulate the denitrification pathways

  • X1′=- k1 X1^g11 X6^g66 X2^g22 //NO3

  • X2′=k1 X1^g11 X6^g66 X2^g22 - k2 E X2 X6^g66 - k24 X2 X6^g66 //NO2

  • X3′=k2 E X2 X6^g66 - k3 X3 X6^g66 X4^g44 - k30 X3 //NO

  • X4′=k3 X3 X6^g66 X4^g44 - k4 X4 X6^g66 X2^g25 - k40 X4 + k24 X2 X6^g66 //N2O

  • X5′=k4 X4 X6^g66 X2^g25 //N2

  • X6′=- k11 X1^g11 X6^g66 X2^g22 - k22 E X2 X6^g66 >>

  • >> - k244 X2 X6^g66 - k33 X3 X6^g66 X4^g44 >>

  • >> - k44 X4 X6^g66 X2^g25 - k6 X6^h66

  • X30′=k30 X3

  • X40′=k40 X4

  • X1=3212

  • X2=0.01

  • X3=0.01

  • X4=0.01

  • X5=0.01

  • X6=1950

  • X30=0.01

  • X40=0.01

  • E=0

  • @ 6.4 E=1

  • k1=0.00075

  • k2=0.003

  • k24=0.0036

  • k3 =.105

  • k4=0.525

  • k30=1000

  • k40=0.42

  • k11=k1* 0.251

  • k22=k2 * 0.125

  • k33=k3 * 0.125

  • k44=k4 * 0.125

  • k244=k24 * 0.125 * 2

  • k6 =.05

  • g11=0.875

  • g22=–0.1

  • g44=–0.675

  • g25=–1.444

  • g66=.95

  • h66=1

  • t0=0

  • tf=24

  • hr=0.1

References

1. BatesBC, KundzewiczZW, WuS, PalutikofJP, eds. Climate change and water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC Secretariat, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

2. HoughtonJT, DingY, GriggsDJ, NoguerM, van der LindenPJ, DaiX, MaskellK and JohnsonCA, eds. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 881.Search in Google Scholar

3. IPCC’s Fifth assessment report. The physical science basis. 2013.Search in Google Scholar

4. DeslooverJ, VlaeminckSE, ClauwaertP, VerstraeteW, BoonN. Strategies to mitigate N2O emissions from biological nitrogen removal systems. Current Opinion Biotechnol2012;23:47482.10.1016/j.copbio.2011.12.030Search in Google Scholar

5. ItokawaH, HanakiK, MatsuoT. Nitrous oxide production in high-loading biological nitrogen removal process under low COD/N ratio condition. Water Res2001;35:65764.10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00309-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. RichardsonD, FelgateH, WatmmoughN, ThomsonA, BaggsE. Mitigating release of the potent greenhouse gas N2O from the nitrogen cycle: could enzymic regulation hold the key?Trends Biotechnol2009;27:38897.10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.03.009Search in Google Scholar

7. TallecG, GarnierJ, BillenG, GousaillesM. Nitrous oxide emissions from secondary activated sludge in nitrifying conditions of urban wastewater treatment plant: effect of oxygenation level. Water Res2006;40:297280.10.1016/j.watres.2006.05.037Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. USEPA. Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

9. FuerhackerM, BauerH, EllingerR, SreeU, SchmidH, ZibuschkaF, et al. Relationship between release of nitric oxide and CO2 and their dependence on oxidation reduction potential in wastewater treatment. Chemosphere2001;44:121321.10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00342-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. KampschreurMJ, van der StarWR, WieldersHA, MulderJW, JettenSM, van LoosdrechtMC. Dynamics of nitric oxide and nitrous oxide emission during full-scale reject water treatment. Water Res2008;42:81226.10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.022Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. SommerJ, CiplakA, SümerE, BenckiserG, OttowJC. Quantification of emitted and retained N2O in a municipal wastewater treatment plant with activated sludge and nitrification–denitrification units. Agrobiol Res1998;51:5973.Search in Google Scholar

12. CrutzenPJ. Atmospheric chemical processes of the oxides of nitrogen including nitrous oxide. In: DelwicheCC, editor. Denitrification, nitrification and atmospheric N2O. Chichester: Wiley, 1981:17.Search in Google Scholar

13. WrageN, VelthofGL, van BeusichemML. Role of nitrifier denitrification in the production of nitrous oxide. Soil Boil Biochem2001;33:172332.10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00096-7Search in Google Scholar

14. DiabS, KochbaM, MiesD, AvnimelechY. Combined Intensive-Extensive (CIE) pond system. A: inorganic nitrogen transformations. Aquaculture1992;101:339.10.1016/0044-8486(92)90230-ISearch in Google Scholar

15. AdouaniN. Etude des emissions de protoxyde d’azote lors du traitement biologique d’effluents azotes par dénitrification. PhD thesis, University of South Britanny, LIMATB, Pontivy, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

16. MetzS, BeiskerW, HartmannA, ScholterM. Detection methods for the expression of the dissimilatory copper-containing nitrite reductase gene (DnirK) in environmental samples. J Microbiol Methods2003;55:4150.10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00089-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. FochtDD. The effect of temperature, pH, and aeration on the production of nitrous oxide and gaseous nitrogen – a zero order kinetic model. Soil Sci1974;118:1739.10.1097/00010694-197409000-00007Search in Google Scholar

18. AdouaniN, LendormiT, LimousyL, SireO. Effect of the carbon source on N2O emissions during biological denitrification. Res Conservation Rec2010;54:299304.10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.07.011Search in Google Scholar

19. HeY, InamoriY, MizuochiM, KongH, IwamiN, SunT. Measurements of N2O and CH4 from the aerated composting of food waste. Sci Total Environ2000;254:6574.10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00439-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. YoungK, YuheiI, MotoyukiM, KyuH. Emission and control of nitrous oxide from a biological wastewater treatment system with intermittent aeration. J Bio Bioeng2000;90:24752.10.1016/S1389-1723(00)80077-8Search in Google Scholar

21. DongLF, NedwellDB, UnderwoodGJ, ThorntonDC, RusmanaI. Nitrous oxide formation in the colne estuary, England: the central role of nitrite. Appl Environ Microbiol2002;68:12409.10.1128/AEM.68.3.1240-1249.2002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. LemaireR, MeyerR, TaskeA, CrocettiGR, KelleJ, YuanZ. Identifying causes for N2O accumulation in a lab-scale sequencing batch reactor performing simultaneous nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus removal. J Biotechnol2006;122:6272.10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.08.024Search in Google Scholar

23. ButlandG, SpiroS, WatmoughNJ, RichardsonDJ. Two conserved glutamates in the bacterial nitric oxide reductase are essential for activity but not assembly of the enzyme. J Bacteriol2001;183:18999.10.1128/JB.183.1.189-199.2001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. de BoerAP, Van der OostJ, WesterhoffHV, StouthamerAH, Van SpanningRJ. Mutational analysis of the nor gene cluster which encodes nitric-oxide reductase from paracoccus denitrificans. Eur J Biochem1996;242:592600.10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0592r.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

25. HenzeM, Grady Jr CP, GujerW, MaraisGV, MatsuoT. Activated sludge model No. 1. Scientific and Technical Report No. 1, IAWPRC, London, 1987.Search in Google Scholar

26. SchulthessRV, GujerW. Release of nitrous oxide (N2O) from denitrifying activated sludge: verification and application of a mathematical model. Water Res1996;30:52130.10.1016/0043-1354(95)00204-9Search in Google Scholar

27. FerreiraEN. Logiciel PLAS. In: VoitEO, editor. Computational analysis of biochemical systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

28. SavageauMA. Biochemical systems analysis: a study of function and design in molecular biology. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1976.Search in Google Scholar

29. TorresNV, VoitEO. Pathway analysis and optimization in metabolic engineering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

30. VoitEO. Computational analysis of biochemical systems: a practical guide for biochemists and molecular biologists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000:531.Search in Google Scholar

31. ChenMY, LeeDJ, TayJH. Distribution of extracellular polymeric substances in aerobic granules. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol2007;73:14639.10.1007/s00253-006-0617-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

32. KuzmicP. Program DYNAFIT for the analysis of enzyme kinetic data: application to HIV proteinase. Anal Biochem1996;237:26073.10.1006/abio.1996.0238Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. KohlrauschJR. Theorie des elektrischen rückstandes in der leidener flasche. Ann PhysChem (Poggendorff)1854;91:179214.10.1002/andp.18541670203Search in Google Scholar

34. BetlachMR, TiedjeJM. Kinetic explanation for accumulation of nitrite, nitric oxide, and nitrous oxide during bacterial denitrification. Appl Environ Microbiol1981;42:107484.10.1128/aem.42.6.1074-1084.1981Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. BarbierGG, CampbellWH. Viscosity effects on eukaryotic nitrate reductase activity. J Biol Chem2005;280:2604954.10.1074/jbc.M409694200Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. BeeversL, HagemanRH. Nitrate reduction in higher plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol1969;20:495522.10.1146/annurev.pp.20.060169.002431Search in Google Scholar

37. CampbellWH. Structure and function of eukaryotic NAD(P)H: nitrate reductase. Cell Mol Life Sci2001;58:194204.10.1007/PL00000847Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. VoitEO. Biochemical systems theory: a review2013. ISRN Biomathematics 8976558. dx.doi.org/10.1155/897658.10.1155/2013/897658Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Published Online: 2014-10-29
Published in Print: 2014-12-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 30.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2014-0050/html
Scroll to top button