Abstract
In this paper we first test whether there is statistical support for a transitivity hierarchy viewed as an implicational hierarchy. To that end we construct data-driven transitivity hierarchies of two-place verb meanings based on the Valency Patterns Leipzig (ValPaL) database using Guttman scaling. We look at how well the hierarchies conform to strict scalarity (one-dimensionality) and, through matrix randomization, test whether their strengths are significant. We then go on to construct slightly different hierarchies based on simple counts of instances of two-participant coding frames for a given verb meaning across languages, rather than through the Guttman scaling procedure, which yields less resolution and is not designed for missing data. Finally, we assess whether the members of the hierarchies fall into semantic verb classes. The concluding section summarizes the results.
Acknowledgements
SW’s research was supported by an ERC Advanced Grant (MesAndLin(g)k, proj. no. 295918) and by a subsidy of the Russian Government to support the Programme of Competitive Development of Kazan Federal University.
References
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2013. Icelandic valency patterns. In Iren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://valpal.info/languages/icelandic (accessed 28 January 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Beavers, John. 2011. On affectedness. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29. 335–370.10.1007/s11049-011-9124-6Search in Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent & Paul Kay. 1969. Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bossong, Georg. 1998. Le marquage de l’expérient dans les langues d’Europe. In Jack Feuillet (ed.), Actance et valence dans les langues de l’Europe, 259–294. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110804485.259Search in Google Scholar
Cooreman, Ann. 1994. A functional typology of antipassives. In Barbara Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function, 49–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.27.05cooSearch in Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2003. Against implicational universals. Linguistic Typology 7. 89–101.10.1515/lity.2003.013Search in Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 2003. Significant and non-significant implicational universals. Linguistic Typology 7. 108–128.10.1515/lity.2003.007Search in Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 40–70. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hartmann, Iren, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.). 2013. Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://valpal.info.Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language, vol. 2, 211–242. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86. 663–687.10.1353/lan.2010.0021Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2015. Transitivity prominence. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages, 131–147. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Iren Hartmann. 2015. Comparing verbal valency across languages. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages, 41–71. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110338812-006Search in Google Scholar
Janssen, Dirk, Balthasar Bickel & Fernando Zuñiga. 2006. Randomization tests in language typology. Linguistic Typology 10. 419–455.10.1515/LINGTY.2006.013Search in Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward & Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 63–99.10.4324/9781315880259-11Search in Google Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo. 2008. Animacy effects on differential Goal marking. Linguistic Typology 12. 245–268.10.1515/LITY.2008.038Search in Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert. 1998. Actancy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110808100Search in Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1991. Predicate classes and participation. In Hansjakob Seiler & Waldfried Premper (eds.), Partizipation: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, 183–239. Tübingen: G. Narr.Search in Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2013. Yucatec Maya valency patterns. In Iren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://valpal.info/languages/icelandic (accessed 28 January 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 2006. Lexical semantics and argument realization VI. More on semantic determinants of argument realization: Evidence from transitivity. Handout for a DGfS/GLOW Summer School course, Stuttgart, August 2006. https://web.stanford.edu/~bclevin/dgfs06semdet.pdf (accessed 20 January 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 2015. Verb classes within and across languages. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages, 1605–1647. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110429343-019Search in Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej. 2005. Case pattern splits, verb types and construction competition. In Mengistu Amberber & Helen de Hoop (eds.), Competition and variation in natural languages: The case for case, 73–118. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-008044651-6/50006-9Search in Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej. 2015. Valency classes and alternations: Parameters of variation. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages, 73–130. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110338812-007Search in Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild. 2004. What markedness marks: The markedness problem with direct objects. Lingua 114. 1186–1212.10.1016/j.lingua.2003.07.005Search in Google Scholar
Oksanen, Jari, F. Guillaume Blanchet, Roeland Kindt, Pierre Legendre, Peter R. Minchin, R. B. O’Hara, Gavin L. Simpson, Peter Solymos, M. Henry H. Stevens & Helene Wagner. 2011. vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 2.0–2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.Search in Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 2003. There’s more than one way to make sense of one-way implications. Linguistic Typology 7. 128–140.10.1515/lity.2003.008Search in Google Scholar
Say, Sergey. 2014. Bivalent verb classes in the languages of Europe: A quantitative typological study. Language Dynamics and Change 4. 116–166.10.1163/22105832-00401003Search in Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Search in Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1981. Split case-marking in verb-types and tense/aspect/mood. Linguistics 19. 389–438.10.1515/ling.1981.19.5-6.389Search in Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1985. Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics 21. 385–396.10.1017/S0022226700010318Search in Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 2015. The hierarchy of two-place predicates: Its limitations. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages, 1575–1603. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Vajda, Edward J. 2004. Ket. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Search in Google Scholar
Wichmann, Søren (ed.). 2014. Arguments and adjuncts cross-linguistically. [Special issue]. Linguistic Discovery 12(2). 1–84.10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.441Search in Google Scholar
Wichmann, Søren. 2015. Statistical observations on implicational (verb) hierarchies. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages, 155–181. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110338812-010Search in Google Scholar
Wichmann, Søren. 2016. Quantitative tests of implicational verb hierarchies. In Taro Kageyama & Wesley M Jacobsen (eds.), Transitivity and valency alternations: Studies on Japanese and beyond, 423–444. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110477153-015Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
