Abstract
Evolution of galaxies is one of the most actual topics in astrophysics. Among the most important factors determining the evolution are two galactic components which are difficult or even impossible to detect optically: the gaseous disks and the dark matter halo. We use deep Hubble Space Telescope images to construct a two-component (bulge + disk) model for stellar matter distribution of galaxies. Properties of the galactic components are derived using a three-dimensional galaxy modeling software, which also estimates disk thickness and inclination angle. We add a gas disk and a dark matter halo and use hydrodynamical equations to calculate gas rotation and dispersion profiles in the resultant gravitational potential. We compare the kinematic profiles with the Team Keck Redshift Survey observations. In this pilot study, two galaxies are analyzed deriving parameters for their stellar components; both galaxies are found to be disk-dominated. Using the kinematical model, the gas mass and stellar mass ratio in the disk are estimated.
References
Chemin L., de Blok W. J. G., Mamon G. A. 2011, AJ, 142, 10910.1088/0004-6256/142/4/109Search in Google Scholar
Conselice C. J. 2003, ApJS, 147, 110.1086/375001Search in Google Scholar
Fathi K., Gatchell M., Hatziminaoglou E., Benoit E. 2012, MNRAS, 423, L11210.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01270.xSearch in Google Scholar
Fernández Lorenzo M., Cepa J., Bongiovanni A. et al. 2010, A&A, 521, A2710.1051/0004-6361/201014244Search in Google Scholar
Giavalisco M., Ferguson H. C., Koekemoer A. M. et al. 2004, ApJ, 600, L9310.1086/378578Search in Google Scholar
Jardel J. R., Gebhardt K., Shen J. et al. 2011, ApJ, 739, 2110.1088/0004-637X/739/1/21Search in Google Scholar
Merritt D., Graham A. W., Moore B. et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 268510.1086/508988Search in Google Scholar
Miller S.H., Bundy K., Sullivan M. et al. 2011, ApJ, 741, 11510.1088/0004-637X/741/2/115Search in Google Scholar
Lackner C. N., Gunn J. E. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 227710.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20450.xSearch in Google Scholar
Mutchler M., Cox C. 2001, Instrument Science Report, ACS 2001-07Search in Google Scholar
Navarro J. F., Ludlow A., Springel V. et al. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 2110.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15878.xSearch in Google Scholar
Simard L., Mendel J. T., Patton D. R. et al. 2011, ApJS, 196, 1110.1088/0067-0049/196/1/11Search in Google Scholar
Sirianni M., Jee M. J., Ben´ıtez N. et al. 2005, PASP, 117, 104910.1086/444553Search in Google Scholar
Tamm A., Tenjes P. 2003, A&A, 403, 52910.1051/0004-6361:20030327Search in Google Scholar
Tamm A., Tenjes P. 2005, A&A, 433, 3110.1051/0004-6361:20041879Search in Google Scholar
Tamm A., Tenjes P. 2006, A&A, 449, 6710.1051/0004-6361:20054065Search in Google Scholar
Tempel E., Tenjes P. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 126910.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10741.xSearch in Google Scholar
Tempel E., Tamm A., Tenjes P. 2010, A&A, 509, A9110.1051/0004-6361/200912186Search in Google Scholar
Tempel E., Tuvikene T., Tamm A. et al. 2011, A&A, 526, A15510.1051/0004-6361/201016067Search in Google Scholar
Tenjes P., Haud U., Einasto J. 1994, A&A, 286, 753Search in Google Scholar
Tenjes P., Haud U., Einasto J. 1998, A&A, 335, 449Search in Google Scholar
Weiner B. J. Willmer C. N. A., Faber S. M. et al. 2006, ApJ, 653, 102710.1086/508921Search in Google Scholar
Wirth G. D., Willmer C. N. A., Amico P. et al. 2004, AJ, 127, 312110.1086/420999Search in Google Scholar
York D. G., Adelman J., Anderson Jr. J. E. et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579Search in Google Scholar
© 2017
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
