Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 14, 2012

Does Homophily Predict Consensus Times? Testing a Model of Network Structure via a Dynamic Process

  • Benjamin Golub and Matthew O. Jackson

Abstract

We test theoretical results from Golub and Jackson (2012a), which are based on a random network model, regarding time to convergence of a learning/behavior-updating process. In particular, we see how well those theoretical results match the process when it is simulated on empirically observed high school friendship networks. This tests whether a parsimonious random network model mimics real-world networks with regard to predicting properties of a class of behavioral processes. It also tests whether our theoretical predictions for asymptotically large societies are accurate when applied to populations ranging from thirty to three thousand individuals. We find that the theoretical results account for more than half of the variation in convergence times on the real networks. We conclude that a simple multi-type random network model with types defined by simple observable attributes (age, sex, race) captures aspects of real networks that are relevant for a class of iterated updating processes.


Author Notes: We are grateful to Andrea Galeotti and an anonymous referee for very helpful suggestions. Jackson gratefully acknowledges financial support from the NSF under grants SES-0961481 and SES-1155302. Golub gratefully acknowledges financial support from an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. This article includes material that originally appeared in the working paper "How Homophily Affects Diffusion and Learning in Networks" (arXiv:0811.4013v2).

Published Online: 2012-9-14

©2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/1446-9022.1367/html
Scroll to top button