Endocrine Journal
Online ISSN : 1348-4540
Print ISSN : 0918-8959
ISSN-L : 0918-8959
ORIGINAL
Urinary equol is associated with bioavailable testosterone but not total testosterone in women
Hongli DongFeng XiongQingwei ZhongYihong LiMeng LiuWenhua LingXinyi TangYuming Chen
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2020 Volume 67 Issue 3 Pages 257-266

Details
Abstract

Little is known about the association between equol and bioavailable testosterone (BT) in adults. In this study, we examined the associations of urinary equol concentrations with serum concentrations of total, bioavailable and free testosterone (FT), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfide (DHEAS), free androgen index (FAI) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). This cross-sectional study included 1,904 women with a mean age of 59.7 years. Urinary equol concentrations were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS/MS). The serum androgenic indices and SHBG were also determined. Overall, urinary equol tended to be inversely associated with bioactive forms of androgenic indices (BT, FT or FAI) but not with total testosterone (TT) or DHEAS. Urinary equol was also positively associated with SHBG. In multi-covariate-adjusted analyses stratified by menopausal status, graded and inverse associations between urinary equol and bioactive forms of androgenic indices (BT, FT and FAI) were observed in postmenopausal women (all p-trends < 0.05), but not in premenopausal women. A significant positive association between urinary equol and SHBG was observed only in postmenopausal women. No significant associations were observed between urinary equol and TT or DHEAS in either group. A path analysis indicated that these associations of equol with androgens in postmenopausal women might be mediated by SHBG. In conclusion, urinary equol exhibited graded and inverse associations with BT or FT, but not TT in women. However, further longitudinal studies of human patients are needed to confirm these results and overcome the limitations of cross-sectional studies.

Content from these authors
© The Japan Endocrine Society
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top