Open Access, Peer-reviewed
pISSN 2288-2405
eISSN 2288-2413
    Brain Tumor Res Treat. 2014 Oct;2(2):69-75. English.
    Published online Oct 31, 2014.
    https://doi.org/10.14791/btrt.2014.2.2.69
    Copyright © 2014 The Korean Brain Tumor Society and The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology
    Original Article

    The Clinico-Oncologic Outcomes of Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma after Surgical Resection Followed by Concomitant Chemo-Radiotherapy

    Hee-Kwon Park, Young-Cho Koh, and Sang Woo Song
      • Department of Neurosurgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
    • Correspondence: Young-Cho Koh. Department of Neurosurgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, 120-1 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-729, Korea. Tel: +82-2-2030-7357, Fax: +82-2-2030-7359, Email: kohyc@kuh.ac.kr
    Received July 03, 2014; Revised September 27, 2014; Accepted October 01, 2014.

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Abstract

    Background

    There have been controversies in the treatment of elderly patients with glioblastoma. We introduce the outcome of the treatment of elderly patients with glioblastoma comparing with younger patients.

    Methods

    The author's hospital database was used to identify patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma after surgery between January 2006 and December 2013. Forty-eight patients (control group) were under age 65 and 16 patients (elderly group) were aged 65 years or over at the time of surgery.

    Results

    The median age of the elderly group was 71 years and control group was 50 years. Mean number of medical comorbidities was 1.8 in the elderly group vs. 0.5 in the control group. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 5.6 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 19.9 months in all patients. The elderly group had a median PFS of 4.2 months vs. 8 months for the control group (log-rank test, p=0.762). Median OS was 8.2 months in the elderly group vs. 20.9 months in the control group (log-rank test, p=0.457). Major complications occurred in 5 cases (7.8%) for all patients. The ratio of completion of concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) was 81.3% and was the same between the two groups. In multivariable analysis, extent of resection (p=0.034) and completion of CCRT (p=0.023) were statistically significant, independent prognostic factors only for PFS in all patients by Cox proportional hazards model. Age was not an independent prognostic factor. As for OS, there was no significant factor.

    Conclusion

    Surgical resection and CCRT were well tolerated in elderly patients with glioblastoma, and maximal safe resection followed by timely CCRT could improve clinic-oncologic outcomes.

    Keywords
    Elderly, outcome; Glioblastoma; Prognosis; Concomitant chemoradiotherapy

    INTRODUCTION

    Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor and has a rapid progressive clinical course and then fatal outcome [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. The standard therapy for glioblastoma is a surgical resection followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using temozolomide (TMZ) [6]. Despite standard therapy for glioblastoma, the median overall survival (OS) is only 14.6 months [6, 7].

    According to the literature, about 50% of cases occur in patients aged 65 years or older [1, 2, 4]. However, the trial by Stupp et al. [7] included only younger patients for standard therapy and several other important clinical trials also excluded elderly patients due to poor outcomes in this group, which could be related to age-dependent underlying molecular differences [1, 4, 8].

    In elderly patients, standard therapy for glioblastoma may bring about additional side effects. While the ratio of elderly patients is steadily increasing, there is a necessity to analyze the outcome of the effect of standard treatment in elderly patients with glioblastoma. Thus, in this study, we analyzed the outcome of the treatment of elderly patients with glioblastoma and compared it with that of younger patients.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Patient population

    This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the authors' hospital. The author's hospital database was used to identify patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma between January 2006 and December 2013. Seventy-five patients were diagnosed as glioblastoma pathologically. Eleven patients with secondary glioblastoma were excluded because they had a previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy history. Therefore, 64 patients were selected for this study. We regarded the 'elderly patient' as aged 65 years or over according to the traditional concept, government law concering elderly patient care and geriatric medicine. The elderly group included 16 patients who were aged 65 years or over at the time of histopathologic diagnosis. The control group included 48 patients who were younger than 65 years. Data was collected by using chart review, surgical reports, and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

    Characteristics of patients

    Table 1 shows the characteristics of patients. The median follow-up period of the patients who were included in this study was 12 months (range, 2.1-78.2 months). There were 37 men and 27 women, with a median age of 54 years (range, 10-82 years). In the control group, there were 26 men and 22 women, and the median age of this group was 50 years (range, 10-64 years). In the elderly group, 11 men and 5 women were included and the median age of this group was 71 years (range, 65-82 years).

    Table 1
    Characteristics of patients

    The median Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) was 90 and there was no difference between the two groups. The KPS range was from 50 to 100 in elderly group and 70 to 100 in the control group.

    We investigated pre-existing medical comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), cardiac disease, pulmonary disease, renal disease, hepatic disease, use of anticoagulation, and others. The most common comorbidity was hypertension in both groups. The next common comorbidity in the elderly group was DM (25.0%) and cardiac disease (25.0%), while it was hepatic disease (4.2%) in the control group. Six patients (37.5%) had 3 or more pre-existing comorbidities in the elderly group while there was just one patient (2.1%) in the control group. Mean number of medical comorbidities was 1.8 in the elderly group and 0.5 in the control group.

    Patients underwent either open resection or stereotactic biopsy for diagnostic purposes. The extent of resection was assessed by the patients' postoperative brain MRIs taken within 48 hours after surgery. The resection extent was classified into 3 groups: "grossly total resection (GTR)", "partial resection (PR)", and "biopsy". GTR was defined as no residual enhancing lesion, and PR as residual enhancing lesion after open resection. Patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy were included in the biopsy group. GTR of tumor was achieved in 23 patients (35.9%) for all patients; 5 patients (31.3%) belonged to the elderly group and 18 patients (37.5%) to the control group. The patients with PR were 39 of 64 patients (60.9%), and only a biopsy was performed in 2 of 64 patients (3.1%).

    Radiotherapy regimens were 2 Gy given 5 days per week for 6 weeks, for a total of 60 Gy and chemotherapy regimens were continuous daily temozolomide (75 mg per square meter of body surface area per day, 7 days per week from the first to the last day of radiotherapy). Fifty-two of 64 patients (81.3%) had completed CCRT, and among them, 13 patients (81.3%) belonged to the elderly group and 39 patients (81.3%) to the control group. Five patients (11.4%) discontinued CCRT and they were all in the control group. Seven of 64 patients (10.9%) could not start the CCRT after surgery, and among them, 3 patients (18.8%) belonged to the elderly group and 4 patients (8.3%) to the control group.

    Nineteen patients were investigated for isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation. IDH1 mutation was positive in none of 5 patients of the elderly group and 2 of 14 patients (14.3%) of the control group. Fifty-three patients were also investigated for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status (methylated vs. unmethylated); 6 of 12 patients (50.0%) in the elderly group and 21 of 41 patients (51.2%) in the control group had methylated MGMT.

    Statistical analysis

    All analyses were done with Version 21.0 of IBM SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The log-rank test was used to get progression free survival (PFS) and OS. PFS was defined as the time interval between initial diagnosis and recurrence or progression on brain MRI, and OS was calculated from the time of initial diagnosis to that of death by any cause. Multivariate analyses of risk factors were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. The following variables were analyzed for correlation with clinico-oncologic outcome: age, extent of resection, status of CCRT, MGMT methylation status, and combined disease status including hypertension, diabetes insipidus, pulmonary disorder, heart disorder, renal disorder, hepatic disorder, use of anticoagulation treatment and others.

    RESULTS

    Overall outcome

    At the time of this study, 37 of 64 patients had expired. The median PFS was 5.6 months and the median OS was 19.9 months in all patients. The median PFS was 8 months in the control group vs. 4.2 months in the elderly group (Fig. 1), but there was no statistical significance (p=0.762). The median OS was 20.9 months in the control group vs. 8.2 months in the elderly group (Fig. 2), but there was also no statistical significance (p=0.457).

    Fig. 1
    Comparison of progression free survival.

    Fig. 2
    Comparison of overall survival.

    Prognostic factors for survival

    Table 2 shows the outcome of this study including prognostic factors in univariate analysis. In univariate analysis, prognostic factor for PFS with a statistical significance were extent of resection, completion of CCRT, and preoperative KPS, and for OS were preoperative KPS and presence of DM. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with PFS and OS was done except for MGMT methylation and IDH1 mutation due to the difference in the number of patients tested for the two factors. Table 3 shows the results of multivariate analysis. Extent of resection and completion of CCRT were identified as independent prognostic factors for PFS. There was no independent prognostic factor for OS in multivariate analysis. In this study, age was not a prognostic factor for PFS and OS in both univariate and multivariate analyses.

    Table 2
    Prognostic factors related to survival

    Table 3
    Multivariate analysis of factors associated with PFS and OS

    Tolerability to surgery

    For all patients, systemic postoperative complications occurred in six patients. Among them, two patients were belonged to the elderly group. One of 2 patients who was 78 years old needed intensive care unit (ICU) care for nine days due to pulmonary congestion, pneumonia and acute renal failure. Other patients who belonged to the elderly group had no need for extension of ICU stays for medical reasons.

    Mean duration from surgery to CCRT was 17.7 days in the control group and 16.3 days in the elderly group. The postoperative recovery period did not show a significant difference between the two groups.

    Postoperative intracranial hemorrhage occurred in three patients (3 of 64 patients, 4.7%). Among them, one patient (1 of 46 patients, 2%) was in the control group and two patients (2 of 16 patients, 12.5%) in the elderly group. Cerebral infarction was found in one patient who was in the elderly group and status epilepticus was also observed in one patient who belonged to the elderly group.

    Tolerability to concurrent chemoradiotherapy

    Fifty-two of 64 patients (81.3%) completed postoperative adjuvant CCRT and there were no differences between the two groups. In the control group, 44 of 48 patients (91.7%) started CCRT after surgery and 5 of 44 patients (11.4%) could not complete CCRT. Therefore, 39 of 48 patients (81.3%) completed CCRT in the control group. In the elderly group, 13 of 16 patients (81.3%) started CCRT after surgery, and they all finished CCRT.

    Disease progression rapidly occurred in 4 patients and one patient discontinued CCRT due to a severe skin rash. On the other hand, in the elderly group, 13 of 16 patients (81.3%) started CCRT and all of them finished CCRT.

    Reported side effects in the patients who were finished CCRT showed that 13 of 52 patients (25%) suffered from minor gastrointestinal problems and 7 of 52 patients (13.5%) from alopecia. Two of 52 patients (3.8%) were observed to have leukocytosis. Skin rash occurred in 2 of 52 patients (3.8%).

    DISCUSSION

    The significance of brain tumor treatment in elderly patients has been emphasized due to the progressive increase in life expectancy [9]. As a result of the significant increase in the incidence of glioblastoma in the elderly [10, 11], treatment of glioblastoma in this group is becoming more important [8, 9]. About half of patients with glioblastoma are older than 65 years in most western countries [1, 12], and its incidence in elderly patients will continue to increase because the elderly group of the population is growing faster than other groups [13]. The incidence of glioblastoma in patients aged over 65 years has doubled from 5.1 per 100,000 in the 1970s up to 10.6 per 100,000 in the 1990s in Los Angeles County [14, 15]. Now, the median age of patients with glioblastoma is about 65 years [14].

    Although there are standard therapies for glioblastoma such as a surgical resection followed by CCRT using TMZ [6, 16], the natural history of glioblastoma is to take a rapidly progressive clinical course, followed by a fatal outcome [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12]. Actually, despite standard therapy for glioblastoma, the median OS for glioblastoma is only 14.6 months [6, 7, 14, 17]. Elderly patients have a poorer prognosis than younger patients and median survival is only 4-5 months in these patients [14, 16]. Reasons for poorer prognosis in elderly patients may include 1) less favorable molecular signatures; 2) receipt of less care including surgery, radiation therapy (RT), and chemotherapy; and 3) treatment toxicity and comorbidities as compared with younger patients [14].

    The trial by Stupp et al. [7] included only younger patients for standard therapy and several other important clinical trials also excluded elderly patients due to poor outcomes in this group [1, 4, 8, 13, 14]. In population-based reviews of the management of elderly patients with glioblastoma, a large proportion of these patients did not receive the standard therapy [12, 18]. Kita et al. [19] reported that the proportion of glioblastoma patients who were treated with only supportive care increased with age. And Barnholtz-Sloan et al. [20] also reported that multidisciplinary therapy was less common in elderly patients. Actually, standard therapy for elderly glioblastoma patients does not exist [10, 13, 14, 21]. This means great variability in treatment for elderly glioblastoma patients in many countries and centers [13].

    In this study, we applied the standard therapy for glioblastoma to an elderly group and control group. Thanks to the recent improvements made in neurosurgery [9], surgery for glioblastoma was tolerable for elderly patients in this study. There were a few complications after surgery. Postoperative intracranial hemorrhage occurred in three patients (4.7%) and among them, two patients in the elderly group. Cerebral infarction was found in one patient in the elderly group, and one patient in the elderly group was diagnosed with status epilepticus after surgery. Tolerability in CCRT was also shown for both groups. Fifty two of 64 patients (81.3%) were treated with CCRT and the results were the same between both groups. The side effects of CCRT were minimal. Only one patient in the control group discontinued CCRT due to a severe skin rash.

    Although our study's patient number could be considered small, the results of this study suggests that the standard therapy for glioblastoma provides a tolerable clinical and oncological outcome for patients who are aged 65 years or over with primary glioblastoma. Elderly patients often believe that they need longer to recover from aggressive neurosurgery and have a high risk for surgical complication [2, 22]. However, this study shows that elderly patients are also tolerable to aggressive tumor resection as is the control group. Oszvald et al. [23] who reported on elderly glioblastoma patients and matched the patients to their younger counterparts confirmed that elderly patients may benefit from aggressive surgery. An increased risk of CCRT toxicity with age was generally known [14, 16, 21, 24], but other studies also show acceptability to RT with TMZ chemotherapy [10, 25]. In this study, elderly patients could tolerate treatment of CCRT as younger patients. Minimal side effects were tolerable in almost all patients including the elderly.

    According to previous studies, prognostic factors for elderly patients with glioblastoma are preoperative KPS, extent of tumor resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and MGMT methylation status [6, 7, 8, 26]. Our study identified the extent of tumor resection, completion of CCRT, and preoperative KPS as independent prognostic factors in univariate analysis, and extent of resection and completion of CCRT in multivariate analysis. However, age and MGMT methylation status were not a prognostic factor.

    This study has several limitations. It is retrospective and uses a small sample size. Unusual high proportion of positive MGMT methylation status was found in this study. This can be presumed to be the reason why the MGMT methylation status is not a prognostic factor. According to molecular studies in glioblastoma, there are substantial differences in important features at the methylation status of the MGMT promoter [27]. All except for one Russian patient are Koreans, and there is a difference in ethnic group compared to other studies. IDH1 mutation is not considered to be significant due to a small number of patients.

    Nevertheless, our study may be meaningful and support the finding that elderly glioblastoma patients could be treated by standard therapy and future prospective clinical studies will be needed to establish a standard of treatment for elderly glioblastoma patients.

    In conclusions, surgical resection and CCRT were well tolerated in elderly patients with glioblastoma. Clinical and oncologic outcome were not affected by age or medical comorbidities. In elderly patients, maximal safe resection followed by timely CCRT could improve clinico-oncologic outcomes.

    Notes

    The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

    Acknowledgments

    This work was supported by Konkuk University in 2014.

    References

      1. Holdhoff M, Chamberlain MC. Controversies in the treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2013;11:1165–1172.
        quiz 1173.
      1. Iwamoto FM, Cooper AR, Reiner AS, Nayak L, Abrey LE. Glioblastoma in the elderly: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Experience (1997-2007). Cancer 2009;115:3758–3766.
      1. Fisher JL, Schwartzbaum JA, Wrensch M, Wiemels JL. Epidemiology of brain tumors. Neurol Clin 2007;25:867–890. vii.
      1. Nguyen LT, Touch S, Nehme-Schuster H, et al. Outcomes in newly diagnosed elderly glioblastoma patients after concomitant temozolomide administration and hypofractionated radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2013;5:1177–1198.
      1. Nava F, Tramacere I, Fittipaldo A, et al. Survival effect of first- and secondline treatments for patients with primary glioblastoma: a cohort study from a prospective registry, 1997-2010. Neuro Oncol 2014;16:719–727.
      1. Uzuka T, Asano K, Sasajima T, et al. Treatment outcomes in glioblastoma patients aged 76 years or older: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. J Neurooncol 2014;116:299–306.
      1. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005;352:987–996.
      1. Piccirilli M, Bistazzoni S, Gagliardi FM, et al. Treatment of glioblastoma multiforme in elderly patients. Clinico-therapeutic remarks in 22 patients older than 80 years. Tumori 2006;92:98–103.
      1. Brandes AA, Compostella A, Blatt V, Tosoni A. Glioblastoma in the elderly: current and future trends. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2006;60:256–266.
      1. Keime-Guibert F, Chinot O, Taillandier L, et al. Radiotherapy for glioblastoma in the elderly. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1527–1535.
      1. Werner MH, Phuphanich S, Lyman GH. The increasing incidence of malignant gliomas and primary central nervous system lymphoma in the elderly. Cancer 1995;76:1634–1642.
      1. Laperriere N, Weller M, Stupp R, et al. Optimal management of elderly patients with glioblastoma. Cancer Treat Rev 2013;39:350–357.
      1. Bauchet L, Zouaoui S, Darlix A, et al. Assessment and treatment relevance in elderly glioblastoma patients. Neuro Oncol. 2014
        [Epub ahead of print].
      1. Arvold ND, Reardon DA. Treatment options and outcomes for glioblastoma in the elderly patient. Clin Interv Aging 2014;9:357–367.
      1. Chakrabarti I, Cockburn M, Cozen W, Wang YP, Preston-Martin S. A population-based description of glioblastoma multiforme in Los Angeles County, 1974-1999. Cancer 2005;104:2798–2806.
      1. Saito K, Mukasa A, Narita Y, et al. Toxicity and outcome of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide in elderly patients with glioblastoma: a retrospective study. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2014;54:272–279.
      1. Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR, et al. A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg 2001;95:190–198.
      1. Pontes Lde B, Loureiro LV, Koch LO, et al. Patterns of care and outcomes in elderly patients with glioblastoma in Sao Paulo, Brazil: a retrospective study. J Geriatr Oncol 2013;4:388–393.
      1. Kita D, Ciernik IF, Vaccarella S, et al. Age as a predictive factor in glioblastomas: population-based study. Neuroepidemiology 2009;33:17–22.
      1. Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Williams VL, Maldonado JL, et al. Patterns of care and outcomes among elderly individuals with primary malignant astrocytoma. J Neurosurg 2008;108:642–648.
      1. Holdhoff M, Grossman SA. Controversies in the adjuvant therapy of high-grade gliomas. Oncologist 2011;16:351–358.
      1. Laigle-Donadey F, Delattre JY. Glioma in the elderly. Curr Opin Oncol 2006;18:644–647.
      1. Oszvald A, Güresir E, Setzer M, et al. Glioblastoma therapy in the elderly and the importance of the extent of resection regardless of age. J Neurosurg 2012;116:357–364.
      1. Brandes AA, Franceschi E, Tosoni A, et al. Temozolomide concomitant and adjuvant to radiotherapy in elderly patients with glioblastoma: correlation with MGMT promoter methylation status. Cancer 2009;115:3512–3518.
      1. Yin AA, Zhang LH, Cheng JX, et al. Radiotherapy plus concurrent or sequential temozolomide for glioblastoma in the elderly: a meta-analysis. PloS One 2013;8:e74242.
      1. Li J, Wang M, Won M, et al. Validation and simplification of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis classification for glioblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;81:623–630.
      1. Shamsara J, Shrif S, Afsharnezhad S, et al. Association between MGMT promotoer hypermethylation and p53 mutation in glioblastoma. Cancer Invest 2009;27:825–829.
    Cited by
    Crossref 1
    Google Scholar 
    PubMed Central 1
    MeSH Terms
    Aged*
    Chemoradiotherapy
    Comorbidity
    Disease-Free Survival
    Glioblastoma*
    Humans
    Prognosis
    Proportional Hazards Models
    Metrics
    Share
    Links to
    Figures
    slide
    slide

    1 / 2

    Tables
    slide
    slide
    slide

    1 / 3

    Funding Information
    PERMALINK